HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Takashi Miyamoto Anne Marie Brecher Boulos Asfour Andreas E. Urban Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miyamoto, T. Articles by Urban, A. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miyamoto, T. Articles by Urban, A. E. Related Collections Congenital - acyanotic

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:35-40
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Twenty years experience of surgical aortic valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in early infancy

German Pediatric Heart Institute ("Deutsches Kinderherzzentrum"), Asklepios Klinik, Arnold-Janssen-Strasse, 29 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany

Received 6 December 2005; received in revised form 24 March 2006; accepted 28 March 2006.

^_* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 2241 249601; fax: +49 2241 249602. (Email: sinzo.md{at}dkhz.de).

	Abstract

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Patients and methods 3. Results 4. Discussion References

 
Objective: To examine early and long-term results of surgical aortic valvotomy in neonates and infants aged less than 3 months. Methods: A review of all 34 neonates (n = 26) and young infants (n = 8) aged 1–62 days undergoing primary open valvotomy for aortic valve stenosis between 1983 and 2003 was carried out. Associated major cardiac anomalies were endocardial fibroelastasis (n = 8), aortic coarctation (n = 3), subvalvular aortic stenosis (n = 2), and ventricular septal defect (n = 1). Risk factors for early mortality were estimated. Current information was available for 31 patients for a follow-up of 115 ± 67 months. Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate freedom from reintervention. Results: Two neonates died early: operative mortality of 6% (2/34). Risk factors for early mortality were associated endocardial fibroelastosis, monocuspid aortic valve and impaired left ventricular function. No patient died late. Seven patients needed reintervention for re-aortic stenosis (n = 5) or aortic insufficiency (n = 2), i.e., re-valvotomy (n = 3), valve replacement (n = 2), Ross procedure (n = 1), and balloon valvuloplasty (n = 1). Freedom from reintervention was 85.1 ± 6.9%, 78.0 ± 9.35%, and 53.5 ± 15.9% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Conclusions: Primary surgical aortic valvotomy in early infancy carries a low early and late mortality, a low occurrence of significant aortic regurgitation and a low early recurrence of aortic stenosis. In great majority of cases, reintervention can be delayed to allow implantation of an adult-sized prosthesis, when required.

Key Words: Critical aortic stenosis • Surgical aortic valvotomy • Long-term outcomes

	1. Introduction

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Patients and methods 3. Results 4. Discussion References

 
The most appropriate first treatment approach for neonates with critical aortic stenosis remains controversial. In the past surgical aortic valvotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) pioneered by Lillehei et al. [1] in 1956 was standard. But various operative techniques have been used including hypothermic circulatory arrest, inflow occlusion, transventricular valvotomy with blunt dilatation of the valve. These operations remained the only therapeutic options until 1983, when Lababidi [2] reported the interventional use of aortic balloon valvotomy. Both surgical valvotomy and transcatheter balloon valvotomy are associated with mortality and morbidity and with residual or recurrent valve dysfunction. Both are palliative procedures: sooner or later, reintervention is likely.

Actually the choice between the two approaches varies according to the local expertise and/or preference. We favor open valvotomy in preference to percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty. This study evaluates results of this policy by estimating survival of patients and freedom from reintervention for aortic valve stenosis or regurgitation.

	2. Patients and methods

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Patients and methods 3. Results 4. Discussion References

 
Between March 1983 and March 2003, 34 consecutive patients younger than 3 months of age (29 girls, 5 boys) underwent open valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in Sankt Augustin, Germany. Median age was 21 days (range 2–62 days). Twenty-six patients were neonates. Median weight at operation was 3.3 kg (range 1.9–6.3 kg).

2.1 Definition of study group
Thirty-two patients fulfilled Turley et al.'s [3] definition of ‘isolated’ aortic stenosis. This excludes major associated malformations other than coarctation of the aorta, in particular lesions not amenable for biventricular repair. This study also includes two neonates with associated subvalvular aortic stenosis and a small ventricular septal defect. Criteria for diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) in our unit are based on echocardiographic findings of aortic valve atresia or hypoplasia with aortic valve annulus diameter less than 4.5 mm, mitral valve atresia or hypoplasia with mitral valve annulus diameter less than 7 mm, and absent or hypoplastic left ventricle with a long axis at least 80% smaller than the long axis of the right ventricle. Until 1996, HLHS neonates were referred to an overseas Center in accordance with parents’ wish. Norwood palliation has been offered in our unit intermittently from 1997 and constantly from 2001. Thus, in the period between January 2001 and March 2003, 19 patients underwent Norwood procedure, whereas two underwent surgical aortic valvotomy.

In the study period, primary aortic balloon dilatation was performed on 30 occasions: for premature neonates weighing less than 1.5 kg, in case of conditions contraindicating cardiopulmonary bypass, cerebral hemorrhage in particular, and when the surgeon was not readily available.

2.2 Clinical presentation
Fourteen patients were directly admitted in the intensive care unit because of cardiorespiratory failure. Ductal dependency was present in five patients who required prostaglandin E1 treatment. The echocardiography with Doppler study showed a preoperative mean peak aortic valve gradient of 72.4 ± 20.9 mmHg. This gradient was over 50 mmHg in all patients except two with impaired left ventricular function (shortening fraction < 28%). Associated major cardiovascular anomalies were endocardial fibroelastosis (n = 8), dilatative cardiomyopathy (n = 1), aortic coarctation (n = 3) with hypoplastic aortic arch in one patient, subvalvular aortic stenosis (n = 2), and ventricular septal defect (n = 1). One of the three aortic coarctations was postoperatively detected.

2.3 Morphology of the aortic valve
Three patients (8.8%) had a monocuspid, 16 patients (47.1%) a bicuspid, and 15 patients (44.1%) a tricuspid aortic valve. At operation, the stenosis was found to result from fusion of the zone of apposition between leaflets in all patients and from thickening and myxomatous changes of leaflets in 31 patients (91%). Obstruction was mainly due to these changes in four cases.

2.4 Surgical technique and follow-up management
After median sternotomy, surgical right atrial cannulation, and aortic cannulation, all patients were placed on hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Myocardial protection was obtained with cold antegrade crystalloid (St. Thomas solution) repeated at 20–30 min intervals and topical hypothermia; short periods of circulatory arrest were also used when necessary to improve visualization. After transverse aortotomy, a careful commissurotomy just short of the aortic annulus was performed in order to avoid development of aortic regurgitation. Obstructive myxomatous and fibrous nodules on the leaflets were removed. This implied careful and meticulous thinning/shaving of leaflets. Modified ultrafiltration at the end of CPB was applied in all patients since 1992. Mean CPB time was 50 ± 43 min (range 12–273 min), median aortic cross-clamp time was 24 min, whereas total circulatory arrest in eight patients lasted 10 min.

Hospital survivors were seen in outpatient clinics at regular intervals by pediatric cardiologists. Two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler studies were routinely performed before discharge from the hospital and during each outpatient visit. The transvalvular aortic peak pressure gradient was calculated using the simplified Bernoulli equation: gradient = 4V ², where V is the peak instantaneous transvalvular Doppler velocity. Aortic valve incompetence was graded in our unit by mapping the dimensions of the regurgitation jet with color flow Doppler echocardiography [4]. A peak gradient of at least 50 mmHg and progression to Grade 3 aortic regurgitation were indication for evaluation by heart catheterization to discuss reintervention.

All hospital survivors, except one patient, have been followed up between 16 and 261 months (mean 115 ± 67 months) postoperatively.

2.5 Data collection and statistical analysis
Data collected retrospectively included patients’ demographics, anatomical diagnoses, clinical status at presentation, echocardiography and cardiac catheterization, operations, and follow-up clinical status. They are expressed as median or mean ± standard deviation and/or percentages with 95% confidence limits (CL). Patients were divided into three groups according to mortality and morbidity as follows: survivors without reintervention (Group A), survivors with reintervention (Group B) and non-survivors (Group C). The three groups were compared to identify the changing patterns in characteristics, management, and outcomes using ² tests and Krunskal Wallis analysis of variance. Risks for death were assessed by univariate analysis. Kaplan–Meier curves for actuarial survival, freedom from reintervention including re-operation or interventional catheterization were calculated using the GraphPad Prism (San Diego, CA, USA). The level of statistical significance was set at a p value of less than 0.05.

	3. Results

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Patients and methods 3. Results 4. Discussion References

 
3.1 Early mortality and morbidity
Two neonates died early on the first operative day from heart failure: operative mortality of 6% (2/34), 0.7–19.6% (95% CL). Significant risk factors for early mortality as displayed in Table 1 were leaflet morphology (monocuspid valve, p = 0.005), presence of endocardial fibroelastosis (p = 0.013) and impaired left ventricular function (shortening fraction < 28%, p = 0.026).

3.2 Late mortality and reintervention
No patient died late. One patient was lost to follow-up. Seven out of 31 patients (23%) needed a re-operation (n = 6) or reintervention by catheterization (n = 1). Concerned were five previous bicuspid valves, one monocuspid and one tricuspid valves. The indication for the second surgical intervention was recurrent aortic stenosis in two patients, Grade 3 aortic insufficiency in two patients, combined aortic regurgitation and stenosis with subvalvular stenosis in one patient, and combined valvular and subvalvular aortic stenosis in the remaining patients. The mean interval between the first and the second procedure was 79 ± 62 months (range 6–168 months).

One patient underwent percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty 61 months after initial repair. Re-aortic stenosis was surgically addressed by repeat open valvotomy/commissurotomy (n = 3) with subvalvular myomectomy (n = 2) and Ross procedure (n = 1). The Ross operation was for re-aortic obstruction of a monocuspid valve 93 months after primary repair. In the patient with combined aortic regurgitation, a hole in one leaflet was found and closed by a pericardial patch. The other two patients with aortic incompetence underwent aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis size 21 mm, 149 and 168 months after open valvotomy. One of these patients required pacemaker implantation because of a postoperative complete heart block. There was no additional mortality with any of these reinterventions.

Overall outcome is schematically summarized in Fig. 1 . Kaplan–Meier estimate for time-related freedom from reintervention for aortic valve dysfunction after initial valvotomy is shown in Fig. 2 . It is 85.1 ± 6.9%, 78.0 ± 9.3%, and 53.5 ± 15.9% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Thirty-four consecutive patients, 26 neonates and 8 infants younger than 3 months, underwent surgical valvotomy for aortic stenosis. Seven patients needed re-operation (n = 6) or catheter reintervention (n = 1). Indication for the second intervention was recurrent aortic stenosis in two patients, severe aortic insufficiency in two patients, a combined aortic regurgitation and stenosis with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) in one patient and recurrent aortic stenosis with LVOTO in another patient. The procedure was percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty in one patient, repeat open valvotomy in one, repeat open valvotomy and LVOTO resection in one, aortic valve plasty and LVOTO resection in one, ROSS operation in one, and aortic valve replacement in two patients. AR: aortic valve regurgitation, AS: aortic valve stenosis, AVP: aortic valvuloplasty, AVR: aortic valve replacement, BD: balloon dilatation, ED: early death, RP: repeat procedure.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier estimate of freedom from reintervention for aortic stenosis or regurgitation after surgical aortic valvotomy (n = 34). Vertical bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM).

3.3.2 Long-term (last follow-up) functional status
One patient was lost to follow-up. There was no late death. Twenty-six patients (84%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I. Five patients (16%), NYHA class II, either presented with mild symptoms or on medical treatment especially captopril (n = 2) because of aortic regurgitation or digoxin (n = 2). All patients, except two children with pacemaker implantation, have retained normal sinus node function. At the latest echocardiography examination for the 28 survivors with native aortic valve, aortic regurgitation was Grade 1 in 10 patients and Grade 2 in 14 patients. Sixteen patients had a systolic ejection gradient across the aortic valve less than 30 mmHg, 7 patients had a peak gradient between 30 and 50 mmHg, and 5 patients had more than 50 mmHg. The mean gradient was 29.8 ± 18.2 mmHg. There were no significant differences in the latest postoperative aortic pressure gradient between Group A and Group B (Table 2).

	4. Discussion

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Patients and methods 3. Results 4. Discussion References

 
This study bears the usual drawbacks of retrospective series over a long period. In particular, there were variations with regard to patient selection for percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty and to criteria for reintervention. Nevertheless, this series is relatively homogeneous as primary surgical valvotomy was performed by the same surgeon.

Critical aortic stenosis commonly presents in the neonatal period with a poor clinical condition. In this series, 14 patients (41%) had to be admitted into intensive care unit because of cardiorespiratory failure. Decision for further management was quickly taken to enhance chance for survival. In the period under review, HLHS cases were rapidly detected in our unit and neonates with isolated aortic stenosis were primary assigned to aortic valvotomy, unless CPB was contraindicated. At surgery, it is of paramount importance to thin/shave aortic leaflets that are usually thickened by myxomatous tissue. Indeed, obstruction can mainly be caused by nodular excrescences and protruding immature tissue on the cups, as seen in four of our cases. This policy resulted in a low early and late mortality, a low occurrence of significant aortic regurgitation and a low early recurrence of aortic stenosis, with freedom from reintervention for aortic valve dysfunction of 78.0 ± 9.3% ten years after initial valvotomy.

Early mortality after neonatal surgical aortic valvotomy, which was high in the past (as high as 52.1% in the series of Gaynor et al. [5]), has been reduced in recent publications to 0–18% [6–10]. Impaired left ventricle function and endocardial fibroelastosis are well-recognized risk factors for early mortality [11,12]. Monocuspid valve, per se, constitutes a surgical risk, as demonstrated by Bhabra et al. [7] and as shown by this study: two among the three patients with monocuspid valve died and the survivor had to undergo Ross procedure 93 months later.

Although surgical or catheter primary management of critical aortic stenosis is still debated, there is agreement that, in trained hands, both methods carry, actually, similar early mortality. It appears that the critical factors predicting outcome are systolic function and morphology of the left ventricle (LV) and the aortic valve. When the LV is small, with endocardial fibroelastosis, and dysfunctions, neither surgical nor balloon valvotomy gives good results. Monocuspid aortic valves are poor candidates for both methods, albeit theoretically worse for catheter procedure, as obstruction relief will inevitably result in aortic regurgitation. Fortunately the great majority of stenosed aortic valves are bicuspid or tricuspid, so that both managements may be discussed. The problem really concerns the residual or recurrent valve dysfunction after the primary procedure. As both procedures are palliative procedures, the question is freedom from reintervention over time for aortic valve stenosis or regurgitation. In a recent paper, Balmer et al. [13] showed that aortic regurgitation was frequently observed among neonates and infants with previous balloon valvotomy; freedom rate from reintervention was only 35% at 3 years. At this age, if the aortic valve cannot be repaired, there is no other choice than Ross procedure or aortic valve replacement by allograft. Survivors after primary valvotomy in most surgical series, like ours, enjoy much longer interval without reintervention, 10-year freedom rates from reintervention varying between 55 and 90% [6,10,14,15]. At this interval, the aortic valve annulus is usually big enough to accommodate an adult-size mechanical valve, if needed.

It is not surprising that neonatal aortic balloon valvotomy frequently ends up with significant aortic regurgitation. Valve stenosis is due, in great majority of cases, not only to the fusion of rudimentary commissures but also (sometimes mainly) to irregular cups thickening. These excrescences protrude into valve orifice and hamper its opening. At surgery, it is possible to directly inspect the aortic valve and to carry out valve debridement. This is not achievable with the ‘blind’ balloon dilatation. Instead, cups are likely to get torn or perforated while trying to relief obstruction.

By comparing survivors with and without reintervention, we could not find any parameter that might predict earlier postoperative failure of the aortic valve, most probably because of the small number of patients. It is to be presumed that trileaflet valves behave better than bileaflet ones [7]. It is noteworthy that reintervention was rarely due to significant aortic regurgitation. Overall long-term prognosis for hospital survivors was very good with regard to late survival, freedom from reintervention for aortic valve dysfunction and heart functional status, all being in NYHA class I or II.

In our view, surgical aortic valvotomy under hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic myocardial protection remains the most favorable approach in the treatment of critical aortic stenosis in neonates and young infants. In centers where surgical expertise is readily available, this management will continue to challenge the balloon valvuloplasty in terms of better long-term outcomes.

	Footnotes

 
Presented at the joint 18th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery and the 12th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Leipzig, Germany, September 12–15, 2004.

	References

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Patients and methods 3. Results 4. Discussion References

 

1. Lillehei CW, DeWall RA, Gott VL, Varco RL. The direct vision correction of calcific aortic stenosis by means of a pump-oxygenator and retrograde coronary sinus perfusion. Dis Chest 1956;30:123-132.[Medline]
2. Lababidi Z. Aortic balloon valvuloplasty. Am Heart J 1983;106:751-752.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Turley K, Bove EL, Amato JJ, Iannettoni M, Yeh J, Cotroneo JV, Galdieri RJ. Neonatal aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:679-683.[Abstract]
4. Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byarad C, Soto B. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency be Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1978;9:952-959.
5. Gaynor JW, Bull C, Sullivan ID, Armstrong BE, Deanfield JE, Taylor JFN, Rees PG, Ungerleider RM, de Leval MR, Stark J, Elliott MJ. Late outcome of survivors of intervention for neonatal aortic valve stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:122-126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Alexiou C, Chen Q, Langley SM, Salmon AP, Keeton BR, Haw MP, Monro JL. Is there still a place for open surgical valvotomy in the management of aortic stenosis in children? The view from Southampton. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:239-246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Bhabra MS, Dhillon R, Bhudia S, Sethia B, Miller P, Stumper O, Wright JGC, De Giovanni JV, Barron DJ, Brawn WJ. Surgical aortic valvotomy in infancy: impact of leaflet morphology on long-term outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1412-1416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Baram S, McCrindle BW, Han RK, Benson LN, Freedom RM, Nykanen DG. Outcomes of uncomplicated aortic valve stenosis presenting in infants. Am Heart J 2003;145:1063-1070.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Gildein HP, Kleinert S, Weintraub RG, Wilkinson JL, Karl TR, Mee RBB. Surgical commissurotomy of the aortic valve: outcome of open valvotomy in neonates with critical aortic stenosis. Am Heart J 1996;131:754-759.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Hawkins JA, Minich LL, Tani LY, Day RW, Judd VE, Shaddy RE, McGough EC. Late results and reintervention after aortic valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in neonates and infants. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1758-1763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Cobanoglu A, Dobbs JL. Critical aortic stenosis in neonate. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996;10:116-119.[Abstract]
12. Rhodes LA, Colan SD, Perry SB, Jonas RA, Sanders SP. Predictors of survival in neonates with critical aortic stenosis. Circulation 1991;84:2325-2335.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Balmer C, Beghetti M, Fasnacht M, Friedli B, Arbenz U. Balloon aortic valvoplasty in paediatric patients: progressive aortic regurgitation is common. Heart 2004;90:77-81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Messmer BJ, Hofstetter R, von Bernuth G. Surgery for critical congenital aortic stenosis during the first three months of life. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1991;5:378-382.[Abstract]
15. Ettedgui JA, Tallman-Eddy T, Neches WH, Pahl E, Zuberbuhler JR, Fischer WH, Beerman LB, Siewers RD. Long-term results of survivors of surgical valvotomy for severe aortic stenosis in early infancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:1714-1720.[Abstract]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. C. Brown, D. Boshoff, B. Eyskens, and M. Gewillig Hybrid approach as bridge to biventricular repair in a neonate with critical aortic stenosis and borderline left ventricle Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 35(6): 1080 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-J. Schafers, D. Aicher, S. Riodionycheva, A. Lindinger, T. Radle-Hurst, F. Langer, and H. Abdul-Khaliq Bicuspidization of the Unicuspid Aortic Valve: A New Reconstructive Approach Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 85(6): 2012 - 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Hraska, J. Photiadis, and C. Arenz Open valvotomy for aortic valve stenosis in newborns and infants MMCTS, June 19, 2007; 2007(0619): 2311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Takashi Miyamoto Anne Marie Brecher Boulos Asfour Andreas E. Urban Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miyamoto, T. Articles by Urban, A. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miyamoto, T. Articles by Urban, A. E. Related Collections Congenital - acyanotic