EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwata, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fujisawa, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwata, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fujisawa, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mediastinum

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:384-388
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL


Original articles

Early open thoracotomy and mediastinopleural irrigation for severe descending necrotizing mediastinitis

Takekazu Iwata, Yasuo Sekine * , Kiyoshi Shibuya, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Akira Iyoda, Toshihiko Iizasa, Yukio Saito, Takehiko Fujisawa

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan

Received 8 March 2005; received in revised form 15 May 2005; accepted 16 May 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 43 222 7171x5464; fax: +81 43 226 2172. (Email: sekine{at}faculty.chiba-u.jp).

Abstract

Objective: Descending necrotizing mediastinitis (DNM) is a severe infection spreading from the cervical region to the mediastinal connective tissue. The mortality rate was reported as 40% until the 1980s. Since DNM is uncommon, few reports of large series of patients with DNM (i.e. more than 10 cases) have been published. The present aim was to evaluate our treatment strategy for DNM by retrospective chart review. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed in 10 patients with DNM between 1991 and 2003. The mean age was 53.8±23.3 years (median 58, range 16–82). The causes of DNM were primary peritonsillar or parapharyngeal abscess in 5 patients, post-extraction odontogenic abscess in 3, cervical abscess of post-tracheostomy in 1, and unknown in 1 patient. In nine cases, the abscess extended from the cervical region to the lower mediastinum. Immediately after the diagnosis of DNM, broad-spectrum antibiotics were administered empirically, and surgical treatments consisting of cervical drainage, thoracotomy with radical surgical debridement of the mediastinum and excision of necrotic tissue, decortication, and irrigation were performed in all cases. Post-operatively, mediastinopleural irrigation with saline was performed once or twice a day until a culture of pleural effusion became negative. Results: The mean duration of chest tube retention was 26.7±17.0 days, and the mean hospital stay was 62.3±33.9 days. Five patients suffered from severe complications including septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and pan-peritonitis due to duodenal perforation. The outcome was favorable in 8 patients. Of those with severe complications, two patients, who were older than 75 and had diabetes, died of multiple organ failure due to septic shock. Therefore, the mortality rate was 20%. Conclusion: Our treatment strategy for severe DNM was efficacious for early treatment and reduced the mortality rate. Early detection of DNM, and immediate thoracotomy and irrigation of the mediastinum and thoracic cavity, are recommended.

Key Words: Descending necrotizing mediastinitis • Thoracotomy • Pleural irrigation

1. Introduction

Acute mediastinitis is a serious infection involving the connective tissue that fills the interpleural spaces and surrounds the median thoracic organs. The most common causes of mediastinitis are esophageal perforations and infections after operations through sternotomy incisions. Occasionally, acute mediastinitis occurs as a complication of infections that may arise from odontogenic or cervicofascial infections or cervical trauma. This is a particularly virulent form of mediastinal infection, described as Descending Necrotizing Mediastinitis (DNM).

The criteria for diagnosing DNM were defined by Estrera and associates in 1983 [1]. These are: (1) clinical manifestations of severe infection; (2) demonstration of characteristic roentgenographic features; (3) documentation of the necrotizing mediastinal infection at operation or post-mortem examination, or both; (4) establishment of the relationship of oropharyngeal or cervical infection with the development of the necrotizing mediastinal process.

Delay of diagnosis and inappropriate drainage of the mediastinum are the main causes of mortality in this life-threatening condition. Until the 1980s, the mortality rates have been reported as 40% [1]. Since DNM is uncommon, few reports of large series of patients with DNM (that is, more than 10 cases) have been published [2–4]. We report our experience of 10 patients with DNM and discuss the surgical management.

2. Patients and methods

A retrospective chart review of 10 patients (7 male and 3 female) with DNM between 1991 and 2003 was performed. The mean age was 53.8±23.3 (median 58, range 16–82) years.

Diagnosis was made by clinical findings and cervicothoracic computed tomography (CT) in all patients. Preoperative CT demonstrated soft-tissue swelling of the neck and encapsulated fluid collections (with gas bubbles in some cases) or abscess of the mediastinum (Fig. 1 ).



View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Preoperative CT in case 7 reveals an abscess of the mediastinum.

 
We identified the extent of DNM according to the DNM classification scheme by Endo et al. [5]: type I—localization of abscess in the upper mediastinum above the tracheal bifurcation; type IIA—extension to anterior lower mediastinum; type IIB—extension from neck to anterior and posterior lower mediastinum. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated empirically as soon as DNM was suspected. Cervical drainage was performed for all patients. A bilateral collar incision was carried out, cervical spaces were opened, and debridement of necrotic tissue and drainage were performed. In odontogenic cases, submandibular spaces were also opened and debridement and drainage were performed. Penrose drains or nelaton catheters were retained in each case (Fig. 2 ).



View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Post-operative cervical and submandibular drainage in case 2.

 
Mediastinal drainage through a thoracic approach was performed for all patients, regardless of the extent of the disease. We usually approached the mediastinum from the right thoracic cavity because the aortic arch interferes with radical debridement from the left side. Surgical treatments included radical surgical debridement of the mediastinum with excision of necrotic tissue, decortication, and adequate placement of chest tubes for mediastinopleural irrigation. We irrigated the mediastinum and thoracic cavity with copious warm saline (approximately 5000–10,000ml) during the operation.

We retained 2–7 silicon tubes at the operation. In the most severe cases, one or two tubes were placed in mediastinum, one or two in the thoracic cavity (apical or dorsal) and one on the diaphragm (Figs. 3 and 4 ).



View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Post-operative chest drainage in case 2.

 
Post-operatively, mediastinopleural irrigation with 1000–2000ml of saline was performed once or twice a day until culture of pleural effusion became negative for three consecutive days. Saline was infused from mediastinal tubes and discharged through thoracic tubes. We also irrigated the neck space, separately, every post-operative day.

Cervicothoracic CT was performed frequently to confirm the disappearance of abscess. Where abscess remained, re-operation was performed.

In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of our management strategy in terms of surgical complications and survival rate.

3. Results

The patient characteristics are shown in Table 1 . Symptoms at hospitalization included pyrexia (n=8), neck or mandibular swelling (n=5), dyspnea (n=4), sore throat (n=4), dysphagia (n=2), and back pain (n=1). The foci of the inciting infections were peritonsillar or parapharyngeal abscess in 5 patients, post-extraction odontogenic abscess in 3, cervical abscess of post-tracheostomy in 1, and unknown in 1 patient. The interval between onset of symptoms and the first hospitalization varied from 0 to 12 days (mean 5.6 days).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient characteristics
 
Cervical drainage before thoracic drainage had been performed in 7 patients. In the remaining 3 patients, cervical drainage and thoracic operation were performed at the same time. The interval between cervical drainage and thoracic drainage varied from 0 to 22 days (mean 5.8 days). In one case (case 8), cervical drainage was performed three times. Tracheostomy was performed in three cases.

The clinical findings are shown in Table 2 . There was one case of Endo's type I, two cases of type IIA, and seven of type IIB. The white blood cell count or C-reactive protein (CRP) was elevated in the blood of all patients. Bacterial infection was determined by fluid culture from the neck or mediastinum in nine cases. The original organisms were Streptococci in seven cases, Peptostreptococci in four cases, Bacteroides in two cases, and Prevotella in two cases. In seven cases, aerobic and anaerobic organisms were mixed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Clinical findings
 
The treatment and outcomes are shown in Table 3 . Broad-spectrum antibiotics were used initially, and changed according to response and sensitivity tests. We often used two types of antibiotics simultaneously for covering both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Carbapenems were used in eight cases. Clindamycin (CLDM) was used in seven cases. Gamma-globulin was used in eight cases.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Treatments and outcomes
 
Anterolateral or posterolateral thoracotomy was performed in 9 patients. Right thoracotomy was performed in 8 patients and left thoracotomy was performed in 1 (case 10). Bilateral thoracotomy was performed in 1 patient (case 6). Video-assisted thoracotomy was performed in 1 patient (case 9).

Post-operatively, mechanical ventilation was provided in all cases, and continuous hemodialysis filtration (CHDF) was performed in a shock case (case 9).

Five patients suffered severe complications. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) or pre DIC occurred in 3 patients. Septic shock occurred in three cases. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurred in two cases. Pan-peritonitis due to duodenal perforation occurred in 1 patient (case 9).

In case 8, we performed a second thoracotomy on post-operative day 3, because mediastinal residual abscess was found after the first thoracotomy by post-operative CT.

The mean duration of chest tube retention was 26.7±17.0 days, and the mean hospital stay was 62.3±33.9 days. Comparing the types of DNM, the mean duration of drainage was 18.3 days in types I and IIA and 37.6 days in type IIB (P=0.05), while the hospital stay was 51.7 days in types I and IIA and 73.4 days in type IIB (P=0.30).

The outcome was favorable in 8 patients who were less than 78-year-old, were without severe concomitant diseases, and were able to receive prompt treatment. Two patients (cases 7 and 9) died (overall mortality: 20%); they were an 82-year-old female and a 79-year-old female, both with severe diabetes and in an exacerbated condition at the time of operation.

4. Discussions

In 1938, Pearse [6] described 110 patients with DNM and reported a 55% mortality rate (86% mortality in non-operative patients and 35% in surgical patients). Even after induction of antibiotics, the mortality was still 40%, as reported by Estrera et al. [1] in 1983. Since the end of the 1990s, a few reports of large series (more than 10 cases) of patients with DNM have been published, which demonstrated a reduced mortality rate. In Table 4 , we compare previous reports to our study. The mortality rates vary from 0 to 23% [2–4].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Comparison with recent large studies
 
Until the 1980s, transcervical mediastinal drainage was the main treatment strategy and open thoracotomy was not usual [1,6,7]. Since the 1990s, early wide thoracotomy has been supported by many authors and the mortality rate has been dramatically reduced [2–4,8–10]. The critical aspects of a treatment strategy for DNM are sufficient debridement, adequate drainage, and effective irrigation. Marty-Ane et al. [9] started aggressive mediastinal drainage by thoracotomy, while Corsten et al. [10] found a statistically significant difference in survival between patients undergoing transcervical mediastinal drainage (53%) versus those receiving transthoracic mediastinal drainage (81%), in a subsequent meta-analysis. However, the necessity of thoracotomy—especially when localized in the upper mediastinum—remains controversial [11,12]. Endo et al. [5] classified DNM into three types according to the extension of DNM as diagnosed by CT, and proposed differential surgical management according to this classification. They insisted on a transcervical approach for type I (localized in the upper mediastinum above the tracheal bifurcation), on irrigation through subxiphoidal and cervical incisions with additional percutaneous thoracic drainage for type IIA (extending to the anterior lower mediastinum), and on complete irrigation and debridement of the entire mediastinum through a standard thoracotomy for type IIB (extending to the anterior and posterior lower mediastinum). On the other hand, because DNM often spreads rapidly and insufficient drainage cannot protect against the progression, we performed thoracotomy even for cases of Endo's types I and IIA. In fact, cervical drainage failed to stop the spread of DNM in seven cases and thoracotomy was required. Although aggressive early thoracotomy was effective in DNM types I and IIA in the absence of severe complications, type IIB was still very difficult to manage. Five patients with type IIB suffered from severe complications and two died. This was because treatment was started too late and the patients had severe concomitant diseases.

In terms of the thoracotomy approach, Freeman et al. [3] and Marty-Ane et al. [2,9] insisted that standard posterolateral thoracotomy was the best approach because it allows comprehensive access to a hemithorax including the ipsilateral mediastinum and pericardium. Successful management through median sternotomy [13,14] or clamshell incisions [15] has been reported. However, the risk of subsequent osteomyelitis of the sternum should be considered. Several authors have reported using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) [16,17]. However, it is controversial whether VATS obtains sufficient drainage and irrigation for severe cases. We used VATS for one case (case 9), but we could not rescue this case.

For effective post-operative irrigation, we retain several tubes and infuse saline from various tubes in order to irrigate a wide area of the thoracic cavity and mediastinum. Frequent culture of pleural effusion is employed to monitor post-operative infection.

5. Conclusion

Our treatment strategy for DNM is as follows. (1) If DNM is suspected, we perform cervicothoracic CT immediately for diagnosis and for evaluating the extent of infection and necrosis. (2) We initiate empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics as soon as DNM is suspected. We select antibiotics in consideration of anaerobic bacteria, which are present in 70% of cases. (3) We perform cervical and mediastinal debridement, drainage, and irrigation. The standard approach for mediastinal drainage is thoracotomy. (4) We repeat cervical and mediastinal-thoracic irrigation with copious saline, post-operatively, until the culture of pleural effusion becomes negative. (5) We perform CT frequently after operation for assessing the results of surgical drainage and irrigation.



View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Post-operative chest X-ray of case 8 shows five chest tubes. Two tubes are placed in the mediastinum and three in the right thoracic cavity (one in the apex, one in the dorsal region, and one on the diaphragm).

 
References

  1. Estrera AS, Lanay MJ, Grisham JM, Sinn DP, Platt MR. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;157:545-552.[Medline]
  2. Marty-Ane C-H, Berthet J-P, Alric P, Pegis J-D, Rouviere P, Mary H. Management of descending necrotizing mediastinitis: an aggressive treatment for an aggressive disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:212-217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Freeman RK, Vallieres E, Verrier ED, Karmy-Jones R, Wood DE. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: an analysis of the effects of serial surgical debridement on patient mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:260-267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Papalia E, Rena O, Oliaro A, Cavallo A, Giobbe R, Casadio C, Maggi G, Mancuso M. Desending necrotizing mediastinitis: surgical management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:739-742.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Endo S, Murayama F, Hasegawa T, Yamamoto S, Yamaguchi T, Sohara Y, Fuse K, Miyata M, Nishino H. Guideline of surgical management based on diffusion of descending necrotizing mediastinitis. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;47:14-19.[Medline]
  6. Pearse Jr HE. Mediastinitis following cervical suppuration. Ann Surg 1938;107:588-611.
  7. Howell HS, Prinz RA, Pickleman JR. Anaerobic mediastinitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976;143:353-359.[Medline]
  8. Wheatly MJ, Stirling MC, Kirsh MM, Gago O, Orringer MB. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: transcervical drainage is not enough. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:780-784.[Abstract]
  9. Marty-Ane CH, Alauzen M, Alric P, Serres-Cousine O, Mary H. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: advantage of mediastinal drainage with thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:55-61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Corsten MJ, Shamji FM, Odell PF, Frederico JA, Laframboise GG, Reid KR, Vallieres E, Matzinger F. Optimal treatment of descending necrotizing mediastinitis. Thorax 1997;52:702-708.[Abstract]
  11. Kruyt PM, Boonstra A, Fockens P, Reeders JWAJ, van Lanschot JJB. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis causing pleuroesophageal fistula: successful treatment by combined trancervical and pleural drainage. Chest 1996;109:1404-1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Brunelli A, Sabbatini A, Catalini G, Fianchini A. Descending necrotizong mediastinitis: cervicotomy or thoracotomy?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:485-486.[Free Full Text]
  13. Izumoto H, Komada K, Okada O, Kamata J, Kawazoe K. Successful utilization of the median sternotomy approach in the management of descending necrotizing mediastinitis: report of case. Surg Today 1996;26:286-288.[Medline]
  14. Narimatsu M, Baba H, Hazama S, Noguchi M, Yamaguchi H, Nishi K. Successfully treated descending necrotizing mediastinitis through mediansternotomy using a pedicled omental flap. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;48:447-450.[Medline]
  15. Ris HB, Banik A, Furrer M, Caversaccio M, Cerny A, Zetabaren P. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: surgical treatment via clamshell approach. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:1650-1654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Min HK, Choi YS, Shim YM, Sohn YI, Kim J. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: a minimally invasive approach using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:306-310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Roberts JR, Smythe WR, Weber RW, Lanutti M, Rosengard BR, Kaiser LR. Thoracoscopic management of descending necrotizing mediastinitis. Chest 1997;112:850-854.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K.-C. Chen, J.-S. Chen, S.-W. Kuo, P.-M. Huang, H.-H. Hsu, J.-M. Lee, and Y.-C. Lee
Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: A 10-year surgical experience in a single institution
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2008; 136(1): 191 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
Y. Sumi, H. Ogura, Y. Nakamori, I. Ukai, O. Tasaki, Y. Kuwagata, T. Shimazu, H. Tanaka, and H. Sugimoto
Nonoperative Catheter Management for Cervical Necrotizing Fasciitis With and Without Descending Necrotizing Mediastinitis
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, July 1, 2008; 134(7): 750 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iwata, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fujisawa, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iwata, T.
Right arrow Articles by Fujisawa, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Mediastinum


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS