EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pramesh, C.S.
Right arrow Articles by Mistry, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pramesh, C.S.
Right arrow Articles by Mistry, R. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esophagus - cancer

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:659
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL

Letter to the Editor

Management of esophagogastric anastomotic leaks{star}

C.S. Pramesh * , Rajesh C. Mistry

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Received 9 January 2005; accepted 29 June 2005.

* Corresponding author. Address: Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India. Tel.: +91 22 4177000; fax: +91 22 24146937. (Email: cspramesh{at}vsnl.net).

Key Words: Esophagogastric • Anastomosis • Leak • Management

We read with interest Junemann-Ramirez and colleagues' article [1] on esophagogastric anastomotic leaks and their analysis of predictive factors, management and survival. We agree with the authors that esophagogastric anastomotic leaks are the most devastating of complications after esophageal resection and that they carry high morbidity and mortality rates. The choice of surgical procedure has a lot to do with the ultimate outcome of the patient. We feel that the consequences of an anastomotic leak are far worse with an intrathoracic anastomosis compared with a neck anastomosis. The Ivor Lewis esophagectomy has neither the advantages of a transhiatal esophagectomy (in avoiding a thoracotomy) nor does it have the advantages of a transthoracic (three-hole) total esophagectomy (where a neck anastomosis avoids the morbidity of mediastinitis in case of a leak). A three-hole esophagectomy also enables radical supracarinal mediastinal lymphadenectomy.

The authors' conclusions that patients treated conservatively fared better than those who underwent surgical intervention could clearly be explained by a selection bias as it is likely that clinically stable patients would have been treated conservatively and sicker patients with mediastinitis would have been reoperated. We also fail to understand how a pyloric drainage procedure could reduce anastomotic leaks—decompression of the gastric tube could easily and effectively be achieved by nasogastric tube decompression. In our unit (we perform an average of 160 esophagectomies a year), we perform a three-hole total esophagectomy in all patients with a neck anastomosis, but do not perform a formal pyloric drainage procedure. None of the leaks we encountered could be explained by non-performance of a gastric drainage procedure. Most true anastomotic leaks in our unit are managed conservatively as the leak gets localized in the neck with no signs of mediastinitis. Gastric tube necrosis or ischemia, on the other hand, are managed aggressively by immediate surgical reoperation with disconnection of the anastomosis with reconstruction by a coloplasty as an interval surgery [2]. Needless to state, the latter group fare worse than the former.

Footnotes

{star} The authors of the original paper [1] were invited to reply to this Letter to the Editor but their reply was not received. Back

References

  1. Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS. Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:3-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Pramesh CS, Mistry RC. Surgical treatment for cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in Hebei, China. Br J Surg 2004;91:511.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pramesh, C.S.
Right arrow Articles by Mistry, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pramesh, C.S.
Right arrow Articles by Mistry, R. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Esophagus - cancer

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS