|
|
||||||||
a Pulmonary Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqwa 49100, Israel
b Cardiothoracic Department, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqwa 49100, Israel
c Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Received 17 October 2007; received in revised form 29 February 2008; accepted 6 March 2008.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +972 3 9377221; fax: +972 3 9377142. (Email: davids3{at}clalit.org.il).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abbreviations: LTX = lung transplantation UNOS = United Network for Organ Sharing 6MWD = six minute walk distance test CPET = cardiopulmonary exercise test
Key Words: Lung transplantation: Waiting list: Emphysema Pulmonary fibrosis Mortality
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with mortality in patients referred for lung transplantation (LTX) assessment in Israeli population listed for LTX.
| 2. Patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study was approved by the ethics committee of Rabin Medical Center.
2.2 Procedure
The data collected during evaluation for transplantation were as follows: age, sex, height, and weight; medical history, including type of end-stage lung disease, time since diagnosis of end-stage lung disease, steroid use, smoking status, and comorbid diseases; blood biochemistry parameters, pulmonary function, arterial blood gas levels, distance on the 6 min walk test, and findings on cardiopulmonary exercise test and cardiac catheterization.
The eligible candidates for lung transplantation were registered on the waiting list of the Israel National Transplant Center. Routine medical management was continued during the waiting period under the supervision of the medical team. Organs were allocated to listed patients who matched the blood type and body size of the donors according to accrued active time on the list.
2.3 Study variables
For purposes of the study, the demographic, clinical and laboratory data of all listed patients were retrieved from the files, and their status at the end of the study period was documented as follows: survived to transplantation or died while awaiting transplantation. All patient deaths were corroborated against the records of the Israel National Transplant Center.
2.4 Data analysis
Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and the significance for it (p) were calculated between the variables. To analyze differences in the distribution of categorical data, chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used, as appropriate. Differences in mean continuous variables between two groups of patients by status at the end of the study were analyzed by t-test. The data were fitted to a logistic regression model to identify predictors of death. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated from the model. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant.
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mean time to transplantation in the survivors was 9.6 ± 9.4 months.
The patient characteristics are presented in Tables 1 and 2 . Comparison of the patients by status at the end of the study period yielded several significant differences by a univariate analysis. The patients who died while awaiting transplantation were older than those who survived to transplantation (55 ± 13 years vs 49 ± 14 years, p = 0.01), used steroids to a greater degree (14 ± 15 mg/day vs 9 ± 13 mg/day, p = 0.02) and smoked more (p = 0.04). Comorbid diseases were similar in the two groups, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, and ischemic heart disease. No differences were noted in pulmonary function measurements. The died-waiting group had a significantly lower albumin level (3.8 ± 0.4 g/dl vs 4.0 ± 0.4 g/dl, p = 0.008) and significantly higher lactate dehydrogenase level (525 ± 199 u/l vs 450 ± 174 u/l, p = 0.02). The only cardiopulmonary parameter that was significantly different between the groups was oxygen saturation at rest (91 ± 8% vs 94 ± 4%, p = 0.005). The 6 min walk distance was strongly and inversely correlated with risk of death before transplantation (270 ± 80 m vs 358 ± 108 m, p = 0.005). The hemodynamic profile and the catheterization findings were similar in the two groups.
|
|
|
|
| 4. Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mannes et al. [14] showed that the type of end-stage lung disease might impact on patients chances of surviving the LTX. While patients with pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema had an equally high probability of transplantation, patients with emphysema were less likely to die while on the waiting list. These findings supported the data of the UNOS registry [1] and those of Kerem et al. [15], who reported the lowest mortality rate in transplant candidates with emphysema and the highest in candidates with pulmonary hypertension (29.6%) or cystic fibrosis (36.8%).
Our study yielded similar findings, with statistically significant differences between the survivors to transplantation and the died-waiting group (Table 1).
Studies of specific potential risk factors of death while awaiting LTX in patients with cystic fibrosis [8,15,16] reported significant findings for short distance on the 6 min walk test, high pulmonary artery pressure, and presence of diabetes mellitus. By contrast, in a landmark study, Kerem et al. [15] found that a low forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (below 30% of predicted) was the most significant risk factor for death in this patient subgroup. In patients with end-stage sarcoidosis, Shorr et al. [16], in a large study of 405 LTX candidates, found race, pulmonary hypertension and oxygen saturation to be the most important risk factors.
The new algorithm for lung allocation to listed patients, adopted in 2005, involves the calculation of a lung allocation score (LAS) for each candidate which takes the following variables into account: forced vital capacity, pulmonary arterial systolic pressure, supplemental oxygen required at rest, age, body mass index, presence of insulin-dependent diabetes, functional status, 6 min walk distance, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, creatinine level, and diagnosis [17]. In addition, the analysis is repeated every 6 months to ensure that the algorithm remains dynamic and is properly adapted to the currently listed population. However, the system has two main disadvantages: it is complex and difficult to understand by both patients and transplant professionals [3], and it has not undergone either internal or external validation, making its present implementation questionable.
Our study was conducted in Israel, where the new model has not yet been adopted and the only criteria for organ allocation (beside blood type and body size) are the accrued active time on the list. In addition, the current program gives the priorities also to the type of transplantation (first to single lung, double lung and only after that to heart–lung transplantation).
In Israel 10% of the patients waiting for LTX had cystic fibrosis (CF) and 4% had PPH, respectively (Table 1). The high rate of HLT in the study population is due to the fact that heart-lung transplantation (HLT) is the preferred surgery to Eisenmenger disease as well as primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH). Patients with severe heart failure and lung disease also underwent HLT (n = 5).
Using a retrospective design, we sought to identify factors associated with improved survival on the waiting list in patients referred for LTX assessment. These including several clinical parameters (low age, diagnosis of emphysema, low rate of smoking status, lower dose of steroid; Table 1), laboratory parameters (high albumin and low lactate dehydrogenase levels; Table 2), and lung function parameters (longer 6 min walk distance and higher oxygen saturation; Table 2 and multivariate analysis). However, only oxygen saturation at rest proved to be a significant independent predictor of survival to LTX.
Interestingly, our results were not significant for high pulmonary arterial pressure, a known risk factor for death in listed patients [5–7]. One explanation for this discrepancy could be the low pulmonary arterial pressure in our patients (Table 2). The 6 min walk distance test integrates cardiopulmonary function, strength, and endurance, and it has been proposed as a useful guide in the decision to list patients for transplantation [8]. In our analysis, the risk of death decreased noticeably with an increase in the 6 min walk distance.
Our study has a several potential shortcomings. Errors could have been introduced during the retrospective data collection, although various techniques were used to minimize them. To lower the chances of omitting pertinent variables, we reviewed all parameters that have shown prognostic importance in previous studies and carefully recorded all relevant data from the patients evaluations. Missing data, too, could have been a source of bias. However, the amount of missing information was small, and the pattern was not very different between the two groups. In addition, statistical adjustments for missing data did not significantly alter our findings. It should be noticed also that only one lung transplant group exists in Israel and thereby there is no competing national organs allocation policy. Finally, although the large number of variables analyzed increased the possibility that one of them could reach statistical significance by chance alone, we limited the set of variables in the Cox multivariate analysis by strict p values and by a priori hypotheses.
On the basis of the findings of the present study, we concluded that in the Israeli population listed for LTX severe hypoxemia, pulmonary fibrosis, high steroid usage, and poor 6MWD are predicted for poor prognosis.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T J Corte, S J Wort, M A Gatzoulis, P Macdonald, D M Hansell, and A U Wells Pulmonary vascular resistance predicts early mortality in patients with diffuse fibrotic lung disease and suspected pulmonary hypertension Thorax, October 1, 2009; 64(10): 883 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |