EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Man-Jong Baek
Chang-Ha Lee
Jae Hyun Kim
Wook Sung Kim
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baek, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baek, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:728-736
© 2006 Elsevier Science NL

Surgical treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation combined with rheumatic mitral valve disease: effects of the cryo-maze procedure and predictors for late recurrence

Man-Jong Baeka,*, Chan-Young Nab, Sam-Se Ohb, Chang-Ha Leeb, Jae Hyun Kimb, Hong Joo Seob, Sang-Won Parkc, Wook Sung Kimd

a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
b Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sejong Heart Institute, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
c Division of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, Sejong Heart Institute, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
d Cardiac and Vascular Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Received 19 April 2006; received in revised form 24 August 2006; accepted 25 August 2006.

* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Guro Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, 80 Guro-Dong, Guro-Gu, Seoul 152-703, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82 2 818 6073; fax: +82 2 818 6377. (Email: mdmjbaek{at}korea.ac.kr).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A
 References
 
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the modified maze procedure using cryoablation for treating chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease and to assess the risk factors for late failure of sinus rhythm restoration. Methods: Between March 2000 and June 2004, 170 consecutive patients, who underwent the modified maze procedure using cryoablation concomitant with mitral valve surgery for atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease, were divided into two groups based on the type of right-sided maze: the modified Cox-maze III (CM group, n = 93) and modified Kosakai-maze (KM group, n = 77) procedures. The postoperative and mid-term follow-up results were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the risk factors for late recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Results: There were three in-hospital deaths, including two in the CM group (2.2%) and one in the KM group (1.3%), and there were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. The cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were significantly shorter in the KM group than the CM group. At discharge, the sinus rhythm rate was 70% in the CM group and 74% in the KM group (p = 0.55). Follow-up was completed in 97% of the patients, with a mean time of 26.6 ± 15.2 months. At the latest follow-up, one death occurred in the CM group (0.6%). Sinus rhythm was documented in 141 (84%) out of all the patients, including 76 (84%) in the CM group and 65 (86%) in the KM group (p = 0.72). The 4-year actuarial survival free from stroke was 90.3 ± 5.9% for the CM group and 96.4 ± 3.5% for the KM group (p = 0.68), and 4-year event-free survival was 81.2 ± 7.4% for the CM group and 96.4 ± 3.5% for the KM group (p = 0.078). Using a multivariate analysis, a left atrial dimension >65 mm (p = 0.011) and repair for rheumatic mitral valve disease (p = 0.038) were independent risk factors for a late recurrence of AF. Conclusions: The modified maze procedures using cryoablation are safe and effective in treating chronic atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation • Arrhythmia surgery • Rheumatic • Mitral valve • Cryoablation


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A
 References
 
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia associated with mitral valve disease, and persists in the majority of patients undergoing mitral valve surgery alone, thus compromising the clinical outcome [1,2]. Eliminating AF can prevent strokes, reduce the late morbidity and mortality, and improve the hemodynamic function and quality of life [3–5]. Since the development by Cox and colleagues in 1987, the Cox-maze procedure has evolved to become the golden standard for the surgical treatment of medically refractory AF. However, it is a complex surgery which requires multiple atrial incisions and has the potential risk of postoperative morbidities [3,4]. Therefore, for over more than a decade many surgeons have modified the maze procedure using alternative ablation methods to interrupt macro-reentry circuits [6–10]. Among those methods, cryoablation is one of the main substitutes for multiple atrial incisions and its results seem to be acceptable [7–10].

The maze procedure was first performed using the cut-and-sew technique alone at our institution in July 1997, and it had been performed in a limited number of AF cases because of the complexity and complications. Meanwhile, cryoablation was introduced at our center in March 2000 and Dr Kosakai [11] reported several modifications of the maze procedure using cryoablation, showing excellent results despite its simplicity. Thereafter, our group modified the conventional Cox-maze and Kosakai-maze procedures, extending the indications of those to various cardiac conditions. Nowadays, we are performing the modified Cox-maze and Kosakai-maze procedures using cryoablation in all patients with AF associated with organic cardiac disease. However, until recently, there have been no comparative studies between the patients undergoing the modified Cox-maze and those undergoing the Kosakai-maze procedures. Moreover, many studies have suffered from conflicting results of the diverse outcomes in treating chronic AF associated with rheumatic mitral disease [6–9,12].

Accordingly, in this study we evaluated the mid-term outcomes of our maze procedures using cryoablation to treat chronic AF associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease, by comparing the surgical results of the modified Cox-maze procedure with those of the modified Kosakai-maze procedure, and assessed the risk factors for late recurrence of AF.


    2. Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A
 References
 
Between March 2000 and June 2004, 170 consecutive patients, who underwent the maze procedure using cryoablation concomitant with a mitral valve operation for chronic AF associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease, were enrolled in this study and were divided into the two groups based on the type of right-sided maze performed. The Cox-maze III (CM group, n = 93) and Kosakai-maze (KM group, n = 77) patients underwent modifications of the Cox-maze III and Kosakai-maze procedures using cryoablation, respectively. All of the patients in this series had chronic AF, which was defined as a documented duration of AF of longer than 6 months. All data were retrospectively obtained from the medical records including the operative records, clinical histories, electrocardiograms (ECG), echocardiograms, and cardiac catheterization data. The clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Preoperative patient characteristics
 
There were 62 men and 108 women, with a mean age of 51.8 years (range, 20–77 years). Ninety-six patients (57%) had a preoperative New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA) of III or IV. All patients, except for seven, had chronic AF which was defined as a reliably documented duration of longer than 1 year, with a mean duration of 7.8 ± 4.7 years (range, 0.6–24 years). The mean f-wave voltage in lead V1 was 0.16 ± 0.11 mV (range, 0–0.45 mV) and 58 patients (34%) had an f-wave voltage of below 0.1 mV. The mean left atrial diameter was 63.1 ± 9.5 mm (range, 45–95 mm) and 56 patients (33%) had a left atrial dimension >65 mm. The rheumatic mitral valve had stenosis in 50 patients (30%), regurgitation in 30 (18%), and mixed lesions in 90 (53%). Thrombi in the left atrium were observed in 30 patients (18%). Twenty-three patients (14%) had one or more previous embolic events, which were cerebrovascular with different neurologic sequelae in 21 patients (12%).

In this study, the patients undergoing a prior mitral valve replacement were excluded because of the uncertainties of the etiologies of the previous mitral valve disease, but patients undergoing a prior repair for rheumatic mitral disease were included. Seven patients (4.1%) had previous cardiac operations, including mitral valve repairs in three, aortic and mitral valve repairs in one, and an aortic valve replacement in one. Written, informed consent, specifying the uncertainties regarding the end-results of the maze procedure for AF, was obtained from all patients before the operation.

2.1 Surgical method
All procedures were performed using routine cardiopulmonary bypass with bicaval and aortic cannulation under moderate hypothermia. After complete cardiac arrest was accomplished, the maze procedure was performed using cryoablation in all patients (Fig. 1 ). The details of the operative technique of our modified maze procedure were described previously [13]. Cryoablation using a dual-probe cardiac cryosurgical system (Frigitronics, Cooper Surgical, Shelton, CN) was applied for 90 s to 2 min at –60 °C according to the thickness of the atrial wall. Our modifications included the substitution of cryoablation for the multiple atrial incisions, preservation of the right atrial appendage in all patients and of the left atrial appendage in selected patients, and reduction of the both atrial dimensions by partial resection of the atrial wall.


Figure 1
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Operative scheme of the modified maze procedure using cryoablation: (A) the modified Cox-maze and (B) modified Kosakai-maze procedures. The thick white dashed lines denote the cryoablation. The solid lines with crossbars represent the incisions and sutures. LAA, left atrial appendage; RAA, right atrial appendage; SVC, superior vena cava; IVC, inferior vena cava; SN, sinus node; MV, mitral valve; FO, foramen ovale; TV, tricuspid valve; CS, coronary sinus.

 
First, the left-sided maze procedure was performed with the same technique in both groups. A standard right-sided left atriotomy was made and extended superiorly and inferiorly. Two linear cryoprobes were applied simultaneously, beginning at the superior and inferior edge of the left atriotomy, respectively, and the lesion was extended to the left atrial appendage isolating the left pulmonary veins. The left appendage was ablated in a linear or circular fashion around the orifice and then excised. The left isthmus was cryoablated on both the endocardial and epicardial sides simultaneously.

Then a right-sided maze procedure was performed while preserving the right appendage in all patients. In the CM group, a small right lateral incision was made, and through that, we applied the cryoablation toward the anterior annulus of the tricuspid valve. A posterior longitudinal right atriotomy was made, and from that a T incision was extended toward the posterior annulus of the tricuspid valve which was later cryoablated. A septal incision was made obliquely toward the coronary sinus. In the KM group, a right-sided maze was performed within only a curvilinear atrial incision. Cryoablation was applied at the interatrial septum transversely, superior edge of the lateral incision toward the anterior annulus of the tricuspid valve, and isthmic portion between the posterior annulus of the tricuspid valve and inferior vena cava.

After the maze procedure other cardiac procedures were performed. The data related to the operative procedures are given in Table 2 . The rheumatic mitral valve was replaced in 153 patients (90%) and repaired in 17 (10%). Tricuspid and aortic valve procedures were performed in 136 (80%) and 48 (28%) patients, respectively. Other concomitant procedures included left atrial thrombectomies in 30 patients, atrial septal defect closures in 7, decalcification and endocardiectomies of the left atrial wall in 5, coronary artery bypass grafting in 2, aortic root enlargements in 2, reduction aortoplasties with wrappings in 2, an ascending aortic graft replacement in 1, ventricular septal defect closure in 1, and pulmonary valve repair in 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Data related to the operative procedures
 
2.2 Postoperative care and follow-up
After removal of the aortic cross-clamp, direct current cardioversion was routinely performed. According to the heart rate or rhythm, amiodarone was intravenously infused in a loading dose of 150 mg over 10–15 min, then at a maintenance dose of 1 mg/min for 6 h, and then 0.5 mg/min. Oral amiodarone, in a dose of 200 mg/day, was maintained for 3 months and then withdrawn when the AF recurrence was absent. During the hospital stay, an electrical cardioversion was only attempted in the patients with hemodynamic deterioration or symptoms induced by the recurrence of AF or atrial flutter. In all patients, oral anticoagulation was maintained and discontinued in the patients undergoing valve repair or replacement with bioprostheses who were in sinus rhythm within 3–6 months postoperatively, and then switched to low dose aspirin, at 100 mg/day.

After discharge, the patients were followed up with a clinical examination, chest X-ray, ECG, echocardiogram, Holter monitoring and coronary angiography, when indicated. A standard 12-lead ECG was checked during the hospitalization, 3 and 6 months after discharge when followed up, and annually thereafter. The closing date for enrolling patient data in this study was December 31, 2004. Thus, all patients, except for one who died 3 months after the discharge, had a minimum of 6 months’ of follow-up, which was achieved in 96% (89/93) of the patients in the CM group and 97% (75/77) in the KM group by outpatient clinic visits or telephone interviews. The mean duration of the follow-up was 26.6 ± 15.2 months for all patients (range, 3–57.7 months).

2.3 Statistical analysis
Continuous data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables were expressed as the number of cases and percentage. The significance of the differences between the groups was assessed by the Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables and chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The actuarial survivals and freedom from stroke and cardiac-related events were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, expressed as the mean ± standard error of the estimate and compared with the log-rank test. To assess the risk for late recurrence of AF, both univariate and multivariate analyses with the logistic regression model were used. The results were considered significant at a 95% confidence interval, p ≤ 0.05. The data were analyzed with the SPSS for Windows version 10.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A
 References
 
3.1 Intraoperative data
The intraoperative data of the patients are described in Table 2. Excluding the mitral valve surgery, concomitant cardiac procedures were performed in 94% (87/93) of the patients in the CM group and 90% (69/77) in the KM group (p = 0.35). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly longer in the CM group (205 ± 62 min) than in the KM group (172 ± 55 min) (p < 0.0001), and the mean aortic cross-clamp time was also longer in the CM group (154 ± 43 min) than in the KM group (135 ± 44 min) (p = 0.002).

3.2 Mortality and morbidity
There were three in-hospital deaths (1.8%). Two patients died in the CM group (2.2%). One patient, a 63-year-old female with an old cerebral infarction, died from repeated cerebral hemorrhages on postoperative day 18, and the other, a 53-year-old female with severe pulmonary hypertension, died 5 months postoperatively from respiratory failure and sepsis that developed after tracheal and esophageal reconstructions for tracheal stenosis with a tracheoesophageal fistula. Another patient in the KM group (1.3%), a 37-year-old female, died 16 days postoperatively from a diffuse brain injury related to a subclavian arterial injury that developed during the central catheterization.

Reexploration for bleeding was required in five patients (2.9%), including four (4.3%) in the CM group (an aorta-graft anastomosis site in one, resection site of the left atrial appendage in one, and diffuse oozing due to coagulopathy in two) and one (1.3%) in the KM group due to a left ventricular rupture after a mitral valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve. The other postoperative complications included a low cardiac output syndrome requiring a temporary assist from cardiopulmonary bypass or a high-dose infusion of inotropic agents in seven patients (4.1%), pericardial or pleural effusions requiring intervention in six (3.5%), respiratory failure requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation in five (2.9%), transient ischemic attacks in three (1.8%), wound dehiscence in three (1.8%), early cardiac reoperation related to the structural failure of a valvular prosthesis or dysfunction of a repaired valve in two (1.2%), and acute renal failure requiring dialysis and ulcer bleeding in one each (0.6%).

During the follow-up, there was only one death (0.6%) in the CM group. That patient, a 43-year-old female maintaining sinus rhythm after aortic and mitral valve replacements with mechanical valves and tricuspid annuloplasty with a prosthetic ring, died suddenly 3 months postoperatively from an unknown etiology. The 4-year actuarial survival was 98.9 ± 1.1% in the CM group and 100% in the KM group (p = 0.36).

Cardiac reoperation was required in two patients (1.2%) in the CM group. One patient undergoing aortic and mitral valve replacements required an urgent coronary artery bypass grafting 3 months postoperatively for unstable angina with a non-Q myocardial infarction. The other patient undergoing aortic and mitral valve repairs required aortic and mitral valve replacements and a redo-maze procedure 39 months postoperatively for progression of aortic and mitral valve diseases and recurrent AF. There were no differences in the incidence of the mortality and complications during the postoperative and follow-up periods between the groups.

3.3 Stroke rate
Postoperatively, strokes occurred in four patients (2.4%), including two (2.2%) in the CM group and two (2.6%) in the KM group. In the CM group, one patient, that maintained sinus rhythm after a mitral valve replacement with a mechanical valve, tricuspid valve annuloplasty and left atrial thrombectomy, had a cerebral infarction 3 days after the operation with complete recovery, and the other that had an old cerebral infarction died due to repeated cerebral hemorrhages. In the KM group, one patient with a sequelae involving a left-sided hemiparesis from multiple old cerebral infarcts had a recurrent cerebral infarction with left-sided hemipleiga, and the other also died due to a diffuse brain injury.

During the follow-up, cerebrovascular accidents occurred in three patients (3.3%) in the CM group and one (1.3%) in the KM group. One patient in the CM group, who had right hemiparesis due to an old cerebral infarction and hemorrhage, experienced a recurrent cerebral infarction with right hemiplegia 40 months postoperatively on anticoagulant therapy for a mechanical mitral valve and AF, and another two in the CM group taking an oral anticoagulant therapy for mechanical mitral valves in sinus rhythm experienced cerebral hemorrhages 8 days after their discharge and 43 months postoperatively, but recovered without any sequelae. One patient in the KM group, who maintained sinus rhythm after mitral and tricuspid valve repairs, had a cerebral infarction 18 months postoperatively and underwent thrombolytic therapy but had right hemiplegia. There were no significant differences in the stroke rate during the postoperative and follow-up periods between the groups.

The 1- and 4-year actuarial survival free from stroke rates were 98.9 ± 1.1% and 90.3 ± 5.9% in the CM group, and 100% and 96.4 ± 3.5% in the KM group, respectively (p = 0.68) (Fig. 2 ). The 1- and 4-year event-free survival rates as assessed by the freedom from late death, cardiac-related reoperation, pacemaker implantation and stroke were 96.7 ± 1.9% and 81.2 ± 7.4% in the CM group, and 100% and 96.4 ± 3.5% in the KM group, respectively (p = 0.078).


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier curve of the actuarial survival free from stroke.

 
3.4 Cardiac rhythm changes
The changes in the cardiac rhythm after the maze procedure are described in Table 3 . Immediately after the operation, sinus rhythm was restored in 98% of the CM group patients and 96% of the KM group patients (p = 0.50). Of those patients, many had recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias within the first or second week after the maze procedure. During the hospitalization, AF and flutter were documented in 24 (26%) and 6 patients (6.5%) in the CM group, respectively, and in 19 (25%) and 7 patients (9.1%) in the KM group, respectively (p = 0.87 and p = 0.52). Among those patients, 2 in the CM group and 6 in the KM group reverted from AF to sinus rhythm. Sick sinus syndrome developed in two (1.2%) out of the total patients. One patient having intermittent sinus arrest with 2:1 block in the KM group required a pacemaker before discharge but spontaneously restored stable sinus rhythm, and another in the CM group is doing well in AF at follow-up. At discharge from the hospital, sinus rhythm was maintained in 72% of the patients, including 70% of those in the CM group and 74% in the KM group (p = 0.55).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Changes in the cardiac rhythm during the postoperative and follow-up periods
 
During the follow-up, AF and flutter were documented in 16 (18%) and 8 patients (8.8%) in the CM group, and in 11 (15%) and 8 patients (11%) in the KM group, respectively (p = 0.59 and p = 0.70). Of those patients, 9 from the CM group (5 with AF and 4 with atrial flutter) and 8 from the KM group (3 with AF and 5 with atrial flutter) reverted to sinus rhythm. A permanent pacemaker was placed in two patients (1.2%) in the CM group, of which one had sick sinus syndrome and the other had complete atrioventricular block. At the latest follow-up, 141 (84%) of the patients were in normal sinus rhythm, which was maintained in 84% (76/91) of the CM group and 86% (65/76) of the KM group patients (p = 0.721).

3.5 Predictors of a late recurrence of atrial fibrillation
According to the restoration of sinus rhythm at the last follow-up, the 167 survivors were divided into the two groups: sinus rhythm was not restored in 26 patients (16%; group AF) and restored in 141 (84%; group SR). The variables assessed for the predictors of late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after the maze procedure are described in Table A.1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table A.1. Variables assessed for the predictors of a late recurrence of atrial fibrillation
 
Among the continuous variables in those patients, there were significant differences in terms of the preoperative duration of AF, f-wave voltage, and left atrial diameter between the two groups. The duration of the preoperative AF was longer in the AF group than in the SR group (10.3 ± 4.5 years vs 7.2 ± 4.7 years; p = 0.001). The f-wave voltage in lead V1 was greater in the SR group than in the AF group (0.17 ± 0.11 mV vs 0.09 ± 0.07 mV; p < 0.0001). The left atrial dimension was larger in the AF group than in the SR group (70.1 ± 10.7 mm vs 61.8 ± 8.7 mm; p < 0.0001). The above continuous variables were converted into categorical variables, then included into the multiple logistic regression model. The sinus rhythm restoration rate in patients with f-waves <0.1 mV, an AF duration ≥10 years, and left atrial diameter >65 mm was as low as 30, 30, and 26%, respectively. Also using the univariate analysis for the categorical variables, the repair for rheumatic mitral valve disease was a significant predictor for the late recurrence of AF. Finally, using the multivariate analysis, a left atrial diameter of >65 mm (p = 0.011) and repair for rheumatic mitral valve disease (p = 0.038) were independent predictors for a late recurrence of AF (Table 4 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the predictors for a late recurrence of atrial fibrillation
 
3.6 Postoperative clinical and echocardiographic findings
The NYHA functional class had improved by the last follow-up as compared with the preoperative class in all patients (1.2 ± 0.4 vs 2.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.0001). Preoperatively, 96 patients (57%) were in functional class III or IV, but 135 (81%) were in functional class I and the remaining were in class II at the last follow-up. Echocardiographic evaluations before and after the operation were performed in all patients. The postoperative left atrial dimensions were similar between the CM and KM groups (54.2 ± 7.6 mm vs 52.3 ± 7.2 mm, p = 0.11), but were significantly reduced within each group after the operation (p < 0.0001). The postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly higher in the KM group (58.7 ± 8.9%) than in the CM group (54.4 ± 10.5%) (p = 0.006), but there was no significant difference in terms of the change in the ejection fraction within each group after the operation (p = 0.15).

A mitral valve repair was performed in 17 patients (10%), including 8 (8.6%) in the CM group and 9 (11.7%) in the KM group. The predominant pathophysiology was pure regurgitation in 14 patients and mixed lesions in 3. During the follow-up, one patient, who had prior mitral and aortic repairs, underwent aortic and mitral valve replacements and tricuspid annuloplasty due to progressive valvular disease and tricuspid regurgitation. There was no residual stenosis or regurgitation in 11 patients, trivial regurgitation in 3, mild stenosis and grade I and II regurgitation in 1 each.


    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A
 References
 
In this study, we investigated the effects of the maze procedure using cryoablation in treating chronic AF associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease, by comparing the mid-term outcomes of the modified Cox-maze procedure with those of the modified Kosakai-maze procedure. For more than a decade, the maze procedure has evolved to become the most successful surgical treatment for medically refractory AF [3,4,12–16]. However, up to the present, several studies have shown diverse outcomes of the maze procedure in curing AF associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease. Several studies on the maze procedure for AF associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease, although reported early on, have revealed a lower sinus restoration rate of 46–77% [6–8]. On the contrary, recent reports have demonstrated a higher success rate of around 95% despite rheumatic AF [9,12]. In our study, the overall sinus restoration rate of 84% at about 4 years of follow-up, although not entirely satisfactory when compared to excellent results, was acceptable in comparison to those of the previous series. We have no precise answers why the sinus conversion rate after the maze procedure was different in the patients with rheumatic AF. However, there were some dissimilarities in the patient groups between those in our study and those in the other two reports showing excellent results. In the study by Jatene and colleagues [12], the patients had a shorter duration of AF and smaller left atrial dimension, and the patients with other organic heart disease, associated with valve dysfunction or past cardiac operations were excluded. Also, in the study by Lee and colleagues [9], the duration of AF and follow-up were relatively shorter and the incidence of concomitant cardiac procedures was lower compared with those in our study. The duration of AF, increased left atrial dimension, and low f-wave voltage are generally accepted as risk factors for late recurrence of AF [7,16–18], and those findings were also proven in our study. These dissimilarities of the preoperative characteristics in respect to the risk factors may explain our low sinus rate in part.

The conventional cut-and-sew maze procedure prolongs the cardiac ischemic time because of multiple and extensive incisions, and has the potential risk of postoperative complications, such as bleeding, sick sinus syndrome, and myocardial dysfunction [3,4]. However, the maze procedure using cryoablation is advantageous in reducing the postoperative complications by minimizing the incisions and shortening the operative time. These effects of cryoablation in the maze procedure were proven in a case-matched study by Nakajima and colleagues [10]. In our series, despite the higher incidence of other concomitant cardiac procedures, the mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were significantly shorter, being 190 and 145 min, respectively, compared to 242 and 170 min in our unpublished data for the conventional maze procedure using the cut-and-sew technique alone, and were also comparable to those of other studies on the conventional Cox-maze procedure [3,12,15].

Bleeding related to the maze procedure, although recently not a main problem, is still morbid, with an incidence of 6–8% for reoperations in the conventional maze procedure [3,4,7]. In our early experience, the cut-and-sew technique for pulmonary vein isolation was time-consuming and somewhat technically demanding, and bleeding especially was mostly attributed to this suture line and sometimes required cardiac arrest to control it. Since the report by Kosakai [11], we have modified the maze procedure by using cryoablation. In this series, the left-sided maze procedure could be easily performed with only a standard left atriotomy, which could be easily accessed for bleeding. Although bleeding which required reexploration developed in five patients (2.9%) in our study, it was related to the maze procedure itself in only one patient who had bleeding from the suture line of the excised left atrial appendage.

The incidence of sick sinus syndrome has been reported as being 6–23% in patients after the conventional maze procedure, requiring a pacemaker placement [3,4,14,16]. Although this higher incidence included patients who required a pacemaker for a preoperative diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome, it is still a major problem. In this study, sick sinus syndrome occurred in only two patients (1.2%) postoperatively, of which only one required a pacemaker but spontaneously regained sinus rhythm during the follow-up, and the other is doing well without a pacemaker implantation. In our series a low output syndrome occurred in seven patients (4.1%), of which six preoperatively required intensive care for severe ventricular dysfunction, and they all recovered completely. Also, our series had three in-hospital deaths, but no patients died from complications related to the prolongation of the operative time.

On the other hand, this study compared the outcomes of the modified Cox-maze procedure with those of the modified Kosakai-maze procedure using cryoablation. The patient groups were similar in both groups, but the operative times were significantly longer in the CM group than in the KM group. This was mostly attributed to the difference in the right-sided maze between both groups. However, the sinus rhythm rate at the last follow-up was the same for both the CM and KM groups and was 84 and 86%, respectively, and there were no differences in the morbidity and mortality rate during the postoperative or follow-up periods in either group. These effects have helped us to determine to continue with the modified Kosakai-maze procedure.

The impact of the maze procedure on strokes in patients with AF was proven by other reports [3,4,10,12,19]. Particularly, in a long-term follow-up study, Cox and his colleagues [3,19] reported an excellent effect of the maze procedure in reducing strokes. Jatene and colleagues [12] also reported a zero stroke rate in patients undergoing the maze procedure. In our series, the maze procedure exhibited positive effects in reducing the stroke rate. Preoperatively, 23 patients (14%) had one or more previous embolic events, which were cerebrovascular in 21 patients. At a follow-up of about 4 years, four patients (2.4%) in our study had cerebrovascular accidents, which were strokes in only two patients in which one had an old cerebral infarction and the other a new onset cerebral infarction. These results suggest that the restoration of sinus rhythm after the maze procedure could play an important role in reducing the strokes in patients with AF.

An advanced age, the duration of AF, increased cardiothoracic ratio, low f-wave voltage, and severely enlarged left atrium are well known risk factors for late recurrence of AF [7,16–18]. In this study the significant predictors of late recurrences of AF by using a univariate analysis were the duration of AF, f-wave voltage, left atrial dimension, and a repair of mitral valve disease. In particular, the patients with an f-wave <0.1 mV, AF duration ≥10 years, and left atrial diameter >65 mm had a significantly lower sinus rhythm restoration rate of 30, 30, and 26%, respectively. Finally the multivariate analysis assessed that the left atrial dimension and repair of mitral valve disease were the predictors for recurrence of AF. Considering the results from other reports [12,20], there was an interesting finding in our study in that a valvular repair for rheumatic mitral disease was an independent predictor for late recurrence of AF in both the univariate and multivariate analyses. This was related to one of the patient characteristics in which there was a larger percentage of patients with a lower f-wave voltage and longer AF duration in the repair group when compared with that of the replacement group.

The drawback of this study was that it was retrospective, with a lack of randomization in selecting the maze procedure and patients. However, there were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the patients between the CM and KM groups, except for the higher grade of mitral regurgitation and a trend toward a lower incidence of aortic valve replacements in the KM group. The restoration of the atrial transport function is an important goal of the maze procedure. However, unfortunately we did not investigate that issue in this study. Also, we had no data on what is the extent of the damaged atrial muscle around a lesion caused by cryothermia and what is the decreased atrial contractile function caused by the damaged muscle; this issue has been documented in many other studies. Lastly, although the mid-term results of our study are encouraging, further follow-up and study on the atrial transport function will be required to draw valid conclusions.

In summary, the maze procedure by using cryoablation is safe and effective in treating chronic AF in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease, with an acceptable sinus conversion rate, mortality and morbidity. For the selection of the maze procedure, both the modified Cox-maze and Kosakai-maze procedures using cryoablation had similar outcomes despite the shorter operative times in the KM group. A left atrial dimension of >65 mm and repair for rheumatic mitral valve disease were significant predictors for a late recurrence of AF. For these reasons we recommend an earlier surgical correction of rheumatic mitral valve disease before the development of AF. Also if AF or dilatation of the left atrium develops, more aggressive intervention should be considered.


    Appendix A
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A
 References
 
See Table A.1 .


    Acknowledgments
 
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our hospital.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Appendix A
 References
 

  1. Chua YL, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Morris JJ. Outcome of mitral valve repair in patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation. Should the maze procedure be combined with mitral valvuloplasty?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:408-415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1998;98:946-952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Prasad SM, Maniar HS, Camillo CJ, Schuessler RB, Boineau JP, Sundt 3rd TM, Cox JL, Damiano Jr. RJ. The Cox maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1822-1828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Raanani E, Albage A, David TE, Yau TM, Armstrong S. The efficacy of the Cox/maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery: a matched control study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:438-442.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lönnerholm S, Blomström P, Nilsson L, Oxelbark S, Jideus L, Blomström-Lundqvist C. Effects of the maze operation on health-related quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2000;101:2607-2611.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Guang Y, Zhen-jie C, Yong LW, Tong L, Ying L. Evaluation of clinical treatment of atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic mitral valve disease by radiofrequency ablation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:249-254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kosakai Y, Kawaguchi AT, Isobe F, Sasako Y, Nakano K, Eishi K, Tanaka N, Kito Y, Kawashima Y. Cox maze procedure for chronic atrial fibrillation associated with mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:1049-1055.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Fukada J, Morishita K, Komatsu K, Sato H, Shiiku C, Muraki S, Tsukamoto M, Abe T. Is atrial fibrillation resulting from rheumatic mitral valve disease a proper indication for the maze procedure?. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1566-1570.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lee JW, Park NH, Choo SJ, Jo MS, Song H, Song MG. Surgical outcome of the maze procedure for atrial fibrillation in mitral valve disease: rheumatic versus degenerative. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:57-61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Nakajima H, Kobayashi J, Bando K, Niwaya K, Tagusari O, Sasako Y, Nakatani T, Kitamura S. The effect of cryo-maze procedure on early and intermediate term outcome in mitral valve disease: case matched study. Circulation 2002;106(Suppl. 1):I46-I50.
  11. Kosakai Y. How I perform the maze procedure. In: Cox JL, editor. Operative techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery: a comparative atlas. vol. 5, no. 1. Orlando: WB Saunders Co.; 2000. pp. 23-45.
  12. Jatene MB, Marcial MB, Tarasoutchi F, Cardoso RA, Pomerantzeff P, Jatene AD. Influence of the maze procedure on the treatment of rheumatic atrial fibrillation—evaluation of rhythm control and clinical outcome in a comparative study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:117-124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Baek MJ, Oh SS, Lee CH, Na CY. Outcome of the modified maze procedure for atrial fibrillation combined with rheumatic mitral valve disease using cryoablation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2005;4:130-134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. McCarthy PM, Gillinov AM, Castle L, Chung M, Cosgrove III D. The Cox-Maze procedure: the Cleveland Clinic experience. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;12:25-29.[Medline]
  15. Millar RC, Arcidi Jr. JM, Alison PJ. The maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: should the indications be expanded?. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1580-1586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Gaynor SL, Schuessler RB, Bailey MS, Ishii Y, Boineau JP, Gleva MJ, Cox JL, Damiano Jr. RJ. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: predictors of late recurrence. J Thorac Cardiovsc Surg 2005;129:104-111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kobayashi J, Kosakai Y, Nakano K, Sasako Y, Eishi K, Yamamoto F. Improved success rate of the maze procedure in mitral valve disease by new criteria for patients’ selection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:247-252.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kamata J, Kawazoe K, Izumoto H, Kitahara H, Shiina Y, Sato Y, Nakai K, Ohkubo T, Tsuji I, Hiramori K. Predictors of sinus rhythm restoration after Cox maze procedure concomitant with other cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:394-398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Cox JL, Ad N, Palazzo T. Impact of the maze procedure on the stroke rate in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:833-840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Bando K, Kobayashi J, Kosakai Y, Hirata M, Sasako Y, Nakatani S, Yagihara T, Kitamura S. Impact of Cox maze procedure on outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation and mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:575-583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Kirchhof, J. Bax, C. Blomstrom-Lundquist, H. Calkins, A. J. Camm, R. Cappato, F. Cosio, H. Crijns, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, et al.
Early and comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation: Proceedings from the 2nd AFNET/EHRA consensus conference on atrial fibrillation entitled 'research perspectives in atrial fibrillation'
Europace, July 1, 2009; 11(7): 860 - 885.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Kirchhof, J. Bax, C. Blomstrom-Lundquist, H. Calkins, A. John Camm, R. Cappato, F. Cosio, H. Crijns, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, et al.
Early and comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation: executive summary of the proceedings from the 2nd AFNET-EHRA consensus conference 'research perspectives in AF'
Eur. Heart J., June 17, 2009; (2009) ehp235v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Fukunaga, H. Hori, T. Ueda, K. Takagi, E. Tayama, and S. Aoyagi
Effect of Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation Associated With Mitral Valve Disease
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 86(4): 1212 - 1217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
H. Grubitzsch, C. Grabow, H. Orawa, and W. Konertz
Factors predicting the time until atrial fibrillation recurrence after concomitant left atrial ablation.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 34(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Man-Jong Baek
Chang-Ha Lee
Jae Hyun Kim
Wook Sung Kim
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baek, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baek, M.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology - arrhythmias


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS