|
|
||||||||
a Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
b Policlinico San Donato Milanese, IRCCS, Milano Italy
c The Heart Hospital, UCLH, London, United Kingdom
d UCL, Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
Received 5 September 2007; received in revised form 29 April 2008; accepted 30 April 2008.
* Corresponding author. Address: Cardiothoracic Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, WC1N 3JH, London, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 2078138106; fax: +44 2078138262. (Email: tsangv{at}gosh.nhs.uk).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Pulmonary regurgitation Pulmonary homograft Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation Magnetic resonance imaging
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgical intervention remains the preferred option for re-intervention; however, the longevity of the RV to PA conduits is an important limiting factor when considering surgical pulmonary valve replacement. Conduit degeneration leading to stenosis and/or regurgitation exposes the patient to a high number of re-interventions with the related risks. Therefore timing for intervention is crucial in the patient management and the possibility of a percutaneous approach to correct RVOT dysfunction is an attractive solution which has recently become available with promising results [7–10].
Furthermore, assessment of the RV response to treatment has to be interpreted with caution, as there is often a physical reduction in the size of the RV body during surgery. Since the percutaneous approach is free from any intervention on RV cavity itself, this represents a good model to assess the effect of a competent valve on cardiac function.
With the following study we wanted to assess the impact on right and left ventricular function following two different techniques, a surgical (PVR) and a percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI). This study was not intended to compare the two different strategies because of differences in baseline characteristics and criteria for re-intervention.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Indications for surgical pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) were the presence of severe pulmonary valve regurgitation (regurgitant fraction (RF)
35% on MR imaging) in a dilated pulmonary trunk, reduced exercise capacity, atrial and/or ventricular arrhythmias, progressive RV dilatation and dysfunction, a RV/LV ratio
1.5 in the presence of symptoms and
2 in asymptomatic patients.
Patients who underwent PPVI were characterised by RVOT dysfunction with predominant pulmonary regurgitation (RF
30% and RVOT peak velocity on continuous Doppler wave <3 m/s); they also had evidence of RV dysfunction, reduced exercise capacity and/or documented atrial and/or ventricular arrhythmias. These patients represent only a sub-group between those who have had PPVI for RVOT dysfunction. The majority of these patients had an RV-PA conduit as result of complete repair. As we have previously described [7], a calcified conduit with an internal diameter <22 mm represents a suitable substrate/anchorage for PPVI; a body weight less than 20 kg is a relative contraindication. The presence of a transannular patch often results in a very dilated and dynamic RVOT, generally therefore representing another relative contraindication to such approach at present.
At 1 year after intervention, whether PVR or PPVI, all investigations were repeated and the results compared within each group to the baseline data obtained pre-procedure.
The local research ethics committees approved the study, and all subjects (and/or a parent/guardian) gave informed consent.
| 3. Magnetic resonance imaging |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.1 Assessment of ventricular volumes and function
Retrospective gated steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine MR images of the heart were acquired in the vertical long-axis, 4-chamber view and the short-axis view covering the entirety of both ventricles [11].
Assessment of left ventricular (LV) and RV volumes was performed by manual segmentation of short-axis cine images with endocardial outline at end diastole and end systole (Argus; Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were calculated by use of Simpson's rule for each ventricle, and from these volumes, stroke volume (SV) and ejection fraction (EF) were calculated. Where pulmonary regurgitation was present, an effective RVSV was calculated to reflect the net forward blood flow into the pulmonary arteries.
3.2 MR flow quantification
Pulmonary blood flow was calculated from phase contrast images by use of a semiautomatic vessel edge-detection algorithm (Argus; Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). Pulmonary regurgitant (PR) fraction was calculated as percent backward flow over forward flow.
All volume and flow measurements were indexed for body surface area and expressed in ml/beat/m2.
| 4. Surgical pulmonary valve replacement (n = 25 patients) |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 5. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (n = 11 patients) |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 6. Statistical analysis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 7. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All patients received a pulmonary homograft, mean size 21 ± 5 mm. In 20 patients, the aneurysmal right ventricular out-flow tract has been excised (RVOTR). Six patients required a further enlargement of the pulmonary arteries (1 RPA, 2 LPA, 3 enlargement of pulmonary artery bifurcation or both branches). A further resection of hypertrophied muscular trabeculations in the subjunctional region was performed in three patients in order to create a widely open pathway. A residual VSD was present in one patient and needed to be addressed. One patient with severe tricuspid regurgitation underwent concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty; an atrial septal defect was closed in the same patient. One patient with significant atrial arrhythmia received anti-arrhythmic surgery via cryoablation of the right atrial isthmus.
Before intervention PR fraction was 41 ± 8%, indexed RV end-diastolic volume (EDV) was 151 ± 49 ml/m2. At 1 year following PVR, there was a normalisation of RV volumes (Fig. 1A) and a significant improvement in right and left ventricular indexes of systolic function: effective stroke volume (Fig. 2A) and ejection fraction. The left ventricular EDV also increased although not significantly suggesting better filling of the ventricle. Patients reported a subjective improvement in their symptoms (NYHA class <2, p = 0.02 vs baseline). MRI results are summarised in Table 1 . There were no re-interventions or mortality at 1-year follow-up.
|
|
|
Pre-PPVI, pulmonary regurgitant fraction was 34 ± 13%, indexed RV end-diastolic volume was 106 ± 27 ml/m2. At 1 year following implantation of a competent valve, there was a significant improvement in biventricular volumes (Fig. 1B) and in RV and LV (Fig. 2B) indexes of systolic function. Similarly to the surgical group, there was a trend toward an increased LV EDV suggesting a better LV filling.
NYHA class also improved (class <2, p = 0.016 vs baseline).
MRI results are summarised in Table 2 . There has been no mortality or need for re-intervention during this first year follow-up.
|
| 8. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Causes of pulmonary valve regurgitation differ between different pathologies and modalities of primary repair. In patients who received a wide transannular patch, the lack of proper coaptation of the valve leaflets is the main mechanism for valve incompetence. In patients who have had a RV-PA conduit, calcification and degeneration occur with time thus causing usually a mixed lesion, i.e. a combination of stenosis and regurgitation. Patients were eligible for this study when the lesion was predominately characterised by pulmonary regurgitation. Finally, pulmonary valvotomy often leaves the patients with some degree of PR from the time of treatment, which tends to increase over time.
In our institutions, indications for surgical pulmonary valve replacement were the presence of significant pulmonary regurgitation (regurgitant fraction
35% on MR), with evidence of progressive RV dilatation and dysfunction (RV/LV end-diastolic ratio
1.5 in symptomatic patients and
2 in asymptomatic patients), reduced exercise capacity with or without documented arrhythmias. Indications for PPVI were the presence of RV out-flow tract dysfunction in combination with evidence of progressive RV dysfunction and reduced exercise capacity. Patients were eligible for this study when the lesion was predominately characterised by pulmonary regurgitation: pulmonary regurgitant fraction
30% and a peak velocity across the out-flow tract less than 3.5 m/s.
For both approaches, an asymptomatic status did not represent a contra-indication to intervention since symptoms are difficult to interpret as the perception of physical limitation is altered in these patients who adapt their life style to a less demanding physical activity.
An accurate study of the RVOT anatomy was essential in the decision-making [14,15]. As we have previously described [7], only pulmonary trunks with a diameter between 14 and 22 mm can potentially be treated with a percutaneous approach; RV-PA conduits represent an ideal substrate, particularly in the presence of some degree of calcification. The transannular patch generally represents a contra-indication, since these RVOTs are often very dilated and dynamic out-flow tract [14].
There is no doubt that pulmonary regurgitation, although well tolerated for a long time, represents a progressive lesion with deleterious and irreversible effects on RV function [1,2,4–6,16]. The need to address it has been widely recognised with numerous studies in the literature suggesting an improvement in RV parameters if surgery is performed relatively early [17,18]. Buechel et al., in a children population, emphasises that prompt RV remodelling occurs when surgery is performed when RV end-diastolic volume is less than 150 ml/m2; Therrien in an adult population suggests a cut-off of 170 ml/m2 in order to achieve normalisation of RV volumes.
Less attention has been given to the left ventricular function, although the biventricular interaction has been widely described in the literature [19]. In the present study, the patients who underwent surgery had a pre-procedure RV EDV of 151 ml/m2. We described a normalisation of RV volumes and improvement in parameters of RV systolic function, therefore confirming the good outcome after early intervention. Following restoration of a competent valve, there was an increased LV end-diastolic volume and this is a reflection of a better filling due to an improved pulmonary forward flow and a left to right shift of the interventricular septum as the RV volumes overload is relieved. Although this increase did not reach a statistical significance, we believe that this is just the reflection of a small number of patients per group. Furthermore, regardless of the technique used to address the RV outflow tract dysfunction, PVR or PPVI, there was an improvement in parameters of LV systolic function. In our opinion, studying the outcome of the left ventricle is a good marker to assess the success of the procedure since the right ventricular volumes are of difficult interpretation as, when surgery is performed, the aneurysmal out-flow tract is excised with a strong impact on RV volumes. RV ejection fraction needs, therefore, to be interpreted with caution.
We cannot over-emphasise the fact that this paper was not written to compare two different approaches but to highlight the possibility to treat successfully such detrimental lesion, pulmonary regurgitation, with different techniques that can be complementary. Our method of anatomic placement of pulmonary homograft may offer better conduit longevity. This is supported by the sub-pulmonary homograft data in the recent article by Selamet Tierney et al. [20] comparing the Ross and the non-Ross patients. Nevertheless any RV-PA conduit has a limited life span [21,22], and will need to be replaced, therefore exposing the patients to a high number of risky procedures. The availability of a percutaneous approach represents a promising alternative to surgery in selected cases. We previously demonstrated that PPVI compares favourably with surgery in terms of morbidity and mortality [23]. While we wait for long-term follow-up data, our impression is that PPVI can be used as a bridge to delay surgery when applicable, without compromising the ventricular function. The anatomic platform for valve stent anchorage remains the key issue. At our institution, the preferred approach at primary infant repair of tetralogy of Fallot with very small transannular patches (if required) can preserve the RVOT substrate for future placement of valve stents. On the other hand, the strategy at other centres of neonatal repair of tetralogy with a high incidence of transannular patching may not be desirable from the point of future PPVI.
8.1 Study limitations
We reported an improvement of patient's symptoms but there is not objective quantification of their exercise capacity. We also did not directly address the main issue, which is the timing for re-intervention. We are currently undertaking a prospective and longitudinal study to address the above issue of this very challenging topic. We confirmed a good outcome when surgery is performed relatively early as previously described in the literature. We have also shown that by restoring a competent valve via a percutaneous approach, the same results can be achieved in the short-term.
8.2 Conclusions
Both PVR and PPVI treatment of pulmonary regurgitation are associated with improvements in RV and also in LV parameters of systolic function. In consideration of the surgical impact on RV volumes, LV parameters remain the best tool to judge the success of the procedure.
| Appendix A |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Dr M. Gewillig (Leuven, Belgium): In your paper you say that reduction of right ventricular volume in your surgical group is slightly better than in the percutaneous group.
However, you do introduce also a selection bias in your patients. The 25 patients you treated surgically are almost free-floating PR, while obviously the percutaneous group has some stenosis to it. On the other hand, both ventricles do improve. Can you speculate on what the juncture is of the surgical procedure? I mean the surgeon does more than just reevaluate. He also takes out the aneurysm and makes it look much, much nicer. Percutaneous techniques can only take away stenosis and are incompetent at this moment to reduce redundant size. Can you comment on that?
Dr Frigiola: This is absolutely true, but the study was not addressed to compare the two techniques. I wanted to highlight complementary approaches in right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction lesions. The indications were different for the two populations. If we have a dilated aneurysmal right ventricular outflow tract, there is no way the patient will escape surgery. At the time of surgery the aneurysmal RV out-flow tract will also be excised and this is what we call remodelling. Patients who underwent a percutaneous approach, as you said, didnt have such high pulmonary regurgitation, they had some degree of stenosis, and also the ventricular volumes to start with were smaller compared to the surgical population. So basically at the time of the decision-making, we were facing a lesion predominately characterised by pulmonary regurgitation in a symptomatic patient or in a patient with progressive right ventricular dilatation; the decision-making, which was made in our multidisciplinary meeting, was purely related to that single patient in relation to the specific lesion. Therefore, whether the decision was for a surgical or a percutaneous approach, this was related to the right ventricular out-flow tract characteristics and the patient's characteristics as well. So we are not comparing two techniques. We are just saying that there are two different approaches for these lesions, and in both cases we can see how the right and left ventricular function are improving following the procedure.
Dr Gewillig: The second question, apparently you have some stent fractures which undoubtedly are due to metal fatigue in a continuously moving heart. How do you see this problem being solved?
Dr Frigiola: We recently presented our 6-year experience, and the stent fracture rate was 20%. So 20% of patients experienced a stent fracture, which has to be classified in three different types. There are stent fractures without loss of integrity, and these patients are just under observation, they dont need anything done, and there isnt even an increased gradient across the valve. There are stent fractures with loss of integrity, and these patients had a second valve, so they needed re-intervention, but the proportion of these patients is very small so far and a second valve has been put in with no problem. The third type of stent fracture is basically the embolisation of the valve, and it happened in only one patient who needed rescue surgery basically for the embolisation. The main determinants of stent fractures are the native outflow tract, the degree of calcification, and recoil after deployment of the stent valve. These are the main risk factors to predict the stent fracture, which is common but is not such a severe problem. Patients in the majority of cases are just followed under normal routine follow-up.
Dr Gewillig: I presume you avoid it by putting in first a bare stent; is that correct?
Dr Frigiola: No. There is a second percutaneous pulmonary valve put in.
Dr Gewillig: But I mean in order to prevent it in future patients.
Dr Frigiola: From what we have seen, the learning curve is extremely important in the patient selection, and, as I said, with a very stenotic calcified conduit, the incidence of stent fracture is really very low. So it's during the patient selection that we are already putting a patient on a high or low risk of stent fracture.
Dr J. Brown (Indianapolis, Indiana): Obviously were comparing apples and oranges here; the percutaneous for PS primarily, with some regurgitation, and the surgical group is for pure regurgitation for the most part. It seems to me that the study that surgeons and cardiologists want to know the answer to is to compare the surgically implanted bovine jugular venous valve with the percutaneous one and which one is going to be more durable over the long-term. Can you tell us more about durability of the percutaneous bovine jugular venous valve compared to surgically implanted? Now, I noticed that these were all homografts. Why homografts when you had both available?
Dr Frigiola: The homograft has been the preferred choice of our institution. It's the belief of the surgeon who performed the procedure that the results will be good in the long-term, in the long run. So we have to wait. A prospective longitudinal study was commenced in 2004. I would wait a few more years before drawing a conclusion about durability of the pulmonary homograft in this setting.
Going back to the percutaneous valve, the stent valve was used for the first time in the year 2000, so we are reaching our seventh year of experience. It's still a short follow-up. We need to wait longer to give an answer on durability of the valve, future complications, and how to address the complications once the stent valve is in place.
You had another question.
Dr Brown: The surgical group is PI. The percutaneous group is PS.
Dr Frigiola: No, it's not PS, and Im quite confident in giving this answer. There are two very nice papers that we published. One paper has been written on a selected population who underwent percutaneous valve implantation for predominant obstruction, and what we have seen in terms of right ventricular physiopathology is completely different from what we have seen in the patient population that has been treated for predominant pulmonary regurgitation, and the results mirror those of the surgical population. I havent reported data about exercise parameters, which is one of the keys in the interpretation. But just knowing the results, I can say that these populations do behave similarly. Patients with predominant pulmonary stenosis have a sort of contractile reserve. Patients treated for predominant pulmonary regurgitation we think are in a decompensated limb of the Frank–Starling curve.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Presented at the 21st Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Geneva, Switzerland, September 16–19, 2007.

AF is funded by Fondazione Bambini Cardiopatici nel Mondo and Policlinico San Donato Milanese, I.R.C.C.S., Milan, Italy. PB is funded by the British Heart Foundation (BHF). AMT is funded by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). Cardiovascular MR imaging is supported by the BHF (grant no. CI/05/010).
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Adamson, H. A. Vohra, and M. P. Haw Does pulmonary valve replacement post repair of tetralogy of Fallot improve right ventricular function? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, September 1, 2009; 9(3): 520 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Vouhe Editorial comment Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 34(3): 581 - 582. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |