|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:566-568. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.12.010
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
Case reports |
a Centre Hospitalier du Centre du Valais, Sion, Switzerland
b Service dAnesthésie et de chirurgie, Hôpital Universitaire de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
Received 1 September 2006; received in revised form 10 December 2006; accepted 12 December 2006.
* Corresponding author. Address: Centre Valaisan de Pneumologie, CHCVs, 3963 Crans-Montana, Switzerland. Tel.: +41 27 603 81 80; fax: +41 27 603 81 81. (Email: gclark{at}smile.ch).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Thoracic surgical procedures Chest tubes/complications Silastic Haemothorax
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, a small and flexible silastic drain (Blake drain, 19F) was introduced to alleviate pleural irritation and attenuate chest pain while providing excellent drainage capacity. Safety and efficacy were only reported in retrospective uncontrolled series [14].
In contrast with standard rigid chest drains, the Blake drains are more flexible, although non-collapsible , and allow drainage of fluid and air over the whole distal third, being divided into four open channels designed to avoid clot obstruction and dynamic collapse (Fig. 1 ).
|
| 2. Case report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
On the day of surgery, a bilateral axillary minithoracotomy with wedge resection of the apical bullous lesions was performed under general anaesthesia and selective one-lung ventilation. No adhesions were found on chest exploration. Talc was dispersed within the thoracic cavities (2 g each side), and the lungs were manually re-expanded. A standard silicon chest tube (24 F; Oriplast, Neunkirchen-Saar, Germany) was inserted on the left side, whereas a new Blake drain (19-F; Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson Company, Issy-Les-Moulineaux, France) was placed on the right side; chest tubes were connected to vacuum units (10 cmH2O) on each side and intercostal anaesthetic blockade was performed on both sides.
The early postoperative course was uneventful: cardiopulmonary variables measured every 20 min were satisfactory (blood pressure [BP] of 130/70 mmHg, heart rate 70/min, pulsed oxygen saturation [SaO2] > 92%), haemoglobin levels were 13 g/dl and chest X-ray showed lungs re-expansion and correct location of the drains (Fig. 2A). No air leak was observed and minimal amounts of blood were drained from the thoracic cavity (100 ml left side, 60 ml right side) over the first 18 h. The patient slept quietly whereas tachycardia (pulse rate > 120/min) and progressive reduction in BP (90/60 mmHg) were noted by the nurses on the morning of the first postoperative day. When moved on a sitting position, the patient became confused and nauseous as BP felt at 70/40 mmHg and heart rate increased over 140 beats/min. We immediately suspected some chest haemorrhage, and haemodynamic resuscitation was initiated. The chest X-ray showed a white right lung (Fig. 2B) and the CT scan demonstrated lung compression by a massive haemothorax. We extracted 550 ml of blood after acute desobstruction of the right drain with 100 ml saline. No additional liquid was drained through the left chest tube. Meanwhile, blood tests showed a decrease in haemoglobin (Hb 66 g/l), acute renal failure (creatinine 258 mmol/l) and a severe metabolic acidosis (pH 7.18).
|
| 3. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Based on retrospective studies in cardiac surgery, chest drainage using small-sized silastic Blake drains is considered safe and efficient [14]. In this type of surgery, Blake and conventional drains showed comparable drainage capacity, similar incidence of major complications and even shorter hospital length of stay [2], although outcome and safety data have only been gathered from uncontrolled and retrospective case-controlled studies [14].
In our case report, development of hypovolemic shock without clear evidence of intra-thoracic bleeding resulted from the thrombotic occlusion of the chest tubing and this critical event delayed a life-saving re-intervention. We recently published a review of our prospective data bank in thoracic surgery [5]. Out of 1145 patients undergoing various surgical procedures (pneumonectomy, lobectomy, bilobectomy, wedge resection), our global mortality and haemothorax rates (1.9 and 0.8%, respectively) compare favourably with other large series [6]. Importantly, we had never experienced drain occlusion when using conventional chest drains.
Indeed, experience with small Blake chest drains (19F) in thoracic surgery is limited. Strong evidence is, however, lacking because of non-randomized design, poor definition of outcome, non-standardized management and the small number of patients [79]. This case suggests, at least, that the good results obtained with small Blake chest drains in cardiac surgery cannot be directly transposed in lung surgery, especially when talc pleurodesis is used. Unlike cardiac surgery patients, the risk for blood clotting within the drainage system is increased in thoracic surgical patients for many reasons: first, the general prothrombotic state after surgery is unopposed by anticoagulation and antiaggregation; second, talc pleurodesis induces a pleural state of hypercoagulability [10]; third, talc itself extracted through the chest tube increases the risk of mechanical obstruction. Therefore, we ought to use either conventional drains or at least larger-sized Blake drains in this kind of thoracic surgery. Clinicians should also keep in mind that any drain may become occluded regardless of its design, and nurse staff should regularly check that negative pressure is transmitted to the water-valve.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Fukui, N. Sakakura, R. Kobayashi, T. Katayama, S. Ito, S. Hatooka, and T. Mitsudomi Comparison of methods for placing and managing a silastic drain after pulmonary resection Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2009; 9(4): 645 - 648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sakakura, T. Fukui, S. Mori, S. Hatooka, K. Yokoi, and T. Mitsudomi Fluid drainage and air evacuation characteristics of blake and conventional drains used after pulmonary resection. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1539 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakamura, Y. Taniguchi, K. Miwa, Y. Adachi, S. Fujioka, and T. Haruki The use of Blake drains following general thoracic surgery: is it an acceptable option? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, January 1, 2009; 8(1): 58 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |