|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:346-350. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.04.029
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
Department of Surgery, MC 1446, King Abdulaziz Medical City, P.O. Box 22490, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia
Received 4 May 2006; received in revised form 10 April 2007; accepted 12 April 2007.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +966 1 252 0088x14136; fax: +966 1 252 0051. (Email: moratief{at}yahoo.com; abdulatiefm{at}ngha.med.sa).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Epidural analgesia General anaesthesia Anaesthesia recovery period Thymectomy Thoracic surgical procedures Thoracic surgery Video-assisted thoracic surgery
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Epidural anaesthesia provides bilateral dermatomal sensory and motor blockade. The level and extent of blockade is evaluated using warm–cold discrimination. Epidural anaesthesia also provides superior postoperative pain control. Local anaesthesia and opioids are combined together to provide optimum results with minimal side effects.1
Performing thoracic surgery under awake anaesthesia has several potential advantages including avoidance of airway trauma associated with endotracheal intubation, general anaesthesia, and single lung ventilation. General anaesthesia may lead to complications including hypoxia due to double lumen endotracheal tube malposition, hyperinflation of the dependent lung, re-expansion pulmonary edema, and unilateral ventilator-induced lung injury [3–6]. By using awake anaesthesia, many of these complications could potentially be avoided.
Among the advantages of awake epidural anaesthesia is the avoidance of the use of muscle relaxants in patients with myasthenia gravis. Patients with myasthenia gravis have unpredictable response to the action of muscle relaxants [7].
In addition, the action of these drugs is potentiated by the use of inhalation agents such as sevoflurane [8]. Avoiding muscle relaxants in patients with myasthenia gravis can potentially lower the risk of postoperative muscle weakness and respiratory insufficiency thus leading to faster patient's recovery [9–12]. Other possible advantages of thoracic epidural anaesthesia include better patients satisfaction, reduced hospital length of stay, and improved resource utilization.
Disadvantages of awake epidural anaesthesia are that it is technically more challenging for anaesthetist and the surgeon, the possibility of failed block and the risk of dural puncture.1
The purpose of this study is to review the experience of a tertiary center in major thoracic surgical procedures performed under awake epidural anaesthesia.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.2 Surgical selection criteria
Selection of cases for surgery was made by the thoracic team (surgeon and the anaesthetist). All patients referred for thoracic surgical procedures were considered with the following exceptions: uncooperative patients, uncontrolled cough, bleeding disorders or unfavourable anatomy for thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Consent was obtained after explaining the type of anaesthesia and the surgical procedure.
2.3 Anaesthetic technique
All patients were pre-medicated using midazolam 3–4 mg intramuscularly (I.M.) and fentanyl 50 mcg intravenously (i.v.). Then patients were placed in the lateral decubitus position. An epidural catheter was inserted between T3–T4 and T4–T5 for all thoracic procedures except sympathectomy and thymectomy. A test dose (3 ml) of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine was given, followed by 8–12 ml of bupivacain 0.5% with epinephrine and 50 mcg of fentanyl. The objective was to achieve sensory and motor block between C7 and T7 levels. At this level diaphragmatic respiration was maintained. The anaesthesia level was monitored by warm–cold discrimination. For symphatectomy and thymectomy, the epidural catheter was inserted between C7–T1 and T1–T2 to achieve sensory and motor block between C5 and C6. At this level of block, the cervical horn of the thymus was included.
If the patient developed excessive cough as a result of surgical manipulation, stellate ganglion blockade was done using 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacain. Basic monitoring included blood pressure, pulse oximetry, temperature, electrocardiography and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring (ETCO2). During the procedure, all patients received oxygen via facemask to maintain oxygen saturation (SpO2) above 92–95%. In patients who needed to be converted to general anaesthesia, this was induced using propofol (2 mg/kg), fentanyl (0.2 mg/kg) and rocuronium (0.5 mg/kg) and maintained using inhaled sevoflurane and rocuronium. Double lumen endotracheal tube was placed under direct vision using fibro-optic bronchoscopy.
2.4 Surgical considerations
The surgical procedure was commenced only when full sensory blockade was achieved. In video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), if the lower incision area was not covered by the epidural blockade, intercostal nerve blockade was performed by the surgeon if the following methods failed to extend the area of blockade: increasing the dose of the local anaesthetics, elevation of the head of the bed, or manipulation of the epidural catheter. When the chest wall was opened, spontaneous collapse of the lung occurred. If significant desaturation occurred, suction tube into pleural cavity was applied until the lung was re-inflated and the cause could be investigated before deflation of the lung again. During surgery, if the patient developed cough due to hilar manipulation, the surgeon usually administered lidocaine trans-bronchially. During thymectomy or any mediastinal procedure, if iatrogenic hole into the contra-lateral pleura occurred then the situation was easily managed by introducing a nasogastric tube through the created hole then got connected to continuous suction to keep the contra-lateral lung passively expanded.
2.5 Study design and data collection
All consecutive cases of thoracic surgical procedures performed under awake anaesthesia between September 2002 and September 2006 were included. A written consent for the procedure was obtained from all patients. Exclusion criteria included: uncooperative patient, uncontrollable cough, bleeding disorders or unfavourable anatomy for thoracic epidural anaesthesia. The following data were documented: patients demographics, the type and approach of the procedure, operative time, intraoperative complications, conversion to general anaesthesia, mortality, the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and postoperative length of stay. This retrospective study was approved by the hospital Institutional Review Board.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Only few studies in the English literature have described thoracic surgical procedures performed under awake anaesthesia (Table 6 ). Pompeo et al. randomized 60 patients to have thoracoscopic resection of solitary pulmonary nodule either under general anaesthesia or awake epidural anaesthesia [13]. They found that awake thoracoscopic resection of solitary pulmonary nodule resulted in shorter length of stay and better patient satisfaction [13]. Tsunezuka et al. described the results of thymectomy performed in three patients with myasthenia gravis under awake epidural anaesthesia [14]. They concluded that awake epidural anaesthesia was safe and had the advantage of avoiding intubation and the use of muscle relaxants [14]. Mukaida et al. described the results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pleurodesis for secondary pneumothorax performed under epidural anaesthesia [15]. There was no postoperative complications or procedure-related mortality [15]. A recent study published in 2006, assessed the feasibility and safety of awake anaesthesia for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) [15]. The investigators reported faster recovery and satisfactory 6-month outcome with this technique [16].
|
Another important finding in our study is that only 30% of patients required chest tube after major thoracic surgical procedures. Watanabe et al. examined the safety of postoperative management of lung resection patients without chest tube [19]. Their criteria for avoiding chest tube placement were: absence of air leaks intraoperatively, absence of bullous or emphysematous changes, absence of severe pleural adhesions and absence of prolonged pleural effusion. They concluded that such practice could be safe without increase in postoperative morbidity if patients were selected carefully [18]. Our results were consistent with this author's findings and were not influenced by operating using awake anaesthesia.
The strengths of our study include the large number of patients and the wide variety of major thoracic surgeries performed. Among the limitations of this study are its retrospective nature, being performed in a single center and the lack of control group. This study demonstrates the feasibility of awake anaesthesia in a variety of thoracic cases and its findings should be validated in a clinical trial.
We conclude that major thoracic procedures can be safely performed under awake anaesthesia. The technique avoids general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation, reduces postoperative hospital stay and minimizes intensive care unit admission. This study strongly suggests awake anaesthesia can improve outcomes and reduce cost. A proper multicenter clinical trial to further evaluate this technique is needed.
| Appendix A |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr M. Beshay (Bielefeld, Germany): I would like to ask you—how did these patients go home? Do you leave the epidural catheter inside? or, as you mentioned, if it is a day case, you would take it away, and how do you control the postoperative pain as they go home without the epidural catheter?
Dr Abdullatief: If it is a day surgery, we dont leave it. We just give a postop bolus dose and it will be working for about 48 h, and then the patient will start the oral analgesia at home. If he is an inpatient, then well leave it for postop care.
Dr D. Waller (Leicester, United Kingdom): Could you give us more details about the drugs that were given to the patients during the procedure?
Dr Abdullatief: No intravenous at all.
Dr Waller: It says in the abstract, though, you gave fentanyl, 50 mcg, and midazolam, 3 mg.
Dr Abdullatief: This is just if the patient needs sedation; otherwise it will be –
Dr Waller: All patients were premedicated with intravenous fentanyl, 50 mcg, and midazolam, 3 mg. I will put it to you that this is not awake anaesthesia, this is asleep anaesthesia, and the patients are spontaneously ventilating.
Dr Abdullatief: No, it's awake. They are awake, as you have seen it, and if they start to have agitation or are anxious.
Dr Waller: If I had 3 mg of midazolam and 50 mcg of fentanyl, I would be asleep.
Dr G. Varela (Salamanca, Spain): How can you conclude in your study that this is a cost-effective procedure when you have not presented any economic data?
Dr Abdullatief: Well, we have found in our center that we avoided admission in some patients, we reduced the hospitalization, and we didnt use many ICU beds. There is one patient who had pneumonectomy and she went to the floor without passing through the ICU. This is the beginning. It needs further study in all directions to prove. This is actually step one, the beginning. In the future we can come with full answers about this. Sorry for not bringing my anaesthetist to verify and answer all the anaesthetist's questions, but in the future we will come with more answers.
| Appendix B |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.04.008.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Horlocker T. Thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Journal for Anasthesie and Intensivbehandlung 2 Ausgabe 1995 (http://www.pabst-publishers.de/Medizin/Medizin.20zeitschriften/jai/1995-2/index.htm1). ![]()
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Kato, I. Matsumoto, S. Tomita, and G. Watanabe A novel technique to prevent intra-operative pneumothorax in awake coronary artery bypass grafting: biomaterial neo-pleura Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 35(1): 37 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Ismail Awake anesthesia: is it valid for all thoracic surgical procedures? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 33(3): 521 - 521. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |