EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Faranak Kargar
Mathias Aazami
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kargar, F.
Right arrow Articles by Aazami, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kargar, F.
Right arrow Articles by Aazami, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology
Right arrow Coronary disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:566
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL


Letter to the Editor

Y-graft and proximal LIMA flow adaptability: the surgical wisdom of iatrogenics

Faranak Kargar, Mathias Aazami*

Shahid Rejaei Heart Hospital, Melat Park, Tehran, Iran

Received 31 March 2006; accepted 1 June 2006.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 912 29 74 380. (Email: mathias.aazami{at}laposte.net).

Key Words: Myocardial revascularisation • Left internal thoracic artery • Composite arterial grafts

Through their recent article, Lemma et al. [1] reported gratifying adaptability to the flow of proximal LIMA when using Y-graft revascularisation, corroborating previous investigation in this field [2], and on which the authors should be congratulated.

Although the authors concluded that the distal flow of LIMA is similar between Y-graft and single graft groups, exclusive Y-graft revascularisation may raise concerns over attendant physiological disturbances afflicted to the integrated perfusion of coronary systems and their interplay. Apart from successfully measuring the relative flow and demonstrating technical feasibility, the exclusive T- or Y-graft nonetheless results in a perfusion pattern similar to a left-dominant coronary system.

It is well documented that the systolic antegrade flow of LAD is composed by antegrade flow from left Valsalva sinus and systolic retrograde given way by its collaterals such as septal and diagonal arteries [3]. Although being slighted in routine practice, the functional role of the latter is crucial. When occluding LAD with balloon, the amount of systolic recruitable collateral flow in LAD increases proportional to increasing flow in contralateral artery [4]. Such a collateral flow that is dependant on myocardium contractility [5], myocardial collateral pump, gives horizon to new integrated insights in coronary physiology, consequences of which should be taken surgically in good advantage.

Therefore, LAD can be seen as having two potential inflows, double-LAD inflow, the importance of which is obvious in clinical practice, such as in the setting of occluded LAD and myocardial hypertrophy where the amount of systolic recruitable flow is increased. Similarly, the loss of contractility by septal infarction that blunt myocardial collateral pump could be an explanation to the poor outcome carried by.

As an added level of complexity, one should integrate the coronary dominance with the above quoted considerations. A left-dominant coronary system should be though seen as providing the most amount of systolic LAD perfusion through a single system inflow, left coronary ostium; a pattern that can be deemed as singly double-LAD inflow while the right dominant or co-dominant coronary systems can potentially feed LAD by two separate inflow (right and left coronary ostia), doubly double-LAD inflow. A more potentially restrictive flow offered by singly double-LAD inflow compared with doubly double-LAD inflow pattern can, therefore, support the higher clinical incidence of angina in patients presenting with aortic stenosis, normal epicardial arteries, and left-dominant coronary system.

Provided that surgical revascularisation results in resuming normal physiological coronary flow, coronary bypass grafting should be considered as an opportunity to offer patients to be provided with a doubly double-LAD inflow pattern, even in the case of patient's left-dominant coronary system, and not to transform routinely a native doubly double-LAD inflow into a potentially restrictive singly double-LAD inflow by exclusive T- or Y-grafting [2], even though the proximal LIMA flow displays some amount of adaptability.

References

  1. Lemma M, Innorta A, Pettinari M, Mangini A, Gelpi G, Piccaluga M, Danna P, Antona C. Flow dynamics and wall shear stress in the left internal thoracic artery: composite arterial graft versus single graft. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:473-478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sakaguchi G, Tadamura E, Ohnaka M, Tambara K, Nishimura K, Komeda M. Composite arterial Y graft has less coronary flow reserve than independent grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:493-496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Spann JAE, Breuls NPW, Laird JD. Forward coronary flow normally seen in systole is the result of forward and cancealed back flow. Basic Res Cardiol 1981;76:582-586.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Piek JJ, Koolen JJ, Metting van Rijn AC, Bot H, Hoedemaker G, David GK, Dunning AJ, Spaan JA, Visser CA. Spectral analysis of flow velocity in the contralateral artery during coronary angioplasty: a new method for assessing collateral flow. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:1574-1582.[Abstract]
  5. Tron C, Donohue TJ, Bach RG, Wolford T, Caracciolo EA, Aguirre FV, Khoury A, Kern MJ. Differential characterization of human coronary collateral blood flow velocity. Am Heart J 1996;132:508-515.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Lemma and C. Antona
Reply to kargar and aazami.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 30(3): 567 - 567.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Faranak Kargar
Mathias Aazami
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kargar, F.
Right arrow Articles by Aazami, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kargar, F.
Right arrow Articles by Aazami, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS