|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letters to the Editor |
Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University Hospital, Baltimore, United States
Received 13 August 2007; accepted 14 August 2007.
* Corresponding author. Address: Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St. – Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States. Tel.: +1 443 287 1262; fax: +1 410 955 3809. (Email: lvricella{at}jhmo.edu).
Key Words: Congenital cardiac surgery Aortic coarctation
We read with great interest the Letter to the Editor by Troise et al. [1] concerning our recently published review of a 20-year experience with subclavian flap aortoplasty for treatment of aortic coarctation in neonates and infants [2]. We congratulate the group at the University of Bari on their results and agree with an individualized approach to aortic coarctation based on morphology. We believe that the size and Doppler-flow acceleration across the mid-aortic arch should guide the surgical approach, and is preferable to routine resection and anastomosis that involves a diminutive and fragile aortic arch in the small neonate. Following subclavian flap repair, the mid-aortic arch with a mild gradient often grows, and we concur with reserving sternotomy with repair on hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass with selective cerebral perfusion for patients with a diffusely hypoplastic aortic arch or those needing concomitant intracardiac repair. In cases of mild stenosis between the right brachiocephalic artery and left common carotid with diminutive distal aortic arch and isthmus, a reverse subclavian flap followed by an end-to-end anastomosis can be considered.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |