EJCTS Click here for details of sales representative
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:932. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.017
Copyright © 2008, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chong, C. F.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chong, C. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrow Mediastinum
Right arrow Trachea and bronchi


Letters to the Editor

Re: Prognostic value of FDG uptake in early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Chee Fui Chong*

Thoracic Unit, Department of Surgery, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital, Bandar Seri Begawan BA 1710, Brunei Darussalam

Received 9 June 2008; accepted 14 July 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +673 2 242424; fax: +673 2 333270. (Email: chong_chee_fui{at}hotmail.com).

Key Words: 2-[18F] Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) • Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) • Standard uptake value (SUV) • Early TNM stage • Prognosis

I read with interest the article by Hanin and colleagues regarding the prognostic value of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) uptake in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), published recently in the May issue of the European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery [1]. Standardised uptake value (SUV) of FDG has previously been shown to prognosticate disease recurrence and survival in patients with early stage NSCLC [2,3]. The current study also reported similar findings. However, there are several faults with the data presentation and analysis in this article.

First, unlike previous studies which all have reported disease-free and overall survival for any malignancies in terms of 5-year survival percentages, Hanin and colleagues have chosen to report their findings in terms of median survival in months from time of surgery for both low and high SUV groups. The median survival was 127 months and 69 months in patients with SUV< 7.8 or SUV >7.8, respectively, both of which had median survival of more than 5 years. Beyond 5 years after a curative resection for early stage NSCLC, the overall influence of the initial cancer on survival and mortality becomes unclear as other causes of mortality can come into play.

Of the 40 patients who died during the follow-up period, more than 50% (21/40) of the deaths were due to cancer unrelated deaths [1]. This group should not be included in the survival analysis as this will bias the outcome. Unfortunately, this cohort was included in the overall analysis by the authors, which is obvious from Fig. 1 where the number of events (death) is more than 30. Hence the authors’ conclusion is misleading.

Second, a multivariate analysis would have been ideal to distinguish the effect of other variables on survival such as age, stage 1A or 1B, etc. Although a univariate analysis was performed, the authors did not report this in the result section nor did they perform a multivariate analysis as the other variables tested (histologic subtype, stage, differentiation) failed to achieve any statistical significance. Considering that the median age of the study population was 65.3 years with the oldest patient at 82.2 years and a reported median survival of more than 5 years, age may have been a significant factor as was found previously [4].

Lastly, previous reports have shown that patients with high SUV are more likely to have poorly differentiated tumours, advanced stages and are less likely to have their disease completely resected [2,4]. Hanin and colleagues have also confirmed these findings that advance stage tumours such as T2 and T3 tumours, undifferentiated tumours, were more likely to have high SUV [1]. Hence high SUV can be considered as a marker as well as an independent prognostic factor for clinical TNM stage but it has been shown not to add to the prognostic significance of pathologic TNM stage [5].

References

  1. Hanin FX, Lonneux M, Cornet J, Noirhomme P, Coulon C, Distexhe J, Poncelet AJ. Prognostic value of FDG uptake in early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33(5):819-823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Ohja B, Bartolucci AA. The maximum standardized uptake values on positron emission tomography of a non-small cell lung cancer predict stage, recurrence, and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130(1):151-159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Berghmans T, Dusart M, Paesmans M, Hossein-Foucher C, Buvat I, Castaigne C, Scherpereel A, Mascaux C, Moreau M, Roelandts M, Alard S, Meert AP, Patz Jr. EF, Lafitte JJ, Sculier JP. Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3(1):6-12.[Medline]
  4. Goodgame B, Pillot GA, Yang Z, Shriki J, Meyers BF, Zoole J, Gao F, Dehdashti F, Patterson A, Siegel BA, Govindan R. Prognostic value of preoperative positron emission tomography in resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3(2):130-134.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Downey RJ, Akhurst T, Gonen M, Park B, Rusch V. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival independent of clinical but not pathologic TNM staging of resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133(6):1419-1427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. J. Poncelet, M. Lonneux, and F.-X. Hanin
Reply to Chong
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 932 - 933.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chong, C. F.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chong, C. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrow Mediastinum
Right arrow Trachea and bronchi


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS