EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Schil, P. E.Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Schil, P. E.Y.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:317
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


Original articles

Editorial comment

Awake one stage bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis: a safe outpatient procedure

Paul E.Y. Van Schil *

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Antwerp (UZA), Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium

* Tel.: +32 3 821 3785; fax: +32 3 821 4396. (Email: paul.van.schil{at}uza.be).

Thoracoscopic sympathectomy remains a controversial procedure. This relates to the precise indications and patient selection for the procedure, the approach by thoracoscopy using 1, 2 or 3 ports or by a small axillary thoracotomy, the technique and extent of ablation of the sympathetic trunk and the treatment of communicating branches, especially to avoid complications as compensatory truncal hyperhidrosis or Horner's syndrome. In this manuscript the authors add another controversial issue: whether or not the procedure is feasible under local anaesthesia as an outpatient procedure.

A provocative, novel and original series of 15 patients undergoing awake one stage bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy under local anaesthesia and spontaneous breathing is described. After a short stay in the outpatient clinic, these 15 patients were discharged the same day. This group is compared to 30 patients having the same intervention under general anaesthesia. Median age was 28.1 years in the group operated under local anaesthesia and 29.4 years in the general anaesthesia group. In both groups no conversion to thoracotomy was necessary. After a mean follow-up time of 7.16 months both groups had an improvement in the quality of life without any difference between both anaesthesia techniques. Cost analysis showed an advantage for the group operated under local anaesthesia. By performing the procedure under local anaesthesia in a patient who is breathing spontaneously, the authors state that the disadvantages of single lung ventilation are avoided. However, no mention of complications due to single lung ventilation is made in the 30 patients undergoing general anaesthesia and one-lung ventilation. The mean operating room time for the whole bilateral procedure under local anaesthesia was 64 versus 86min in the group undergoing general anaesthesia. In a recent study, 176 patients underwent thoracoscopic sympathectomy via a transaxillary single-port approach and one-lung ventilation [1]. In this study, the operating time for one side was only 9min and for both sides less than 20min. So, it is questionable whether single lung ventilation is really harmful in these patients.

Although this is a consecutive series of patients undergoing thoracic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis, it is not clear how patients were precisely selected for this procedure. How many patients were evaluated but excluded afterwards? Due to a potential selection bias, results of this non-randomised study should be interpreted with caution. Whether this technique is feasible for other indications as e.g. digital ulcerations in older patients with vasospastic or immunologic disorders with arteritis or occlusive arterial disease also remains to be determined.

The authors are to be commended for bringing this novel technique to our attention, showing that is it feasible to perform a thoracic sympathectomy under local anaesthesia in young patients with its possible advantages of rapid discharge and cost containment. However, its real clinical value and benefit need to be demonstrated in larger comparative studies.

References

  1. Georghiou GP, Berman M, Bobovnikov V, Vidne BA, Saute M. Minimally invasive thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis via a transaxillary single-port approach. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2004;3:437-441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Schil, P. E.Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Schil, P. E.Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS