|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:695-699
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL
a Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, Paris, France
b Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, Paris, France
Received 11 June 2006; received in revised form 28 July 2006; accepted 31 July 2006.
* Corresponding author. Address: Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France. Tel.: +33 1 44 38 19 03; fax: +33 1 44 38 19 06. (Email: ppouard.laennec{at}invivo.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Cardiopulmonary bypass Normothermia Congenital heart disease Neonates Arterial switch
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hypothermic cardioplegia has the same effects on the heart. Hypothermia delays recovery of mechanical function of the myocardium (the most important determinant of oxygen consumption) and reduces basal metabolism. This reduction, however, has only a minimal impact on oxygen need. Less known is the deleterious effect of hypothermia on the myocardium. Reactivity of the microcirculation seems to be impaired after deep hypothermia and possibly also many cellular functions. In 2001, we started a different perfusion protocol where the heart and the body were no longer cooled. The protocol was rapidly extended to most of our operations, including the arterial switch operation, when there was no need for an aortic arch reconstruction. The arterial switch operation has always been specially analysed in our unit with a prospective determination and gathering of fine biochemical markers of myocardial damage. This gave us the opportunity to finely compare two populations undergoing arterial switch repair; one operated on with hypothermia and the other operated on with normothermia. During the duration of the study, the perfusion protocol was the only parameter that was modified, and this allowed us to obtain two comparable groups of patients and determine the impact of normothermia on myocardial and body damage.
| 2. Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.1 Common approach
Induction of anaesthesia was performed with sevoflurane, alfentanil and vecuronium, and maintenance of anaesthesia was done with continuous infusions associating alfentanil and midazolam (2 mcg kg1
min1). All the patients underwent the procedure with a closed circuit including a Dideco® 701 gas exchanger and a centrifugal pump (Medtronic® biomedicus). They received a high-dose aprotinin regimen, 30,000 KIU kg1 before CPB and in the priming, followed by 8000 KIU kg1
h1 of CPB. The efficacy of perfusion was assessed by continuous monitoring of the oxygen venous saturation which was kept over 70%, continuous haemoglobin level (Terumo CDI 100®) and discontinuous blood gas analysis. Temperature was measured with rectal, oesophageal and arterial line probes. CPB is performed at a flow rate around 3 l min1
m2 in the normothermic group and 2.7 l min1
m2 in the hypothermic group, using alphastat blood gas management with a PaO2 maintained below 150 mmHg. The haematocrit is targeted to be at least around 44% at the end of CPB for both groups. At the end of the procedure, low doses of milrinone (0.3 mcg kg1
min1) and epinephrine (0.1 mcg kg1
min1) were infused until the first echocardiographic assessment of myocardial contractility.
2.2 Surgical technique
Our technique has already been reported elsewhere [10,11]. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established between both vena cava and the aortic arch. After cross-clamping of the aorta, the heart was arrested with infusion of cardioplegic solution in the aortic root and then intermittently selectively in the coronary ostia. The aorta and pulmonary artery were transected. The coronary arteries were harvested with a button of aortic wall. The defect created was covered with a single patch of fresh autologous pericardium. After division of the ductus arteriosus and extensive dissection of the pulmonary arteries, the pulmonary bifurcation was translocated anterior to the ascending aorta. The native pulmonary root was anastomosed to the ascending aorta and the coronary arteries were reimplanted appropriately. The atrial septal defect (ASD) was closed using an incision in the right atrium. The heart was then deaired, warm blood cardioplegia given in the neoaortic root and the aortic cross-clamp removed. The pulmonary bifurcation was reconstructed on a perfused and beating heart. Cardiopulmonary bypass was discontinued after haemodynamic and rhythm stability was achieved. Continued ultrafiltration of blood was performed during CBP, as previously described by our group [12]. Additional modified ultrafiltration was not performed.
2.3 Hypothermic group
Immediately after initiation of CPB, core temperature was lowered to approximately 23 and 25 °C. After cross-clamping of the aorta, an initial dose of warm cardioplegia (induction cardioplegia) was followed by intermittent infusion of cold blood (at 8 °C) cardioplegia every 20 min, or sooner when myocardial activity resumed. Warm blood cardioplegia was given (hot shot cardioplegia) shortly before the removal of the aortic clamp. The patient was rewarmed during reconstruction of the pulmonary bifurcation. Ultrafiltration of blood was initiated during the rewarming phase and terminated at the end of CPB.
2.4 Normothermic group
Core temperature was maintained between 35 and 36 °C. Cardioplegia was obtained by infusion of warm hyperkaliemic blood every 10 min for 1 min, or sooner when myocardial activity resumed. Ultrafiltration was used throughout CPB.
2.5 Measurements
Perioperative data were prospectively recorded including duration of surgery, aortic clamping time, CPB assistance time, volume of cardioplegic solution, incidence of delayed sternal closure, time to extubation, length of stay in the ICU and mortality rate.
Myocardial protection was assessed clinically and biochemically. Spontaneous sinus rhythm recovery, dysrhythmias, electrical shock and potassium level at the end of aortic clamping and at the end of the procedure were recorded.
Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) was measured before bypass, 30 min after aortic unclamping, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after the procedure with the immunoenzyme assay Stratus provided by Dade® (Fig. 3).
|
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
The cTnI showed significantly lower values in the normothermic group than in the hypothermic group after 24 h (Fig. 3 ). The time course, however, showed a reduction of the difference on an accumulated scale which no longer reached significance. In spite of the infusion of larger cardioplegic volume, the potassium level did not significantly increase in the normothermic group (3.7 ± 6 mmol l1 vs 4.2 ± 0.8 mmol l1).
None of the patients experienced neurological disorders such as seizures, chore athetosis or motor deficit during the ICU stay. None of them needed peritoneal dialysis for acute renal failure.
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
First, those results and those of other children now reaching more than 2500 patients clearly show that this perfusion protocol is feasible and safe. None of the reported parameters are worse in the normothermic group compared with the hypothermic group. Normothermia, in spite of the more frequent administration of cardioplegia, neither increases the length of the procedure nor the duration of the aortic cross-clamping. Anaesthetic requirements remain unchanged and none of the routine process associated with bypass such as ultrafiltration or aprotinin protocol had to be modified. The results do not show important difference between groups. Nevertheless, the normothermic group presents a quicker recovery as shown by a shorter time of mechanical ventilation, a shorter length of stay in the ICU and a quicker return to the baseline of cTnI. These results are obtained without additional or deleterious effects, particularly with regard to potassium level and arrhythmias. Due to the large standard deviation, in the hypothermic group, the difference in ICU length of stay cannot be expressed as significant although the mean duration in the normothermic group is 3.5 ± 1.7 days versus 5.5 ± 4 days in the hypothermic group. Shorter time to extubation in the normothermic group is one of the findings of the study. Lungs are very sensitive to CPB, and hypothermia could increase the capillary leakage more than normothermia by inducing microcirculatory dysfunction and impairing endothelial responses [15]. Time on bypass is not shorter in the normothermic group probably due to the time for surgical haemostasis after bypass which remains essential in the ASO. The myocardial protection seems to be adequate with regard to spontaneous rhythm recovery, low rate of arrhythmias, lack of low cardiac output syndrome and cTnI time course. The level of inotropic drugs has not been compared in this study due to our protocol using systematically 0.5 mcg kg1 min1 of milrinone and 0.1 mcg kg1 min1 of epinephine after the completion of CPB. When paediatric cardiac surgery is performed using hypothermic CPB and when a cardiac arrest is required, the myocardial protection generally depends on a cold cardioplegic solution. It may be more or less sophisticated with cristaloids or blood, with or without additives, with warm induction and/or warm reperfusion. Neonatal hearts may be difficult to protect because of immaturity, cyanosis, hypertrophy of the right ventricle, complex coronary artery pattern and duration of ischaemia to achieve a good repair. When using a normothermic bypass, two methods are available; continuous or intermittent warm cardioplegia. Continuous warm cardioplegia has already been described for Fallot repair or mitral valve replacement in children [16]. It does not make surgery more comfortable and is at risk of producing excessive hyperkalemia. Intermittent warm blood cardioplegia (IWBC) routinely used in adult patients could be the appropriate choice in this setting. Myocardial protection seems to be dependent on age and degree of cyanosis and is difficult to assess in paediatric cardiac surgery. Despite many unsolved questions, cTnI time course seems to be the best marker of perioperative myocardial injury [17] and therefore is a good surrogate to evaluate strategies of myocardial protection. In ASO, the cTnI time course is particularly interesting because of the absence of ventriculotomy, therefore the cTnI level is a direct marker of myocardial injury. We have monitored cTnI time course in more than 300 arterial switches to identify specific time courses. In ASO for simple TGA, cTnI increases during the early postoperative period, peaks between the 12th hour and the 18th hour to less than 10 ng ml1 and declines slowly to return to baseline between the second and the third postoperative day without secondary increase. In our study, the results are very similar between cold blood diluted cardioplegia associated with warm induction and reperfusion and IWBC. Both methods seem to provide a good myocardial protection. Nevertheless, the myocardium seems to recover quicker in the normothermic group with IWBC, as shown by the lower cTnI level at 24th hour postoperatively. These results coroborate a recent experimental study reporting an increase in reactive oxygen species during hypothermia [18].
The incidence of delayed sternal closure is lower in the normothermic group although not significant (10% vs 15%, p = 0.7) but in our group, the indication to delay the sternal closure is based more on low weight (<2.5 kg) and difficult coronary patterns rather than on haemodynamic or echocardiographic data. Results after repair of congenital heart defects are improving and the mortality/morbidity rates are decreasing continuously [10]. Change in cardiopulmonary bypass technique is responsible for this improvement as well as improved surgical and anaesthetic techniques, echocardiography and postoperative care. Modifications to neonatal cardiopulmonary circuits and management have been numerous such as smaller pump, priming and canulae, ultrafiltration, assisted venous drainage, methods to modulate the systemic inflammatory response [19] and better understanding of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) pathophysiology [20]. This change in the approach of neonatal cardiac surgery allowed early corrective surgery even in premature and low birth weight infants. Despite the arising of this advanced technology, bleeding, blood components transfusion, low postoperative cardiac output, delayed sternal closure and impaired neurological outcome are still present and add to the morbidity/mortality rate. The advantages of hypothermia with or without DHCA have been well described. Hypothermia has been used mainly to increase the ischaemic tolerance by reducing the oxygen demand, to protect the brain when the surgical repair required a decrease of CPB flow to dry the operating field. With the development of DHCA and later with the low-flow technique, hypothermia remained actually the only way. In addition, hypothermia avoided spontaneous myocardial rewarming and allowed an adequate myocardial protection. Hypothermia was also designed to cope with any technical problem arising during the procedure (circuit leakage, power failure, etc.). With regard to the incidence of technical problems, this point is much less relevant [21] than before as long as the recommendations for standards of monitoring and alarms are met. After decades of hypothermic CPB, there is a growing number of evidences that show that temperature management during CPB may influence perioperative outcome. The price to pay for the benefits of hypothermia is particularly high: impaired haemostasis [1], microcirculatory dysfunction, capillary leakage, parenchymal oxygen delivery, endotoxin release, glucose metabolism [2] or myocardial contractility [3]. By reducing oxygen demand, hypothermia is effective in protecting the brain, but it impairs vasomotricity and cerebral oxygen regulation [4] alters energetic metabolism [5], increases intracranial pressure and rewarming may induce neurological injury [22]. With regard to the management of CPB, normothermia makes it more simple and preserves vasomotricity, avoiding vasoactive drugs during CPB. Excessive pulmonary venous return can be managed by reducing the pump flow down to venous oxygen saturation around 70% and does not impede surgery.
Further studies will have to provide answer on bleeding, renal function, and particularly on neuro psychological outcome. A recent study [9] found no difference in the release of brain specific proteins (NSE and S-100 beta protein) between hypothermic and normothermic CPB during repair of congenital heart disease. Another study [23] reports that cortical oxygen extraction is maintained during warm cardiopulmonary bypass at full flow and moderate haemodilution, and cerebral oxygen balance assessed by SjO2 is not impaired during normothermic CPB. In our cohort of ASO, none of the patients experienced clinical or electrical seizures nor motor deficit or choreic movements. Long-term neurological assessment has not been performed yet.
In conclusion, due to the lack of literature about warm neonatal surgery, it is difficult to compare our experience with others. We are aware of the fact that this study has some limitations regarding the methods, but in this setting it is difficult to blind the protocols. Nevertheless we can say that normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass associated with warm cardioplegia is feasible for ASO, and that most of the operative data are similar to hypothermic CPB. Among the postoperative data, extubation time is improved, myocardial protection seems to be better regarding troponin I recovery and there is a trend to reduce the length of ICU stay and consequently the cost of surgery.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Haussler and R. Pretre Surgical closure of a perimembranous ventricular septum defect with a running suture MMCTS, May 23, 2008; 2008(0523): 2410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Rastan, T. Walther, N. A. Alam, I. Daehnert, M. A. Borger, F. W. Mohr, J. Janousek, and M. Kostelka Moderate versus deep hypothermia for the arterial switch operation -- experience with 100 consecutive patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 619 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Corno Systemic venous drainage: can we help Newton? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 1044 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Cassano and L. Milella Warm surgery: our experience Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 754 - 755. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pouard Reply to Cassano and Milella Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 755 - 755. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Corno Normal temperature and flow: are the 'physiological' values so scary? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 756 - 756. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pouard Reply to Corno Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2007; 31(4): 757 - 757. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R d. Leval 'Because we can, should we ...?' Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 30(5): 693 - 694. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |