EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Pankaj Kumar Mishra
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, P. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Transplantation - heart

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:862-863
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL


Letter to the Editor

Reliable noninvasive diagnosis of coronary allograft vasculopathy: is it still wishful thinking?

Pankaj Kumar Mishra *

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK

Received 1 January 2006; accepted 26 January 2006.

* Tel.: +44 141 2114731/5645206; fax: +44 141 5520987/2114845. (Email: mishrapk_25{at}yahoo.com).

Key Words: Cardiac transplant • Coronary allograft vasculopathy • Noninvasive diagnosis

I read with interest recent article by Caus et al. [1]. It is an interesting article which provides valuable insight into this promising noninvasive diagnostic modality. I would like to add a few comments.

Many previous studies created a gloomy picture about the sensitivity and specificity of currently available noninvasive tests in the diagnosis of coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) [2]. The poor predictive ability of noninvasive tests in this population was probably due to the fact that these tests were designed to detect effects of ischemia rather than coronary obstruction alone [2]. This particular technique described by the authors has the potential to diagnose CAV before the appearance of angiographically detectable lesions. The authors need to be congratulated.

The demographic data provided do not mention the age of the recipients either at the time of transplant or at the time of study. Donor age and organ age (donor age + time since transplant) are relevant but do the authors mean that recipient age at the time of study was not relevant? They have discussed the recipient risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) (smoking, hypertension, etc.). Do they have the demographic data for donor risk factors for CAD? Atherosclerosis is a progressive disease and prevalence of CAD risk factors in donors will have impact on development of CAV in recipients [3]. Mean time between the heart transplant and the study was around 7 years but the incidence of CAV was only 30%, which was quite low as compared to the generally reported incidence of around 50% after 5 years of transplantation [4]. It will be interesting to know what the authors think about the possible reasons for low incidence of CAV in their patients. Besides, what is the usual protocol for angiography in their post-transplant patients? Some centres have abandoned annual surveillance angiography and rely on radionuclide studies and angiography is performed only if the patient is symptomatic or noninvasive reports are suspicious [5]. Were the patients included in this study picked up by routine surveillance angiography or was the angiography indicated because of patient's symptoms?

I was a bit baffled by the definition of CAV used as inclusion criteria by the authors. The conclusions drawn from such cohort of patients will have little impact on diagnosis and management of a substantial number of post-transplant patients. The definition and classification used by Costanzo et al. [3] seems to be of more clinical value. At the end of the day newer investigations should alter treatment options. We are not going to gain anything by making a diagnosis if the management plan remains the same. There is no dispute that medical management for prevention of CAV is warranted in any case in all post-transplant patients.

We need further studies so that the concept of early detection of CAV leading to modulation of immunosuppressive regimens (as suggested by the authors) with an improved late survival after transplant could come out of the realm of wishful thinking. Prevention currently relies heavily on modification of nonimmunologic factors only.

References

  1. Caus T, Kober F, Marin P, Mouly-Bandini A, Quilici J, Metras D, Cozzone PJ, Bernard M. Non-invasive diagnostic of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by (31) P magnetic resonance chemical shift imaging. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Jan 2006;29(1):45-49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Smart FW, Ballantyne CM, Cocanougher B, Farmer JA, Sekela ME, Noon GP, Young JB. Insensitivity of noninvasive tests to detect coronary artery vasculopathy after heart transplant. Am J Cardiol Feb 1991;67(4):243-247.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Costanzo MR, Naftel DC, Pritzker MR, Heilman III JK, Boehmer JP, Brozena SC, Dec GW, Ventura HO, Kirklin JK, Bourge RC, Miller LW. Heart transplant coronary artery disease detected by coronary angiography: a multiinstitutional study of preoperative donor and recipient risk factors. Cardiac Transplant Research Database. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998;17(8):744-753.[Medline]
  4. Kapadia SR, Ziada KM, L’Allier PL, Crowe TD, Rincon G, Hobbs RE, Bott-Silverman C, Young JB, Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM. Intravascular ultrasound imaging after cardiac transplantation: advantage of multi-vessel imaging. J Heart Lung Transplant 2000;19(2):167-172.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Clague JR, Cox ID, Murday AJ, Charokopos N, Madden BP. Low clinical utility of routine angiographic surveillance in the detection and management of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in transplant recipients. Clin Cardiol 2001;24(6):459-462.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Caus
Reply to mishra.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 863 - 864.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Pankaj Kumar Mishra
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, P. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Transplantation - heart


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS