EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Tjark Ebels
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geven, L. I.
Right arrow Articles by Ebels, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geven, L. I.
Right arrow Articles by Ebels, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chest wall

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:232-236
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Vascular thoracic outlet syndrome.

Longer posterior rib stump causes poor outcome

Leontien I. Gevena, Andries J. Smitb, Tjark Ebelsa,*

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
b Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands

Received 6 March 2006; received in revised form 10 April 2006; accepted 11 April 2006.

* Corresponding author. Address: Thorax Centre, Room T4.234, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 50 3613238; fax: +31 50 3611347. (Email: t.ebels{at}thorax.umcg.nl).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Objective: To assess the role of the relative length of the posterior rib stump in outcome after transaxillary first rib resection for thoracic outlet syndrome. Methods: All patients with a transaxillary first rib resection between January 1990 and February 2004 were selected. Relative rib stump length was calculated by dividing the length of the posterior rib stump by the height of the 10th thoracic vertebra. Measurements were made on postoperative X-rays. Outcome was defined as excellent, good, fair, or poor. Results: Surgical outcome was excellent in 11 procedures (28.2%), good in 12 procedures (30.8%), fair in 9 (23.1%), and poor in 7 procedures (17.9%). Correlation of the outcome with the relative rib stump length gives a coefficient of .374 (P = .02). After exclusions of 3 patients with other medical conditions explanatory for remaining pain in the operated limb, the correlation coefficient was .614 (P < .01). Conclusion: The relative length of the posterior rib stump is correlated with the outcome after transaxillary first rib resection in patients with thoracic outlet syndrome. First rib resection in patients with proven vascular compression should be as close as possible to the articulation with the transverse process, without injuring the brachial plexus.

Key Words: Thoracic outlet syndrome • Surgery • Transaxillary approach


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a controversial entity, variably defined as a complex including radiating pain, paresthesias, fatigue, and other symptoms depending on the attitude of the upper limb. The implicit supposition of TOS is that arterial, venous and nervous structures can be compressed in the thoracic outlet depending on upper limb attitude. Due to lack of uniformity in the definition of TOS, various treatment strategies have been proposed with varying success [1–6]. We have used clinically demonstrated attitudinal compression of the axillary (subclavian) artery coinciding with attitude-dependent incapacitating complaints as an indication for resection of the first rib through a transaxillary approach.

It is unknown whether the completeness of the first rib resection is related to residual or relapsing symptoms. The aim of the present report was to assess the relation between the remaining posterior first rib stump to residual symptoms in patients after transaxillary first rib resection for vascular TOS.


    2. Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
2.1 Methods
All subsequent cases with transaxillary first rib resection performed at the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands, between January 1990 and February 2004 were selected for this study. The diagnosis TOS is considered if invalidating symptoms occur during positive provocative photoelectric plethysmographic testing. Only patients with a photoelectric plethysmography (PPG) indicating signs of attitudinal vascular compression coinciding with occurrence of symptoms were offered a first rib resection. PPG was performed in one of the digits (usually the thumbs) of both hands, after warming up both hands to an externally measured finger temperature of at least 30 °C. First, normal perfusion of both the digits was checked with the arms in a resting, lowered position. Subsequently, the amplitude of the PPG was monitored bilaterally during a series of attitudes of the arms, which were brought into these positions both passively and actively. The positions and maneuvers included the Adson maneuver, ‘military position,’ abduction with 10° intervals, and as a control maneuver anteflexion. A positive test was defined as the disappearance of pulsatility (<5% remaining amplitude) in the PPG recording of the digit perfusion of one (or both) finger in at least two of the positions or maneuvers. Fig. 1 shows an example of a PPG study of a patient. Antero-posterior chest X-rays after the surgery were obtained from all patients.


Figure 1
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Preoperative photoelectric plethysmographic (PPG) study of a patient during various degrees of hyperabduction. After resection of the left first rib, he reported an excellent result.

 
In order to normalize the length of the posterior rib stump, we divided the length of the stump of the first rib by the height of the 10th thoracic vertebra to rule out confounding by radiological magnifying and to compensate for the patient's total body length. The vertebral body height and the height of an individual are well correlated. The correlation is the greatest at the level of T12 (r = .73) and decreases cranially [7]. On most of our X-rays, both the 10th vertebra and the rib stump were visible. T12 was not as often visible on the same X-ray that revealed the first rib.

Pre-, peri- and postoperative hospital records and PPG studies of the patients were reviewed retrospectively.

Follow-up information was obtained by a standardized telephone questionnaire. The symptomatic relief was classified as Excellent (relief of all symptoms); Good (relief of the major symptoms with some residue of symptoms); Fair (improvement in some symptoms, but persistence of major ones); and Poor (failure, no significant improvement). The procedure was considered a success if the patient reported an excellent, good or fair result [2,6].

Only those patients were included in the study in whom the piece of rib and the height of the 10th thoracic vertebra were clearly visible.

Measurements of the rib stump were made by one single person (L.I.G.) with a ruler in millimeter. Measurements of the height of the tenth thoracic vertebra were made by the same person on the same X-ray film to rule out magnifying problems. The line of the measurements was as close to the midline as possible, not to include the projection of the posterior spinous process.

2.2 Surgical technique
The technique used to perform the first rib resection is based on the transaxillary approach described by Roos [8]. The patient is positioned in a semi-lateral position with the arm in 90° abduction, held in position by a second (sturdy) assistant. The axillary space is opened through an incision in the lower axillary hairline from the pectoralis major to the latissimus dorsi muscles. The intercostobrachial nerve is spared if possible. The axillary vein, artery, and the plexus are identified. Unlike Roos’ original description, the periosteum is resected along with the first rib in order to avoid osteal regeneration. The anterior scalenus muscle is divided after passing a clamp behind it. The medial scalenus muscle's insertion is stripped off the first rib with a periostal elevator. Division of the medial scalenus muscle is not advisable for danger of damaging the long thoracic nerve. The intercostal muscles are divided between the first and second rib, by stripping them off the first rib with a forked periostal elevator. The costoclavicular ligament is divided. The rib is cut at its anterior aspect by a pair of straight bone scissors, then the rib is cut at its posterior aspect, posterior to the plexus, by a straight angled pair of bone scissors. Unlike Roos’ original description, the rib has not systematically been divided quite at the articulation with the transverse process, when this point was difficult to reach behind the brachial plexus, thus leaving a posterior rib stump of variable length. After removal of the rib, the cut surfaces of the rib stumps were carefully checked for sharp edges. Cervical ribs or other fibrous ligaments are resected when present. The pleura is checked for its integrity, when opened a drain is placed in the pleural cavity. Only the subcutaneous tissues and the skin are closed by absorbable sutures.

2.3 Patient demographics
Included in our group were 15 males and 17 females (N = 32). One patient was lost to follow-up, three patients were excluded from this study because the rib stump could not be measured due to poor quality of the postoperative X-ray. Seven patients (18%) were operated on both sides; one patient was operated first on one side in another hospital, we did not include the result of that affected limb in our study. The right side was operated on 19 times (49%) and the left side 20 times (51%). Patients’ mean age was 43 ± 10 years (range 24–76 years). Mean follow-up time was 107 ± 40 months (range 8–153 months, almost 13 years). Mean body mass index was 24.2 ± 3.7. Mean time of onset of symptoms was 6.2 ± 7.2 years (range 0–32 years, median 3 years) prior to surgical removal of the first rib.

In our population, 8 patients (21%) had a previous trauma preceding symptoms of TOS. An old and healed clavicular fracture was diagnosed in two patients. Two patients with a previous trauma had complaints of both arms and were operated on both sides. Two patients had a previous thrombosis of the axillary vein (Paget–Schroetter syndrome), one patient had an occlusion of the ulnar artery.

Referring doctors were general practitioners, general surgeons and rehabilitation doctors. Patients visited generally a median of three other specialists before referral to our department, with a maximum of eight other specialists.

Preoperative EMG testing was negative for carpal tunnel syndrome in 23 affected upper limbs of the patient, 1 patient had a positive EMG test for carpal tunnel syndrome. For 15 affected upper limbs of the patient, EMG data are not known retrospectively. Six patients (15%) had a cervical rib visible on preoperative chest X-ray.

2.4 Statistical analysis
For statistical analysis of the data we used SPSS 11.0© (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Spearman's rho correlation test was used to evaluate the result with the relative rib stump length. One-way ANOVA testing was used for multi variance analysis. Independent sample t-test was used if necessary. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.

2.5 Complications
No patient died during follow-up. No other major complication occurred in our patient group. In 4 cases (10%), the intercostobrachial nerve was consciously sacrificed. In one patient a cervical rib was not resected, and a wound infect complicated the postoperative course of one other patient.


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
The telephone questionnaire outcome revealed an excellent result for 11 procedures (28.2%), a good result for 12 procedures (30.8%), 9 procedures (23.1%) had a fair result of the surgery, and for 7 procedures (17.9%) the outcome was poor (Table 1 ). The relative rib stump length had a normal distribution (P = .234), the mean relative length was 1.47 ± .35 (range 0.83–2.08). Spearman's rho correlation test of the total number of procedures included in this study, showed a significant correlation (r = .374, P = .02) for the operative result and the relative rib stump length (Fig. 2 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Mean relative rib stump length after transaxillary first rib resection divided by result
 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relative rib stump length with result of transaxillary first rib resection for TOS, correlation coefficient .374 (P = .02). Note the wide spread of relative rib stump length in patients with a poor result.

 
Seven patients reported a poor outcome. One patient was operated on both sides and reported a fair result on the other side. In this group the relative rib stump length has a large variability, with three cases with a relative rib stump length smaller than 1.47. In one of the cases the relative rib stump length was 0.91. This patient was treated by a pain management team for using excessive pain medication and alcohol abuse. The second patient with a relative rib stump length under the mean (1.17) has posttraumatic dystrophy on the operated side and arthritis, both diagnoses who could easily explain persistent pain in the affected limb. Patient number 3 of this selected group has a relative rib stump length of 1.20. She was also diagnosed with fibromyalgia, a chronic pain syndrome. We, therefore, must conclude that their poor outcome is influenced by other factors than their thoracic outlet syndrome and we decided to exclude their results for further analysis. The correlation coefficient after the exclusion of these three patients was .614 (P < .01) (see Fig. 3 ).


Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relative rib stump length with result of transaxillary first rib resection for TOS after exclusion of patients with other medical condition, explanatory for persistent pain symptoms, correlation coefficient .614 (P < .01).

 
The result of the operation was not significantly correlated with the total body length itself (P = .640), the length of the transverse process of the first vertebra (P = .505), the surgeon performing the operation (P = .384), a previous trauma in the patient's history (P = .305), the presence of a cervical rib (P = .383), and mean follow-up time (P = .995). The relative length of the rib stump was not significantly correlated to the surgeon performing the operation (P = .139) or the length of the patient (P = .541). Body mass index did not quite have a significant influence on the relative rib stump length (P = .068) or the result of the operation (P = .778).


    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
We demonstrated a clear role for the relative length of the posterior rib stump in the outcome after transaxillary first rib resection in TOS with proven vascular compression. The role of the length of the posterior rib stump in the recurrence of symptoms after first rib resection has so far been little addressed [1,3,9–11]. Only once before has the length of that rib stump been correlated with the outcome of the surgery. Degeorges et al. [5] found that an extended first rib resection is a predictor for negative outcome; this is in contradiction with current beliefs about the role of the posterior rib stump. As total first rib resection is a procedure with potential brachial plexus hazards, we felt the need to investigate the exact role of the length of the posterior rib stump. We calculated a relative rib stump length, dividing it by the height of the tenth thoracic vertebra, to compensate for magnifying problems and the total body length of the patient. As measurements of rib stump have not been described previously on X-rays as well as perioperatively, we could not compare our results. However, our method provides an easy and inexpensive method for objective determination of its relative length.

Our series only included patients with clinically proven vascular compression in the thoracic outlet region. The vascular structures are positioned more anterior in the thoracic outlet region than in the brachial plexus. Possibly the symptoms of the patients in our study group with a poor outcome have shifted from vascular origin to a more neurological basis. The remaining posterior rib stump is said to be an anchoring point for attachment of scar tissue. The scar tissue may compromise the posterior structures more easily than the arterial structures positioned slightly more anterior in the thoracic outlet, but in the same space bordered by the scalenus muscles. This might explain why in patients who had obvious vascular compression but insufficient relief of the surgery, the vascular compression is no longer detectable by physical examination while symptoms remain: the symptoms have changed their origin from vascular compression to compromise of the brachial plexus. As patients with exclusive neurogenic TOS are not represented by our series, we cannot assess the role of the rib stump in patients with neurogenic TOS exclusively. The difference between these different groups of patients will be interesting for further investigation. Paradoxically, while patients were selected for vascular compression being located anterior to the plexus, the correlation with the length of the posterior rib stump suggests that the anatomic basis of the residual complaints is located posterior, and thus neurological in origin. We did not perform neurologic testing after the surgery to make the shifting of symptoms from a vascular origin to a more neurologic one more clear.

For the transaxillary first rib resection the surgical technique as described by Roos [8] was used. Traction on the arm was provided by an assistant. Urschel [12] describes his technique with continuous traction on the arm by a 1–2 lb weight. Continuous traction can cause ischemic damage to the nerves. If traction is provided by an assistant, the natural fatigue of the arms of the assistant are an indicator for lessening the traction, also on the nerves. Both nerves and assistant can recuperate shortly, before traction is continued and possible ischemic damage of the nerves is thus prevented. Obviously, this technique is dependent on the stamina of the assistant.

Axelrod et al. [13] reported a correlation between depression and reported pain and the outcome of the surgery for neurogenic TOS. By analyzing our data, we have excluded three patients with a poor outcome. We did not use psychological tests for preoperative screening of our patient group. Retrospectively we must conclude that although vascular compression was present in these patients, their symptoms were not caused (only) by TOS. In hindsight, these patients should not have been offered a first rib resection.

In our institute we used digital PPG to demonstrate and register arterial vascular compression. PPG is not often used in the clinical workup for a TOS patient. Leffert and Perlmutter [14] found in 82% of their patients a positive PPG. In their study, Lai et al. [15] found PPG as a significant predictor of outcome after surgery. Colon and Westdorp [16] studied the various maneuvers in healthy subjects of different age groups. Their conclusion was that zero flow during the Adson or ‘military’ maneuver in a patient with symptoms is a significant finding for thoracic outlet syndrome, but zero flow during 120° abduction is not. We did not analyze the PPG outcome as a predictive value for the surgery, but used it as a confirmation of our physical examination. We will perform a more detailed study evaluating the results of PPG in patients with TOS in the future. Although its role is still discussed, we find PPG a useful, non-invasive test to document arterial compression in provocative maneuvers.

The length of the follow-up time is an important parameter in interpreting the success rate of the surgery for TOS. Lepäntalo et al. [17] and Sanders et al. [9] reported that longer follow-up time worsens surgical outcome. Altobelli et al. [1] recommend a follow-up time of ≥18 months. In our series of patients the mean follow-up time was 107 ± 40 months, well over the 18 months recommended. The mean follow-up time for the different result groups was 104 months for excellent, 108 months for good, 107 months for fair, and again 108 months for a poor result. There is no significant difference between the groups in follow-up time. Only one patient had a follow-up time (8 months) under the recommended 18 months; he reported a good result after the operation.

In this article we want to emphasize that our patient group was selected for arterial compression in the thoracic outlet. We only make the diagnosis ‘TOS’ if vascular compression is obvious on clinical examination and PPG. We have the impression that the diagnosis TOS is often offered to a wider patient population, especially if it concerns neurological symptoms. This is partly due to the lack of objective testing methods, but in our opinion it varies greatly with the doctor's own definition of TOS too. Some define TOS as the occurrence of paresthesias with brachial plexus nerve compression or muscle imbalance in the region of the back, neck, and shoulder [18], where others have serious reservations with the existence of this syndrome at all (or parts of it) [19]. This difference of opinion causes major problems in the interpretation of the investigated patient groups. Misdiagnosis of TOS is said to be the most common reason for poor outcome after first rib resection. Our strategy only to offer surgery to patients with proven vascular compression hopefully limits the number of misdiagnoses. In at least three patients in our group, the diagnosis was incomplete or not correct. Potentially this could be the case for a larger number of patients in our group.

We investigated the exact role of the posterior rib stump in the initial outcome after transaxillary first rib resection for TOS with proven vascular compression. The length of the posterior rib stump is correlated with the initial outcome of transaxillary first rib resection in our group of patients with TOS with vascular compression and probably not for the more diverse group with only neurological complaints. We advise to resect the first rib as close as possible to the articulation with the transverse process of the first thoracic vertebra.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Altobelli GG, Kudo T, Haas BT, Chandra FA, Moy JL, Ahn SS. Thoracic outlet syndrome: pattern of clinical success after operative decompression. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:122-128.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Sanders RJ, Pearce WH. The treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome: a comparison of different operations. J Vasc Surg 1989;10:626-634.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Mingoli A, Feldhaus RJ, Farina C, Cavallari N, Sapienza P, Marzo di L, Cavallaro A. Long-term outcome after transaxillary apprach for thoracic outlet syndrome. Surgery 1995;118:840-844.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Landry GJ, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, Edwards JM, Porter JM. Long-term functional outcome of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome in surgically and conservatively treated patients. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:312-319.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Degeorges R, Reynaud C, Becquemin J-P. Thoracic outlet syndrome surgery: long-term functional results. Ann Vasc Surg 2004;18:558-565.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Bhattacharya V, Hansrani M, Wyatt M, Lambert D, Jones N. Outcome following surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003;26:170-175.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Scoles PV, Linton AE, Latimer B, Levy ME, Digiovanni BF. Vertebral body and posterior element morphology: the normal spine in middle life. Spine 1988;13:1082-1086.[Medline]
  8. Roos DB. Transaxillary approach for first rib resection to relieve thoracic outlet syndrome. Ann Surg 1966;163:354-358.[Medline]
  9. Sanders RJ, Haug CE, Pearce WH. Recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg 1990;12:390-400.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Urschel HC, Razzuk MA. Neurovascular compression in the thoracic outlet: changing management over 50 years. Ann Surg 1998;228:609-617.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Urschel HC, Razzuk MA. The failed operation for thoracic outlet syndrome: the difficulty of diagnosis and management. Ann Thorac Surg 1986;42:523-528.[Abstract]
  12. Urschel HC. Thoracic outlet syndrome. In: Shields Thomas W, editor. General thoracic surgery. 4th ed.. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994. pp. 564-571.
  13. Axelrod DA, Proctor MC, Geisser ME, Roth RS, Greenfield LJ. Outcomes after surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:1220-1225.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Leffert RD, Perlmutter GS. Thoracic outlet syndrome: results of 282 transaxillary first rib resections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999;368:66-79.
  15. Lai DT, Walsh J, Harris JP, May J. Predicting outcomes in thoracic outlet syndrome. Med J Aust 1995;162(7):345-347.[Medline]
  16. Colon E, Westdorp R. Vascular compression in the thoracic outlet: age dependant normative values in non-invasive testing. J Cardiovasc Surg 1988;29:166-171.
  17. Lepäntalo M, Lindgren K-A, Leino E, Lindfors O, von Smitten K, Nuutinen E, Totterman S. Long term outcome after resection of the first rib for thoracic outlet syndrome. Br J Surg 1989;76:1255-1256.[Medline]
  18. Mackinnon SE, Patterson GA, Novak CB. Thoracic outlet syndrome: a current overview. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;8:176-182.[Medline]
  19. Wilbourn AJ. Thoracic outlet syndrome: a neurologist's perspective. Chest Surg Clin N Am 1999;9:821-839.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
R. J. Sanders
Vascular thoracic outlet syndrome
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 753 - 753.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
L. I. Geven, A. J. Smit, and T. Ebels
Reply to Sanders
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 753 - 754.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Tjark Ebels
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geven, L. I.
Right arrow Articles by Ebels, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geven, L. I.
Right arrow Articles by Ebels, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chest wall


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS