|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:274-280. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.02.033
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
a Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Academic Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands
b Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands
Received 11 October 2006; received in revised form 15 February 2007; accepted 16 February 2007.
* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Academic Hospital Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229HX Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 43 3875070; fax: +31 43 3875993.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Cerebral emboli Transcranial Doppler Cardiac surgery Ultrasound
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All animals received humane care in compliance with the Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals of the National Institutes of Health. The study was approved by the local animal ethics committee.
2.1 The EmBlockerTM
The new ultrasonic device, the EmBlockerTM (Neurosonix, Rehovot, Israel), consists of a round 2.2 MHz transducer with a diameter of 36 mm which is developed for placement on the aorta ascendens at the level of the bifurcation of the aorta and the innominate artery after thoracotomy as shown in Figs. 1 and 2
. The EmBlockerTM was kept in position with an ESTECH stabilizer (ESTECH, San Ramon, United States of America). The mechanism of the EmBlockerTM is based on the principle that an object with different acoustic impedance (density multiplied by sound speed) than its surroundings partly reflects and partly absorbs ultrasound energy. The acoustical energy which is absorbed by an object is also called the acoustic radiation force, and this energy is able to move an object or to change the direction of its path [6,7]. The acoustic radiation force on an object depends on the extent of the difference between the acoustic impedance of the object and its surroundings; the greater the difference in acoustic impedance is, the higher the acoustical force on the object will be. Due to the fact that there is hardly an acoustic difference between red and white blood cells and its surroundings, the ultrasonic radiation power will not affect these cells. The acoustic impedance difference between gaseous emboli and its surroundings exceeds the acoustic impedance difference between solid emboli and its surrounding. [8]. For this matter a lower ultrasonic energy level of the EmBlockerTM can be sufficient to achieve the same acoustic radiation force on gaseous emboli as a higher ultrasonic level of the EmBlockerTM on solid emboli. Due to this knowledge and in-vitro testings, an intensity level of the EmBlockerTM of 0.5 W/cm2 is chosen to divert gaseous emboli and an intensity level of the EmBlockerTM of 1.5 W/cm2 is chosen to divert solid emboli.
|
|
2.2.2 Histopathology and hematology
Six female domestic pigs approximately 70 kg (about 4 months old) were subcutaneously administrated with xylazine, diazepam and ketamine HCl 30 min prior to intubation. After the baseline blood sample was taken, endotracheal intubation was conducted and was followed by mechanical ventilation. Maintenance of general anesthesia was performed with isoflurane during the whole procedure. After administration of the anesthesia, a mid sternotomy was performed using a sterile technique. The EmBlockerTM transducer was placed at the level of the bifurcation of the aorta and the innominate artery. The position of the transducer was documented to allow identification of the sonicated tissues. Then all animals were exposed to a combination of eight periods of 120 s of 1.5 W/cm2 intensity of the EmBlockerTM and one period of 20 min of 0.5 W/cm2 intensity of the EmBlockerTM (90 s on and 30 s off). After sonication, the chest was surgically closed in layers and blood samples were taken. Each animal recovered from anesthesia in the operating room, and then was transported to the step-down unit. Each animal received antibiotic (cefazolin 30 mg/kg by i.v., a single dose was given at the conclusion of the procedure and bytril 1 ml/20 kg intramuscular injection – once a day for 4 days) and analgesic agents (morphine single dose was given at the conclusion of the procedure and depirone in the first 24 h, continued with depirone for 3 days) in the postoperative period. After each clinical stage the animals were observed daily for signs of distress that would indicate the need for administration of analgesics. Seventy-two hours post surgery, a blood sample was taken. At day 7 postoperatively, all animals were sacrificed. Blood samples were taken prior to euthanasia. Post euthanasia, a mid-re-sternotomy was performed. Tissues were taken from sonicated and non-sonicated areas of the aorta, the innominate artery (or the junction of the innominate artery and aorta as a sonicated tissue), the trachea, the esophagus and the vagus nerve. The tissue samples were divided in two sections: back and front, whereby the front section is chosen as that which first comes into contact with the ultrasonic beam. The tissues were fixed in formalin for at least 1 week and prepared routinely for histopathology.
Blood samples were analysed for general chemistry, free hemoglobin and hematology variables. Blood samples were taken from the animal at four different points of time: at baseline (prior to any surgical intervention); post closure; 72 h after surgery; and before sacrifice (after 1 week).
2.2.3 Efficiency
Seven pigs (75 ± 20 kg) were premedicated with 0.07 ml/kg azaperone (stresnil 40 mg/ml) intramuscularly. Anesthesia was induced with a mask of 1.5% isoflurane and with help of xylocaine spray (10%) the pigs were orally intubated. Anesthesia was maintained with a mixture of O2 and isoflurane (1.5%). After administration of analgesic buprenorfine (i.v. bolus 0.01 mg/kg) and muscle relaxant suxamethonium (i.v. bolus 0.1 mg/kg), a mid sternotomy was performed. Heparin was administered (bolus 200 IU/kg i.v.). After the activated clotting time (ACT) reached 300, an extracorporeal circulation with central cannulation was installed. ACT was kept above 480 s during the experiment. After the extracorporeal circulation had been started anesthesia was maintained with a propofol i.v. drip. Monitoring included ECG, blood pressure, oxygen saturation and capnography.
A cardioplegia needle was placed in the aortic root distal from the arterial cannula, which was used for emboli injections. Polystyrene DVB particles (Duke Scientific Corp) (1200,500–750 µm) were dissolved in a 10 ml syringe filled with a mixture (1:33) of serum and ringer's lactate. Air emboli were created by mixing 1 ml of air with 9 ml of blood. Immediately after the mixture, the 10 ml was injected. Each kind of injection was performed 10 times; 5 times without EmBlockerTM activation (control) and 5 times with activation of the EmBlockerTM (sonicated). The applied power of the EmBlockerTM transducer during air emboli injections 0.5 W/cm2 and for solid emboli injections is 1.5 W/cm2. At the end of the experiment, all animals were sacrificed through a pentobarbital overdose (bolus 80 mg/kg i.v.).
For cerebral monitoring, two transcranial transducers (Embodop DWL, Singen, Germany) were placed on each eye of the pig. Through the opening of orbita of the eye, the ultrasound could pass the skull and penetrate into the white and gray matter of the brain and reach the cerebral blood vessels. A cerebral blood flow velocity spectrum from an intracranial artery could be obtained. Transcranial Doppler recordings were saved and analyzed offline. One observer manually counted the number of emboli according to the golden standard [9].
Statistical comparison (mixed model, two-tailed comparisons, n = 7) was performed to compare emboli counts between On and Off stages, while taking into account the fact that all animals are different and that each animal provides a number of correlated replicates. Statistical analyses were conducted with SAS/STATA® statistical software. The number of cerebral emboli was averaged over all replicated emboli injections for each type of emboli and for left and right measurements in all animals and presented as mean and standard deviation.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.1 Temperature
In Table 1
, the temperature values are shown from the esophagus, the trachea, under the aorta, on the aorta, control aorta and control esophagus at two time intervals during two different power settings of the EmBlockerTM. The high power application (1.5 W/cm2) results in the highest temperature (41.9 °C) under the aorta after 2 min. At the low power application (0.5 W/cm2), the highest temperature measured (38.1 °C) was observed under the aorta after 10 min. All sonicated areas showed a rise in temperature during high and low power EmBlockerTM activation. The temperatures in the control areas, outside the ultrasound beam, remained constant during EmBlockerTM activation.
|
|
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
43 °C up to a couple of hours. In animals the most sensitive organs (testes and brain) did show some level of damage after a disposure of 20 min at a temperature of 43 °C. Other organs like skin, retina and prostate injury occurred in animals after 21–40 min at a temperature of 43 °C. All these findings are confirmed in a report by Miller and Ziskin [11]. In this study, the temperature never came above 43 °C and although under the aorta the temperature reached almost 42 °C, the time period was less than 2 min. In clinical use, the period of activation is pretended to be half of the time period which was used in these temperature measurements, resulting in a temperature under the aorta of less then 41 °C. The temperature rise in the lower power application of the EmBlockerTM did not exceed the temperature value of 38.5 °C. This implies that the 0.5 W/cm2 energy level of the EmBlockerTM produces less heat than the 1.5 W/cm2 energy level and can therefore be used for a longer time period. The high power application cannot be replaced clinically by the low power application because the high energy level is required to divert solid emboli. We can conclude from the temperature measurements (high and low energy level) that the device can be used safely. Although the temperature results did not show any values above the limit, there are twosome temperature precautions made for clinical use. A condom will be placed over the transducer in which continuously cold water (0° till 5°) will be circulating, as is shown in Fig. 1. As a second precaution, a temperature sensor will be installed, which automatically shuts down the EmBlockerTM when the temperature level of the underlying aorta reaches 43°.
4.2 Histopathology
Intra-individual comparison of sonicated versus non-sonicated tissue revealed no effect of sonication except in two special cases. The inflammation in the aorta found in four animals (animal 1, 2, 3 and 5) was found in control as well as in sonicated tissue. As this inflammation is a typical reaction to a surgical procedure, it can be concluded that these effects are not due to sonication of the EmBlockerTM per se. In one animal (animal 6) mildly vascularised and mildly fibrotic tissue of the adventitia of the external layer of the aorta was demonstrated in just the sonicated aorta. Probably, these findings can be ascribed to the surgical procedure as well, in particular, because in more animals even stronger reactions were found in control than in sonicated tissue. Tracheitis (which is a common infection in pigs) was found in two animals. In one animal tracheitis was also detected in the control tissues and in the other animal a mild tracheitis was detected in sonicated tissue at the back of the trachea which is in the far end of the ultrasonic beam and the actual estimated intensity on that area is close to zero. We can conclude that the inflammation and the tracheitis are not caused by sonication. Coagulation necrosis, which is considered to be a marker of damage caused by ultrasound induced hyperthermia, was not observed in any of the tissue samples.
4.3 Hematology
Blood analyses showed no specific effect of sonication (Table 3). The high plasma CPK, which was already demonstrated in the baseline measurement, is most likely caused by transportation of the animals just prior to the surgical procedure. The reduction of the CPK value to a normal value in 7 days after the transportation, confirms the assumption that the high CPK values are due to transportation. Free hemoglobin values did not reveal significant red blood cell destruction due to the sonication procedure and remained within normal levels in time.
4.4 Efficiency
The efficiency results show significant reduction of cerebral emboli due to EmBlockerTM activation. The ultrasonic wave of the EmBlockerTM exerts a more pronounced diversion effect on gaseous emboli than on the solid emboli, which can be explained by the difference in acoustic impedance (as mentioned before) between the two types of emboli and their surroundings.
However, both gaseous and solid cerebral emboli were reduced by use of the EmBlockerTM, but despite the use of lower intensity of the EmBlockerTM for gaseous emboli, the reduction of emboli in the cerebral arteries is 10% higher for gaseous emboli than for solid emboli. The proof of principle was demonstrated by these preliminary results; yet adjustments of the positioning, the shape and size of the transducer could improve the efficiency. The EmBlockerTM seems to be an efficient device to reduce cerebral emboli during extracorporeal circulation and thereby could reduce postoperative neurological complications [4,5,12].
| 5. Clinical application |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although this animal study already demonstrates a diversion effect, a possible change in intensities or design of the EmBlockerTM could improve the efficiency.
| 6. Limitations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this preliminary study a surrogate marker (number of emboli) was used to examine the efficiency of the EmBlockerTM, no brain MRI or brain pathology has been performed to examine the cerebral damage of the emboli (gas and solid) injections.
| 7. Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Appendix A |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr U. Lockowandt (Stockholm, Sweden): It's quite fascinating to move objects with an ultrasonic beam.
Do you think it will influence the thrombocytes, lymphocytes or erythrocytes?
Dr Sauren: No. It was also tested. Because this mechanism only works when there is a difference in acoustic impedance and the difference between blood and erythrocytes or any other particles, it's not that much, it wont be able to move that particles. That's also why air is much better to divert because the acoustic impedance is quite large.
Dr P. Gründeman (Utrecht, The Netherlands): I think it's a great idea to get the air down in the descending aorta. Suppose there is debris in the ascending aorta that's attached to the inner wall, for instance, calcification, can that (material) be dislodged by this technology?
Dr Sauren: That is, of course, an interesting question, but it's something we still need to take a look at. Of course, it's different material then particles in the blood circulation, I mean, it's attached to the aorta, if youre talking about calcification. but it's something we still need to take a look at for sure.
Dr Van Der Linden (Stockholm, Sweden): I have a question regarding the size of the particles you can redirect. How much power do you need to redirect big particles as opposed to microemboli, very small particles?
Dr Sauren: Well, this is something we are looking at in the in vitro setup actually. We want to use different kind of sizes. And this animal study, quite big particles, were used between 500 and 750 µ. And also we want to have a look at which power should be used for each different size. But I cannot say anything about it now.
Dr Van Der Linden: Did you use transcranial Doppler in these pigs insonating the middle cerebral artery or did you insonate the carotid artery?
Dr Sauren: No, I placed the probes on the eyes, because it was possible to get the cerebral arteries through the eyes.
Dr Van Der Linden: So you were looking at retinal emboli?
Dr Sauren: No, no. Because of the eye there is no bone at the spot where the nerves are going into the brain. There is a spot where there no bone is so I can get through with the ultrasound.
Dr Van Der Linden: Because the anatomy of the cerebral circulation of the pig is a bit difficult and it's difficult to insonate the middle cerebral artery.
Dr Sauren: Im aware that we are not completely sure that we have the middle cerebral artery and that is also why these results could be the results are not that perfect. Maybe the results could be better because of this, but we didnt see them. So we still need to take a look at it further.
Dr Van Der Linden: And which Doppler technique did you use? Did you use the EmboDop?
Dr Sauren: Yes, it was the EmboDop.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
\#9734;\#9734; We thank Neurosonix for financial support.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. D. Sauren, M. la Meir, G. Bolotin, F. H. van der Veen, J. H. Heijmans, W. H. Mess, and J. G. Maessen The EmBlocker: Efficiency of a New Ultrasonic Embolic Protection Device Adjunctive to Heart Valve Surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2009; 88(1): 253 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |