EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Dietmar Boethig
Heidi Goerler
Masamichi Ono
Axel Haverich
Thomas Breymann
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boethig, D.
Right arrow Articles by Breymann, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boethig, D.
Right arrow Articles by Breymann, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - acyanotic
Right arrow Congenital - cyanotic
Right arrow Great vessels
Right arrow Valve disease

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:133-142. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.02.025
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Evaluation of 188 consecutive homografts implanted in pulmonary position after 20 years

Dietmar Boethiga,*, Heidi Goerlerb, Mechthild Westhoff-Bleckc, Masamichi Onob, Anna Daiberb, Axel Haverichb, Thomas Breymanna

a Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
b Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
c Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

Received 23 October 2006; received in revised form 20 February 2007; accepted 23 February 2007.

* Corresponding author. Address: Hannover Medical School, Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, K 10, D-30625 Hannover, Germany. Tel.: +49 511 532 9424; fax: +49 511 532 9832. (Email: boethig.dietmar{at}mh-hannover.de).


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Appendix A
 References
 
Objective: Homografts are considered the gold standard for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Their long-term durability is limited, and alternatives became available. We evaluate their long-term hemodynamic performance to permit comparisons with alternative devices. Methods: Between 1985 and 2004, 188 homografts were implanted in pulmonary position at our institution. Mean patient age was 24.8 years (range 2 days–75 years); 56 were female and 132 male. Total follow-up time was 1073 years. Fifty-eight percent were Ross procedures (mean age 31.5 years) and 42% were different procedures (mean age 15.6 years); main diagnoses were tetralogy of Fallot (48%), truncus arteriosus (14%), transposition of the great arteries (11%). Twenty-six percent were redo implantations. We evaluated freedom from death, explantation, insufficiency, relevant gradient, degeneration, and the interval between diagnosis of degeneration and therapeutic procedure (therapeutic gap). Results were stratified by indication, age, history, homograft size, and origin. Results: Ten-year-freedom-from explantation was 82% in homografts >19 mm and 45% in smaller ones. Ten-year freedom from degeneration was 68% after Ross procedure and 25% after other operations; it was 83% in patients older than 10 years at implantation and 51% in younger ones. ‘Non-Ross-procedure’ and ‘implantation age below 10 years’ were the only independent risk factors for degeneration. The observed trend towards therapeutical gap reduction was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Homograft implantation in the pulmonary position can be performed with good long-term freedom from explantation. However, freedom from degeneration is a matter of concern. Therefore, alternative valved conduits are required especially for pediatric patients.

Key Words: Right ventricular outflow tract • Valved conduit • Homograft • Hemodynamic performance • Long-term follow-up


   1. Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Appendix A
 References
 
Homografts are considered the gold standard for the reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). Since their introduction into clinical practice in 1962 by Donald Ross [1], their widespread use and their results have been described in numerous publications. Alternatives such as valved conduits (bovine jugular veins, porcine vessels and tissue engineered devices based on various matrices) have yet to be shown at least equivalent to homografts in terms of availability, hemodynamic performance and durability. Lack of availability is hard to quantify, but reports about performance of mismatched homografts [2] show that not all desired grafts are readily available. Statements as ‘14% of the requests must be unanswered for lack of appropriate homografts’ [3] from major homograft bank reports indicate an unsolved problem. Implanted homografts often give reasons for concern because of calcification, development of high gradients and insufficiency.

In the last decades, the approach to homograft degeneration has changed remarkably regarding methods of diagnosis (color Doppler echo, MRI) and treatment policy (e.g. earlier reoperation [4], catheter based interventions [5]) and thus has created difficulties for the evaluation of valuable long-term data.

This paper presents the follow- up results of 188 consecutive homografts that were implanted in pulmonary position at our institution between October 1985 and October 2004. The evaluation focuses on homograft degeneration. We have tried to minimize the bias that is inherent due to repeated changes in the medical environment.


   2. Patients and methods
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Appendix A
 References
 
One hundred and eighty-eight consecutive recipients of a homograft in the pulmonary position at Hannover Medical School between October 1985 and October 2005 (total follow-up time of 1073 years) were included in the study. One hundred and thirty-two patients (70%) were male and 56 (30%) were female.

Ninety percent of the implants were of pulmonary origin and 10% were aortic roots. All homografts except one was cryopreserved. Pulmonary homografts have been our first choice, and aortic homografts were implanted only if no appropriately sized pulmonary graft was available. A slight homograft oversizing was preferred in young patients. However, the limited availability of small homografts and the lack of alternatives led to a broad range of acceptance for homograft size. Most homografts were used in Ross procedures (58%). The remaining 42% were implanted for other diagnoses (48.1% tetralogy of Fallot, 13.9% truncus arteriosus, 11.4% transposition of the great arteries, 8.9% pulmonary atresia, 5.1% double outlet right ventricle, and 12.6% others).

Of the homograft implantations, 56.9% were primary procedures. 24.5% followed previous palliative operations such as aortopulmonary shunts or pulmonary artery patch plasties. 13.8% were conduit exchanges and 4.8% replaced valveless conduits. Tables 1–3 give details about the patients’ demography and their operations, mean values and 95% confidence limits. In order to facilitate comparisons with other patient populations, all analyses were split according to three criteria: by age at time of operation (Table 1, Figure series A), operative procedure (Table 2, Figure series A), and size of homografts (Table 3, Figure series C). The 10-year cutoff for age stratification was chosen because most 10-year-old patients can receive a conduit of approximately adult size. In contrast, for patients under 10 years of age, outgrowth is considered a significant risk factor for development of stenosis. Results were obtained by reviewing the patients’ records and retrieving information from external physicians and hospitals involved in the postoperative treatment. The follow-up of all survivors included results of 773 echocardiographic and 74 angiographic studies. Six patients were lost to follow-up after a mean observation period of 2.5 years; among them, five moved to foreign countries. Follow-up is thus 96.8% complete. We included only transvalvular or transconduit instantaneous peak gradients; postanastomotic pulmonary artery (branch) stenoses were not included as terminal events in the evaluation since they were not related to the homograft. One patient had a plasty of the right pulmonary artery 1 year after implantation without explanting the homograft; in all other patients, reoperation meant homograft explantation for degeneration.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 Patient and outcome summary—by age group
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2 Patient and outcome summary—by kind of operation
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3 Patient and outcome summary—by homograft size group
 
For each patient, rates of freedom from following parameters were calculated: death, explantation (for any reason, details are given in the tables), first detection of a peak gradient of 50 mmHg or more, insufficiency of at least grade ‘moderate’ and degeneration (due either to gradient or insufficiency, as described). The relevant Kaplan–Meier plots were split by implantation age below or above 10 years, Ross procedure versus other operations, and by homograft size group (less than 20 mm, 20–25 mm and above 25 mm diameter). Event free rates and the numbers of patients at risk at 5-year intervals, the relevant standard errors and log-rank-test results for significant differences between groups are given in figures. P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Since the policies for explantation and percutaneous intervention had changed within the observation interval, we considered the freedom from combined degeneration as the most relevant outcome parameter. In each case, an explantation or intervention was preceded by an echo or angiographic examination. Therefore, we chose only the endpoint ‘degeneration’ to evaluate the role of procedural history and the role of homograft origin.

In the past decades, conduit exchange was riskier, and reoperations were postponed as long as clinically tolerable. Permanent right ventricular damage was more likely to be accepted then, than nowadays. The indication for angiography to confirm homograft deterioration was often seen only in advanced stages of clinical deterioration. Today, routine echos and a more aggressive approach towards procedural therapy reduce both the time until detection of homograft dysfunction as well as the interval between dysfunction and therapy. We illustrate the changing approach by displaying the interval between detection of a dysfunction and the procedural therapy, stratified by the decade of dysfunction detection.

Univariate risk factor illustrations as Kaplan–Meier plots are highly suggestive to consider the split criterion itself as a real clinically significant risk factor. However, the common association of several factors makes multivariable methods as the Cox regression analysis indispensable. The mentioned potential risk factors (other operations vs Ross procedure, previous homograft, homograft size group, patient age under 10 years, aortic vs pulmonary homograft) were included in multivariable analyses. Stenosis, insufficiency and degeneration were considered as endpoints.


   3. Results
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Appendix A
 References
 
In the univariate analysis, survival was significantly better for patients older than 10 years at time of operation (Fig. 1A); this group had a very low late mortality, while younger patients seem to have a considerable risk for late death beyond the fifth postoperative year. Patients with Ross procedures (Fig. 1B) had a low mortality in the follow-up: one patient died postoperatively (1% early mortality) and two patients within the later follow-up interval—one in a traffic accident in the 8th postoperative year and one after a cerebral stroke 3 years postoperatively. Fig. 1C shows that patients with small homografts have a significantly higher mortality than those with larger size grafts.


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Survival after homograft implantation.

 
Overall, 35 conduits were explanted: 16 (45.7%) for stenosis, 8 (22.9%) for combined degeneration, 9 (25.7%) were predominantly insufficient conduits—of which, one became insufficient after dilatation. Two had endocarditis (5.7%). See Tables 1–3 for the distribution of reasons for explant among the subgroups. All explantations were due to conduit failure; no device was explanted for technical reasons. In 30 cases (85.7%), the reason for explantation involved the valvular or tubular part of the homograft; 2 (5.7%) homografts had predominating severe stenoses at the proximal anastomosis, 1 (2.9%) at the bifurcation, 1 (2.9%) at the left pulmonary artery anastomosis and 2 (5.7%) at the anastomosis to the right pulmonary artery. The certainty of this information is limited to the quality of the pre- and intraoperative records.

Freedom from homograft explantation for patients older than 10 years at implantation was 81.8%, while 40% of the grafts in younger patients had to be explanted after the same time interval (Fig. 2A). Obviously, other factors than outgrowth contributed to the indication for explantation: beyond 10 years, the explantation rate continues to rise remarkably also in the older patient group. Patients with a Ross operation (Fig. 2B) reach 95% freedom from explantation at 10 years. The outcome thereafter is not encouraging, but determined by only few patients. Homografts smaller than 20 mm appear significantly less durable than the larger sizes (Fig. 2C).


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Freedom from explantation for any reason.

 
Gradient development affected both older and younger patients, but those with an implantation age under 10 years became stenotic significantly earlier (Fig. 3A). This was also true for patients that underwent non-Ross procedures, as shown in Fig. 3B. Persistent 94.2% freedom from stenosis after a Ross procedure is an excellent result. Patients under 10 years of age receive often (56.5%) small conduits (<20 mm). Homografts of this size group develop gradients significantly earlier than larger devices (Fig. 3C).


Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Freedom from stenosis within the homograft and its anastomoses.

 
Development of insufficiency in homograft patients is not negligible: 5 years after implantation, nearly 2/3 of the recipients under 10 years and 60% of the older ones suffer from at least a moderate degree of insufficiency (Fig. 4A). 17.7% of the Ross procedure patients (Fig. 4B) are affected by insufficiency at 5 years which increases to 29.6% after 10 years. Rates of insufficiency for non-Ross procedure patients are significantly worse. Although insufficiency occurs significantly earlier in small conduits (Fig. 4C), about 25% of the large (above 20 mm) homografts in place at 5 years are insufficient.


Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 4. Freedom from at least moderate insufficiency.

 
Combined degeneration is the most critical endpoint for homograft evaluation. Neither older patients (Fig. 5A), Ross procedure patients (Fig. 5B) nor patients with larger conduits (Fig. 5C) show rates of long-term freedom from degeneration that can be called satisfactory. For the corresponding less favorable groups the situation is significantly worse.


Figure 5
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 5. Freedom from degeneration (stenosis or insufficiency). (F) Illustration of the interval between detection of a conduit degeneration and the procedural therapy (surgical or interventional), which in the present decade lasts more than 2.5 years for half of the patients.

 
Homograft rejection has been suggested as a potential contributor to earlier degeneration in recipients of a second homograft [6], and Fig. 5D seems to confirm this hypothesis. Aortic homografts in the pulmonary position were used only as second choice in the Hannover Medical School, and the relevant evaluation (Fig. 5E) seems to confirm this policy. In Fig. 5F, we interpreted the time interval between degeneration detection by angio- or echocardiography and the procedural treatment (reoperation or catheter based intervention) as freedom from event, and the homograft explantation or intervention (10 balloon dilatations, among them 3 stent placements) as terminal event. The stratification according to the decade of degeneration detection showed a statistically insignificant tendency towards earlier intervention. We also see latency intervals that are possibly longer than desirable: In the 1990s, half of the patients with signs of degeneration were not corrected after 4.5 years, and currently, this interval is reduced to 2.5 years.

All the above time related evaluations were univariate: they considered one variable only. Obviously, more than one factor permits to divide the entire group of homograft recipients into different strata that have significant differences in outcome. The Cox regression is meant to calculate the independent impact of each of several factors on the terminal event. The algorithm can be set to run forward, by successively including more and more variables and testing their significance; or backwards, by starting with the inclusion of all potential risk factors and eliminating step by step the least important one until only independent significant factors remain in the analysis. If the results of both directions, forward and backward, coincide, the result is considered more robust than if this is not the case.

We applied the Cox regression analysis including the following potential risk factors: age at time of implantation <10 years or not, no Ross procedure versus Ross procedure, homograft diameter <20 mm or larger, previously implanted homograft versus first homograft implantation, aortic versus pulmonary homograft origin. Examined endpoints were: freedom from gradient ≥50 mmHg, freedom from insufficiency of at least grade moderate, and freedom from degeneration defined as either of the latter.

All Cox regression models (backward and forward), for all of the three end points (stenosis, insufficiency, degeneration) resulted in indicating that ‘a non-Ross procedure’ and ‘implantation age <10 years’ were both independent risk factors. P- values ranged from <0.001 to 0.028, and odds ratios from 2.25 to 3.6. Homograft origin, size and previous homograft implantation were no significant risk factors in any of the regression models.


   4. Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
 Appendix A
 References
 
Homografts are well established standard implants for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract with a valved conduit. The quantity of implanted homografts since the first report [1] can now be counted in five digits. Accordingly, the number of publications on results after homograft implantation is substantial: In February 2007, PubMed listed 175 publications in a search of the keywords ‘homograft ’ and ‘right ventricular outflow tract’. The wide range of indications for implanting homografts in the pulmonary position (from neonates with complex malformations to senescent patients with a Ross operation) makes results largely a question of patient selection [7]. The present paper gives a detailed description of various patient groups in order to facilitate comparisons with other summaries and own patient data.

Our Kaplan–Meier curves on freedom from stenosis, insufficiency and their combination are conservative estimations: the events ‘gradient of 50 mmHg and more’ or ‘moderate or more insufficiency’ was considered to have taken place at the first time the event was documented by an examination. Delay in the detection of these parameters of degeneration – either by late decision for angiography (in former times) or caused by patients who skipped examinations – is common. Although the assumption that a valve dysfunction is present before its diagnosis is justified, it is neglected in this evaluation. If all patients would have been examined at regular intervals, the event free intervals would be shorter.

There is a (minor) concern for the inter-method-variability when gradients and insufficiency classifications from two different sources (such as the echo and the cath lab) are pooled. Nonetheless, the results of these examinations – with all the systematic limitations – are both commonly used to make a decision whether to reoperate on a patient or not. So we pooled the results of both methods for the present evaluation.

The kind and magnitude of long-term sequelae after homograft implantation at our institution is not exceptional, but can be considered representative and normal for homografts. With all the mentioned limitations, our results compare well to other large series: Dittrich et al. [8] found 44% freedom from more than moderate insufficiency at 4 years in his group of 23 homograft patients. Homann et al. [6] observed 70% freedom from homograft replacement at 10 years in his cohort of 215 patients. Lange et al. [9] described 40% and 60% freedom from explantation at 15 years for his recipients of homografts smaller and larger than 15 mm, respectively. LeBlanc et al. [10] stratified the freedom from explantation by patient age and found 89% free at 4 years for patients above 2 years of age at implantation versus 52% for the younger ones. Tatebe et al. [11] found 42% freedom from homograft failure after 5 years in his observation of 141 homografts in patients under 10 years. Feier et al. [12] reports a 30% incidence of mean transconduit gradient of 20 mmHg and more at 5 years; Böhm et al. [13] found 66% freedom from explantation or transvalvular gradient of 30 mmHg or more after the same time, Settepani et al. [14] communicates that 25.5% of his patients developed homograft stenoses (no time related estimate was given) and Williams et al. [15] reports 88% freedom from reoperation at 5 years. Stark et al. [4] describe 31% ‘conduit survival’ after 15 years, while Niwaya et al. [16] indicated 76% freedom from dysfunction at 8 years in his population of 78% Ross procedure patients. A 10-year-freedom from explantation of under 20% has been described for a group of 52 homografts implanted for congenital malformations in patients with a median age of 1.5 years [7].

Authors agree broadly that homograft durability and availability are not ideal, especially in small patients [17–20].

According to Meyns et al. [21] and Bielefeld et al. [22], a previously implanted homograft does not accelerate degeneration of the second homograft. Mohammadi et al. [23] found homografts to be a risk factor for a second reoperation. In our population, univariate analysis showed significantly earlier degeneration of a second homograft, but the results of the Cox regression model suggests to attribute earlier degeneration to the high rate of younger patients with non-Ross procedures.

The recent paper of Karamlou et al. [24] does illustrate durability deficits in younger patients using a parametric estimation that shows the implant-age related probability for the first conduit related intervention within 2 years.

The optimal time for replacement of a degenerated homograft remains controversial. The degree and long-term consequences of right ventricular myocardial damage are both uncertain and have to be balanced against the risk of repeated conduit exchanges. The operative risk also for redo operations has been reduced in the passed decades, so – from the surgical point of view – the decision for a homograft replacement is taken easier and earlier today than 15 or 20 years ago. But patients themselves, their referring cardiologists and their home physicians are important links in the chain leading to the decision to exchange a degenerated homograft. Fig. 5F suggests that the reaction time to make this decision has indeed decreased. In contrast to the previously presented curves, this Kaplan–Meier plot does not start at the day of operation, but at the first detection of homograft degeneration – defined as mentioned –, and the terminal event is not the homograft failure, but the therapy – catheter based or surgical intervention. Thus, the terminal event is a positive event, so a short therpeutical gap results in a small area under the curve. Indeed, in the recent era (2000–2006) the curve descends more steeply than in the previous one (1990–1999). The delay times in the earliest decade are explained by the relatively high threshold to perform the invasive angiography in children; this diagnostic procedure was often performed shortly before the reoperation, just to have a final confirmation or a legal justification for the homograft exchange.

A retrospective single centre report has intrinsic limitations—no randomization with an alternative device, no standardized outcome parameters for comparisons. Although if clear end point criteria are given, the accuracy of examinations depended on the diagnostic equipment, the examiner's subjectivity in the description of a finding, and the nervousness of the patient during the echo examination. As mentioned, we overestimated to a certain extent the homograft durability, because conduit degeneration is determined only at the time of the first available echo or catheter examination, although degeneration might have existed months or years before.

Despite all the limitations, homograft results from this large patient group cannot be called ideal. Therefore, we have to look for other options such as bovine jugular veins [25] or valved stents. Comparisons with alternative devices remain difficult. A prospectively organized registry [24], or better, a randomized study comparing homografts and newer valved conduits will provide more evidence for finding the optimal available conduit for the pulmonary position. Currently, we think that bovine pulmonary valved conduits are an alternative to homografts.


   5. Conclusion
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
Appendix A
 References
 
In our population, we found a 10-year homograft degeneration rate of 46% in patients older than 10 years of age at implantation; in younger patients, nearly 65% had degenerated after 5 years. The interval between detection and curative therapy for degeneration became shorter in the past decade, but is still at 2.5 years for 50% of the patients. ‘Other than a Ross procedure’ as indication for homograft implantation and ‘implantation under 10 years’ were independent risk factors in our population; ‘aortic versus pulmonary homograft’, ‘previous homograft implantation’ and ‘graft size under 20 mm’ were univariate, but not independent risk factors. A randomized controlled trial is essential to see whether homografts are superior to any alternatives for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction.


   Appendix A
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Appendix A
References
 
Conference discussion

Dr G. Gerosa (Padova, Italy): How do you explain such a huge difference between the Ross and non-Ross patients in terms of long-term durability?

Dr Goerler: I think the major reason is that the age of non-Ross patients was significantly lower than that of the Ross patients. They were adult patients compared to patients with congenital heart disease. The mean age of the non-Ross patients was 14 years. That means that one reason for valve replacement was outgrowth, simply outgrowth. It had nothing to do with the quality of the valve.

Dr Gerosa: And the homografts were all cryopreserved homografts coming from the same bank or from different institutions?

Dr Goerler: I can’t say anything about the specific origin of the homografts because they came from different homograft banks.

Dr Gerosa: Nevertheless, they were cryopreserved homografts or fresh homografts?

Dr Goerler: All homografts except one were cryopreserved.

Dr B. Koul (Lund, Sweden): I don’t know if I missed something that you said. Are we talking about the pulmonary homografts or they were mixed, both pulmonary, aortic?

Dr Goerler: All patients received homographs in the pulmonary position. Eighteen of them came from the aortic position in the donors, the rest were pulmonary homographs.

Dr M. Nathanson (San Jose, CA): Is it possible that in the congenital group the initial pulmonary vascular resistance was higher than the adult group or the non-congenital group?

Dr Goerler: That is possible. But, unfortunately, I don’t have this data.


   Footnotes
 
\#9734; Presented at the joint 20th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery and the 14th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Stockholm, Sweden, September 10–13, 2006.

\#9734;\#9734; This study was supported by the Medtronic Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Appendix A
 References
 

  1. Ross DN. Homograft replacement of the aortic valve. Lancet 1962;2:487.[Medline]
  2. Sinzobahamvya N, Wetter J, Blaschszok HC, Cho M-Y, Brecher AM, Urban AE. The fate of small-diameter homografts in the pulmonary position. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:2070-2076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Goffin YA, Van Hoeck B, Jashari R, Soots G, Kalmar P. Banking of cryopreserved heart valves in Europe: assessment of a 10-year operation in the European Homograft Bank (EHB). J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:207-214.[Medline]
  4. Stark J, Bull C, Stajevic M, Jothi M, Elliott M, de Leval M. Fate of subpulmonary homograft conduits: determinants of late homograft failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:506-516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Powell AJ, Lock JE, Keane JF, Perry SB. Prolongation of RV–PA conduit life span by percutaneous stent implantation. Intermediate-term results. Circulation 1995;92(11):3282-3288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Bielefeld MR, Bishop DA, Campbell DN, Mitchell MB, Grover FL, Clarke DR. Reoperative homograft right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:482-488Homann M, Haehnel JC, Mendler N, Paek SU, Holper K, Meisner H, Lange R. Reconstruction of the RVOT with valved biological conduits: 25 years experience with allografts and xenografts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:624-630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Boethig D, Thies WR, Hecker H, Breymann T. Mid term course after pediatric right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: a comparison of homografts, porcine xenografts and Contegras. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27(1):58-66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Dittrich S, Alexi-Meskishvili VV, Yankah AC, Dahnert I, Meyer R, Hetzer R, Lange PE. Comparison of porcine xenografts and homografts for pulmonary valve replacement in children. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70(3):717-722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lange R, Weipert J, Homann M, Mendler N, Paek SU, Holper K, Meisner H. Performance of allografts and xenografts for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:S365-S367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. LeBlanc JG, Russell JL, Sett SS, Potts JE. Intermediate follow-up of right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with allograft conduits. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S174-S178.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Tatebe S, Nagakura S, Boyle Jr. EM, Duncan BW. Right ventricle to pulmonary artery reconstruction using a valved homograft. Circ J 2003;67:906-912.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Feier H, Collart F, Ghez O, Riberi A, Caus T, Kreitmann B, Metras D. Risk factors, dynamics, and cutoff values for homograft stenosis after the Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79(5):1669-1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Böhm JO, Botha CA, Horke A, Hemmer W, Roser D, Blumenstock G, Uhlemann F, Rein JG. Is the Ross operation still an acceptable option in children and adolescents?. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82(3):940-947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Settepani F, Kaya A, Morshuis WJ, Schepens MA, Heijmen RH, Dossche KM. The Ross operation: an evaluation of a single institution's experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79(2):499-504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Williams IA, Quaegebeur JM, Hsu DT, Gersony WM, Bourlon F, Mosca RS, Gersony DR, Solowiejczyk DE. Ross procedure in infants and toddlers followed into childhood. Circulation 2005;112(9):S390-S395.
  16. Niwaya K, Knott-Craig CJ, Lane MM, Chandrasekaren K, Overholt ED, Elkins RC. Cryopreserved homograft valves in the pulmonary position: risk analysis for intermediate-term failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117(1):141-146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Rodefeld, MD, Vijay P, Turrentine MW. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with an allograft conduit in non-Ross patients: risk factors for allograft dysfunction and failure. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80(2):655-663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Yankah AC, Alexi-Meskhishvili V, Weng Y, Schorn K, Lange PE, Hetzer R. Accelerated degeneration of allografts in the first two years of life. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60(2):S71-S76.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Wells WJ, Arroyo Jr. H, Bremner RM, Wood J, Starnes VA. Homograft conduit failure in infants is not due to somatic outgrowth. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124(1):88-96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Tweddell JS, Pelech AN, Frommelt PC, Mussatto KA, Wyman JD, Fedderly RT, Berger S, Frommelt MA, Lewis DA, Friedberg DZ, Thomas Jr. JP, Sachdeva R, Litwin SB. Factors affecting longevity of homograft valves used in right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction for congenital heart disease. Circulation 2000;102(3):S130-S135.
  21. Meyns B, Jashari R, Gewillig M, Mertens L, Komarek A, Lesaffre E, Budts W. Daenen: factors influencing the survival of cryopreserved homografts. The second homograft performs as well as the first. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28(2):211-216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Bielefeld MR, Bishop DA, Campbell DN, Mitchell MB, Grover FL, Clarke DR. Reoperative homograft right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(2):482-487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mohammadi S, Belli E, Martinovic I, Houyel L, Capderou A, Petit J, Planche C, Serraf A. Surgery for right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit obstruction: risk factors for further reoperation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28(2):217-222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Karamlou T, Blackstone EH, Hawkins JA, Jacobs ML, Kanter KR, Brown JW, Mavroudis C, Caldarone CA, Williams WG, McCrindle BW, Pulmonary Conduit Working Group for the members of the Congenital Heart Surgeons Society Can pulmonary conduit dysfunction and failure be reduced in infants and children less than age 2 years at initial implantation?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:829-838.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Rodefeld, MD, Vijay P, Darragh RK. Valved bovine jugular vein conduits for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in children: an attractive alternative to pulmonary homograft. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82(3):909-916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Horer, M. Vogt, U. Stierle, J. Cleuziou, Z. Prodan, C. Schreiber, and R. Lange
A comparative study of mechanical and homograft prostheses in the pulmonary position.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 88(5): 1534 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Horer, T. Hanke, U. Stierle, J. J.M. Takkenberg, A. J.J.C. Bogers, W. Hemmer, J. G. Rein, R. Hetzer, M. Hubler, D. R. Robinson, et al.
Homograft performance in children after the Ross operation.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2009; 88(2): 609 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Papadopoulos, A. Esmaeili, A. Zierer, F. Bakhtiary, F. Ozaslan, and A. Moritz
Secondary Repair of Incompetent Pulmonary Valves.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 87(6): 1879 - 1884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CirculationHome page
T. E. David
Ross Procedure at the Crossroads
Circulation, January 20, 2009; 119(2): 207 - 209.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Dietmar Boethig
Heidi Goerler
Masamichi Ono
Axel Haverich
Thomas Breymann
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boethig, D.
Right arrow Articles by Breymann, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boethig, D.
Right arrow Articles by Breymann, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - acyanotic
Right arrow Congenital - cyanotic
Right arrow Great vessels
Right arrow Valve disease

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS