|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:446
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL
Papworth Hospital, Cambridge CB3 8 RE, United Kingdom
* Tel.: +44 1480 364299; fax: +44 1480 364744. (Email: sam.nashef{at}papworth.nhs.uk).
In this issue, Yap et al. [1] examine the performance of the additive and logistic EuroSCORE risk models in an Australian cardiac surgical population of over 8000 patients. To date, there have been papers which tested EuroSCORE in single-institution studies and some have reported that the model overpredicts risk. When this happens, true risk overprediction by the model may be the explanation, but other possibilities also exist. First, it is likely that those institutions with first-class data collection and robust audit mechanisms do in fact perform better than average, and such a study may tell us more about the excellent results of an institution than about the risk model itself. The second is publication bias: if you test EuroSCORE, or any other model, in your institution and find that your outcomes are not as good as predicted, you are less likely to wish to publicise the fact.
This paper by Yap et al. [1] is different: it has examined the EuroSCORE models in a multi-institutional recent study and found that the model significantly overpredicts risk and therefore has poor calibration in this study. To be fair to the model, however, the discrimination remains excellent with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of 0.820.83.
The paper concludes that the model may not be applicable to Australian patients. This is being generous to the model because it may be equally likely that the reason for overprediction is that the model may now be out of date.
EuroSCORE has been a very successful European venture which has been well received worldwide. It is probably the most commonly used and cited surgical clinical risk model in medical history. However, the patients from whose data EuroSCORE was constructed were operated more than 10 years ago. The time has come for a repeat calibration. This should be preferably based on fresh data which should be of the same high quality as the original database.
The EuroSCORE project group will be reconvened soon to address these issues. Many questions will need to be answered about the shape and nature of the new data collection exercise. Input from all surgeons and epidemiologists with an interest in this field is welcome.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. R Ward and B. Bridgewater Implications of publishing surgical results Heart, September 1, 2007; 93(9): 1136 - 1136. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Mestres, M. A. Castro, E. Bernabeu, M. Josa, R. Cartana, J. L. Pomar, J. M. Miro, J. Mulet, and the Hospital Clinico Endocarditis Study Group Preoperative risk stratification in infective endocarditis. Does the EuroSCORE model work? Preliminary results Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 32(2): 281 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |