EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:58-63. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.10.010
Copyright © 2008, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Gustav Fraedrich
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neuhauser, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fraedrich, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neuhauser, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fraedrich, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels

Serious complications following endovascular thoracic aortic stent-graft repair for type B dissection

Beate Neuhausera,*, Andreas Greinera, Werner Jaschkeb, Andreas Chemellib, Gustav Fraedricha

a Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria
b Department of Radiology, University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria

Received 10 August 2007; received in revised form 27 September 2007; accepted 15 October 2007.

* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Tel.: +43 512 504 80800; fax: +43 512 504 22559. (Email: Beate.Neuhauser{at}i-med.ac.at).


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 
Objective: To describe our experience with endovascular stent-graft repairs in type B aortic dissection focusing on serious secondary complications resulting in immediate or late conversion to open repair. Methods: From November 1997 to May 2007, 28 patients underwent a thoracic endovascular stent-graft procedure for acute symptomatic type B dissection at our institution. Indication for endovascular repair at our department is a complicated course of type B dissection, including thoracic aortic rupture, suspicion of impending rupture, visceral and/or peripheral ischemia, uncontrollable hypertension, and severe therapy-resistant pain. Median follow-up time was 48.3 months (range 2–97 months). Results: Secondary complications with indication for a secondary intervention occurred in 5/28 patients, resulting in additional procedures in 4 patients. One patient declined any further therapy. Conversion to an open procedure was performed in four patients, one due to type I endoleak followed by retrograde type A dissection, and three due to retrograde type A dissection. One of these patients had an additional stent-graft procedure performed due to a type III endoleak 20 months post stent grafting. Retrograde type A dissection occurred 39 months later, finally leading to conversion to an open procedure. Open surgery was performed in four patients after 3, 26, 29, and 1170 days post stent-graft placement and was successful in three patients. The fourth patient died 3 months post-surgically due to multi-organ failure. The procedure-related mortality rate following secondary complications was (1/5) 20%. Conclusions: Endovascular stent-graft repair of the thoracic aorta is an alternative to surgical repair, however not without significant morbidity and mortality. Potentially lethal complications, acute or delayed, may occur.

Key Words: Endovascular thoracic aortic repair • Severe complication • Type B dissection


   1. Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 
Aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition associated with a mortality rate up to 80% if left untreated [1–5]. The preferred treatment in uncomplicated Stanford type B dissection involving the descending aorta is conservative with meticulous control of blood pressure [2–4]. Acute surgical treatment in type B dissection is reserved for patients with a complicated course such as dissection progression bearing the risk of aortic rupture, branch vessel occlusion resulting in visceral and/or leg ischemia, refractory hypertension, or pain. Aortic replacement for acute aortic dissection showed significant mortality (29–50%) and paraplegia rate (30–36%) [5–7]. There was and is a clear need for less invasive techniques. Endovascular repair of a complicated Stanford type B dissection has several benefits compared to open surgery. Thoracotomy, extracorporal circulation, or aortic cross-clamping and single lung ventilation can be avoided. Minimal anticoagulation is sufficient. Minimal invasiveness decreased ischemic events to the spinal cord, viscera, and kidneys. Minimal blood loss is an additional advantage. The 30-day mortality rate following endovascular type B dissection repair is acceptably low at 8.4% [1]. Several study groups have documented the feasibility of endovascular stent-graft repair in acute or elective type B dissection, however not without significant morbidity [1–14]. Acute or delayed retrograde type A dissection (6, 8%) [15–18], stroke (3%) [1], paraplegia (2%) [1], access-related complications (27%) [10], endoleaks (4%) [1], bowel infarction, limb ischemia, or wound infection have been described [1–10].

The aim of this report was to describe our experience with endovascular stent-graft repairs in type B aortic dissection focusing on serious secondary complications resulting in immediate or late conversion to open repair.


   2. Materials and methods
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 
2.1 Patient population
From November 1997 to May 2007, 28 patients underwent a thoracic endovascular stent-graft procedure for acute symptomatic or progressive type B dissection at our institution. Indication for endovascular repair at our department is a complicated course of type B dissection including thoracic aortic rupture, suspicion of impending rupture, visceral and/or peripheral ischemia, uncontrollable hypertension, and severe therapy-resistant pain.

2.2 Pre-procedural imaging studies
In all patients, CT angiography of the entire aorta with three-dimensional vascular reconstruction was performed preoperatively to determine the anatomical feasibility for the stent-graft procedure, the level of entry and re-entry sites, location, extension, and relationship between the dissection membrane and significant aortic branches such as the left subclavian artery and visceral vessels. Dimensions of stent grafts used were determined on the basis of contrast-enhanced spiral CT images (HiSpeed Advantage and Light Speed QX/I; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) and angiographic images.

2.3 Stent-graft device
Two types of stent grafts were used in this series: the GORE Thoracic Excluder Endoprothesis (W.L. Gore and Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ), a modular system manufactured with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis supported by a self-expanding nitinol stent exoskeleton; and the Talent endoluminal stent graft system (Medtronic AVE, Sunrise, FL), a self-expanding endograft consisting of a polyester (Dacron) graft fabric and self-expanding nitinol exoskeleton with bare springs at the proximal site of the covered portion. The stent-graft procedure was described in detail previously [19].

In patients with a short proximal landing zone, the origin of the left subclavian artery was crossed with the uncovered or covered portion of the stent graft to extend the landing zone. A four-vessel cerebral angiography was obtained prior to overstenting to document the collateral blood supply to the left subclavian artery in these patients. A carotid-to-carotid and subclavian-to-carotid bypass procedure was performed in one patient prior to the stent-graft procedure to extend the proximal landing zone to the left carotid artery. A completion angiography was performed to ensure complete sealing and adequate device placement and to assess the adequacy of the repair. A completion CT scan was performed within 2 days post-procedure in all patients to confirm complete sealing of the entry tear and the lack of endoleaks.

2.4 Follow-up investigation
Median follow-up time was 48.3 months (range 2–97 months). Clinical examinations and contrast-enhanced spiral CT post stent grafting was performed after 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Follow-up CTs were repeated more frequently for the investigation of suspected complications such as changes in the morphologic characteristics or progress of the dissection, or new-onset endoleaks. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was done in cases of suspected complications. The presence and source of endoleaks are classified at all time intervals according to the standard classification [20].

2.5 Data collection
A patient database was used to record clinical variables, including information on patient history, clinical presentation, medical and surgical/endovascular treatment, and outcomes including mortality and morbidity prospectively. Yearly follow-up data were obtained including clinical and imaging data, as well as information about mortality and morbidity.

2.6 Statistical evaluation
Statistical analysis was performed by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 10.1.3. Patient survival rates were calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier life table method (Fig. 1 ).


Figure 1
View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 1. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 10.1.3. Patient survival rates were calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier life table method. Six years cumulative survival (Kaplan–Meier). Years after intervention; n, number of patients at risk; CS, cumulative survival rate calculated for 6 years.

 

   3. Results
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 
Secondary complications with indication for a secondary intervention occurred in 5/28 patients. Patient characteristics are listed in Table 1 . The cumulative survival rate was 78%, 73%, and 58% after 1, 3, and 6 years, respectively (Kaplan–Meier method Fig. 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 Patients’ characteristics
 
Five patients, four males and one female (median age 65 years, range 43–87), experienced complications after thoracic aortic endovascular stent-graft repair within a median time of 306 days (range 3–1170 days) resulting in conversion to open surgery in four patients. All besides one aortic stent graft were correctly positioned; the entry tear was completely excluded following endovascular stent grafting in four patients suffering from type B dissection. However, the fifth patient, an 87-year-old female, showed a type I endoleak without further possibility for an additional stent-graft deployment due to anatomical conditions. Retrograde type A dissection was observed on the follow-up CT scan 3 days later. Although any kind of therapy was declined, the patient survived 50 more months and finally deceased due to respiratory failure. In a 65-year-old male completion angiography and follow-up CT scan 2 days post-procedure (Fig. 2 ) was unremarkable, although emergency open surgery was performed 29 days post stent-graft placement due to a retrograde type A dissection (Fig. 3 ) and consisted of successful graft replacement of the ascending aorta. In the intraoperative findings, there was an intimal injury next to the proximal struts of the stent graft. It is most likely that the aortic wall was injured by handling the endovascular devices. Unfortunately, the patient developed a permanent tetraplegia following the replacement of the ascending aorta and partial replacement of the aortic arch.


Figure 2
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 2. Post-interventional contrast-enhanced spiral CT image performed 2 days post endovascular therapy is showing the stent graft in place, the false lumen thrombosed, and the ascending aorta appears unremarkable (arrow).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Fig. 3. Post-interventional contrast-enhanced spiral CT image performed 29 days post endovascular therapy due to new-onset chest pain shows a dissection of the ascending aorta (arrow). The intima is nearly completely detached from the ascending aortic wall. The stent graft is seen in the descending aorta.

 
In a 64-year-old male the distal entry side continued to show significant blood flow at the completion of angiography during the initial procedure, therefore a third Talent stent graft was inserted and balloon dilatation was used after deployment in order to compress the additional stent graft to the dissected aortic wall. While using the inflatable balloon, disconnection between the second and third stent graft occurred resulting in a type III endoleak. Additional stent-graft deployment between the second and third stent graft was not possible because no further appropriate stent graft was on hand. The stent graft was ordered; however, the patient developed the retrograde type A dissection before we were able to do the additional stent-graft procedure. The patient complained of new-onset chest pain on post-interventional day 3. CT scan showed a retrograde type A dissection. Emergent extended aortic arch and descending aortic replacement was performed, and the Talent stent grafts were removed. Intraoperative findings revealed an aortic tear next to the proximal end of the stent graft. The patient died 3 months post-surgically due to multi-organ failure.

A 63-year-old male developed a type III endoleak 619 days post stent grafting due to migration between the originally perfectly placed two stent grafts. A further stent graft was successfully deployed; however, 39 months later the patient developed a retrograde type A dissection. Significant descending aortic enlargement at the distal end of the stent graft following the second endovascular stent-graft procedure was observed from 60 mm up to 84 mm within 24 months. The patient and his relatives declined thoraco-abdominal aortic replacement. Thirty-nine months after the second stent-graft procedure a retrograde type A dissection occurred unrelated to the additional endovascular procedure, resulting in emergency graft replacement of the ascending aorta.

In a 43-year-old male completion angiography and follow-up CT scan 2 days post-procedure was unremarkable. However, 26 days after the initial procedure, the patient developed a retrograde type A dissection resulting in emergency graft replacement of the ascending aorta. The stent grafts themselves were intact and well positioned within the descending aorta. The new entry tear was located in the ascending aorta, clearly unrelated to the stent-graft procedure. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course. Follow-up investigations were done at an outside hospital. Proximal descending aortic enlargement from 50 mm to 70 mm was detected after 50 months. Graft replacement of the aortic arch and the descending aorta was performed. The patient had serious respiratory complications and finally deceased due to sepsis 51 months after the initial symptoms and endovascular stent-graft therapy for type B dissection. Autopsy was declined.

In hospital mortality rate was 14% (4/28) including one stroke, two multi-organ failures, and one respiratory failure (4/27). Total mortality rate was 32% including one retrograde type A dissection, one myocardial infarction, one pulmonary failure, and one cerebral hemorrhage (8/28). The mortality was aortic disease-related in 14% (4/28). The procedure-related mortality rate following acute retrograde type A dissection was 20% (1/5). Mean follow-up was 43 months (range 2–97 months).


   4. Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
 References
 
The first results on stent-graft repair in type B aortic dissection were published in 1999 by Dake et al. and Nienaber et al. [10,14]. Since then numerous reported data confirm the technical feasibility and relative low rate of complications compared to surgical repair [1–6,8–14,21]. However, with growing experience in endovascular stent-graft repair more and more serious complications are reported. Aneurysm development, aortic rupture, stroke, paraplegia, bowel infarction, limb ischemia, access-related complications, and endoleaks have been described [1–14]. Retrograde type A dissection was recognized by several study groups; however, it is still an unexpected complication following endovascular stent-graft repair [15–18].

The primary goal of endovascular stent-graft repair in type B aortic dissection is to provide false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodeling with false lumen reduction. Closure of the proximal entry tear is essential to achieve these primary goals [10,14]. After endovascular treatment, a strict imaging follow-up is essential to detect endoleaks, antegrade or retrograde dissection progression, development of proximal or distal aortic enlargement, all signs that might increase the risk of aortic rupture [11,15,22].

Extension of the dissection is a known event in type B dissection. It is important to note that patients with successful initial treatment of acute or chronic aortic dissection have a systemic illness that predisposes their entire aorta to dissection in an ante- or retrograde manner, the first possibility for retrograde type A dissection development following stent-graft repair. Medical therapy alone does not stop the blood flow to and within the false lumen. Expansion of the false lumen, aneurysm formation, or aortic rupture may occur. It has been estimated that nearly a third of patients surviving initial treatment for acute dissection will experience dissection extension or aortic rupture within 5 years of presentation [7,11].

The incidence of retrograde type A dissection with an entry in the descending aorta ranges from 4% to 20% among Stanford type A dissections [6,23]. Our results are similar to the Stanford group. Acute retrograde type A dissection after endovascular stent-graft repair is a rare complication that has been described in conjunction with the procedure [16,17]. However, as seen in five of our patients, one must be aware that this complication can occur not only during the procedure but even days, weeks, or months following stent-graft implantation, a fact that seems to be under-reported. Dissections that originate in the descending aorta and extend in a retrograde direction into the ascending aorta may lead to aortic valve regurgitation, cerebrovascular ischemia, pericardial tamponade, and obstruction of the coronary artery. Open surgery is the treatment of choice in an effort to avert these life-threatening complications.

The retrograde dissection was clearly related to the initial stent-graft procedure in three of our patients; the entry tear was not completely excluded by a Talent stent graft in the 87-year-old lady and showed a type I endoleak at the end of the procedure. By scrutinizing all images of that patient, who was initially treated for an acute type B dissection, the pre-interventional diagnosis of peri-aortic effusion was questioned. Retrospectively, the hypodense fringe encasing the ascending aorta was interpreted as an intramural hematoma. We suspect that the fragility of the aortic wall caused by this pathology finally resulted in a type A dissection, which was triggered by the stent-graft procedure. The 64-year-old male in whom a type III endoleak occurred due to disconnection between the second and third Talent stent graft while balloon dilatation was performed was in a high risk to develop a complication while waiting for an additional suitable stent graft. Not having the appropriate material available needs to be added on the list of risk factors for developing serious complications. The 65-year-old male, in whom two Gore Tag devices were used for type B dissection repair, showed the new entry tear next to the proximal part of the stent graft during emergency surgery. Balloon dilatation during the stent-graft procedure might have triggered the intimal damage resulting in retrograde type A dissection in that case. The poor quality of the aortic wall may be another cofactor leading to this severe complication. We suspect that repeated balloon dilatation provoked the retrograde type A dissection at least in one of our patients. Two out of five patients with type B dissection showed persistent blood flow into the false lumen at the end of the procedure. The small number of cases impaired the ability to draw final conclusions, however persistent blood flow might be a positive predictor for type A dissection due to the still existing pressure against the aortic wall within the false lumen.

Retrospectively, acute dissection may have been initiated during the endovascular procedure, and then extended in a retrograde manner during the following days or weeks. Wire and sheath handling or balloon dilatation during the endovascular procedure may have caused localized intimal minimal tears in the extremely fragile and easily injured intimal flap and aortic wall that progressed and resulted in a new-onset dissection. The device itself may have also contributed to the new-onset dissection. It is well known that the Gore Excluder prosthesis has a better longitudinal flexibility that adapts better to the aortic curve of the distal arch than the Talent device, which has a semi-rigid design. However, both types of stent grafts may require repeated balloon dilatation to accommodate the curved geometry of the aortic arch and to form a tight seal. Intimal injuries directed by local forces against the intima may have occurred. In addition, routinely performed stent-graft oversizing may have contributed to the intimal injuries despite exact measurements and the use of stent-graft oversizes recommended by the manufactures was used. Our inserted stent grafts are usually 10% larger than the diameter of the non-effected segment of the aorta proximal to the entry tear to achieve secure proximal sealing.

The new type A dissection had no relation to the stent graft in two patients. One patient initially admitted for acute type B dissection showed an entry tear located in the ascending aorta unrelated to the stent graft during emergent surgery 26 days later. The second patient developed a significant distal expansion of the descending thoracic aorta 39 months after an additional stent-graft procedure due to type III endoleak followed by retrograde type A dissection. No relation to the primary or secondary endovascular stent-graft procedure was found; the entry tear was located in the ascending aorta. The possible explanation for the new-onset type A dissection might be caused by disease progression.


   5. Conclusion
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
References
 
The number of patients treated for acute or chronic type B dissection at our institution is small. Final conclusions regarding precursors for developing a potentially lethal retrograde type A dissection are not feasible; however, the poor quality of the aortic wall in patients with type B dissection seems to be related to this severe complication. The influence of the different stent grafts in connection with intimal injuries is questionable, although forced and repeated balloon dilatation is an important factor which contributed to intimal injuries. Avoiding of balloon dilatation is recommended whenever possible since self-expanding forces of the stent grafts also result in continuous expansion of the true lumen over time.

Endovascular stent-graft repair of the thoracic aorta is an alternative to surgical repair, however not without significant morbidity and mortality. Potentially lethal complications, acute or delayed, may occur. Life-long surveillance is mandatory.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Leurs LJ, Bell R, Degrieck Y, Thomas S, Hobo R, Lundbom J, EUROSTAR; UK Thoracic Endograft Registry collaborators Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic diseases: combined experience from the EUROSTAR and United Kingdom Thoracic Endograft registries. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:670-679[discussion 679–80].[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Kato N, Shimono T, Hirano T, Ishida M, Yada I, Takeda K. Transluminal placement of endovascular stent-grafts for the treatment of type A aortic dissection with an entry tear in the descending thoracic aorta. J Vasc Surg 2001;34:1023-1028.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Greenberg R, Khwaja J, Haulon S, Fulton G. Aortic dissections: new perspectives and treatment paradigms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003;26:579-586.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Marui A, Mochizuki T, Mitsui N, Koyama T, Kimura F, Horibe M. Toward the best treatment for uncomplicated patients with type B acute aortic dissection: a consideration for sound surgical indication. Circulation 1999;100:275-280.
  5. Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Jamieson SW, Shumway NE. Independent determinants of operative mortality for patients with aortic dissections. Circulation 1984;70:153-164.[Free Full Text]
  6. Erbel R, Oelert H, Meyer J, Puth M, Mohr-Katoly S, Hausmann D, Daniel W, Maffei S, Caruso A, Covino FE. Effect of medical and surgical therapy on aortic dissection evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography. Implications for prognosis and therapy. The European Cooperative Study Group on Echocardiography. Circulation 1993;87:1604-1615.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Crawford ES, Svensson LG, Hess KR, Shenaq SS, Coselli JS, Safi HJ, Mohindra PK, Rivera V. A prospective randomized study of cerebrospinal fluid drainage to prevent paraplegia after high-risk surgery on the thoracoabdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 1991;13:36-45[discussion 45–6].[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Mehta RH, Suzuki T, Hagan PG, Bossone E, Gilon D, Llovet A, Maroto LC, Cooper JV, Smith DE, Armstrong WF, Nienaber CA, Eagle KA, International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Investigators Predicting death in patients with acute type a aortic dissection. Circulation 2002;105:200-206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Panneton JM, Hollier LH. Dissecting descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: part II. Ann Vasc Surg 1995;9:596-605Review.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Nienaber CA, Fattori R, Lund G, Dieckmann C, Wolf W, von Kodolitsch Y, Nicolas V, Pierangeli A. Nonsurgical reconstruction of thoracic aortic dissection by stent-graft placement. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1539-1545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Aortic dissection: new frontiers in diagnosis and management: part II: therapeutic management and follow-up. Circulation 2003;108:772-778.[Free Full Text]
  12. Kato N, Hirano T, Takeda K, Nakagawa T, Mizumoto T, Yuasa H, Shimizu Y. Treatment of aortic dissections with a percutaneous intravascular endoprosthesis: comparison of covered and bare stents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1994;5:805-812.[Medline]
  13. Walker PJ, Dake, MD, Mitchell RS, Miller DC. The use of endovascular techniques for the treatment of complications of aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 1993;18:1042-1051.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Dake MD, Kato N, Mitchell RS, Semba CP, Razavi MK, Shimono T, Hirano T, Takeda K, Yada I, Miller DC. Endovascular stent-graft placement for the treatment of acute aortic dissection. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1546-1552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Neuhauser B, Czermak BV, Fish J, Perkmann R, Jaschke W, Chemelli A, Fraedrich G. Type A dissection following endovascular thoracic aortic stent-graft repair. J Endovasc Ther 2005;12:74-81.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Totaro M, Miraldi F, Fanelli F, Mazzesi G. Emergency surgery for retrograde extension of type B dissection after endovascular stent graft repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:1057-1058.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Fanelli F, Salvatori FM, Marcelli G, Bezzi M, Totaro M, Vagnarelli S, Dake, MD, Rossi P, Passariello R. Type A aortic dissection developing during endovascular repair of an acute type B dissection. J Endovasc Ther 2003;10:254-259.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Pasic M, Bergs P, Knollmann F, Zipfel B, Müller P, Hofmann M, Hetzer R. Delayed retrograde aortic dissection after endovascular stenting of the descending thoracic aorta. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:184-186.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Neuhauser B, Perkmann R, Greiner A, Steingruber I, Tauscher T, Jaschke W, Fraedrich G, Czermak BV. Mid-term results after endovascular repair of the atherosclerotic descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;28:146-153.[Medline]
  20. White GH, Yu W, May J, Chaufour X, Stephen MS. Endoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, incidence, diagnosis, and management. J Endovasc Surg 1997;4:152-168.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Fattori R, Lovato L, Buttazzi K, Russo V. Evolving experience of percutaneous management of type B aortic dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;3:115-122.
  22. Juvonen T, Ergin MA, Galla JD, Lansman SL, McCullough JN, Nguyen K, Bodian CA, Ehrlich MP, Spielvogel D, Klein JJ, Griepp RB. Risk factors for rupture of chronic type B dissections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:776-786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kazui T, Tamiya Y, Tanaka T, Komatsu S. Extended aortic replacement for acute type A dissection with the tear in the descending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:973-978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
H. Eggebrecht, R. H. Mehta, A. Dechene, K. Tsagakis, H. Kuhl, S. Huptas, G. Gerken, H. G. Jakob, and R. Erbel
Aortoesophageal Fistula After Thoracic Aortic Stent-Graft Placement: A Rare but Catastrophic Complication of a Novel Emerging Technique
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 570 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. M. R. Alves, J. H. P. da Fonseca, J. A. M. de Souza, H. C. Kim, G. Esher, and E. Buffolo
Endovascular treatment of type B aortic dissection: the challenge of late success.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1360 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Circ Cardiovasc IntervHome page
D. Y. Sze, M. A.A.J. van den Bosch, M. D. Dake, D. C. Miller, L. V. Hofmann, R. Varghese, S. C. Malaisrie, P. J.A. van der Starre, J. Rosenberg, and R. S. Mitchell
Factors Portending Endoleak Formation After Thoracic Aortic Stent-Graft Repair of Complicated Aortic Dissection
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, April 1, 2009; 2(2): 105 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ICVTSHome page
N. Uchida, H. Shibamura, A. Katayama, K. Aishin, M. Sutoh, and M. Kuraoka
Surgical strategies for organ malperfusions in acute type B aortic dissection
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, January 1, 2009; 8(1): 75 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. D. Parker and J. Golledge
Outcome of Endovascular Treatment of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1707 - 1712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
G. Melissano, L. Bertoglio, A. Kahlberg, D. Baccellieri, M. M. Marrocco-Trischitta, F. Calliari, and R. Chiesa
Evaluation of a new disease-specific endovascular device for type B aortic dissection.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2008; 136(4): 1012 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
W. Y. Szeto, M. McGarvey, A. Pochettino, G. W. Moser, A. Hoboken, K. Cornelius, E. Y. Woo, J. P. Carpenter, R. M. Fairman, and J. E. Bavaria
Results of a New Surgical Paradigm: Endovascular Repair for Acute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 86(1): 87 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B. Neuhauser
Reply to Mastroroberto et al. * Serious complications following endovascular thoracic aortic stent-graft repair for type B dissection
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 946 - 947.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
P. Mastroroberto, A. di Virgilio, A. Renzulli, and C. Indolfi
Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: is it possible to prevent post-procedure complications?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 945 - 946.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Gustav Fraedrich
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neuhauser, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fraedrich, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neuhauser, B.
Right arrow Articles by Fraedrich, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS