EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Samer A.M. Nashef
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nashef, S. A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nashef, S. A.M.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:582-583
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Editorial comment

EuroSCORE and the Japanese aorta

Samer A.M. Nashef*

EuroSCORE Project Group, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge CB3 8RE, UK

* Tel.: +44 1480 364299; fax: +44 1480 364744. (Email: sam.nashef{at}papworth.nhs.uk).

In this paper, [1] Nishida and colleagues have reviewed 327 patients who have undergone surgery of the thoracic aorta in their hospital and stratified them using EuroSCORE (both logistic and additive versions). They found that both models work well in this patient population but that the logistic model is superior in the higher risk group. They also found that the logistic model remains well calibrated in this Japanese thoracic aortic surgical patient group.

The study has some weaknesses. It is from a single institution and therefore, when such studies purport to assess a risk model they may end up telling us more about the institution and its performance than about the risk model itself. Some of the data collection must have been retrospective as EuroSCORE was not available at the beginning of the thoracic aortic surgical experience as reported in the study. The authors duly recognise the limitation of the relatively small number of patients. They are perhaps a little too self-critical in that respect: the paper deals with a highly selected subset of cardiac surgical procedures and 327 patients is a very respectable number of operations on the thoracic aorta. Finally, the conclusion that the logistic model works better in high-risk patients is one that is already well known and documented in general cardiac surgery, so it is not surprising to find this fact confirmed in surgery of the thoracic aorta. Indeed, thoracic aortic surgery is in itself a relatively higher risk subgroup of cardiac surgery; so logistic models in general are better suited to such a patient population than additive models [2].

The interesting findings in this study are that, even within a small patient subgroup such as this, we have a risk model which is still capable of differentiating risk strata and that the model remains well calibrated in this cohort. This is despite several recent reports of overscoring and claims that the model may soon be out of date. That EuroSCORE remains valuable for measuring the quality of surgical care in aortic surgery in Japan and that its discriminatory power has, if anything, increased with time over the last three decades are new findings which are both interesting and satisfying. Nevertheless, it has to be recognised that the data from which EuroSCORE was originally constructed are now 10 years old. The results of cardiac surgery have changed in the last decade. There is evidence from the United Kingdom [3] and elsewhere that around the year 2002, cardiac surgical outcomes have improved significantly despite a general tendency towards operating on older and sicker patients. Undoubtedly, the time has come for a re-evaluation of the risk model and the EuroSCORE project group are in the process of developing this re-evaluation. The current tendency is towards a repeat exercise in data collection which may be worldwide rather than confined to European countries. Institutions with an interest in participating in this venture are encouraged to register their interest with the project group.

Finally, the authors conclude that risk stratification has helped them improve the quality control of thoracic aortic surgery. I agree with them and would go even further: without measuring actual and predicted outcomes, there can be no quality control.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Nishida T, Masuda M, Tomita Y, Tokunaga S, Tanoue Y, Shiose A, Morita S, Tominaga R. The logistic EuroSCORE predicts the hospital mortality of the thoracic aortic surgery in consecutive 327 Japanese patients better than the additive EuroSCORE. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30(4):578-582.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Michel P, Roques F, Nashef SA. Logistic or additive EuroSCORE for high-risk patients?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23(5):684-687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bhatti F, Grayson AD, Grotte G, Fabri BM, Au J, Jones MT, Bridgewater B. The logistic EuroSCORE in cardiac surgery: how well does it predict operative risk? Heart 17 Mar 2006; Epub ahead of print..




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Samer A.M. Nashef
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nashef, S. A.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nashef, S. A.M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS