|
|
||||||||
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:682. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.06.021
Copyright © 2007, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
Letters to the Editor |
a Pindara Private Hospital, Australia
b University of Queensland, Australia
Received 5 May 2007; accepted 19 June 2007.
* Corresponding author. Address: PO Box 20, Terranora, NSW 2486, Australia. Tel.: +61 7 55905740; fax: +61 7 55905872. (Email: Benjamin.bidstrup{at}bigpond.com).
Key Words: Cardiac pharmacology Extracorporeal circulation Pericardium
Dr Baric and colleagues are to be congratulated for their study of topical agent use to reduce post cardiotomy bleeding [1]. The systemic effects of tranexamic acid and aprotinin are both well described regarding their efficacy and safety in open heart surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass [2].
The authors report statistically significant reductions in chest drainage after surgery in a wide variety of cardiac procedures, including off-pump coronary artery bypass (CAB) (approx 50% of cases), on-pump CAB (approx 25%) and the remainder a range of operations seen in a busy CT unit.
Many of these procedures would be considered to be at low risk of bleeding; especially given antiplatelet agents were ceased five or more days prior to surgery and all cases were primary procedures [3].
The blood loss data shows an absolute reduction in the first 12 h of 190 ml in the tranexamic acid group and 222 ml in the aprotinin group. This is less than half a bag of packed red cells. Similar changes were reported in the other time periods. Of more interest, there was no reduction in transfusion requirements, nor was there any difference in reexploration rates. The early studies of prophylactic aprotinin given systemically in CAB patients showed not only reductions in chest drainage, but also blood use as well as a marker of red cell loss (haemoglobin loss) [4,5].
A therapy of any type has risk and benefits. A benefit should not only be statistically significant but also clinically relevant. The use in this population of tranexamic acid and aprotinin offers no useful clinical advantage as reported in this study.
It is somewhat hard to see what relevance the use of either agent is in off-pump CAB; a procedure touted for its minimal bleeding and blood use. Baric reports the 24 h bleeding and transfusion was neither statistically significant nor clinically relevant.
What advantage does topical tranexamic acid or aprotinin offer these patients?
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Baric, D. Unic, and B. Biocina Reply to Bidstrup and Yellowlees Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 32(4): 682 - 683. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |