Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:39-42
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL
The sealing effect of fibrin glue against alveolar air leakage evaluated up to 48h; comparison between different methods of application
Masafumi Kawamura
a
,
*
,
Masatoshi Gika
a
,
Yotaro Izumi
a
,
Hirohisa Horinouchi
a
,
Noriko Shinya
b
,
Makio Mukai
c
,
Koichi Kobayashi
a
a Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keio University, School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582 Japan
b Pathology Department, The Chemo-Sero-Therapeutic Research Institute, Kumamoto, Japan
c Division of Clinicopathology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Received 4 January 2005;
received in revised form 14 February 2005;
accepted 15 February 2005.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 3 5363 3806; fax: +81 3 5363 3499. (Email: kawamura{at}sc.itc.keio.ac.jp).
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Objective: There is little experimental evidence to show how much positive airway pressure fibrin sealants can actually withstand, and in particular, how this effect changes over time. In the present study, we experimentally evaluated the sealing effect of fibrin glue against alveolar air leakage up to 48h after application. Methods: Beagles were used (n=48). Under thoracotomy, approximately 5x10mm defects (2mm depth) were made on the lung surface. Fibrin glue sealants were applied to this defect in three ways. In rubbing and spray method, fibrinogen was rubbed, followed by spraying of both fibrinogen and thrombin solutions. In double layer method, fibrinogen was dripped, followed by thrombin. Collagen fleece, coated with fibrinogen and thrombin (TachoComb) was also tested. The minimum positive airway pressure which produced air leakage was measured for each sealed defect (seal breaking pressure, cmH2O) at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48h after application (n=6 at each time point). Results: The seal-breaking pressure increased over time in all of the application methods. At 6h, differences between methods were not significant but three defects in RS reached 70cmH2O, the maximum pressure tested, compared with none in other two methods. At 12h, the seal-breaking pressure was significantly higher in RS compared with the other two methods (rubbing and spray method vs TachoComb; 66±3 vs 47±17, P=0.047, rubbing and spray method vs double layer method; 66±3 vs 42±18, P=0.024). Beyond 24h, sealing pressure reached close to 70cmH2O in all the methods. Conclusions: The results show that the sealing effect of fibrin glue is relatively unstable up to 12h after its application. Rubbing and spray method may help the fibrin seal to reach its full strength faster compared with the other two methods.
Key Words: Fibrin glue Air leakage Pulmonary resection Sealing effect
 |
1. Introduction
|
|---|
Alveolar air leakage is a very common complication in lung surgery. Along with inadequate control of postoperative pain, persistence of air leakage was identified as the most common cause of delay in hospital discharge after thoracic surgery [1]. Many tissue sealants are being applied to prevent air leakage after surgery [28]. Among them, fibrin glue is a popular sealant with a variety of application methods [9,10]. However, there are also reports that indicate that the use of fibrin glue does not reduce the duration of chest-tube drainage or hospital stay [1113]. This implies that, air leakage often restarts shortly after surgery despite the application of fibrin glue.
Intraoperatively, we test the efficacy of fibrin glue by applying positive airway pressure. But we usually do not apply pressure beyond 2025cmH2O, since it defeats the purpose to break the seal at this point. Clinically, it is not rare that air leakage becomes apparent, for example through the chest tube, shortly after surgery. While this may be air leakage from lesions that were missed during surgery, it is also true that airway pressure often spikes beyond the pressure tested, 25cmH2O, as the patient recovers spontaneous breathing. The fibrin seal may be broken at this point. To our knowledge, there is little experimental evidence to show how much positive airway pressure fibrin sealants can actually withstand, and in particular, how this effect changes over time. In the present study, we experimentally evaluated the sealing effect of fibrin glue against alveolar air leakage up to 48h after application. We also compared three different methods of application.
 |
2. Materials and methods
|
|---|
2.1. Animals
Adult male beagles, 1012 months of age, weighing 811kg were used for this study (Toyota Trading Co., Kumamoto, Japan) (n=36). Animals were housed individually and provided food and water ad libitum. All animal studies were approved by the School of Medicine, Keio University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All animals received humane care in accordance with the Japanese Government Animal Protection and management law
2.2. Fibrin glue application
The fibrin glue used in this study was Bolheal (The Chemo-Sero-Therapeutic Research Institute, Kumamoto, Japan). We also compared, fibrinogen-based collagen fleece, TachoComb (ZLB Behring Co., USA). The mechanism of fibrin glue formation is well described [14]. The fibrin glue product consists of two components. Solution A is a protein concentrate consisting of fibrinogen, plasma fibronectin, factor XIII, and plasminogen, reconstituted in aprotinin solution. Solution B is thrombin reconstituted in calcium chloride solution. TachoComb is a collagen fleece coated with dry fibrinogen and thrombin on one side.
We applied fibrin glue in two different ways, rubbing and spray method and double layer method. In rubbing and spray method, solution A was dripped and gently rubbed onto the air leakage area. Then both solutions were sprayed simultaneously onto the rubbed surface as a mixed aerosol using Bolheal Spray Set (The Chemo-Sero-Therapeutic Research Institute, Kumamoto, Japan). In double-layer method, solution A was dripped onto the air leakage surface after which solution B was dripped. To apply TachoComb, the fibrinogen-coated side was first soaked in saline, and then was attached to the air leakage surface. The sheet was gently pressed with dry gauze for about 5min so that the collagen fleece was attached to the lung surface with fibrin glue.
2.3. Experiment
The dogs were anesthetized with an intravenous injection of pentobarbital sodium (2530mg/kg). The dogs were placed in left decubitus position, intubated, and mechanically ventilated. The right chest wall was shaved, and disinfected. Through a thoracotomy, defects were created on the right lung surface using scalpels, one on each of the three lobes (anterior, middle, and posterior). The defect was created with the lung fully inflated at a positive airway pressure of approximately 20cmH2O. The defect size was adjusted to be approximately 5x10mm, and approximately 2mm in depth. Hemostasis was obtained when necessary with the minimum use of electrocautery. In each animal, each of the three defects was sealed with one of three methods, rubbing and spray method, double-layer method, or TachoComb. Randomization was performed to allot these three methods to each lobe equally. The chest was closed, and the animals were allowed to recover, except for time 0. Xylazine (2mg/kg) was administered as needed as analgesics. The minimum positive airway pressure which produced air leakage was measured for each sealed defect (seal-breaking pressure) at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48h after the application of the fibrin sealant (n=6 at each time point). Except for time 0, thoracotomy was performed again under anesthesia. Air leakage pressure for each defect was evaluated separately by clamping the remaining two lobar bronchi with forceps. The maximum positive airway pressure applied was 70cmH2O, since higher pressure induced air leakage from uninjured lung around the hilum. After the completion of seal-breaking pressure measurement at each time point, each animal was sacrificed with intracardiac injections of pentobarbital (1000mg/body).
2.4. Histological examinations
A separate group of animals was used to obtain histological specimens because the fibrin seal is broken by the seal breaking pressure measurements. Two specimens for each method and time points were prepared (n=12). The animals were sacrificed and the whole right lung was fixed in 10% neutral formaline. After fixation, each defect site was resected, embedded in paraffin, and processed in 3µm sections for hematoxylineosin staining. Specimens were analyzed at Clinicopathological Division of Keio University Hospital in a blinded manner by M.M.
2.5. Statistical analyses
The results are presented as the mean±SD. Seal-breaking pressure per time point was compared between different methods using unpaired T-test. Differences within each method were tested using paired T-test. Significance was assumed at P<0.05.
 |
3. Results
|
|---|
3.1. Seal breaking pressure measurements
The seal-breaking pressure increased over time in all the application methods (Fig. 1
). At 0h, seal-breaking pressure was significantly higher in rubbing and spray method compared with TachoComb (54±5 vs 36±6, P<0.001), and in TachoComb significantly higher compared with double layer method (36±6 vs 27±3, P=0.007). Seal breaking pressure in rubbing and spray method declined significantly from 0 to 3h (from 54±5 to 38±6, P<0.001). At 3h, seal-breaking pressure in double layer method tended to increase, and in TachoComb tended to decline compared with 0h, but these changes were not significant. At 6h, differences between methods were not significant but three defects in rubbing and spray method reached 70cmH2O, the maximum pressure tested, compared with none in other two methods. At 12h, the seal-breaking pressure was significantly higher in rubbing and spray method compared with the other two methods (rubbing and spray method vs TachoComb; 66±3 vs 47±17, P=0.047, rubbing and spray method vs double layer method; 66±3 vs 42±18, P=0.024). Beyond 24h, sealing pressure reached close to 70cmH2O in all the methods, with no significant differences between methods.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. The time interval changes in seal-breaking pressure after application of the fibrin sealants is shown. RS, rubbing and spraying method; DL, double layer method, TC, TacoComb. *P<0.05 vs other two groups, **P<0.05 vs RS at 0h.
|
|
3.2. Histological examinations
The layer of fibrin covering the lung surface could be observed in all three methods by hematoxylineosin staining (Fig. 2 ). Up to 12h, deeper penetration of fibrin into the injured lung parenchyma was seen in rubbing and spray method compared with the other two methods. This difference was not apparent between application methods beyond 24h. Also, at 3h, hemorrhage was more evident underneath the fibrin layer in rubbing and spray method compared with other two methods.

View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Hematoxylineosin staining of the injured lung sealed by different fibrin sealants. At 12h, deeper penetration of fibrin into the injured lung parenchyma was seen in RS compared with the other two methods. This difference was not apparent between application methods beyond 24h. Upper and lower panels correspond, respectively, to 12, and 24h after sealant application RS, rubbing and spraying method; DL, double layer method; TC, TacoComb, magnification 2x.
|
|
 |
4. Discussion
|
|---|
Fibrin glue is derived from human, or in some products like bovine plasma, and hence, carry the same risks as blood transfusion. We have reported the possibility of viral transmission by clinical use of fibrin glue [16]. Despite these potential drawbacks, fibrin glue is widely used in order to reduce postoperative alveolar air leakage, but questions remain regarding its clinical efficacy [5,12,13,15]. The results of this study show that the sealing effect of fibrin glue is relatively unstable up to 12h after its application. Clinically, this result suggests that coughing or positive pressure ventilation should be kept to a minimum for 12h in order to fully exploit the sealing effect of fibrin glue.
The sealing effect of fibrin glue is affected by the concentration of fibrin, and how well it attaches to tissue. The concentration of fibrin depends primarily on how well the thrombin and fibrinogen solutions are mixed on application. The attachment of fibrin may be affected at least in part by its penetration into tissue. Rubbing and spray method is a method that we have recently devised. Our intention was to improve tissue penetration by rubbing fibrinogen into the lung parenchyma. We also utilized the effective mixing of the two solutions by aerosol to form a more even layer of fibrin in continuity with the penetrated fibrinogen, which is converted to fibrin by the spray. The present study suggests that rubbing and spray method may help the fibrin seal to reach its full strength faster compared with the other two methods. Histological findings, at least in part suggest that this may be due to the initial deeper penetration of fibrin into the lung parenchyma. We speculate that because of this, the attached surface area of fibrin was initially greater in rubbing and spray method compared with the other two methods. Presumably, this difference became insignificant with the formation of tissue-derived fibrin. We evaluated TachoComb and double layer method as the most widely used methods. Double layer method is the application method recommended by most manufacturers, and is therefore, presumably most often used. It is encouraging that both these methods provided satisfactory sealing effect beyond 24h. Control experiments, in which no sealant was used, was not performed due to ethical reasons. In our preliminary studies, the alveolar leakage created in this experiment did not stop spontaneously, and respiratory distress was unavoidable even with the use of chest tubes. Regarding rubbing and spray method, there was haemorrhage underneath the fibrin layer at 3h, which resolved at 6h. Presumably this was caused by rubbing. This may in part explain the significant decrease in seal-breaking pressure in rubbing and spray method at 3h. A less invasive way to infiltrate the fibrinogen solution, for instance the use of a soft sponge, is currently being studied.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Wright CD, Wain JC, Grillo HC, Moncure AC, Macaluso SM, Mathisen DJ. Pulmonary lobectomy patients care pathway: a model to control cost and maintain quality. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:299-302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kanno S, Yamazaki H, Kashiwabara S, Uchiyama H, Maekawa Y, Ito G, Muto T, Kariya K, Kojima T, Koshiyama Y, Oda M, Kurumi M. Adhesive and sealing effects of TO-193 on tissues and organs in various experimental models. Folia Pharmacol Jpn 1999;113:269-276.
- Otani Y, Tabata Y, Ikada Y. Sealing effect of rapidly curable gelatin-poly (L-glutamic acid) hydrogel glue on lung air leak. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:922-926.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tsuda T, Nakamura T, Yamamoto Y, Teramachi M, Kiyotani T, Lee YH, Shimizu Y. Prevention of postoperative air leakage from lungs using a purified human collagen membranepolyglycolic acid sheet. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:339-342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Porte HL, Jany T, Conti M, Gillet PA, Guidat A, Wurtz AJ. Randomized controlled trial of a synthetic sealant for preventing alveolar air leaks after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1618-1622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ranger WR, Halpin D, Sawhney AS, Lyman M, Locicero J. Pneumostasis of experimental air leaks with a new photopolymerized synthetic tissue sealant. Am Surg 1997;63:788-795.[Medline]
- Macchiarini P, Wain J, Almy S, Dartevelle P. Experimental and clinical evaluation of a new synthetic, absorbable sealant to reduce air leaks in thoracic operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:751-758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Herget GW, Kassa M, Riede UN, Lu Y, Brethner L, Hasse J. Experimental use of an albumin-glutaraldehyde tissue adhesive for sealing pulmonary parenchyma and bronchial anastomoses. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 2001;19:4-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yuasa K, Shimizu T, Matsubara J, Toyoda T. Sealing effect of fibrin adhesive by various method on protection of air leakage in lung surgery. Kyobu Geka 1998;51:1001-1005.[Medline]
- Morikawa T, Katoh H. Improved techniques of applying fibrin glue in lung surgery. Eur Surg Res 1999;31:180-186.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Fleisher AG, Evans KG, Nelems B, Finley RJ. Effect of routine fibrin glue use on the duration of air leaks after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:133-134.[Abstract]
- Wong K, Goldstraw P. Effects of fibrin glue in the reduction of postthoracotomy alveolar air leak. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:979-981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wain JC, Kaiser LR, Johnstone DW, Yang SC, Wright CD, Freidberg JS, Feins RH, Heitmiller RF, Mathisen DJ, selwyn MR. Trial of a novel synthetic sealant in preventing air leaks after lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1623-1628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sierre D. Fibrin sealant adhesive systems: a review of their chemistry, material properties and clinical applications. J Biomater Appl 1993;7:309-351.[Medline]
- Fleisher AG, Evans KG, Nelems B, Finley RJ. Effect of routine fibrin glue use on the duration of alveolar air leaks after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:133-134.[Abstract]
- Kawamura M, Sawafuji M, Watanabe M, Horinouchi H, Kobayashi K. Frequency of transmission of human parvovirus B19 infection by fibrin sealant used during thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1098-1100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Araki, H. Tao, N. Nakajima, H. Sugai, T. Sato, S.-H. Hyon, T. Nagayasu, and T. Nakamura
Development of new biodegradable hydrogel glue for preventing alveolar air leakage.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
November 1, 2007;
134(5):
1241 - 1248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Araki, H. Tao, T. Sato, N. Nakajima, H. Sugai, S.-H. Hyon, T. Nagayasu, and T. Nakamura
Creation of a uniform pleural defect model for the study of lung sealants
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
July 1, 2007;
134(1):
145 - 151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|