HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gilbert, S. H. Articles by Holden, A. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gilbert, S. H. Articles by Holden, A. V. Related Collections Cardiac - physiology Cardiac - other Electrophysiology - arrhythmias

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:231-249. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.03.032
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Review

Regional localisation of left ventricular sheet structure: integration with current models of cardiac fibre, sheet and band structure

Computational Biology Laboratory, Institute of Membrane and Systems Biology & Cardiovascular Research Institute, Worsley Building, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Received 22 January 2007; received in revised form 12 March 2007; accepted 13 March 2007.

^_* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 113 343 4251. (Email: stephen{at}cbiol.leeds.ac.uk).

	Abstract

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

 
The architecture of the heart remains controversial despite extensive effort and recent advances in imaging techniques. Several opposing and non-mutually compatible models have been proposed to explain cardiac structure, and these models, although limited, have advanced the study and understanding of heart structure, function and development. We describe key areas of similarity and difference, highlight areas of contention and point to the important limitations of these models. Recent research in animal models on the nature, geometry and interaction of cardiac sheet structure allows unification of some seemingly conflicting features of the structural models. Intriguingly, evidence points to significant inter-individual structural variability (within constrained limits) in the canine, leading to the concept of a continuum (or distribution) of cardiac structures. This variability in heart structure partly explains the ongoing debate on myocardial architecture. These developments are used to construct an integrated description of cardiac structure unifying features of fibre, sheet and band architecture that provides a basis for (i) explaining cardiac electromechanics, (ii) computational simulations of cardiac physiology and (iii) designing interventions.

Key Words: Ventricle • Sheet structure • Laminar myocardium • Continuum • Syncytial mesh • Helical ventricular myocardial band

	1. Introduction

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

 
A heated debate is ongoing in the Journal and the wider literature on the morphology of the ventricular myocardium. The current controversy stems from longstanding disagreements – a complete and consistent anatomical description of cardiac structure has proved to be difficult. The heart is a contradiction between the symmetry of helically coursing fibres and regularly stacked laminae with the asymmetry of anisotropic fibre branching and merging of laminae. This complexity has led to the proposition of several incompatible structural models.

One current controversy concerns Torrent-Guasp's concept of the helical ventricular myocardial band (HVMB) – a structural and functional hypothesis that the ventricles are a single band of muscle, coiled into two helices with insertions on the pulmonary trunk and aorta. This model has gained some favour in the medical community, particularly among cardiac surgeons. Indeed, the HVMB has influenced surgical procedures, surgical research and the understanding of the dynamics of heart contraction. However, the HVMB concept has received vigorous criticism of the objectivity and repeatability of the dissection method, its philosophical basis and the failure by its proponents to find or adequately look for independent corroborating evidence. At least eight reviews, one original paper and five letters supporting the HVMB, and six reviews, two original papers and seven letters opposing the HVMB have been published since January 2003. Until recently the argument has been polarised, but Criscione et al. [1] have widened the discussion to a more complex and subtle view of cardiac structure: that there may be regional specialisations of the myolaminar architecture within a continuum meshwork, and that the HVMB may or may not represent a simplification of these regions.

A second area of controversy is on the nature, orientation and degree of anisotropy of the laminar structure of the heart. A non-partisan consideration of both these controversies is presented here. New imaging evidence integrates some features from the opposing models. Based on published evidence, along with our revisualisation of data from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DT-MRI), a unifying concept of cardiac structure is proposed which is based on the groundbreaking work of Grant [2].

Excellent historical reviews of heart structural research have been compiled [3,4] and are not recapitulated here.

	2. Fundamentals of cardiac structure

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

 
Along with controversy on macroscopic heart structure there is some disagreement and confusion on microstructural histology and the terminology used to describe this. This is chiefly a result of attempts to fit a simple classification scheme derived from skeletal muscle morphology to the more complicated structure of the heart. We first review and define the terminology.

2.1 Myocytes
Ventricular muscle cells (myocytes) are long, thin cells; their precise dimensions are variable depending on species, age and cardiac location, but are within the approximate range of 50–150 µm in length and 10–20 µm in diameter [3,5–8]. They are joined to their neighbours via intercalated discs at their ends. Terminal abutments are usually with more than one cell [3,9]. Being long extended cells, myocytes possess a principal direction given by the long axis of the cell, and the ellipsoidal myocardial nuclei are aligned to this axis [10–13].

2.2 Myofibres and myolaminae
In skeletal muscle morphology, myofibre has an absolute definition. In cardiac morphology it has different meanings to different researchers. Streeter [3] uses the term as a synonym for the myocytes. Other groups [4] use the term to indicate groups of three or more myocytes surrounded by a perimysial weave. The term myolaminae has been introduced [9] to describe sheet-like cleavage planes of attached myocytes (Fig. 1d–g). Some controversy exists regarding the form of laminae within the living heart. Some researchers [4,8,14], although recognising the existence of laminae, have played down their significance, emphasising instead the mesh-like nature of cardiac structure. The evidence presented in this review points to myolaminae and the groups of myocytes surrounded by a perimysial weave being a continuum of structure; therefore, we use myofibre to refer to individual myocytes and myolaminae to refer to these groups of myocytes. The term fibre is used by some groups to denote a continuous axial sequence of individual myocytes [15]. We use this term to denote the net axial direction of myocytes at a specific cardiac location, always with consideration of the important caveats in defining such a continuous axial sequence (as discussed in Sections 4 and 6). Likewise, the term sheet is related to the myolaminae but has a looser definition – describing the planar features of the myocardial wall, both the myolaminae and the cleavage planes between myolaminae [16].

View larger version (89K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Microscopic cellular and intercellular (a–f) and macroscopic (g) tissue structure of the LV wall. (a) Lower magnification and (b) higher magnification optical images of a rat LV midwall stained with picrosirius red. Endomysial collagen surrounding individual myocytes is evident. M, myocytes; C, collagen cords; V, vascular structures; P, cleavage planes. (c) Honeycomb connective tissue skeleton revealed by scanning electron microscopy of human heart. The perimysium (P) envelops groups of myocytes. The endomysium, as final arborisation of the perimysium, supports and connects individual cells. The endomysial weave (W) envelops each individual myocyte and is connected to adjacent myocytes by lateral struts (S) presenting branches of variable size and extension. The range of length and diameter of these struts is very wide. Collagen struts also connect myocytes to interstitial microvessels (arrow 1) or perimysium (arrow 2). (d–f) Scanning electron micrographs showing three orthogonal surfaces of a typical left ventricular midanterior midwall specimen: (d) oblique view of tangential (TN), axial transmural (AT) and transverse (TR) faces of specimen; (e) view of TN and TR surfaces; (f) TR surface. Perimysial connective tissue weave surrounding myocardial sheets is evident and covers surface capillaries (C). (g) Micrograph of longitudinal–transmural section of left ventricle showing the radial alignment of myolaminae [(a and b) from Young et al. [20] with kind permission from Blackwell Publishing; (c) from Rossi et al. [93] used with permission; (d–g) from LeGrice et al. [56] used with permission].

2.4 Endomysium
Each myocyte is wrapped in a prominent sheath of endomysium which supports the Z-bands and basal laminae [17]. The endomysium is seen in picrosirius red-stained confocal images (Fig. 1b), high-power scanning electron micrographs (not shown) and sodium hydroxide digestions (Fig. 1c).

2.5 Perimysium
The perimysium unites the myolaminae as units, from within, via collagen struts linking adjacent myocytes (120–150 nm) (Fig. 1b), and exteriorly as a weave of connective tissue (Fig. 1c and f). Long perimysial collagenous tendons link connective tissue of adjacent myolaminae (Fig. 1a, b, e and f).

2.6 Epimysium
This term is of little value in cardiac morphology. In skeletal muscle it represents the outer smooth collagen layer of the muscle belly which makes no fibrous connections from its external surface – the cardiac equivalent is only present at endocardial and epicardial surfaces.

	3. Models of heart structure

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

 
Seven conceptual models of cardiac structure are summarised in Fig. 2 . The variety of proposed structures is visually striking – this is due, in a large part, to the different levels of cardiac structure described (discussed in detail in Section 4). Model 6 (Fig. 2, part 6) groups the myocardium into regional functional units analogous to skeletal muscles. Models 1–5 (Fig. 2, parts 1–5) are continuum concepts – stressing to differing degrees the anisotropic interconnectivity inherent in cardiac structure. Models 1 and 2 (Fig. 2, parts 1 and 2) describe fibre orientation. Model 3 (Fig. 2, part 3) describes changes through layers from epicardium to endocardium. Models 4 and 5 (Fig. 2, parts 4 and 5) examine the myolaminar structure, with less emphasis on fibre orientation. Some descriptions of Model 7 (Fig. 2, part 7), the HVMB, have emphasised discrete structural bundles [18] while other reports have proposed the band within a continuum framework [8].

View larger version (45K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Models of mammalian ventricular architecture. (1) LV as nested doughnut (toroidal) geodesics (synthesised by Streeter [3] from work of Krehl [49], Hort [54] and reconstructed by Jouk et al. [23] (see Model 2)): assumes myocardium is a specialised form of vascular musculature, with myocardial fibres as a network of preferentially orientated and branched myocardial cells forming end-to-end cellular junctions. The fibres follow paths of shortest length (geodesics) nested on doughnut-shaped surfaces (toroidal bodies of revolution). (2) LV and RV as nested pretzel geodesics (Jouk et al. [23]): extension of Model 1 to describe both left and right ventricles, based on data from quantitative optical polarisation microscopy of the foetal human heart. Fibres follow geodesic trajectories on nested warped pretzels, where a pretzel is two side-to-side joined doughnuts. (3) Three-layered ventricle (proposed by Rushmer et al. [48] and developed by Anderson et al. [4] and others): the ventricles are composed of superficial, middle and deep layers. The fibres follow a continuum or functional syncytial mesh (FSM) with multiple branching and cannot be split down further into functional units. There is a net helical fibre orientation across and within the ventricular walls [4]. Some debate has occurred between proponents of this view regarding the degree of fibre penetration between layers. (4) Simple laminar structure (proposed by LeGrice et al. [56]): the myocardial wall consists of an ordered laminar structure, separated by extensive cleavage planes that run approximately radially from endocardium to epicardium. In tangential sections the plane of the laminae coincides with local fibre orientation. Layers are about 4 ± 2 myocytes across and 48.4 ± 20.4 µm thick (in the dog). Components of the connective tissue matrix connect adjacent laminae. (5) Complex laminar structure: strain modelling, histological and DT-MRI studies [9,11,13,44,45,58] have revealed evidence of two approximately normal myolaminae populations. More complex features of cardiac structure have been described to account for this evidence, but have not been formalised or organised into complete conceptual structural models. However, one early model has been proposed by Harrington et al. [11] and is shown here. (6) Distinct muscle bundles (DMB): Robb and Robb [61], following from Mall [94], consider cardiac structure analogous to skeletal muscle – fibres gathered in distinct bundles to form muscle bellies. Four muscle bodies proposed, anchoring to the fibrous trigones and aortic and pulmonary roots. (7) Helical ventricular myocardial band (HVMB) (Torrent-Guasp et al. [8,18,62,95]): both RV and LV exist as a single muscle band: the HVMB, organised spatially as a helix and consisting of basal and apical loops. This band is a helical rope-like structure that is unrolled easily from the heart by blunt dissection along natural cleavage planes – that follow the principal fibre direction at any point. A connective tissue sheath enclosing the band segments was not proposed [diagrams for Models 1, 2, 3 and 6, adapted from Jouk et al. [23] with kind permission from Springer Science and Business Media, Model 4 from LeGrice et al. [56] used with permission and Model 5 from Harrington et al. [11] used with permission. Model 7 from Kocica et al. [8] used with permission].

	4. Philosophical approach for description of a complex structure

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

(1) as evidenced from numerous dissections, a given fibre segment has branching connections with other fibre segments in several different directions – as such the myocardial structure is a syncytium-like arrangement [19],

(2) the cardiac structure problem is therefore a three-dimensional network problem,

(3) structure understood from study of the network depends on the level on which the structure is approached; whether an attempt is made to describe the predominant behaviour in the entire ventricle(s) or at the other extreme, to describe the average branching from a specific location,

(4) many models of heart structure can therefore be proposed depending on the conceptual approach,

(5) statistical study of the branching must be added to geometry for an accurate picture of myocardial architecture,

(6) in consideration of such statistical problems one approach is to construct models for different degrees of generalisation of the problem,

(7) no single model gives the whole story but together they provide a schema,

(8) the existence of a syncytium-like arrangement does not in itself dictate that no separate ‘bundles’ are present; however, due to the complex structure it is possible to construct by dissection bizarre arrangements which have no underlying anatomical reality,

(9) any dissection of the myocardium may represent (a) a valid schema from an infinite set of valid schema, (b) a bizarre and meaningless pathway or (c) a grouping of fibre paths within the syncytium of such general shared fibre direction that it can be considered a physiological or anatomical bundle,

(10) a unique anatomical bundle is not the same as a unique physiological bundle – a connection between separate anatomical structures may produce one physiological structure,

(11) a statistical approach is required to demonstrate any independent anatomical entity.

When viewed from this perspective it is not surprising that many models exist, that these are not all mutually compatible and that argument continues. Further evidence for these principles is presented in a dissection study by Fox and Hutchins [19], where principle (1) is re-stated and emphasised: ‘The only level of the network of cells that can be referred to accurately as a fibre is a single cell. The ‘fibre’ is often only one cell in length before it splits and branches’.

When considering the structural debate it is logical to return to Grant's principles – an approach adopted in this review. It should be noted that although Grant suspected regional variations in fibre branching within the left ventricle, he was sceptical whether these local prevalences would statistically warrant consideration as separate bundles. One feature of the myocardial structure problem Grant did not consider was that significant structural differences may exist between individuals of the same species – a question discussed at length later in this review.

	5. Traditional and novel techniques

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

 
Traditional anatomical techniques have several limitations which have made it difficult to apply Grant's principles: (i) dissections and histological studies are subjective; (ii) the techniques are better suited to qualitative rather than quantitative descriptions, so the application of statistical analysis is difficult; (iii) the techniques are destructive and (iv) the reconstruction of three-dimensional fibre and sheet orientation from two-dimensional sections has been difficult [3].

Recent technical developments have greatly contributed to the available data on cardiac structure. Automated confocal microscopy methods have allowed extended imaging of three-dimensional tissue at high resolution, clearly demonstrating laminar structure [20,21]. Optical methods, including polarisation microscopy, have allowed demonstration of fibre orientation in the whole heart [22,23].

Whole heart fibre and laminar structure have been revealed by DT-MRI, a three-dimensional technique which uses MRI to provide the axes of diffusion of protons of water molecules in tissue. Detail of tissue architecture is imaged by its restriction of the random movement of the protons. The pattern of diffusion is represented mathematically by a symmetric second-rank tensor in three-dimensional space, which can be written as a 3 x 3 matrix. The three orthogonal eigenvectors of this tensor (ranked in order of their magnitudes of their corresponding eigenvalues) have been related to cardiac structure, with the eigenvalues representing the diffusion along three principal axes. Theory suggests that the direction of greatest proton diffusion (i.e. the eigenvector with the largest eigenvalue, the primary eigenvector) will be along the fibre long axis, intermediate diffusion (the secondary eigenvector) will lie in the myolaminae plane, orthogonal to the fibre long axis. The third and minor direction of diffusion (the tertiary eigenvector) is by definition orthogonal to the primary and secondary eigenvectors, so is normal to the myolaminar plane. The correspondence between the primary eigenvector and fibre orientation, and the secondary and tertiary eigenvectors and sheet orientation has been validated by combined DT-MRI and three-dimensional histological reconstruction of fibre and sheet structure [9,13,24–27].

An advantage of whole heart DT-MRI and optical methods is that they can provide digital datasets that can be analysed and compared algorithmically at high speed. They are, therefore, inherently suitable for statistical analysis. The bias, resolution and selectivity for the architectural characteristic measured apply equally across the entire heart. Examination of data from these techniques is therefore highly suited to identification of grouped fibre paths, which satisfy Grant's criteria for uniqueness; the validity of structural models is discussed in this light.

	6. Doughnut and pretzel models – Models 1 and 2 (Fig. 2, parts 1 and 2)

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

 
The fibre path models are based on the synthesis of many measurements of angles of fibre orientation through the ventricular wall and differ primarily in their scope (Model 1 is left ventricle (LV) only; Model 2 is LV and right ventricle (RV)). No argument is made for discrete traceable fibre paths – rather a recognisable general fibre trajectory [3]. These models reconstruct the long accepted helical pattern of fibre orientation, which has recently been confirmed by DT-MRI [30,35–40] (Fig. 3 ). DT-MRI fibre-tracing algorithms (Zhukov and Barr [28] and Kondratieva et al. [29], applied to canine data; Schmid et al. [30], applied to porcine data; Rohmer et al. [31], applied to human data) and automatic computational constructive visualisation methods (Chen et al. [32,33] and Fig. 15(B) in [8]), used to extract meaningful visual information from histologically recorded three-dimensional fibre orientation datasets [33,34] (recorded from the rabbit heart), produce models remarkably similar to that proposed by Streeter (Fig. 2, part 1).

View larger version (35K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. (a) Smooth changes in DT-MRI derived fibre helix angles in canine heart, short axis basal (top), equatorial (middle) and apical (bottom) slices from three hearts A, B and C. The fibre helix angle is the angle between the transverse plane and the projection of the primary eigenvector onto the tangential plane. The shading shows the absolute value of the angle using a grey scale, such that white indicates fibres lying in the transverse plane and black indicates fibres normal to this plane. (b) Combined transmural fibre helix angle from 15° sectors in the interpapillary muscle region of the equatorial slice of three canine hearts. Data are aligned at the midwall where normalised position = 0.

These models form a conceptual model of cardiac structure from the one macro- and microscopically observed characteristic of principal fibre direction. As such, the nested doughnuts/pretzel surfaces are abstract concepts – no discrete biological equivalents exist. It is possible to create the surfaces by dissection following the observed principal fibre direction, as demonstrated in early studies by Torrent-Guasp [3,42], but in so doing much information is lost. The dissection and histological methods used do not record data of local branching in directions other than the predominant fibre orientation, so by definition no detail of local tissue organisation is modelled. Locally branching fibres are smoothed to a single orientation, which is again smoothed to a global ventricular fibre orientation. With reference to Grant's principles, these models represent the highest order schema of whole heart fibre orientation in isolation.

It might be assumed that the fibre maps produced by algorithmic analysis and computer visualisation may be more than a conceptual model, but the considerations above apply equally. The DT-MRI fibre-tracing algorithms track the principle fibre orientation from the primary eigenvector only. The automatic computational constructive methods were applied to histological fibre orientation datasets which only record principle fibre orientation. Being limited to tracking the principle fibre orientation alone, these methods cannot reconstruct any detail of myolaminar structure, and as such reproduce idealised fibre-tracing dissections.

Much evidence points to myolaminae as the central feature of the wall motion mechanism [16,43–46]. As such the doughnut and pretzel models represent geometric abstractions of cardiac structure. Their primary uses may be in (i) refining more histologically detailed models for the constraint of fibre orientation and (ii) in modelling the spread of the cardiac action potential, the conduction of which is significantly influenced by principal fibre direction [47].

	7. Three-layered myocardium – functional syncytial mesh – Model 3 (Fig. 2, part 3)

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

 
This model is similar to the fibre path models (Models 1 and 2). It divides the myocardium into three layers on the basis of fibre orientation. It was put forward by Rushmer et al. [48] as a mechanistic model of cardiac contraction, in which (as first proposed by Krehl [49]) the middle circular layer acted as a constrictor. Further studies endorsed and extended this description [15,50–52]. Paradoxically, these later studies endorse this model whilst also accepting that the separation of layers is artificial as the orientation of fibres changes gradually, and there are fibres which span layers: ‘As a result we can differentiate three layers of fibres: superficial (subepicardial), middle and deep (subendocardial). However, it is very important to emphasize that the separation of these three layers is artificial since the change of the direction of the fibres is gradual without cleavage planes of connective tissue. Moreover, a number of fibres change layers in their trajectory around the ventricles’ [15].

As with the previous models, the features described in the three-layer model are largely correct – this is not surprising given the many anatomical dissections upon which the model is based. However, as described, the model is vague or contradictory in its description of the boundary zones between layers, where evidence points to a smooth transition of principal fibre direction through the myocardium. Laminar structure is omitted in early descriptions of the model and, although now accepted by some proponents [4], its higher-level symmetry and regional patterning remain unappreciated.

	8. Simple myolaminae model – Model 4 (Fig. 2, part 4)

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

 
Sheet structure was first described in detail by Feneis (cited by Hort in [54]) and then Hort [53–55]. Hort described macroscopic sheet structure visible in dissections as feathering or pinnation, and understood these areas to be regions of reduced fibre and connective tissue interconnectivity between sheets of myocardial cells. Grant [2] described parallel fibres, which ‘by their branching form planes that seem to rotate’. Spotnitz et al. [46] not only described open spaces between planes in rat heart histology but also proposed that sliding between these planes accounted for the change in myocardial volume associated with contraction. Greenbaum et al. [50] referred to the grossly visible structures as layers and described them as regions of little change in fibre orientation in contrast to regions of rapid change, but disputed different connective tissue morphology between and within layers.

LeGrice et al. conducted the first quantitative analysis of sheet structure and formalised this into a conceptual [34,56] and mathematical [57] laminar model of cardiac structure in which the canine myocardial wall is organised with an ordered laminar structure, separated by extensive cleavage planes and running radially from endocardium to epicardium, integrating whole heart fibre orientation. Examination of the long-axis cut surface of the LV allows myolaminae to be identified without magnification (Fig. 1g). Viewing this image from a distance allows the identification of radial myocardial sheets, but the eye oversimplifies the structure – close-up inspection reveals a highly branched topology with two approximately perpendicular (strictly normal as in three dimensions) sheet populations.

Although the authors of this model recognised regional anisotropy in sheet structure, they underestimated its degree and significance which was recognised by Feneis (cited by Hort in [54]) and has recently been highlighted in several studies [9,11,13,44,45,58]. A mathematical analysis of the co-existing regular helical fibre path and LeGrice's proposed sheet structure (in the manner of Peskin [41] for fibre path alone) has not been carried out, but these features do not seem compatible.

	9. The helical ventricular myocardial band – Model 7 (Fig. 2, part 7)

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

 
This is a structural and functional hypothesis that the ventricles are a single band of muscle, coiled into two helices with insertions on the pulmonary trunk and aorta. The concept is based on Torrent-Guasp's dissection method, where the predominant fibre direction at given point is followed in hearts boiled in 1% ethanoic acid. Aberrant fibres, going against the plane of dissection, are recognised but are torn in the process of the dissection.

9.1 HVMB topology
The concept of the ventricular myocardial band is very simple: there are two loops each divided into two segments (basal loop – right and left segments; apical loop – ascending and descending segments). The connectivity and anatomical arrangement of these four segments is shown in Fig. 4a.

View larger version (25K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. (a) The topology of the HVMB. The dendrogram illustrates the band hierarchy with the same colour scheme used in the images: (i) band segments colour-coded on the intact heart; (ii) RV cut away to reveal deeper fibres; (iii) start of HVMB dissection – separation of the RS from the AS, and rotation around the aortic root; (iv) the unrolled myocardial band [modified from Kocica et al. [8] (a video of the dissection can be viewed at http://www.helicalheart.com/video_right.htm)]. (b) A partially reconstructed image of the ventricles from the HVMB dissection. The red arrow indicates how the dissection planes are re-apposed, and the green and blue lines show the surface fibre orientation. The angle of fibre orientation is approximately the same on either side of the dissection plane. The choice of this dissection path was therefore on minimal difference: (i) a block is cut out of the HVMB ascending segment of a near fully reconstructed heart. Through the cut out surface fibres of the descending segment can be seen and are orthogonal to the visible surface fibres of the ascending segment. What is not shown is that the fibre angle changes continuously throughout the cut out slab such that fibre orientation in the ascending segment and descending segment are almost identical on the plane where they meet as observed in (ii) [adapted from Kocica et al. [8], used with permission].

The continuum concept has always been present in the HVMB literature; in earlier descriptions it was underplayed [18,42,60] but has recently received greater emphasis [8]. While it cannot be expected that an idea will remain static over 30 years, the evolution of the concept is not clearly set out and this has increased confusion in the HVMB debate. This confusion is compounded by the presentation of images and diagrams of the HVMB dissection which create a false impression of the band's discreteness (Fig. 4b). Images of the same dissections in different orientations would emphasise the continuum of structure across band segments.

9.3 Philosophical problems
The HVMB has been dismissed on the basis of histological, optical [23] and DT-MRI [30] evidence of the smooth change in ventricular fibre orientation across the myocardium, as described in the geodesic models and shown in Fig. 3. If fibre angle changes smoothly across the wall with no glitches, how can the band exist? This argument against the band appears powerful, but is flawed. Grant's principles allow for the presence of discrete localisations of branching within a smoothly changing whole ventricle predominant fibre orientation schema. Recent evidence has been found for regionally anisotropic distribution of two sheet populations (discussed at length in Section 10.2). Could this regional sheet anisotropy represent the HVMB?

A more complete consideration of the HVMB requires separate analysis of (i) the merits of the dissection, (ii) the static structural model and (iii) the dynamic concept formulated on the basis of the structure.

A first consideration is that, by Grant's principles, any dissection path followed in the ventricles is a statistical concept. An implication is that if a path is sought from any point to any other within the ventricles it can by definition be found. In fact, infinite paths can be found, and again by definition, one path will also be most statistically favoured. Being the most favoured path alone does not necessarily make the path sensible or informative.

Is the HVMB (i) a bizarre and meaningless pathway, (ii) one of an infinite set of valid schema, (iii) a useful schema of structural features at one level of abstraction of cardiac structure or (iv) a grouping of fibre paths within the syncytium of such general shared fibre direction that it can be considered a unique physiological or anatomical entity (as proposed by Torrent-Guasp et al.)? The answer depends on both the statistical analysis of the fibre branching along the dissection path and on a detailed study of the macro- and microstructural boundary zone between HVMB segments. If the band is one dissection out of infinite possible dissections, each dissection will have a statistically derivable value calculated from the predominance of fibres following the chosen path at each point along its length. The validity of the band can be judged from the significance of the difference between the HVMB and other possible dissections (i.e. the p-value).

As discussed above, the HVMB has been rejected by some on the basis of histological [4,14], optical [23] and DT-MRI [30] evidence of the smooth change in ventricular fibre orientation across the myocardium (Fig. 3) There is, however, convincing and conflicting evidence that the HVMB does follow a favoured path from histological [54], optical [22] and DT-MRI data presented in Fig. 5 . This figure synthesises fibre angle change, obtained from DT-MRI, with the dissection diagrams of Hort [54] and optical section reconstructions of McLean and Prothero [22]. Both longitudinal DT-MRI (fibre angle change) sections and the optical reconstruction split the ventricles into zones clearly reflecting the HVMB dissection planes.

View larger version (47K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Synthesis of maps of fibre orientation obtained from DT-MRI with ventricular architecture from histology. (a–d) Radial transitions in canine DT-MRI primary eigenvector (fibre orientation). Divergences above 6° are shown in black in (a) basal heart B (fixed approximately in systole); (b) basal heart A (fixed approximately in diastole); (c) mid-heart heart A; (d) anterior long-axis view heart C (fixed approximately in diastole). Major transitions highlighted in red. (e, f) Canine histological pinnation patterns observed by Hort in (e) systole and (f) diastole. The angle formed by the pinnation (between the arms which form the V shape) is greater in systole (a, e) than in diastole (b, c, f). (g) Longitudinal reconstruction of murine optical mapped fibre angle by McLean and Prothero [22]; and (h, i) diagrams of cross-sections of the HVMB dissection [(a–d) novel analysis of DT-MRI data by the authors; (e, f) adapted from Hort [54] with kind permission from Springer Science and Business Media; (g) adapted from McLean and Prothero [22], used with permission; (h) from Torrent-Guasp et al. [60], used with permission; (i) from Kocica et al. [8], used with permission]. All transverse sections viewed from above, all longitudinal sections viewed from anterior position.

View larger version (66K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8. (a) Anterior view of three-dimensional detailed representation of ß'-sheet angle from hearts 15 (top), 16 (middle) and C (bottom) showing detail of sheet morphology in three dimensions. Basal, equatorial and apical slices are shown from these three hearts, which represent major forms within the continuum of cardiac structure. ß'-sheet angle is coloured as shown in the scale bar I (h) from +90° red to –90° blue. (b) Top view of short axis cross-section of lateral LV free wall of heart 16. In the top panel ß'-sheet angle is coloured as shown in the scale bar I (h) from +90° red to –90° blue, in the bottom panel a cardiac outline is shown in black with no sheet angle colouration. The panel shows an image of scanned dimensions 80 mm x 80 mm and 256 voxels x 256 voxels. 10° contours (in white) have been applied to the cut surface, which in (b, i top) are spread out over the red and blue zones of similar ß'-sheet angle but are crowded together (forming a thick white line) at the boundaries between these zones. The purple square shown in (b, i) is magnified to the right (b, ii – scanned dimensions 28 mm x 28 mm, 90 voxels x 90 voxels) and shows greater detail of the contours in positive to negative sheet boundaries. The small purple square (indicated by the arrow) is magnified to the right in (b, iii – scanned dimensions 1.4 mm x 1.4 mm, 4.5 voxels x 4.5 voxels) where detail of the contours (angular change) can be seen in a small region of the myocardial wall. The grid overlying (b, iii) shows the voxel dimensions (voxels are 0.3125 mm x 0.3125 mm in this plane). As seen in the top panel angular values are interpolated between voxels. At this scale it can be seen that the change from negative to positive sheet orientation takes place between two adjacent voxels. (c and d) Posterior long-axis three-dimensional view of heart 15 with ß'-sheet angle is coloured as shown in the scale bar I in (c) and scale bar III in (d) from +90° red to –90° blue. This view clearly shows that the three-dimensional morphology of myocardial sheets recreate the band segments of the HVMB as described in Fig. 4. (e) Three-dimensional visualisation of heart 16 ß'-sheet angle shows that the contiguous zones of similar ß'-sheet angle are continuous in three dimensions, and hence can be considered as stacks of laminae of the same orientation. (f) Top view of data from a histological sheet angle reconstruction of canine heart presented by Scollan et al. [36], used with permission, from the data of LeGrice et al. [56]. The inclination angle of the tertiary eigenvector in the tangential plane (a measure which, similar to ß', gives the base–apex orientation of the cardiac sheets) is coloured as shown in the scale bar II (i) from +90° red to –90° blue. (g) Sample of data from 5 of a total of 30 anatomical regions in seven canine hearts from Fig. 8 in Helm et al. [43], used with permission, showing the bimodal distribution of sheet angle with the average peak sheet angles (for all the data) at 45.5° and 117.6° (equivalent to –44.5° and 27.6° on ß'-sheet angle scale adopted in the visualisations presented here). (h) Colour scale bars used throughout this figure.

View larger version (74K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. (a–c) Two co-existing sheet populations in the serially confocal imaged rat ventricle. Images used with permission from dataset described in Sands et al. [21] and reconstructed from the video which can be viewed at http://www.bioeng.auckland.ac.nz/movies/database/cardiovascular_system/B24b_scan.avi. The outermost face of the tissue block is the longitudinal–radial cardiac plane. As the video runs from (a) through to (c) additional longitudinal–radial layers are added, such that the transverse cardiac plane (to the top of the block) becomes increasingly visible as a surface. As video runs from (a) through to (c) the co-existence of +45° and –45° sheet orientations (ß'-sheet angle), and the merging of these into central longitudinal myolaminae (of roughly rhomboid cross-section – highlighted in the yellow circle) can be seen. The two sheet populations can be observed to co-exist in the regions identified by blue circles. The looseness (spacing) of the laminae in the merge region is evident. (d) Identifies the cardiac location of the interpapillary mid-heart tissue block which was serially confocally imaged (modified from [20]). (e) Rat cardiac ßs-sheet angle reconstructed from DT-MRI [from Chen et al. [16], used with permission]. The +90° –90° colour scale bar is shown. The highlighted region of this transverse slice corresponds to the transverse surface shown in (d). The DT-MRI imaged region is therefore representative of a transverse slice of the confocal imaged tissue block in (a–c). The sheet angle reported here is ßs, and was set as positive for a sheet orientated towards the base from endocardium to epicardium. The global sheet features seen in the confocal imaged tissue block are also seen in the DT-MRI determined ßs-sheet angle.

At best, the HVMB dissection represents one generation of Grant's schema of cardiac structure, but as described above, it misleads more than it informs. More useful schema are in the form of the DT-MRI transition data, which demonstrate boundaries of subtly different fibre orientation without overemphasising their importance by tearing and then refolding them as distinct units.

	10. Unifying structural model

Top Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Fundamentals of cardiac... 3. Models of heart... 4. Philosophical approach for... 5. Traditional and novel... 6. Doughnut and pretzel... 7. Three-layered myocardium -... 8. Simple myolaminae model... 9. The helical ventricular... 10. Unifying structural model 11. Sheet stack boundaries 12. Technical limitations of... 13. Validity of the... 14. Implications 15. Conclusions References

 
10.1 Terminology for local aggregations of structure
Primary cardiac structure has been defined as the predominant fibre orientation, secondary as the organisation of the myolaminae through which these fibres course, and tertiary structure as localised aggregations of primary and secondary structure (often referred to as bands) [4,14,65,66].

Some cardiac researchers have dismissed the presence of localised aggregations of cardiac structure in the myocardial wall [4], but there is convincing evidence from DT-MRI data. We present a revisualisation of DT-MRI data and review published DT-MRI results alongside optical, automated confocal, strain modelling and histological data. Before introducing this analysis a review of the recent literature on mixed sheet populations and sheet merging is presented.

10.2 The evolving concept of myolaminar sheets: mixed sheet populations, sheet merging, the role of sheets in myocardial contraction and inter-individual variability in sheet structure
There is general agreement based upon histology, optical studies and DT-MRI that myocardial fibre orientation is remarkably uniform between and within species [2,13,16,23–25,27,28,30,35–40,44,50,53,54,67–85] (Fig. 3). Intriguingly, there is recent convincing evidence that, despite this fibre structure uniformity, cardiac sheet structure is considerably variable within species [27,44,45].

In order to review the literature on cardiac sheet structure it is first necessary to clarify what is meant by the term ‘sheet angle’. This is not a simple task; there are many distinct definitions of sheet angle in the literature. There is no uniformly accepted system for reporting cardiac geometrical data, but cylindrical [39] or prolate spheroidal [57] coordinate systems have been adopted. In either coordinate system, three standard cardiac axes are defined: the long axis, the radial axis and the tangential axis. These axes in turn are used to define three standard cardiac planes: the radial–longitudinal plane, the transverse plane (also known as the short-axis cross-section plane or the radial–circumferential plane) and the tangential plane [81,86]. Sheets have a separate local orthogonal coordinate system defined by the fibre-orientation axis (primary eigenvector), the sheet normal axis (tertiary eigenvector) and a second axis lying in the sheet plane (secondary eigenvector). In general terms, sheet angles relate the local sheet coordinate system to the standard cardiac coordinate system. It is possible to define many different angles between the sheet and cardiac coordinate systems, depending on the chosen plane or axis from each system, and unfortunately no convention has been established. All the sheet angle definitions used in the literature are geometrically dependent, but they are distinct. An additional complication is created by the differing angular scale adopted in reports, being either 0° ß 180° or the equivalent range –90° ß +90°. These considerations make both qualitative and quantitative comparisons of sheet structure between reports difficult.

The definitions of sheet angle adopted in visualisations in this report are those described in general geometric terms by Costa et al. [86], and are defined in relation to the DT-MRI eigenvectors here:

• ß'-Sheet angle (–90° ß' +90°): The angle the sheet makes in the longitudinal–radial plane. This is the angle between the transverse plane and the projection of the secondary eigenvector onto the longitudinal–radial plane. Positive angles rise to the heart base from endocardium to epicardium (or LV endocardium to RV endocardium).

• ß''-Sheet angle (–90° ß'' +90°): The angle the sheet makes in the transverse plane. This is the angle between the longitudinal–radial plane and the projection of the secondary eigenvector onto the transverse plane.

• ßs-Sheet angle (–90° ßs +90°): The angle between the radial axis and the secondary eigenvector lying in the sheet plane (i.e. the projection of the secondary eigenvector onto a standard cardiac plane has not been performed). Positive angles rise to the heart base from endocardium to epicardium (or LV endocardium to RV endocardium). This angle is referred to a ß by Costa et al. [86], but here we denote it with ßs as in Chen et al. [16].

The role, importance and the mechanism of action of cardiac sheets in contraction is addressed in many studies (as presented below) but is still an area of controversy. The cited papers should be referred to for the precise definition of the sheet angle reported. To allow qualitative comparison, angles are reported on the –90° ß +90° scale and positive sheet angle refers to sheets in which ß' rises to the heart base from endocardium to epicardium.

Hort [53–55] proposed a model (Fig. 10 in [53] and Fig. 21 in [3]) to explain wall thinning from systole to diastole in which parallel bundles of fibres are arranged in several stacked layers in systole. In diastole, these layers of like-fibre orientation interdigitate, reducing the number of layers, and allowing the wall to become thinner and the cardiac chambers larger. This model could not function in the presence of cardiac sheets, as it requires bundles of myocytes separated by parallel cleavage planes that, due to their separate connective tissue, can interdigitate during the cardiac cycle.

Spotnitz et al. [46] explored the relative contribution of (i) the myofibre diameter and (ii) the sliding between bundles of myocytes, in myocardial wall thickening. They concluded that (i) changes in fibre thickness could not account alone for the changes in myocardial thickness during contraction, (ii) that ‘cleavage planes’ were present between groups of myocytes, that (iii) the sliding of groups of myofibres (permitted by cleavage planes between them) was an important mechanism in myocardial contraction, and is evidenced by cleavage planes having a more vertical alignment in diastole and a more horizontal alignment in systole, and that (iv) there is no evidence for insinuation or interleaving of fibres as suggested by Hort. They do not address if cleavage planes separate myolaminae or if they separate bundles of myocytes.

As described above, LeGrice et al. [56] carried out the first quantitative histological analysis of laminar structure throughout the ventricles, and formulated this into a mathematical model [57]. Unlike later reports, this model of the canine ventricles described smoothly varying sheets rather than dual sheet populations; however, regions of abrupt change can be recognised in the data (Fig. 8f). Two canine hearts were studied by histological measurement and two by scanning electron microscopy, but direct heart-to-heart comparisons were not performed. The study reported little detail of inter-individual variability in structure but found significant variation in local sheet structure within hearts, which was considered to be branching from a model of regular transmural endocardial to epicardial planes.

In a mechanics study, LeGrice et al. [43] demonstrated that in dogs >50% of the thickening of the myocardial wall during contraction could be accounted for by slippage along the cleavage planes between myolaminae. They performed biplane cinematic radiography on radiopaque beads at two cardiac sites in open-chest dogs. The premise for the study was the observation that myocyte thickening alone could account for only a fifth of ventricular wall thickening. This study utilised small regions of the LV anterior free wall and septum from 10 mongrel dog hearts. Inter-individual variation in sheet structure is not recorded in this report.

This work was extended by Costa et al. [44] using the same methodology, who described generally smoothly varying cleavage planes from epicardium to endocardium in three of six dogs, but with abrupt changes associated with the trabeculata–compacta interface (the zone linking trabeculated endocardium and compact subendocardium) in a further three dogs. They confirmed that the laminar nature of the myocardium is critical for normal ventricular dynamics. They also demonstrated that in addition to the sliding of sheets due to interlaminar shear, the sheets participated in myocardial contraction dynamically by extending during systole. They showed the shear component to contribute 40% and the extension component 60% to ventricular transmural thickening.

Arts et al. [45] carried out a strain modelling analysis of the data from the above Dokos et al. [58] study and predicted two distinct sheet populations. Histologically determined sheet angles were pooled for all six hearts and revealed a bimodal distribution by cardiac location, of approximately normal sheet orientations. Theoretical modelling of sheet structure using mechanics supported these measurements. They concluded that sheet orientation is not a unique function of the transmural location but occurs in two distinct populations.

Dokos et al. [58] examined laminar shear in samples of excised ventricular myocardium from six pigs. They demonstrated dual cardiac sheet orientations, describing a predominant orientation and an orientation approximately normal to this. They showed that patterns of sheet intersection were not uniform in the circumferential direction, varying significantly over sub-millimetre dimensions. Inter-individual variation in sheet architecture was not characterised or reported.

Jiang et al. [81] produced high-resolution three-dimensional reconstructions of sheet orientation from DT-MRI of the murine heart. They showed whole heart visualisations of sheet angles extracted from the secondary and tertiary eigenvectors (including ß'). These images display regional localisations of structure in the LV, but little qualitative and no quantitative descriptions are provided and inter-individual variations are not characterised.

Harrington et al. [11] also identified two sheet populations from a histological study of tissue blocks from the LV interpapillary muscle region of five sheep. They proposed a model with alternating, approximately normal (in the longitudinal–radial plane) positive and negative sheet orientations across the ventricular wall with sheet orientation dependent on transmural depth; positive epicardial, negative mid-myocardial and positive endocardial orientation (Model 5, Fig. 2, part 5). There was relatively little inter-individual variation in sheet orientation (maximum cluster SD = 9 in the reported sheet angle). This model is a satisfactory explanation of the study findings, but is an attempt to extrapolate the features of a small tissue block to a wider region and is hence only valid in a LV without localised heterogeneous aggregations of structure.

Helm et al. [27,83] describe the two sheet populations in DT-MRI data from seven canine hearts. In