|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:9-12. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.03.022
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
a Afyon Kocatepe University, School of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Afyon, Turkey
b Yedikule Training and Research Hospital for Pulmonary Diseases and Chest Surgery, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey
c Afyon Kocatepe University, School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Afyon, Turkey
d Afyon Kocatepe University, School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Afyon, Turkey
Received 5 February 2007; received in revised form 10 March 2007; accepted 13 March 2007.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +90 272 2132661; fax: +90 272 2172029. (Email: okanchest{at}yahoo.com).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Chronic post-thoracotomy pain Neuropathic pain Gabapentin Wound pain
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CPTP consists of different types of pain. Wallace and Wallace reported in their review both myofascial and neuropathic characteristics of CPTP pain [7]. Several studies in which patients were also asked about the characteristics and location of their pain have shown the dominance of neuropathic characteristics [7,8]. Patients with CPTP typically describe their pain as being burning, aching, electrical and/or shock-like in quality, and responding poorly to the use of opiates [9,10]. These characteristics are the same as those of recognized neuropathic pain syndromes, such as post-herpetic neuralgia [11]. The neurological mechanisms for the production of neuropathic pain, hyperalgesia and somatic pain are well described [12,13].
CPTP is one of the most challenging conditions confronting physicians. Different strategies have been described to reduce acute and chronic post-thoracotomy pain. These have included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, parenteral opiates, epidural and paravertebral infusions of local anesthetics, intercostal and phrenic nerve blockades, and cryotherapy [14]. However, the results were variable and no single strategy was shown to be effective in all patients.
We administered gabapentin (GP) (Neurontin, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA) an anti-convulsant, to the patients with CPTP and compared its effectiveness with naproxen sodium (NS), a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, used in conventional pain treatment. There is only one prospective study and a case report about gabapentin treatment in CPTP. But the prospective study is lacking a control group and it does not include a standardized thoracotomy approach [14,15].
| 2. Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The patients who had a history of CPTP, a VAS score
5, and a LANSS score
12 were included in the study. At the end of the treatment, VAS score <5 were accepted as amelioration of wound pain and LANSS score <12 were accepted as amelioration of neuropathic pain.
The patients were divided into two groups according to the order of their presentation to the outpatient clinic. A 2 x 500 mg/day dose of NS was administered orally to one of the groups for 60 days (n = 20). GP was administered to the other group (n = 20) for 60 days with an incremental stepwise dosage protocol. The GP dosages were as follows: 300 mg/day for the first 3 days, then 900 mg/day until the 15th day, 1800 mg/day between the 15th and 30th days and finally 2400 mg/day between the 30th and 60th days. VAS and LANSS scorings were performed before the treatment (0) and on the 15th, 30th, 45th and 60th days of the treatment. Adverse events were questioned and recorded.
The patients with chest wall invasion, empyma thoracis necessitans, tumoral intercostal neural lesions, pathological costal fracture and costal resection were excluded from the study. Also the patients with the history of analgesic addiction or abuse, epilepsy, other neurologic disorders and allergy to gabapentin or NS were excluded from the study.
All patients who were enrolled in the study gave informed signed consent. The study protocol was approved by our Institutional Research Ethics Committee.
Sample size was determined prospectively using data from a previous study (Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Post-thoracotomy Pain: Randomized Prospective Study) in our institution. Power analysis indicated that 17 patients per group were required to detect the efficacy of GP on VAS and LANSS (
= 0.05, ß
= 0.2). Assuming a potential dropout rate of 15%, we decided to recruit 20 patients per group. Statistical calculations were performed using SPSS 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
Friedman's variance analysis was used for the evaluation of scores recorded on different post-operative days. The MannWhitney U-test was used for intergroup and the Wilcoxon test for intragroup evaluations. p values less than 0.05 were considered as significant.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
3.3 Adverse events
Minor adverse events which did not mandate discontinuation of the treatment were observed in seven (35%) patients in the GP and four (20%) patients in the NS group. Adverse events in the GP group were nausea in three (15%), drowsiness in two (10%) and dizziness in two (10%) patients. The only adverse event observed in the NS group was stomachache in four (20%) patients.
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The patients included in our study had wound pain scores VAS
5 and neuropathic pain scores LANSS
12. This corresponds to moderate or severe pain as reported in previous studies [8,14].
Various thoracic incisions have been described to decrease the incidence of post-operative pain. There is little evidence that any technique is superior in reducing the development of chronic pain. Both rib spreading and rib closure is the same in all these techniques. Closure and reapproximation of the ribs may be responsible for CPTP [5,6]. We included only the patients who had undergone posterolateral or lateral thoracotomy to our study to let the study be homogenous. Seventy five percent of the patients had posterolateral thoracotomy and 25% had lateral thoracotomy. The mean VAS scores of the patients with posterolateral or lateral thoracotomy were not different (p > 0.05).
Recently, attention has focused on the potential role of anticonvulsants in post-herpetic neuralgia and other neuropathic pain syndromes [1822]. Recent evidence shows, however, that a newer anticonvulsant, gabapentin, is efficacious in the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy [21,23]. Gabapentin's mechanism of action is yet to be fully elucidated. Gabapentin does not bind to g-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors despite being a structural analogue of GABA [11]. It has been shown to bind to calcium channel subunits and to modulate high threshold calcium currents in brain neurons, implying that neuronal voltage-gated calcium channels are a possible target of gabapentin [24].
Gabapentin is recommended to be administered at doses of up to 3600 mg/day (forced titration up to this dose, which could be back titrated if the patients were unable to tolerate). In our study, GP was administered in a stepwise protocol up to 2400 mg/day, which to our belief increased patient compliance and decreased the prevalence of adverse effects. NS was found to be effective at dose of 550 mg/day in post-operative pain of moderate to severe intensity [25]. In our study, NS was administered at dose of 1000 mg/day, twice more than the dose found to be effective in post-operative pain of moderate to severe pain.
There is only one prospective clinical study about gabapentin treatment in CPTP in the literature [14]. Sihoe et al. investigated the effectiveness of gabapentin for post-operative and post-traumatic pain in thoracic surgery patients [14]. They reported that severe pain and chest wall paresthesia decreased in 73.3% and 75% of patients, respectively. We used a ten number VAS to determine the severity of chronic wound pain and LANSS to determine the severity of neuropathic pain. We compared GP with NS, a NSAID, which is used frequently as a conventional agent in the treatment of CPTP. NS decreased VAS scores below 5 only in 15% of the patients, but GP decreased VAS scores below 5 in 85% of the patients. NS was not efficacious in neuropathic pain treatment. GP was found to be efficacious in neuropathic pain treatment in CPTP decreasing the LANSS scores below 12 in 85% of patients. But there was no patient with LANSS score below 12 in the NS group.
In our study, we observed that gabapentin was safe and efficacious in the treatment of CPTP. All patients could tolerate gabapentin. Minor side effects did not cause discontinuation of the treatment, and were observed in 35% of the patients. Sihoe et al. reported the rate of minor side effects as 40% in their study [14]. In an article about gabapentin treatment in post-herpetic neuralgia with 336 patients, the incidence of dizziness, somnolence, and diarrhea were reported as 28%, 21.4% and 5.7%, respectively, and in this study 16% of the patients quit treatment because of the side effects [20,23].
Previous trials involving gabapentin for post-herpetic neuralgia typically restricted treatment to 7 or 8 weeks course [20,23]. Sihoe et al. administered gabapentin after thoracotomy and thorax trauma for a mean duration of 21.9 weeks [14]. We administered gabapentin for 60 days. We performed VAS and LANSS scorings to evaluate different components of CPTP, VAS for wound pain and LANSS for neuropathic pain, and included a control group which made this study different from the previous study of Sihoe et al. But the major limitation of our study is that it does not report long-term follow-up results.
Intercostal nerve dysfunction is the most important reason of severe wound pain and neuropathic pain in CPTP [5,6]. This explains the low effectivity of NSAID in the treatment of CPTP as they are not effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain. In our study, although NS could provide amelioration of wound pain in a few patients according to VAS, it could not decrease LANSS scores below 12 in any patient. Gabapentin reduced both neuropathic pain and wound pain.
To our knowledge, this is the first prospective clinical study comparing the efficacy of gabapentin with naproxen sodium in a homogenous patient group with CPTP, scoring the severity of wound pain according to VAS and neuropathic pain according to LANSS.
Gabapentin seems to be safe and well tolerated in the treatment of CPTP with minor side effects. Gabapentin is effective in the treatment of chronic post-thoracotomy wound pain and neuropathic pain. However, these results must be supported with multidisciplinary studies with larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-ups.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
n S, Dilege S, Pembeci K. The effects of three different analgesia techniques on long-term postthoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg 2002;94(1):11-15.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |