EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Siegfried Hagl
Falk-Udo Sack
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sack, F.-U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sack, F.-U.
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation - heart

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:717-723
© 2005 Elsevier Science NL

Influence of different implantation techniques on AV valve competence after orthotopic heart transplantation{star}

Achim Koch a , * , Andrew Remppis b , Thomas J. Dengler b , Philipp A. Schnabel c , Siegfried Hagl a , Falk-Udo Sack a

a Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
b Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
c Institute of Pathology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Received 18 May 2005; received in revised form 16 July 2005; accepted 27 July 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 6221 5636191; fax: +49 6221 565585. (Email: achim_koch{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 
Objective: About a decade after the introduction of the bicaval and pulmaonary venous heart transplantation technique a reduction of tricuspid and mitral valve incompetence compared to the standard technique by Lower and Shumway is still discussed controversially. We used this technique regularly since the year 1993 and report about our 10 years experience. Methods: A total of 297 patients were transplanted at our institution between 1989 and 2003, 158 with the standard and 139 in the total orthotopic technique (TOHT). Ninety-four of the standard and 72 of the TOHT group were followed up as outpatients and were examined with right-heart catheterisation and trans-thoracic echocardiography. Results: Patients in both groups were similar in demographic data. Right heart catheterisation showed no statistical significant differences between the two groups. The left atrium was significantly enlarged in the standard group. The TOHT group showed a significant reduction of tricuspid regurgitation in 5-year follow up echocardiography. Conclusion: This study showed excellent long-term survival rates for both groups. The significant reduction of left atrial size and atrio-ventricular valve regurgitation in the TOHT group might have important impact on the long-term preservation of cardiac function. Total orthotopic heart transplantation with bicaval and pulmonary venous anastomosis should be preferred for heart transplantation.

Key Words: Bicaval heart transplantation • Tricuspid regurgitation


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 
Despite significant improvement in pharmacological treatment of end-stage heart failure, heart transplantation that was introduced into broad clinical use 20 years ago remains the gold standard in for treatment of severely depressed myocardial function. Since then the standard technique of cardiac transplantation that was first described by Lower, Stofer and Shumway has been successfully used worldwide [17].

However, anastomosis according to the Lower-Shumway technique of cardiac transplantation create enlarged atrial cavities with abnormal geometry between donor and recipient atrium. It has been claimed, that loss of normal atrial geometry is responsible for the occurrence of post-transplant mitral- and tricuspid regurgitation and poor preservation of sinus node function [19].

In order to retain normal shaped atria with preserved atrial contractility, sinus node function and competent atrio-ventricular valves different techniques of cavoatrial and pulmonary venous-atrial anastomoses were introduced into clinical practice in the early 1990's [12].

This study was designed to compare the long-term difference in atrio-ventricular valve competence between the standard and total orthotopic heart transplantation technique.


    2. Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 
2.1 Study population
The heart transplantation program at our centre started in 1989 and until December 2003 297 recipients received orthotopic heart transplantation. 236 (80%) patients survived the first postoperative year. Mean age at transplantation was 50 ± 12 years and 77% of the recipients were male. The preoperative cause of heart failure was ischemic heart disease in 85 recipients, dilative cardiomyopathy in 110 recipients, valvular heart disease in three recipients and other causes in 19 recipients. The demographic data of the recipients in the different implantation technique groups are given in Table 1 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline data of the patients transplanted using ‘standard’ and ‘total orthotopic implantation technique’
 
2.2 Immuno-suppression
All patients received cytolytic induction therapy during the initial period. In the first period between 1989 and 2000 the recipients were treated with a full eight days ATG-course (Thymoglobuline 1.5 mg/kg/day, Imtix-Sangstat, Lyon, France). Since 2000 induction therapy was switched to a T-cell adapted regimen (Thymoglobuline 1.5 mg/kg/day, Imtix-Sangstat, Lyon, France) with daily monitoring of T-lymphocyte subpopulations.

Additional immuno-suppression was continued with a triple therapy including methyl prednisolone, azathioprine and cyclosporine A. Cyclosporine A was started orally at a dose of 2 mg/kg and was adjusted to keep the whole blood trough levels between 200 and 300 ng/ml in the initial postoperative period. During the first postoperative year serum trough levels were maintained at 150 ng/dl for monoclonal assays. Additionally oral azathioprine was given at a dose of 0.5–1 mg/kg on condition that leucocyte count was over 4000/µl. Patients received 500 mg methyl-prednisolone before aortic cross clamp was released. A starting dose of 100 mg methyl-prednisolone per day was tapered 5 mg every second day up to a maintenance dose of 10 mg/d for the first postoperative year.

Rejection monitoring was performed by standard Stanford routine endomyocardial biopsy scheme (EMB) and graded according to the ISHLT grading system (M.E. Billingham). Endomyocardial biopsies were performed weekly for the first 4 weeks. Afterwards, the intervals between the biopsies were prolonged stepwise to yearly biopsies, taking into account previous rejection episodes. Additional biopsies always were performed when rejection was clinically suspected. Endomyocardial biopsies were performed through a percutanous V. brachiocephalica approach using a Caves biotome in a strictly aseptic technique. Biopsy specimens were obtained under fluoroscopic guidance from the septum and the apex of the right ventricle.

In a rejection higher than grade 2, initial treatment with oral methyl-prednisolone was given. Patients in both groups received 1000 mg methyl-prednisolone daily for three days followed by a control biopsy.

2.3 Echocardiography
The recipients had routine echocardiographic follow-up examinations during the first month, the first, third, fifth, seventh, tenth and more than 10 years after transplantation.

Echocardiographic measurements were performed using a Hewlett-Packard Sonos 5500 ultrasound (Hamburg, Germany) imaging system with a 2–5 MHz transducer from a standard window in the left lateral position. Valve competence was assessed by colour Doppler four-chamber view (see Table 2 ). Right and left ventricular ejection fraction was estimated visually and graded in impaired and not impaired. Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were calculated. The dimensions of the ventricles and atria were measured in the M-mode.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Criteria for qualitative assessment of AV-insufficiancy
 
2.4 Hemodynamic assessment
Right heart catheterisation was performed during the first 2 months, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 years after transplantation. Measurements were carried out using a multipurpose Baxter 7 F Swan-Ganz-pulmonary-catheter (Baxter, Chicago, IL) connected to a Hellige transducer (Hellige, Freiburg, Germany). Intracardiac pressures were recorded at the levels of the right atrium, the right ventricle, and the pulmonary artery. The left atrial wedge pressure was also recorded. Echocardiographic, hemodynamic and clinical assessments were performed in the absence of rejection.

2.5 Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS software (Version 11,0; SPSS Inc, Chicago IL). Results are given as mean values ± SD unless indicated otherwise.

A P-value of <0.05 represents statistical significance.


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 
A total number of 297 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these 158 patients were transplanted using the Lower-Shumway technique and in 139 patients the total orthotopic technique was used. 94 of the Lower-Shumway patients and 72 of the total orthotopic patients were followed up and included in the analysis.

Both group showed comparable data for age at transplantation, weight, height, pre-transplant diagnosis, donor-recipient height, weight ratio and donor age.

There was no statistical significant difference between the two groups in operative mortality and long-term survival.

The total operation time of 285 ± 109 min in the total orthotopic group was significantly longer than in the standard group 232 ± 63 min (P< 0,05). There was also a significantly increased cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time in the total orthotopic group (144 ± 55 min) (P<0,05). The total orthotopic technique prolonged the cold ischemic time also significantly (P<0.05).

The significantly longer operation times and the higher blood loss of the TOHT-group can be seen as a result of the significantly higher rate of redo-operations (42%, P<0.01).

3.1 Hemodynamics
Hemodynamic data are summarized in Table 3 and in Fig. 1 A–E. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. In both groups pulmonary vascular resistance decreased from the postoperative examination to the examination after 7 years, but this difference did not reach significance. The postoperative cardiac output was increased significantly for the TOHT-group relative to the standard group in postoperative year 3 and 7. This is probably not accounted by differences in preload as central venous pressure were similar. During the other periods the difference did not reach significance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Degree of mitral-valve (MV) and tricuspid-valve (TV) incompetence in the Lower-Shumway (LS) and totol-orthotopic group direct to year 7 postoperatively in percent
 

Figure 1
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Cardiac output (l/min) of the total orthopic heart transplantation group versus the Lower-Shumway group from direct postoperatively to the 7th year. Significant P-values are marked by an asterisk. (B) Left atrial mean pressure (mmHg) of the total orthopic heart transplantation group versus the Lower-Shumway group from direct postoperatively to the 7th year. Significant P-values are marked by an asterisk. (C) Pulmonary vascular resistance (dyn*cm–5) of the total orthopic heart transplantation group versus the Lower-Shumway group from direct postoperatively to the 7th year. Significant P-values are marked by an asterisk. (D) Central venous pressure (mmHg) of the total orthopic heart transplantation group versus the Lower-Shumway group from direct postoperatively to the 7th year. Significant P-values are marked by an asterisk. (E) Pulmonary artery mean pressure (mmHg) of the total orthopic heart transplantation group versus the Lower-Shumway group from direct postoperatively to the 7th year. Significant P-values are marked by an asterisk.

 
3.2 Morphology
Echocardiography showed that the resulting left atrial size after preservation of the recipient atria in the standard group was significantly increased after transplantation at every examined time-point. Left ventricular dimensions 5 years after transplantation were predominantly within the normal range. The mean left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameter was similar for both groups (Fig. 1; Table 4 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Left ventricular endsystolic and enddiastolic diameter in (mm) for the total-orthotopic (TOHT) and Lower-Shumway (LS) group
 
The two groups showed no differences in amount of mitral regurgitation over the years. The large majority of patients in both groups showed normal mitral valve function. The Doppler echocardiographic findings are given in Table 3. Five years after transplantation moderate tricuspid regurgitation occurred in 39% of evaluated patients transplanted with the standard technique, versus 14% of evaluated patients transplanted with the total orthotopic technique. Severe tricuspid regurgitation was only seen in the standard group in 4% of the patients. The occurrence of mild tricuspid regurgitation was more pronounced in the standard group (24 versus 19%). After 5 years postoperatively the TOHT group showed a significantly higher percentage of patients with normal tricuspid function.

The tricuspid insufficiency was in three patients severe enough to cause prosthetic valve replacement.


    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 
4.1 Introduction
This study should demonstrate the influence of different implantation techniques on the long-term course after orthotopic heart transplantation. The total orthotopic transplantation technique is currently used in only 4.5% of centres performing heart transplantation worldwide [2]. A total number of 166 patients in two different implantation groups has been followed up for 7 years and were echocardiographically examined on the presence of mitral- and tricuspid-insufficiency and left atrial size. Furthermore, the pre- and postoperative results of right heart catheterisation as right atrial and pulmonary arterial pressures as well as cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance were calculated for both, standard and total orthotopic implantation technique. The clinical relevance of an impaired right heart function in the presence of severe tricuspid-insufficiency has been previously underestimated.

4.2 Significance of tricuspid regurgitation
Recent studies report about a high incidence of moderate to mild degrees of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after orthotopic heart transplantation. A high prevalence of TR in healthy subjects can be also found as a result of great sensitivity of echocardiographic colour-flow mapping. Trivial or mild degrees of TR after HTx are thought to have a benign course. The overall prevalence ranges from 47 to 98% in echocardiographic series. But severe TR occurs rarely and is refractory to medical management [1,8,10,24]. DeSimone reports that TR can occur immediately after transplantation and can be caused in turn by a reduction in systolic annulus shortening. They found the degree of mitral regurgitation was usually mild, whereas TR ranged from mild to moderate [11]. The Wythenshawe group reported that recipients who underwent operation by the standard technique had always a significantly higher severity of TR than bicaval technique did. In the long-term follow up after HTx severe TR contributes to RV-volume loading and patients are at high risk for the development of right heart failure, which is associated with significant morbidity. Particularly in recipients with persistent pulmonary hypertension after surgery presence of TR might have a detrimental effect on right ventricular cardiac performance with lower cardiac index and higher atrial filling pressures [1,8,16,22].

4.3 Explanation of TR
Most widely accepted explanation for TR is tricuspid leaflet or chordal damage during endomyocardial biopsy. In almost all patients undergoing tricuspid valve replacement reported ruptured or torn chordae were identified at the time of operation, further supporting the theory that severe TR is biopsy induced. The chordae tendineae usually arise from the papillary muscles but also from the septal wall and thus are subject to trauma by the biotome each time it traverses the tricuspid valve [8,24]. The influence of number and degree of rejection episodes on the incidence of TR is discussed controversely [2,8]. Especially in the late postoperative period the recipients in our institution developed moderate and severe tricuspid insuffiency if they were transplanted in the standard technique. This group had a higher degree in rejection episodes and a larger number of endomyocardial biopsies. However, our results cannot definitely answer the question if more rejection led to more biopsies that increased the risk of traumatic tricuspid insufficiency. Both groups did not differ in immunosuppression but it may be speculative if a better cardiac output in the total orthotopic group and as a result a better renal function allows a more intensive immunosuppression.

Aziz identified in a multivariate analysis standard technique as the most independent predictor for early and late TR. Apart from a distortion of the tricuspid annulus due to disturbed geometry of the right atrial anastomosis, there might be an influence of ischemic injury to the papillary muscles at the time of transplantation [1,24,25].

Severe degrees of TR may cause intractable right heart failure which itself may contribute to early and late morbidity after heart transplantation.

4.4 Pulmonary hypertension
The transplanted heart is directly after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass exposed to elevated pulmonary pressures of the recipient. This afterload mismatch may enhance the risk of right ventricular failure. The occurrence of TR can be explained by persistent chronic pressure overload due to persistent pulmonary hypertension and a volume overload due to primary or secondary tricuspid insufficiency [1].

In contrast to our data other groups report about elevated right-sided pressures in the recipients with moderate to severe TR in right heart catheterisation. They also found standard technique recipients to have higher right-sided pressures compared to the bicaval technique recipients [3]. In both of our groups mean pulmonary arterial pressures were on an equal level and pulmonary vascular resistance was decreasing with time.

4.5 Right atrial function
To obtain the functional integrity enhances the function of the right atrium (RA). The loss of right ventricular filling pattern through asynchronous contraction of donor and recipient atria after use of standard technique contributes to diminished stroke volume. Bicaval technique offers a more physiologic RA size and minimises geometric mismatch between donor and recipient atria [20,23].

Diminished forward systolic vena cava flow has been proposed as a sign of acute cardiac rejection. Increased late diastolic tricuspid flow in the patient with bicaval technique indicated more rigorous RA contraction following by better atrial relaxation. RA contraction may be less vigorous in recipients of the standard technique as a result of atrial sutures and greater size [3,24].

4.6 Right heart function
The improved right heart hemodynamic of the TOHT-recipients reflects the improved right-ventricular function of these patients. This can be caused by a better atrial geometry with a lower incidence of tricuspid-insufficiency. In contrast right atrial size was significantly enlarged in patients with standard atrial anastomoses, this probably contributes to the development of TR by increasing wall tension and tricuspid annular size during late systole. Patients with atrial anastomoses and tricuspid regurgitation could have been shown to have significant increases of right atrial pressure during exercise. Only patients without TR were able to achieve 100 watts of workload providing some evidence that TR may influence exercise capacity [21].

Severe TR has been previously shown to have a deleterious effect on right ventricular function. Right ventricular volume loading combined with right ventricular dilatation can cause right ventricular dysfunction. This may lead to a septal displacement and contributes diminished left ventricular filling. So, ventricular interdependence may lead to LV-diastolic dysfunction. Furthermore, in dilative cardiomyopathy left ventricular function after standard technique HTx is altered by left atrial dysfunction and lack of atrial filling waves of the atrial cuff. So, a small left atrial cuff of the recipient with the bicaval technique and dilative Cardiomyopathy lowers the incidence mitral valve dysfunction [2].

4.7 Surgical technique
The standard surgical technique for heart transplantation first described by Lower, Stofer and Shumway has been used worldwide for most heart transplantations since 1967 [17]. This technique is very attractive in its simplicity and offers a highly reproducible surgical procedure. However, some immanent disadvantages of this technique have been previously described:

The standard therapy requires more pacemakers has a higher incidence of pulmonary hypertension, increased peak oxygen consumption and a greater extent of mitral- and tricuspid regurgitation [5].

But it also creates enlarged atriae with a sort of snowman aspect of the left atrium. The suture lines may protrude into the atrial cavity. Combined with asynchronous contraction between enlarged donor and recipient atrium blood stasis and consecutive spontaneous echo-contrast can be promoted. Presence of spontaneous echo contrast has been shown to increase thrombembolic risk in orthotopic heart transplantation [6]. Sievers reports about the absence of spontaneous echo in bicaval patients. Standard technique: high incidence of spontaneous echo contrast SEC, left atrial enlargement is thought to be responsible for blood stasis.

Embolic events only occurred in the standard group. None of the patients transplanted with the total heart technique showed signs of peripheral embolism. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was not significantly different between both groups and was not increased with the enlargement of the left atrium in the standard group.

In 1991 Dreyfus introduced the total orthotopic technique into clinical practice [6]. In contrast to the Lower–Shumway technique it offers a total anatomical transplantation of the whole heart and preserves normal morphology of both atria. A potential problem might be an increased aortic-cross-clamp time for completion of two additional anastomoses. In our experience the cross-clamp time was increased significantly. Implantation time was significantly longer, however, in centers employing the total technique [1]. Different authors agree that bicaval anastomoses decrease atrial size and have less tricuspid regurgitation. Especially total orthotopic transplantation provides better left ventricular function, a significantly better cardiac index, more frequently non-paced normal SR, demonstrates clinical benefit, less hospitalisation time and a strikingly better survival [2,4,7,13,18,21]. Studies underline early and long-term influence of the surgical technique.

The pulmonary venous anastomoses have to be performed very carefully to prevent bleeding from their inaccessible medial aspect. Blood loss was not increased by the use of total orthotopic heart transplantation technique [6]. Blood-loss was significantly lower in the bicaval group both, at 24 h and overall [13].

When sewing the two caval anastomoses the use of an interrupted suture line helps effectively to prevent the otherwise inevitably purse-stringing [15]. Generally, the incidence of caval stenosis seems to be quite rare and not to be a reason to avoid bicaval procedure [18].

4.8 Rhythm disturbances
The incidence of need for permanent postoperative pacing range from 0 to 10%. The lowest incidence of pacemaker use was reported among centres employing the total technique. After weaning from extra-corporal circulation modified operation technique for orthotopic transplantation leads immediately to a stable sinus rhythm [2,13,15]. Brady-cardia in the early postoperative period is a well described phenomenon. Little is known about brady-cardia occurring in the late postoperative period. Grant describes the incidence of symptomatic brady-cardia with 5% one year after transplantation. Experience with permanent pacing tends to be small in any given institution [9,14]. Potential risk factors for permanent pacing may be disruption of sino-atrial nodal blood supply, long donor ischemic time, long aortic cross clamp time, longer postoperative temporary pacing time and high grades of rejection in the first month. Temporary atrial pacing was more frequently required in those patients who had been receiving pre-transplantation amiodarone. Reduced graft function may also occur due to denervation of the graft and rhythm disturbances [8,14].

In summary, TOHT helps to decrease atrial size, preserves better right and left heart function, decreases tricuspid regurgitation. TOHT is sometimes thought to cause bleeding problems and pulmonary vein stenosis. We did not observe these problems in our transplant programme. To avoid potential bleeding problems of the pulmonary veins anastomoses, they are coagulated circularily and the suture lines are performed very carefully.

None of our recipients developed a pulmonary vein stenosis postoperatively. If the atrial orifice and the pulmonary vein flap are large enough, a purse-string effect of the sutures can be safely prevented. Under these regards we strongly encourage other groups to perform the only ‘physiological’ implantation technique, the total orthotopic heart transplantation.


    5. Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 
This study shows excellent long-term survival rate for both groups. Total orthotopic heart transplantation has significant impact on reduction of tricuspid regurgitation. Both, right and left sided cardiac function, were preserved for more than 5 years after the transplantation. Therefore, TOHT should be the method of choice in heart transplantation.


    Footnotes
 
{star} Presented at the joint 18th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery and the 12th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Leipzig, Germany, September 12–15, 2004. Back


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Aziz TM, Burgess MI, Khafagy R, Hann AW, Campbell C, Rahman A, Deiraniya A, Yonan NA. Bicaval and standard techniques in orthotopic heart transplantation medium-term experience in cardiac performance and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:115-122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Aziz TM, Burgess MI, Rahman AN, Campbell CS, Deiraniya AK, Yonan NA. Risk factors for tricuspid valve regurgitation after orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:1247-1251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Aziz TM, Saad RA, Burgess MI, Campbell CS, Yonan NA. Clinical significance of tricuspid valve dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2002;21:1101-1108.[Medline]
  4. Bittner HB, Chen EP, Kendall SW, Craig D, Van Tright P. Total atrioventricular cardiac transplantation preserves atrial systole and ventricular diastolic filling. Circulation 1996;94(Suppl. II):II-260-II-266.[Medline]
  5. Blanche C, Nessim S, Quartell JJM, Takkenberg JJM, Aleksic I, Cohen M, Czer LSC, Trento A. Heart transplantation with bicaval and pulmonary venous anastomoses—a hemodynamic analysis of the first 117 patients. J Cardiovasc Surg 1997;38:561-566.[Medline]
  6. Bouchart F, Derumeaux G, Mouton-Schleifer D, Bessou JP, Redonnet M, Soyer R. Conventional and total orthotopic cardiac transplantation: a comparative clinical and echocardiographical study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;12:555-559.[Abstract]
  7. Brandt M, Harringer W, Hirt S, Walluscheck KP, Cremer J, Sievers HH, Haverich A. Influence of bicaval anastomoses on late occurrence of atrial arrhythmia after heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:70-72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chan MC, Gianetti N, Kato T, Kornbluth M, Oyer P, Valantine HA, Robbins RC, Hunt SA. Severe tricuspid regurgitation after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001;20:709-717.[Medline]
  9. Cooper MM, Smith CR, Rose EA. Permanent pacing following cardiac transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:812-816.[Abstract]
  10. Copeland J. Heart transplantation: the standard versus bicaval technique controversy. Transplant Proc 2000;32:1519-1520.[Medline]
  11. DeSimone R, Lange R, Mehmanesh H, Sack F-U, Hagl S. Atrioventricular valve insufficiancy and atrial geometry after orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1686-1693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Dreyfus G, Jebara V, Carpentier A. Total orthotopic heart transplantation: an alternative to the standard technique. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;52:1181-1184.[Abstract]
  13. Grande AM, Rinaldi M, D'Armini AM, Campana C, Traversi E, Pederzolli C, Abbiate N, Klersy C, Vigano M. Orthotopic heart transplantation: standard versus bicaval technique. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:1329-1333.[Medline]
  14. Grant SCD, Khan MA, Faragher EB, Yonan N, Brooks NH. Atrial arrhythmias and pacing after orthotopic heart transplantation: bicaval versus standard atrial anastomosis. Br Heart J 1995;74:149-153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Laske A, Carrel T, Niederhäuser U, Pasic M, von Segesser LK, Jenni R, Turina MI. Modified operation technique for orthotopic heart transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:120-126.[Abstract]
  16. Leyh RG, Jahnke AW, Kraatz EG, Sievers HH. Cardiovascular dynamics and dimensions after bicaval and standard cardiac transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1495-1500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lower RR, Stofer RC, Shumway NE. Homovital transplantation of the heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1961;41:196-201.[Medline]
  18. Milano CA, Shah AS, Van Trigt P, Jaggers J, Duane Davis R, Glower DD, Higginbotham MC, Russell SD, Landolfo KP. Evaluation of early postoperative results after bicaval versus standard cardiac transplantation and review of the literature. Am Heart J 2000;140:717-721.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Miniali DN, Robbins RC. Techniques in orthotopic cardiac transplantation: a review. Cardiol Rev 2001;9:131-136.[Medline]
  20. Sarsam RA, Campbell CS, Yonan NA. An alternative surgical technique in orthotopic cardiac transplantation. J Cardiovasc Surg 1993;8:344-349.
  21. Sievers HH, Leyh R, Jahnke A, Petry A, Kraatz EG, Herrmann G, Simon R, Bernhard A. Bicaval versus atrial anastomoses in cardiac transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:780-784.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Traversi E, Pozzoli M, Grande A, Forni G, Assandri J, Vigano V, Tavazzi L. The bicaval anastomosis technique for orthotopic heart transplantation yields better atrial function than the standard technique: an echocardiographic automatic boundary detection study. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998;17:1065-1074.[Medline]
  23. Tsilimingas NB. Modification of bicaval anastomosis: an alternative technique for orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1333-1334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wilhelmi M, Pethig K, Wilhelmi M, Nguyen H, Strüber M, Haverich A. Heart transplantation: echocardiographic assessment of morphology and function after more than 10 years of follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1075-1079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Yankah AC, Musci M, Weng Y, Loebe M, Zurbruegg R, Siniawski H, Mueller J, Hetzer R. Tricuspid valve dysfunction and surgery after orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:343-348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
A. V. Kristen, F.-U. Sack, S. O. Schonland, U. Hegenbart, B. M. Helmke, A. Koch, P. A. Schnabel, C. Rocken, S. Hardt, A. Remppis, et al.
Staged heart transplantation and chemotherapy as a treatment option in patients with severe cardiac light-chain amyloidosis
Eur J Heart Fail, October 1, 2009; 11(10): 1014 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
S. Jacob and F. Sellke
Is bicaval orthotopic heart transplantation superior to the biatrial technique?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2009; 9(2): 333 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F.-U. Sack, A. Kristen, H. Goldschmidt, P. A. Schnabel, T. Dengler, A. Koch, and M. Karck
Treatment options for severe cardiac amyloidosis: heart transplantation combined with chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation for patients with AL-amyloidosis and heart and liver transplantation for patients with ATTR-amyloidosis
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 33(2): 257 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Schnoor, T. Schafer, D. Luhmann, and H. H. Sievers
Bicaval versus standard technique in orthotopic heart transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2007; 134(5): 1322 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. K. Mishra
'Trivial tricuspid regurgitation' - is the impact really trivial?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 29(4): 634 - 635.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Siegfried Hagl
Falk-Udo Sack
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sack, F.-U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sack, F.-U.
Related Collections
Right arrow Transplantation - heart


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS