|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:403-408. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.05.027
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
a Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
b Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
c Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
d Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland
Received 7 March 2007; received in revised form 23 May 2007; accepted 31 May 2007.
* Corresponding author. Address: Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 1 865 225 227; fax: +44 1 865 225 221. (Email: Malcolm.Kohler{at}orh.nhs.uk).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Pleura Solitary fibrous tumour Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery Positron emission tomography
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A preoperative diagnosis of SFTP by radiological imaging can be difficult and a reliable differentiation between malignant and benign forms is often impossible with computed tomography scanning (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Benign and malignant SFTPs usually appear as well circumscribed, homogeneous, and at times lobulated masses with the density of soft tissue in CT scans. CT heterogeneity, large tumour diameter, and pleural effusion are more likely to be found in malignant forms, but may also be observed in benign variants [1,4,9,10]. Furthermore, diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided aspiration biopsy is unsatisfactory [6,8,11]. To date there is very little data available from positron emission tomography (PET) with [18fluorine]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) performed in patients with these tumours [12,13]. FDG-PET could possibly predict or rule out malignancy in SFTP preoperatively and reveal metastatic recurrence, an event rarely observed in these tumours [4].
Recently, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been introduced for the treatment of SFTP which is thought to result in shorter hospital stay and less postoperative morbidity, but comparative data between VATS and thoracotomy are scant [5]. In order to define the clinical and radiological pattern of benign and malignant SFTP more accurately and evaluate the role of VATS as a less invasive treatment option we summarise our experience in the management of SFTP.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients underwent chest X-ray and computer tomography (CT) of the chest preoperatively. Whole body FDG-PET was performed in six patients. FDG uptake was qualitatively assessed, positivity and likelihood of malignancy was defined as focally increased FDG uptake in comparison with the background not related to physiologic processes, combined with a tumour diameter >10 cm or inhomogeneous FDG uptake.
The diagnosis of SFTP was confirmed by typical histomorphologic findings of a solid spindle cell component, and a diffuse sclerosing component combined with matching immunohistochemical staining (positive for vimentin and/or CD34, negative for keratin and/or S-100 protein). SFTPs were classified as benign or malignant according to the histologic criteria published previously [4]. Malignancy was assumed if one or more of the following criteria were met: (1)
4 mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields (HPF), (2) presence of necrosis or haemorrhage, (3) pleomorphism based on nuclear size, nuclear crowding and overlapping, and the presence of nuclear atypia.
Student's t-tests for normally distributed, and Mann–Whitney U-tests for not normally distributed data were performed for comparisons between groups. For comparison of frequencies
-square test of independence or a Fisher's exact test when any of the expected tumour features were fewer than five was used. Statistical significance was assumed at a probability of p
< 0.05.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twelve patients (44.4%, four females) were smokers or ex-smokers (mean pack years ± SD, 24.6 ± 16.6 years). Further data on clinical presentation are given in Table 1 .
|
Tumours appeared inhomogeneous on CT in three patients with malignant SFTP and in two patients with benign SFTP (p = ns). Tumour necrosis in histology was only found in patients with malignant lesions. Tumour invasion into the chest wall was radiologically suspected in one patient with malignant SFTP, which was subsequently confirmed during surgery and by histology. Calcification of the tumour was detected by CT in one patient with malignant and in two patients with benign SFTP.
In six patients, three with malignant and three with benign SFTPs, an integrate 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT was performed preoperatively. PET-CT was positive in three patients who had a histologically proven malignant SFTP, whereas criteria for positivity were not met in patients with benign SFTP. No signs of lymph node or distant metastases were found in the three cases of malignant SFTPs.
Preoperative CT-guided transcutaneous aspiration biopsy was performed in five patients (18.5%) leading to the correct histologic diagnosis in two cases. A typical example of a CT scan from a patient with SFTP is shown in Fig. 1 .
|
Lung function testing revealed a moderate restrictive ventilatory defect in one patient caused by a large SFTP (23 cm x 21 cm x 7 cm). An obstructive pattern was determined in three other patients with COPD (GOLD-stage I–II) due to smoking. Bronchoscopy was performed in eight patients and provided no relevant additional information.
3.3 Treatment
Complete resection was achieved in all 27 patients. In all patients a single lesion was found at surgical exploration. Tumours originated from the visceral pleura in 88.8%, a pedicle was present in 59.3% of the cases (e.g. Fig. 2
). In three cases (11.1%) the lesions arose from the parietal pleura (two of them were malignant). Macroscopically a tumour-capsule was found in 74.1%.
|
Anterolateral thoracotomy was performed in 12 patients (44.4%, in 1 patient anterolateral thoracotomy was combined with upper median sternotomy because of very large tumour size), whereas surgical resection was accomplished by VATS in 15 patients (55.6%). Mean hospital stay was significantly shorter for patients operated by VATS than by thoracotomy, 4.5 (range 3–6) versus 7.5 (range 4–25) days, respectively (p < 0.01). Duration of hospitalisation was longer in patients with malignant SFTPs (median 8, range 3–25 days) compared to patients with benign SFTPs (median 5, range 3–7 days, p < 0.05).
Major perioperative complications occurred in one patient in the VATS group (bleeding) and in three patients undergoing thoracotomy (one patient with sepsis, one patient with pneumopleural leakage, one patient with atrial fibrillation, liver and renal failure). There was no perioperative mortality reported in either group.
As expected, mean tumour diameter was larger in the thoracotomy group, 12.4 cm (range 3.0–23 cm) versus 4.9 cm (range 2.0–9.5 cm) in the VATS group (p < 0.01).
3.4 Pathology
Maximal tumour diameter ranged from 2 cm in the smallest to 23 cm in the largest tumour with an average of 8.2 cm. Mean tumour volume was 460 cm3 (range 1.6–4301 cm3).
Histological examinations revealed 17 benign (63%) and 10 malignant (37%) SFTPs. All malignant tumours showed more than 4 mitoses per 10 HPFs. Malignant SFTPs were bigger and occurred more often in men than in women. Malignant SFTPs were equally distributed between smokers and non-smokers. Recurrence of the tumour was only recognised in malignant forms.
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed in 23 cases. All tumours were positive for CD34 and/or vimentin, while none showed a positive reaction to antikeratin antibodies.
Comparative data between malignant and benign SFTPs are given in Table 2 . A typical example of histological photomicrographs from a SFTP is shown in Fig. 3 .
|
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A preoperative diagnosis of SFTP based on radiological imaging can be difficult and a differentiation between malignant and benign forms is often impossible by CT or MRI. In our series inhomogeneous appearance and calcification of the tumour did not discriminate between malignant and benign SFTP, and CT-guided biopsy of the tumour established the correct diagnosis in only two cases out of five which is in accordance with previously published studies [11]. Most authors feel that diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided aspiration biopsy in SFTPs is unsatisfactory [6,8,11]. In our opinion CT-guided biopsy may be helpful in cases where diagnosis of SFTP is uncertain. In an attempt to improve diagnostic accuracy, we retrospectively looked at FDG-PET-scans, and found PET positivity in all patients with malignant SFTPs. To our knowledge there are only a few case reports on FDG-PET in SFTP in the literature. Robinson [12] reported no FDG uptake in two benign SFTPs, and Cortes et al. [13] found FDG-PET negativity in three benign lesions. Because the small number of patients limits our findings and the available information in the literature, prospective studies including a higher number of patients are needed to further evaluate the accuracy of FDG-PET in differentiating malignant from benign SFTPs and to define its role in clinical practice. We believe all patients with SFTPs should undergo surgery without delay, as SFTPs can progress in size causing symptoms and may transform to a malignant tumour, therefore the value of preoperative FDG-PET would be limited to exclusion of tumour metastasis, an event rarely observed in SFTPs [4]. However, some centres apply a strategy of watchful waiting in asymptomatic SFTP and operations may be delayed in countries with long waiting lists. In this setting, an FDG-PET positive SFTP could be considered malignant and should be operated without delay. Furthermore, FDG-PET might be suitable to detect metastases after surgery in patients with malignant SFTP.
We observed a malignant histology in 37% of cases on the basis of criteria suggested by England et al. [4]. The same criteria have been used in recently published studies and they are accepted by the American registry of pathology [1,6,11,16]. The percentage of malignant tumours is similar to that found in other series (e.g. 37% in the study of Magdeleinat et al. [11], 36% in the study of England et al. [4]), but there is a considerable variability ranging from 7 to 60% reported in other studies [5–7]. A likely explanation for the variability might be the difficulty in establishing the criteria for malignancy in large tumours due to heterogeneity of the lesion.
Recently VATS has been reported to be a promising surgical approach for resection of SFTPs resulting in less invasive surgery and therefore minimising postoperative morbidity [5]. Other advantages of VATS are better cosmetic results and in theory less costs because of shorter hospital stays. We found a significantly shorter hospital stay (4.5 days) in patients operated by VATS compared to patients operated by anterolateral thoracotomy (7.5 days). There was a tendency towards fewer postoperative complications occurring in the VATS group (6.7%) in comparison with thoracotomy (25%). Takahama et al. [5] reported a mean duration of hospital stay of 8.6 days in their series of 13 patients including 9 patients operated by VATS; further comparative data between thoracotomy and VATS in SFTPs are lacking. Of note, very large lesions (e.g. >10 cm diameter) and tumours with radiological signs of invasion into the chest wall or intrathoracic organs are not suitable for VATS, and tumour diameter was significantly larger in the thoracotomy group in our study. Furthermore, the extent of resection possibly influences postoperative morbidity and the length of hospital stay, although the differences between VATS and thoracotomy found in our series could not be entirely explained by the different extent of resection.
Local recurrences of SFTPs after complete surgical resection are not uncommon in malignant forms, but are exceptionally rare in benign lesions [1,4]. If recurrence does occur in benign lesions, this may be due to incomplete resection, unrecognised malignancy or growth of an unrelated second SFTP, which has been described previously [4]. We observed recurrence of the tumour during follow-up in 4 out of 10 patients with malignant SFTPs, although some authors report less recurrences [11,17], and in none with benign SFTPs, which is in accordance with other series [4,7]. A possible explanation for these differences could be different radiological methods used at follow-up. It must be stressed that the minimal-invasive approach by VATS should not compromise an oncologically sound operation, and therefore the type of operation (VATS vs thoracotomy) should not influence tumour recurrence.
De Perrot et al. [1] suggested a follow-up plan after resection of malignant SFTPs with half-yearly radiologic controls by CT in the first 2 years and yearly thereafter. Especially in malignant lesions a long-term follow-up is mandatory because of possible late recurrences, which can be locally aggressive, and lead to death through local invasion and compression, which occurred in two of our patients. In case of recurrence, surgical resection is the treatment of choice with a good chance for complete cure [1]. There are only a few cases described in the literature concerning adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy in malignant SFTPs and their role needs to be established [11].
In conclusion, we found that large SFTPs with increased FDG-uptake have a high likelihood for malignancy, but the role of FDG-PET in clinical practice has to be further defined. VATS is associated with a short hospital stay and minor postoperative morbidity, and is therefore our preferred surgical approach for resection of SFTPs smaller than 10 cm. Long-term follow-up is mandatory in malignant SFTPs because of late recurrences associated with death.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Cardillo, L. Carbone, F. Carleo, N. Masala, P. Graziano, A. Bray, and M. Martelli Solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura: an analysis of 110 patients treated in a single institution. Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 88(5): 1632 - 1637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |