|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:96-102
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 326, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
b Department of Physiology and Experimental Clinical Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
c Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Received 4 October 2005; received in revised form 12 March 2006; accepted 4 April 2006.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49 6221 566246; fax: +49 6221 565585. (Email: dzsi{at}hotmail.com).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Transplantation Reperfusion injury Inosine Endothelial function Rat
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently it has been discovered that purines in general and inosine in particular (but not adenosine) inhibit poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) activation and modulate cell death [8]. PARP is an abundant nuclear enzyme of eukarotic cells that has been implicated in response to DNA injury and oxidant-induced cell death (see overview in Ref. [9]). We and others [1012] previously showed that PARP-inhibition reduces ischemiareperfusion injury.
In contrast to adenosine which mainly acts via surface purine receptors, inosine might have more direct effect on intracellular signaling. We hypothesized that inosine may also exert cytoprotective effects by interfering with the PARP activation pathway. This assumption is based on the structural similarity of inosine to part of NAD+, the substrate of PARP. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of inosine on ischemia/reperfusion injury and whether inosine influences the PARP pathway during ischemia/reperfusion.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All animals received humane care in compliance with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care formulated by the National Society of Medical Research and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the National Academy of Sciences and published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 86-23, revised 1996).
2.2 Functional measurements in the graft
Left ventricular systolic (LVSP) and end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), rate of pressure development (dP/dt), and relaxation time constant (
) were measured by a Millar micromanometer (Millar Instruments Inc., Houston, TX, USA) at different LV volumes using an intraventricular balloon. Total coronary blood flow (CBF) was measured by a perivascular ultrasonic flow probe on the donor aorta. After baseline measurement, the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine (ACH, 1 nM, 0.2 ml) and bradykinin (BK 0.1 nM, 0.2 ml) as well as the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium-nitroprusside (SNP, 10 nM, 0.2 ml) were administered directly into the coronary arteries of the graft via the donor aorta. Between the infusions, CBF was allowed to return to baseline levels. Vasodilator response was expressed as maximum percent change of CBF from baseline.
2.3 Determination of high energy phosphates
Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and adenosine monophosphate (AMP) contents were assessed with standard photometry using an enzyme-kinetic assay [10]. Energy charge potential was calculated as (ATP + 0.5ADP)/(ATP + ADP + AMP).
2.4 Immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed cryostat-fixed sections were stained by primary mouse monoclonal anti-poly(ADP-ribose) antibody (Alexis, San Diego, CA, USA) to detect the product (poly(ADP-ribose)) of PARP activity [12,13]. Quantitative histomorphologic assessment was performed by the COLIM software package (Pictron Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) based on the intensity and distribution of labeling. The results were expressed with a grading system of 0 (no staining) to 4 (extensive staining) based on the measured intensity and area of positive labelings [10,12].
2.5 Experimental protocol
Four transplant groups were studied (n
= 6 for each group). Immediately before releasing the aortic clamp, the slow injection of either saline (control group) or the inosine (100 mg/kg) was started and continued during the first 5 min of the reperfusion period. This dose was chosen based on in vitro and in vivo studies [8], previous efficacy data with the compound in various models of inflammation and vascular injury and pilot transplant experiments. In Group A (control) and Group B (inosine) the measurements of systolic and diastolic function and CBF were performed after 1 h of reperfusion. In Group C (control) and Group D (inosine) the abdominal cavity was closed and the animals were allowed to recover from the anesthesia. During the following 24 h, the animals of both groups received the same standard diet and normal drinking water. After 24 h the animals were reanesthetized and the abdominal cavity was reopened. The grafts were instrumented and the measurements were performed as in Groups A and B. After the functional measurements the hearts were excised for histologic analysis.
In a separate series of experiments, four groups (n = 6 for each group) of hearts were transplanted and treated with either inosine or saline vehicle similarly to the above mentioned protocol. After either 1 or 24 h of reperfusion, the grafts were excised to determine high energy phosphate contents.
2.6 Statistical analysis
All values were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Individual means between the groups were compared by one-way analysis of variance followed by an unpaired t-test with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons and the post hoc Scheffe's test. A value of p
< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
significantly lower (p
< 0.05) in the inosine group indicating a better myocardial relaxation (Table 1, Fig. 2
). LVEDP did not differ between the groups. The diastolic compliance curves (end-diastolic pressurevolume relationships) were similar in all groups (Fig. 2). CBF was significantly higher (p
< 0.05) in the inosine group in comparison to control after 60 min (Table 1). Endothelium-independent vasodilatation after SNP (Fig. 2) was similar in both groups. In contrast, endothelium-dependent vasodilatation after ACH and BK was significantly (p
< 0.05) better in the inosine group than in the vehicle-treated transplant group (Fig. 3
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
, and LVEDP between the vehicle- and the inosine-treated transplant groups (Table 1). In the vehicle-treated transplant group, all these parameters showed a significant improvement in comparison to the values after 60 min of reperfusion (p
< 0.05). In the inosine-treated transplant group, there were no significant differences in comparison to the values of 60 min of reperfusion. Systolic cardiac function curves and diastolic compliance curves of the control and the inosine group were nearly identical (Figs. 1 and 2). Baseline CBF was also similar in both groups. After 24 h, endothelium-dependent vasodilatation was significantly increased (p
< 0.05) in both groups in comparison to the 60 min of reperfusion values. Endothelium-dependent vasodilatation after both ACH and BK was also significantly higher in the inosine group in comparison to vehicle-treated transplant group (Fig. 3). After 24 h, total adenylate pool showed no significant differences between the groups; however, ATP content was still slightly higher in the inosine-treated animals without reaching the level of significance (Fig. 4).
Immunohistochemical staining showed almost no activation of PARP in both groups (not shown).
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The modulation of the ATP degradation pathway at different levels is an important strategy to reduce ischemiareperfusion [14]. During the past years, beneficial effects of adenosine [14,15], adenosine analogues [16], adenosine uptake, and desaminase inhibitors [17] have been described. In contrast, the role of other purine nucleotides is poorly investigated. An increase of contractile force and coronary blood flow in response to inosine has been demonstrated as early as the late 70s [5]. Inosine was supposed to block the desensitizing action of cyclic AMP on the reaction between calcium ions and contractile proteins [18]. Furthermore, it was found that inosine infusion resulted in a nonmetabolically coupled coronary vasodilatation in dogs [19]. In subsequent studies, inosine exerted beneficial effects after hypoxia-reoxygenation [20] and ischemia/reperfusion [6] which is in concert with our data.
The mechanism of action of inosine is multiple and not completely understood. It has been shown previously that intermediate periods of ischemia induce a severe loss of cellular NAD+ and ATP levels. The loss of cellular energetic pools, in turn, importantly affects myocardial function [10]. We demonstrated that a major action of inosine is the preservation of myocardial of ATP contents during reperfusion. This is in accordance with a 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopic study in which significantly higher levels of ATP was detected after ischemia/reperfusion in crystalloid perfused isolated hearts after application of inosine [21].The increase of coronary blood flow during reperfusion contribute also to the improvement of cardiac function. Previous studies [6,21] demonstrated that inosine increase coronary flow dose dependently and, as a consequence, the function of the reperfused heart. These effects are also comparable with that of adenosine: Galinanes and Hearse [15] showed in a similar model of heterotopic transplantation that after 8 h of cardiac preservation and 1 h of reperfusion, that adenosine significantly improved coronary blood flow and myocardial function. Interestingly they did not found any difference in high energy phosphate contents which implicate that increased coronary blood flow is an independent factor of enhanced functional recovery.
Similar to our previous studies, endothelial function was severely impaired after 1 h of reperfusion and was sustained after 24 h. The present study is the first which demonstrates that inosine improves not only myocardial but also endothelial function. This effect is comparable to those with application of nitric oxide donors [22], endothelin receptor antagonists [23], or PARP-inhibitors [9,10,12]. How inosine protects the endothelium remains not completely understood. Previous data suggest that energy depletion severely impairs endothelial function [10]. As inosine restores ATP levels, this may contribute to improved endothelial function. If inosine has a direct effect on nitric oxide synthesis remains to be clarified.
Neutrophilendothelial interaction is a central step during the development of reperfusion injury which leads to endothelial and subsequent myocardial injury. Novel studies implicate that purin nucleotides in general and inosine in particular may reduce neutrophil-mediated injury. In isolated cell cultures, inosine dose-dependently inhibited LPS-induced monocyte activation [24]. In a rodent model of endotoxin shock, inosine improved vascular function and reduced neutrophil accumulation in selected organs [13]. Recently, it has been shown that inosine-monophosphate, an intermediate metabolite of the AMP-inosine degredation pathway and inosine itself inhibits neutrophil rolling and trafficking into the reperfused tissue [25].
A very important new finding of the present study that inosine acts as an endogen PARP inhibitor. The immunhistologic examinations indicated extensive PARP activation in the vehicle-treated group, which is in accordance with our previous studies [9,10]. Inosine treatment almost completely abolished PARP activation. Recently we were able to demonstrate in vitro that inosine (and other purine nucleotides such as hypoxanthine) reduce cellular PARP activity in peroxynitrite-treated macrophages and improves mitochondrial respiration.
The activation of PARP is currently described to be a final common effector in various types of tissue injury including systemic inflammation, circulatory shock, and ischemia/reperfusion (see Section 1). Both genetic disruption and pharmacologic inhibition of the PARP pathway effectively protect against oxygen radical and nitric oxide toxicity in different cell cultures, attenuate regional myocardial ischemia/reperfusion and global hypoxia-reoxygenation injury [5,9]. The pathomechanisms of PARP inhibition are discussed in detail elsewhere [9]. Briefly, PARP-inhibitors exert their beneficial effects at multiple levels by preservation of cellular ATP, downregulation of adhesion molecules, improvement of mitochondrial respiration, and regulation of necrosis and apoptosis. The observed changes after inosine treatment are in concert with previous studies using PARP inhibitors in similar models of ischemia/reperfusion [10]. The current results are the first to demonstrate that an endogenous molecule (other than nicotinamide), namely inosine, inhibits PARP activation in vivo and therefore modulates oxidant-induced cell death [8]. We propose the hypothesis that inosine appears to work, at least in the currently used model systems, as nonprofessional, but reasonably potent inhibitor of PARP activation; it modulates cell death in a fashion that is entirely consistent with its PARP inhibitory effect. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to elucidate the exact mode of action of inosine treatment.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Presented at the joint 19th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery and the 13th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Barcelona, Spain, September 2528, 2005. | References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Aharinejad, O. Andrukhova, M. Gmeiner, A. Thomas, A. Aliabadi, A. Zuckermann, K. Krenn, and M. Grimm Donor Serum SMARCAL1 Concentrations Predict Primary Graft Dysfunction in Cardiac Transplantation Circulation, September 15, 2009; 120(11_suppl_1): S198 - S205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Rose and I. R. Coe Physiology of Nucleoside Transporters: Back to the Future. . . . Physiology, February 1, 2008; 23(1): 41 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |