|
|
||||||||
a Heart Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
b Department of Clinical Physiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
Received 19 June 2007; received in revised form 17 August 2007; accepted 22 August 2007.
* Corresponding author. Address: Heart Center, Tampere University Hospital, P.O. Box 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland. Tel.: +358 3 31165039; fax: +358 3 31165045. (Email: mika.kohonen{at}pshp.fi).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Radial artery Coronary artery bypass grafting Ultrasonography Allen test
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The circulation of the hand is supported by two main arteries, ulnar artery and radial artery. Some individuals have even a third, or median, artery supporting the hand. These arteries form several collaterals in the hand which makes the harvest of the radial artery possible without compromising the circulation [5]. Sufficient circulation to the hand can be endangered in situations with lack of palmar collaterals, absent or insufficient ulnar artery or sclerotic changes within the supra-aortic, brachial or antebrachial vessels if the radial artery is sacrificed. For reasons mentioned above 7.5–27.1% of the radial arteries are not suitable for harvesting [6,7].
Our aim was to study whether the Allen test alone is a reliable screening method before harvest of the radial artery regarding sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy.
| 2. Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Allen test was performed by asking the subject to clench his fist for 1 min while both radial and ulnar arteries were compressed with the examiner's fingers. The wrist was held at the level of the heart and extension was avoided. The ulnar artery was then released and the time that elapsed between the release and the recovery of normal pallor of the thumb and thenar area was recorded. Cut-off point was determined at 6 s. A positive test was reported when there was abnormality in the capillary filling of the fingers in 6 s.
Biplane ultrasonography was performed to assess calcification, sclerosis of the media and anomalies. The inner diameters of the radial and ulnar arteries were measured both distally and proximally. A transducer with emission frequency between 5 and 10 MHz was used, based on best visibility (Aloka, Pro Sound 5500). The harvest of the radial artery was contraindicated when diffuse intimal or medial calcification was present, when inner diameter of the radial artery was less than 2 mm or an anomaly, such as high bifurcation of the brachial artery or hypoplasia of the radial or ulnar artery, was seen. Circulatory measurements with Doppler ultrasonography included peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) of both radial and ulnar artery. A resistance index was calculated (PSV-EDV/PSV). These measurements were repeated on the ulnar artery while the radial artery was compressed. During radial compression the distal part of the radial artery was controlled for reverse flow. An absence of reverse flow in the radial artery and an increase of ulnar PSV less than 20% were interpreted as abnormal findings and were considered as contraindications for radial artery harvest [6,7].
Digital plethysmography (Finapress) was performed on every digit both at rest and during radial compression. A 40% decrease in systolic pressure in any digit was considered abnormal and was a contraindication for harvest [6].
Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS 15.0 software.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Changes of flow velocity and resistance index in ulnar artery between rest and during radial compression are summarised in Table 1 . All changes in flow velocities were significant. In eight patients the increase of ulnar PSV was less than 20%. Reverse flow on distal radial artery during radial compression was present in 122 patients. Intimal calcification in radial artery was found in 12 patients and on ulnar artery in 13 patients. Sclerosis of the media was seen on seven patients radial artery and on six ulnar arteries.
|
Digital plethysmography showed significant changes in digital pressures between rest and radial compression. These are summarised in Table 2 . Thirty-three patients had a 40% decrease on digital pressure in thumb, 19 of these (13.1%) had zero pressure. Corresponding figures for the fifth finger are 25 and 15 (10.3%), respectively.
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are several reasons for insufficient ulnar hand circulation. The collaterals between the radial artery and the ulnar artery are several. Altogether there are four arches, two in the carpal area and two in the palmar area. The palmar arches, superficial and deep, are especially important. They have been studied in detail in several cadaver studies [5,9]. Although there is considerable variation between the reported results, it is important to notice that the superficial and deep arch support each other in majority of cases, and thus, create a safety marginal.
The Allen test is a clinical test and, as such, a subjective measure, which contains several possible biases. It tells us nothing about the vascular anatomy of the hand, only the functional circulatory status which is interpreted by the examiner, whose interpretation is based on experience that may vary considerably. A false-negative result may be due to inadequate compression of the radial artery and false-positive result may be due to extension of the wrist. Furthermore there is no consensus regarding the cut-off point which may vary between 3 and 10 s. We chose to set the cut-off point to 6 s as a compromise between absolute sensitivity and specificity.
Jarvis et al. [4] studied 93 hands in 47 patients with Doppler ultrasonography and the Allen test to examine the overall reliability of the Allen test and determine the optimal cut-off point. They found that diagnostic accuracy was maximal at 5 s cut-off point, being 79.6%. Sensitivity and specificity were 75.8% and 81.7%, respectively. Sensitivity was at its peak level at 3 s (100%), but diagnostic accuracy was only 52% and specificity decreased to 27%. The authors concluded that the Allen test is unreliable and should be substituted with more objective tests.
Ruengsakulrach et al. [10] used a 10 s cut-off point and studied 71 patients with the Allen test, Doppler ultrasonography dynamic test and biplane for evaluation of the anatomy. Diagnostic accuracy was 97.2% when compared to ultrasonography regarding the flow in thumb artery. The absence of flow in thumb artery was considered as a contraindication for harvest of radial artery. Sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 97.1%, respectively. Other parameters, namely flow of the superficial palmar arch and flow of the ulnar artery, were not as reliable as the flow of thumb artery. The authors concluded that the Allen test is a valid screening method and that the use of ultrasound in conjunction with the Allen test permits safe harvest of the radial artery.
Earlier ultrasonography studies have shown that collateral circulation is insufficient in 10–23% of cases where radial artery is considered for harvesting [6]. Our own study showed that 27.7% (40/145) of patients had anatomical variations, pathologic changes or abnormal circulatory findings that would have made the harvest of radial artery questionable. Their radial arteries were left untouched.
There are multiple anatomical variations that unable the use of radial artery. A small diameter may carry problems in harvesting and in anastomosis technique. Also medial or intimal calcification can cause problems which may lead to a poorer patency or graft failure. Hypoplasia of ulnar artery is rare but does exist. In our material one patient had a hypoplastic and one had occluded ulnar artery. In 6.8% of cases there was anatomical contraindication for radial artery harvest.
Anatomy of the radial or ulnar artery per se is seldom a reason why radial artery is not suitable for harvesting. More often there is a circulatory deficit which can be measured as insufficient increase of ulnar flow, absence of reverse flow in radial stump or as a loss of blood pressure in digits. In our study 11.7% patients had a circulatory contraindication for radial artery harvest. Anatomical and circulatory changes often correlate which each other and 9% of our patients had both anatomical and circulatory contraindications.
Circulation to the hand is secured if there is adequate collateral circulation between radial and ulnar arteries and the ulnar artery is able to respond to the increased demand. If these two prerequisites are met there should be sufficient circulation to the hand to ensure safe harvest of the radial artery. Adequate collaterals are difficult to point out except with angiography, which is impractical. Ulnar response can be measured with Doppler scanning as we have done. The functional circulatory status after radial artery harvest can be measured as blood pressure in digits or as flow digital arteries. We chose to measure blood pressure as this is easily done with plethysmography. During radial compression pressure of the thumb decreased to zero in 13.1% of the patients, which suggests radial dominance. Earlier on, this has been reported in 26–28% of patients [11].
We compared the Allen test with Doppler ultrasonography and plethysmography and found that the negative Allen test correlates well with sufficient circulation in the hand after radial artery harvest. Specificity rate was 97.1% at 6 s cut-off point. Sensitivity was 73.1%; therefore it is possible that the radial artery is harvestable even if the Allen test is positive. If the Allen test is positive or there is suspicion of pathologic changes in arterial wall of radial artery, as it can be in diabetes or in arteriosclerotic disease we recommend plethysmography and Doppler ultrasound scanning preoperatively.
Contraindications as outlined in the section 2 are summarised in Table 3 . We regard them as valid contraindications; however, none of them is absolute. In our study we found that zero pressure in thumb during radial artery compression is a marker of significantly reduced circulation of the hand and as such an absolute contraindication for radial artery harvest.
|
We conclude that the Allen test is a good and valid screening test for the circulation of the hand. If the Allen test is negative it is safe to harvest the radial artery. If it is positive further examinations are needed to ensure safe harvesting of the radial artery.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Brzezinski, T. Luisetti, and M. J. London Radial Artery Cannulation: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Anatomic and Physiologic Investigations Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2009; 109(6): 1763 - 1781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-C. Wu, S.-C. Wen, M.-K. Chen, C.-W. Yang, S.-Y. Pu, K.-C. Tsai, C.-J. Chen, and C.-H. Chao Radial artery approach for endovascular salvage of occluded autogenous radial-cephalic fistulae Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 2497 - 2502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Liava'a, S. Theodore, T. Wagner, and J. Tatoulis Late presentation digital ischemia after radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass. Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2009; 87(3): e21 - e22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kohonen, O. Teerenhovi, T. Terho, J. Laurikka, and M. Tarkka Non-harvestable radial artery. A bilateral problem? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2008; 7(5): 797 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Vukovic, S. S. Radak, M. S. Peric, D. G. NeSic, and A. M. KneSevic Radial Artery Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Stepwise-Made Decision Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 828 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Asif and P. Sarkar Re: Is the Allen test reliable enough? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2008; 33(6): 1161 - 1161. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Agrifoglio, F. Barili, L. Dainese, and P. Biglioli The Allen test is not adequate enough for the screening of hand circulation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 754 - 754. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Sajja Assessment of ulnar collateral circulation by the Allen test in patients undergoing radial artery harvest Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 755 - 755. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kohonen Reply to Agrifolio et al., Unlu, Sajja * Is the Allen test reliable enough? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 756 - 756. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Unlu Is the Allen test reliable enough? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 754 - 754. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |