|
|
||||||||
a Heart Center, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
b Heart Center, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated 1st Hospital, Alexandria University, Faculty of Medicine, Egypt
c Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Turku, Finland
Received 24 August 2007; received in revised form 18 December 2007; accepted 19 December 2007.
* Corresponding author. Address: Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Center, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, PO Box 2000, Fin-33521 Tampere, Finland. Tel.: +358 3 31166378; fax: +358 3 31165756. (Email: matti.tarkka{at}pshp.fi).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Adenosine Apoptosis Cardioplegic solution Cardiopulmonary bypass Myocardial protection
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Indeed, animal and human studies have demonstrated that cardioplegic arrest during open heart surgery has been associated with induction of endothelial cell and cardiomyocyte apoptosis [3,6,7,19,20].
Various cardioplegic protocols have been evaluated to decrease the apoptotic process. Cold blood cardioplegia has been reported to be superior to cold crystalloid cardioplegia in inhibiting myocardial apoptosis during ischemic arrest [8,9]. It is currently the most commonly used technique to maintain a safe form of cardiac arrest during cardiac surgery.
Adenosine is an endogenous substance with well-documented cardioprotective properties against ischemia-reperfusion injury [10]. Several studies have shown promising results with adenosine as an adjunct to hyperkalemic cardioplegia, both in large animal models, [11] and in clinical trials [12]. However, the effects of adenosine on cardiomyocyte apoptosis remain largely unknown.
Adenosine induces rapid cardioplegic arrest by inhibiting sinus and atrioventricular node function [13]. The cardioprotective effect is shown to be due to both A1 receptor and A3 receptor activation [14,15]. The mitochondrial ATP sensitive K+ channel (mitoKATP) activation downstream of protein kinase C (PKC) activation is shown to be involved in the signal transduction pathway from adenosine receptor activation [16].
The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that adding 250 µg/kg adenosine directly into the aortic root as an adjuvant to cold blood cardioplegia is successful in modifying the occurrence of cardiomyocyte apoptosis in the left ventricle of patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patient selection was planned to result in homogenous study and control groups. The exclusion criteria were diabetic patients with sulfonylurea medication, unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction within the last month, redo cardiac operation, preoperative diagnosis of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney function impairment or liver dysfunction. Patients with poor left ventricular function (ejection fraction EF
30), valvular disease, and those receiving corticosteroids were considered not eligible.
2.2 Anesthesia
A radial artery line and a pulmonary artery catheter were inserted for hemodynamic monitoring. Anesthesia was induced with propofol (0.5–1.0 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.6–0.8 µg/kg) and cis-atracurium. Sufentanil infusion was continued with a rate of 0.03–0.05 µg/kg min. Sevoflurane was used as the main anesthetic agent throughout the operation, and also provided during the cardiopulmonary perfusion with a vaporizer attached to the fresh gas inlet. It is important to consider that sevoflurane may have an effect on the KATP-channels comparable to that of adenosine.
2.3 Operative and perfusion techniques
The surgical techniques were standardized in all cases. A median sternotomy was performed, and one internal thoracic artery and from one to four peripheral vein grafts from the lower extremities were taken in each case. Radial artery graft was harvested whenever indicated. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established with regular cannulation technique using mild hypothermia (35 °C) with nonpulsative flow with a membrane oxygenator. The circuit was primed with 1500 ml of Ringer's acetate. The proximal anastomoses were constructed during a single cross-clamping period.
2.4 Cardioplegia and adenosine administration
Patients were allocated into two groups. In the adenosine group, 20 patients received adenosine 250 µg/kg into the aortic root just after cross-clamping. This dose was chosen in view of a pilot study to be the lowest effective dose to stop the myocardium. Twenty patients in the control group received normal saline as placebo. All patients received routine blood cardioplegia delivered through antegrade route. The effect of adenosine is known to be dependent on the temperature [11]. Therefore, the first cardioplegia infusion was given at normothermia. After reaching asystole, cardioplegia temperature was lowered to 10–12 °C. Subsequent 1 min antegrade cardioplegia infusions were administered after completion of each distal anastomosis, and final warm antegrade cardioplegia (37 °C) was given for 3 min before the removal of the aortic clamp.
2.5 Tissue harvesting
Two samples of left ventricular apex were harvested from each patient in both groups. The first sample was obtained after CBP was established immediately before aortic cross-clamp by oblique introduction of Tru-Cut needle (PRECISATM 14G x 150 mm) into the left ventricle apical wall. The second sample was taken from the same location by the same needle before cardiopulmonary bypass was stopped. The puncture sites were secured with small 4-0 Prolene (Ethicon) stitch even when no bleeding occurred. Myocardial tissue (5–10 x 3 mm) was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for histological studies.
2.6 Assessment of apoptosis
Apoptosis was detected using the TUNEL (terminal transferase mediated ddUTP nick-end labeling) assay, as previously described. [17,18] In brief, paraffin-embedded myocardial sections were heated in sodium citrate solution and digested with proteinase-K to expose DNA. The DNA strand breaks were then labeled using terminal transferase with digoxigenin-conjugated ddUTP and visualized using alkaline phosphatase immunohistochemistry (IHC). To confirm optimal sensitivity of the assay, it was standardized with the use of serial sections treated with DNase I to induce enzymatic DNA fragmentation (positive control of apoptosis). The amount of apoptotic cardiomyocytes was calculated in an average of 34 microscopic fields in each sample (magnification x250) and expressed as the percentage of the TUNEL positive cardiomyocyte nuclei from the total number of cardiomyocyte nuclei. Only the nuclei surrounded by myofilaments were considered as cardiomyocytes.
2.7 Sample collection and hemodynamic measurements
Hemodynamic monitoring comprised measurement of heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and cardiac output (CO). Derived cardiovascular variables, cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), and pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRI) were calculated from standard formulas. All cardiac output measurements were based on the thermodilution technique, and data collection was started as baseline measurements before anesthesia induction.
Preoperative baseline creatine kinase (CK-MB) and hemodynamic measurements were obtained, followed by serial postoperative hemodynamic measurements up to the first postoperative morning, and CK-MB determinations were done after transfer to ICU, then after 12 h and in the first postoperative morning. Reference values for CK-MB were 0–25 U/l.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows software, version 9.0 (SPSS; Chicago, IL, USA). The Mann–Whitney U test was used to distinguish demographic differences between the groups. Continuous variables were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures. Logarithmic transformation was used, as the variables were not normally distributed. Statistical significance was attributed to p value <0.05.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study cohort included 40 patients between the ages 46 and 73 years, 90% of them were male patients. Baseline patient data and operative data were homogenous in the two groups, as summarized in Table 1 . Perioperative myocardial function, and EF, baseline hemodynamics and the level of creatine kinase MB fraction (Table 2 ), were not significantly different between the adenosine group and the controls. There were no cross-over cases between the adenosine and control groups, and intention-to-treat analysis was completely followed.
|
|
|
|
The other 11 patients were excluded from the analysis because only very few cardiomyocytes could be found in their tissue sections (<10 microscopic fields).
In the preischemic samples, apoptotic cardiomyocytes were not detected in any patient. In contrast, scattered myocytes with intensely TUNEL-positive nuclei were detected in eight patients in both groups and the baseline data did not show significant difference between these subgroups (Table 4 ). The mean value of the apoptotic cells in the control was 0.03 ± 0.07% (SD) with the 95% confidence interval (0.03; 0.7). This is almost twice the mean in the adenosine group 0.017 ± 0.0% (SD) with confidence interval (0.00; 0.03). However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). When patients were allocated into quartiles depending on the percentage of apoptosis (low, medium and high percentage), there was a non-significant tendency towards more apoptosis in the control than adenosine group in all quartiles (p = 0.268) (Table 5 ).
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main aim of our study was to investigate the effect of adding adenosine to the blood cardioplegia in order to decrease the development of cardiomyocyte apoptosis during cardiopulmonary bypass.
The rationale for studying adenosine in the setting of open heart surgery is based on the considerable experimental evidence that adenosine reduces both myocardial stunning and infarct size [10–14]. Although the exact mechanism underlying the cardioprotective effect of adenosine is unknown, the beneficial effects of this agent appear to be related to activation of specific adenosine receptor subtypes, at least three of which (A1, A2a and A3) may be involved [14,15]. Experimental findings indicate that adenosine is most effective in protecting a reversibly injured heart when administered before ischemia, most likely by activation of cardiac myocytes A1 and A3 receptors. Preischemic adenosine treatment also reduces experimental myocardial infarct size, but there is additional evidence that reperfusion adenosine treatment may also reduce infarct size by its ability to reduce platelet and neutrophil adherence to coronary endothelium [11,15,16].
We studied biopsies obtained from the left ventricular myocardium in the beginning of CPB and after cardioplegic ischemia followed by reperfusion. There was a marked increase in the number of cardiomyocytes containing TUNEL-positive cardiomyocytes in postischemic samples compared with samples obtained before ischemia in both groups in general. We quantified apoptotic cardiomyocytes using the TUNEL method, which is based on demonstration of DNA fragmentation occurring in apoptotic cells. A weakness of this method is that DNA fragmentation is not 100% specific for the apoptotic type of cell death [15]. On the other hand, this effect was not a constant finding, as half of the patients did not develop apoptosis at all. Myocardial biopsies obtained from the left ventricle of our patients were necessarily very small. Apoptosis has been shown to occur in a patchy distribution during acute myocardial ischemia, [18,19], and highest numbers of apoptotic cells have been found adjacent to scars of previous myocardial infarctions [19]. Thus, small samples may not reflect accurately the quantity of apoptosis in the whole left ventricle.
There was no significant difference between the adenosine and control group in regard to the demographic preoperative clinical data, the cross-clamp or weaning time. However, we found a wide range of apoptotic response between the patients. Although the difference in the mean apoptotic indexes between the two groups was statistically not significant, the index in the control group was twice as high as in the adenosine group. This indicator is giving some evidence that adenosine could be capable of producing a remarkable effect. As we used the minimal effective dose to induce rapid myocardial arrest, it might be possible that modification of the dose and timing of adenosine administration [24] could further significantly reduce the cardiomyocyte apoptosis. On the other hand, we concentrated in this initial study only in low-risk coronary artery disease patients with well-preserved myocardial function, and, therefore, adenosine effect may have been more limited than in patients with more severe myocardial functional impairment. We can only speculate that, in more advanced cases the protective effect of adenosine might have been more pronounced. Similarly, with a larger study population and longer reperfusion, the difference might be more pronounced. Further studies with longer follow-up time would be needed to study the effects of adenosine on apoptosis during open heart operation as negative results might be due to an insufficient number of patients. In conclusion adenosine enhanced blood cardioplegia could not prevent myocardial apoptosis completely. Therefore, it seems to be that adenosine might influence the frequency of apoptosis, and this needs to be considered in the future investigations.
| Appendix A |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr G. Szabo (Heidelberg, Germany): In the present study the authors investigated the effects of adenosine in a clinical trial, and I find it very good that they also presented the negative results here. We saw that in most of the parameters there was no effect of adenosine. I find personally that not only positive but also negative effects should be published.
Adenosine is well known for its potent vasodilatation. However, it promotes also glycolysis, activates potassium-sensitive ATP channels, and strongly inhibits neutrophil function, such as the production of free radicals. In the past three decades, numerous experimental and clinical studies have been conducted on the effects of adenosine in the setting of cardioplegia and reperfusion, and meanwhile there have been numerous clinical studies which investigated the effects of adenosine. The first was in 1995 from Lee who showed a protective effect using the same dose of adenosine as this study and higher expressions, followed by a study 2 years ago in a very similar setting as yours. However, it should also be noted that there are some negative trials, such as a large trial published in Circulation in 1998 with 250 patients and a study in 2000 from the Tampere group. This is the first question. If I look at the paper which was published in 2000 in the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and the paper that you sent to the European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, the question that is raised is, is the study which was published 7 years ago and the study presented here the same? The only new aspect is the investigation of apoptosis. If in fact it is, it should be stated here and also in the paper that this is a post hoc analysis regarding apoptosis markers. If this was a new study, I would have serious ethical concerns in setting up a clinical study which had been shown ineffective 7 years ago.
The second point, you showed no or marginal differences regarding apoptosis markers. I find it not surprising, because adenosine has a major effect via influencing myocardial metabolism or due to inflammatory effects. So if there is any effect on apoptosis, this is just secondary.
Third, I would like to ask you to speculate why the results of clinical studies are diverging. What role does the time of application of adenosine play and what role does the type of cardioplegia play?
Dr Shalaby: Regarding to the first point this study is a new study. I would like to say that, this is the first work to use blood cardioplegia plus adenosine as a single dose injected directly into the aortic root after cross-clamp and use left ventricular tissue sample to evaluate the apoptotic myocardial changes. From the clinical point of view, there was no significant difference in this regard. It could be the effect of using blood cardioplegia can mask this effect clinically, but at cellular basis we detected some apoptotic difference. As regards the induction of myocardial arrest, it was very fast, and this show the direct effect of adenosine on the potassium channels as a primary effect not as a secondary effect on cardiomyocyte metabolism and inflammation. We were evaluating does this first induction influence the course of cell apoptosis during cardiopulmonary bypass or not.
The second question?
Dr Szabo: What is the role in terms of time of application; before cardioplegia, within the cardioplegic solution, or even during reperfusion, such as the Chinese group published a couple of months ago, and what is the role of the type of the cardioplegia? This is just speculation, but this may explain the diverging results of the numerous clinical studies performed before.
Dr Shalaby: Yes, the timing, of course, is very important because it affects the mechanism of action of adenosine. In the reperfusion, it is related more to the antioxidant and the anti-inflammatory effects. But here we are investigating the induction and the effect on ion transportation.
Dr T. Steensrud (Tromso, Norway): I have one question. Adenosine given in blood has a half-life of 0.6 s, and you gave that in blood. Have you considered that?
Dr Shalaby: Yes, we considered that, and this is why we didnt mix the adenosine with the blood cardioplegia but we injected adenosine directly through three-way line, intracoronary, then it was followed immediately by the blood cardioplegia. It doesnt mix.
Dr H. Vanermen (Aalst, Belgium): I want to say something in favor of the presenter here. Everybody knows that I have used endoclamp occlusion for 10 years in all of my endoscopic mitral valve surgeries, and there is just one way to make sure that your endoclamp is well positioned, and that is to induce the fastest cardiac arrest possible. Adenosine does that. There is not a single doubt about that. You give adenosine and you can position the balloon. And usually, and Ill say 99% of the cases, I dont see a single heartbeat anymore, which is never the case when you put an external cross-clamp and you give cardioplegia, whether it is blood cardioplegia or St. Thomas, and just wait for the arrest by potassium. That's one thing.
The other thing is that I think that the effect of cardioplegia can be better, because adenosine prior to the administration of cardioplegia has a vasodilative effect, so you probably reach more areas with your cardioplegia. And if you just inject your cardioplegia immediately, which is cold, it will induce a vasoconstrictive effect. Those are my thoughts.
Dr Shalaby: Yes, this is true, and in this group of adenosine, we saw this immediate arrest result, and after a short while we saw fibrillation indicating the end-point of the action of adenosine overlapped by the starting of the arrestive action of potassium.
Dr Vanermen: I agree with you. It happens very often. You put an external clamp and you just give cardioplegia without adenosine and you see the heart beat for another 3 min against an obstacle, which I dont think is favorable for the protection.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Geneva, Switzerland, September 16–19, 2007.

This work was carried out at Heart Center, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
This study was made possible with the research grants from The Pirkanmaa Hospital District Competitive Research Funding and from Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Liu, J. Xing, N. Miao, W. Li, W. Liu, Y.-Q. Lai, Y. Luo, and B. Ji The myocardial protective effect of adenosine as an adjunct to intermittent blood cardioplegia during open heart surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2009; 36(6): 1018 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Venugopal, A. Ludman, D. M. Yellon, and D. J. Hausenloy 'Conditioning' the heart during surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 35(6): 977 - 987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |