|
|
||||||||
Paediatric Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Received 8 February 2008; received in revised form 25 June 2008; accepted 14 July 2008.
* Corresponding author. Address: Pediatric Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. Tel.: +41 21 314 35 56; fax: +41 21 314 36 65. (Email: yvan.mivelaz{at}chuv.ch).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Aortic coarctation Ultrasonography Paediatric Infant Neonate
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Associated anomalies of the aortic arch with isolated coarctation, in particular displacement of the left subclavian artery and narrowing of the distal transverse arch, have been widely described [4–10]. Their presence, independent of haemodynamic repercussions of the coarctation, has not been used for the diagnosis until recently. Dodge-Khatami et al. have proposed the carotid-subclavian artery index (CSA index) in infants less than 3 months of age and Wu et al. the isthmus–descending aorta diameter ratio (I/D ratio) in newborns with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) as a supplementary diagnostic tool for the detection of coarctation by 2D echocardiography (Fig. 1 ) [11,12].
|
There are several advantages of these measurements. They can easily be obtained from a standard suprasternal view even if the aortic arch and a possible ductus are not in the same plane and are independent of a Doppler gradient. The presence of a PDA does not alter the accuracy of the indexes [13].
However, these indexes have only been validated for a very limited population. The CSA index was only published in infants less than 3 months of age and only in isolated coarctation. The I/D ratio has been described only in newborns with PDA. We hypothesised that the abnormal distal displacement of the left subclavian artery is characteristic of aortic coarctations whatever the associated cardiac defect is. The objectives of our study were to confirm the CSA index as a predictor of coarctation in patients with complex coarctation and in patients older than 3 months old and to evaluate the benefit of calculating the I/D ratio for detecting coarctation in every aged patient and those without PDA. Finally we determined if performing both indexes in the same patient would improve the sensibility and specificity of predicting coarctation.
| 2. Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Children were included if they satisfied the following criteria: less than 18 years old at the time of echocardiography, confirmation of the diagnosis either by surgery or at autopsy, at least one technically adequate echocardiogram prior to surgery or death, and adequate two-dimensional imaging of the distal aortic arch in the suprasternal view to allow offline measurements. Children with anomalies of the head and neck vessels or interrupted aortic arch were excluded.
Patients were divided in subgroups according to the complexity of their cardiac defects: isolated coarctation (including children with PDA, bicuspid aortic valve or patent foramen ovale), coarctation and minor defects (VSD, ASD, aorto-pulmonary window) and coarctation belonging to a complex cardiopathy (transposition of great arteries, double outlet right ventricle, single ventricle or hypoplastic left heart). Another analysis was performed according to the age of the patients: infants less than 3 months of age and older than 3 months.
Eighty-six patients with a diagnosis of coarctation were identified. Of these, 18 were excluded because of the absence of good quality imaging of the aortic arch (7 patients), of interrupted aortic arch (6 patients), of head and neck vessels anomalies (4 patients) or because of death prior to surgery without necropsy examination (1 patient). All remaining 68 patients were included in the study. There were 44 patients less than 3 months of age and 24 patients older than 3 months. Videotapes and echocardiogram reports of every identified patient were reviewed. All echocardiograms were recorded by either Vingmed Sonotron CFM 800 (VingMed, Oslo, Norway) or Acuson Sequoia 256 (Siemens Acuson Co., Mountain View, CA, USA) echocardiograph (with 3.5, 5 and 7 MHz transducers).
An age- and sex-matched control group consisted of 24 children without heart defects requiring an echocardiogram at our clinic. Patients were excluded if they had anomalies of the head and neck vessels or an inadequate transthoracic window (Table 1 ). Seventeen infants were younger than 3 months and seven older than 3 months.
|
2.3 Measurements
Echocardiograms were all recorded on digital videotapes. They were reviewed by one observer. Echocardiographic parameters of the aortic arch described in Fig. 1 were measured with on-screen calibration of still frames from video recordings. Measurements were made from the suprasternal view, during end-systole in order to capture the largest inner diameter of the vessels from inner edge to inner edge and the largest distance between great vessels. From these measurements, we calculated the CSA index and the I/D ratio in all patients.
A second investigator remeasured the stored images of 10 randomly selected cases for calculation of interobserver variability.
2.4 Analysis
All data were analysed using the StatView for Windows statistical package version 5.0.1 (SAS, Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The coarctation and control group were analysed as two independent groups. Each continuous measurement was summarised by its arithmetic mean and standard deviation (SD), and reported as mean (SD) in the tables. Comparisons were performed using the chi-square test or by unpaired Student's t-test. A value of p
< 0.05 was considered as significant.
To test the agreement between measurements made by the two independent observers a one-way ANOVA was used to estimate the various components of variance required to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) [14,15].
| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 68 children with coarctation were included in the study and their echocardiogram reviewed. Thirty-three patients (49%) had an isolated coarctation. Twenty-six patients (38%) had minor associated defects: perimembranous ventricular septal defect (n = 14), muscular ventricular septal defect (n = 4), ventricular septal defect and atrial septal defect (n = 3), atrial septal defect (n = 4) and aorto-pulmonary window (n = 1). Nine patients (13%) had major associated defects: double outlet right ventricle ± great vessel malposition (n = 4), hypoplastic left heart syndrome (n = 2), single ventricle (n = 2) and transposition of the great vessels (n = 1). A PDA was present in 25 patients (4 in the isolated coarctation group, 14 in the coarctation with minor defects and 7 in the coarctation with major cardiac defects group), 22 of whom were younger than 3 months.
The control group included 24 children without coarctation or other cardiac defect. A PDA was found in six patients less than 3 months old, all newborns. PDA was considered physiological in newborns less than 2 days old.
3.2 Echocardiographic measurements
Echocardiographic parameters of the aortic arch, calculated CSA index and I/D ratio for the coarctation and the control group are provided in Table 2
. CSA index was calculated for every patient, I/D ratio could not be calculated in two patients due to the lack of good quality imaging of the descending aorta. A significant difference was observed between both groups for the distal transverse aortic arch, the isthmus diameters, the CSA index and the I/D ratio.
|
|
|
Associated cardiac lesions did not affect the relation between CSA index and coarctation. CSA index showed a significant difference from the CSA index of the control group (Fig. 2C, Table 3).
For the I/D ratio, we obtained similar significant results between coarctation groups and the control group (Fig. 2D, Table 3).
With a cut-off of 1.5, sensitivity of the CSA index for the diagnosis of coarctation was 99% (95%CI: 92–100%) and specificity 96% (95%CI: 80–99%). For the I/D ratio specificity was 100% (95%CI: 86–100%), but sensitivity was poorer with 72% (95%CI: 61–80%). Association of both indexes (CSA index <1.5 OR I/D ratio <0.64 for the diagnosis of coarctation) improved the sensitivity to 100% (95%CI: 95–100%) and the specificity to 96% (95%CI: 80–99%).
3.3 False negatives
One patient in the coarctation group had a false negative CSA index (CSA index 3.13). This was a newborn with an associated minor defect (perimembranous VSD and a small muscular VSD). He had a pathological I/D ratio of 0.44 and surgery confirmed the coarctation. Eighteen patients had a false negative I/D ratio, 10 of which were less than 3 months with 5 having a PDA. Ten had isolated coarctation, six had coarctation with minor defects and two had coarctation with major defects.
3.4 False positives
In the control group, one patient had a false positive CSA index (CSA index 1.39) close to the cut-off 1.5. None of the patients had a false positive I/D ratio.
3.5 Interobserver agreement
For the 10 randomly selected echocardiograms reviewed by two observers, the ICC range for aortic arch measurements and ratios is from 0.86 to 0.99, indicating good agreement (Table 4
).
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In older children the ductus arteriosus is closed but precise imaging of the isthmus in the suprasternal view can be challenging. Presence of an aortic coarctation in complex heart disease is an aggravating factor and may change the medical or surgical approach. For all these reasons an echocardiographic index, independent of cardiac function, presence of PDA or other lesions and based on 2D measurements of the transverse aortic arch would provide a simple tool to improve the accuracy of diagnosing coarctation.
In the literature two previous studies have introduced such indexes which were validated in a limited group of patients [11,12]. Dodge-Khatami et al. described for the first time the CSA index and at a cut-off point of 1.5 showed 97.7%/94.7% sensitivity and 92.3%/100% specificity for newborns/infants less than 3 months of age with coarctation. This study was a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 63 patients with a mean age of 12 days in the neonatal group and 75 days in the infant group. Forty-two percent of the study population had an associated VSD and 42% had a PDA. The control group comprised 16 neonates and 7 infants. Wu et al. described the I/D ratio with the objective to have a tool to diagnose coarctation in newborns with PDA. They performed a retrospective analysis of 36 neonates with coarctation and PDA, 75% of whom had also associated intracardiac anomalies. The I/D ratio was below 0.64 in 32/36 neonates (89%). The control group comprised 19 neonates with PDA. In a subsequent prospective study in 162 neonates with PDA and I/D ratio below 0.64 together with the delineation of a posterior shelf and an arm-leg blood pressure discrepancy had a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 99.3%.
Our study showed that the CSA index is a reliable echocardiographic tool in detecting coarctation of the aorta in infants younger than 3 months as well as in patients older than 3 months. With the CSA index we also demonstrated that it is possible to predict the presence of aortic coarctation in a wide variety of complex cardiac malformations such as in double outlet right ventricle independent of the position of the aorta, single ventricle or transposition of the great arteries. Although we included in our study patients of all ages or with all types of cardiac malformations, we found almost the same sensitivity and specificity for CSA index as compared to the initial publication.
The I/D ratio in our study was less efficient in detecting aortic coarctation in all groups of patients. Several reasons might have played a role. Originally in Wu's paper, the I/D ratio was instituted only for newborns with PDA and simple coarctation. A high sensitivity was only achieved when adding two other parameters: the blood pressure difference between upper and lower extremities and the presence of a posterior shelf on echocardiography. In our study we tried to extend this first initial description to all age groups and to all associated cardiac malformations independent of the presence of a PDA and without taking into account the blood pressure and the presence of a posterior shelf. This most certainly decreased the sensitivity in our study. The other reason could have been that for measurement of this ratio a perfect view of the isthmus and descending aorta is necessary, which is a limiting factor, especially in older children.
When using CSA index there was only one false negative patient, a newborn who had nevertheless a pathological I/D ratio. From this we can deduct that CSA index is a reliable tool in detecting coarctation and the adjunction of the I/D ratio is only helpful in newborns.
4.1 Limitations
This study was retrospective with its limitations. It required the review of videotapes, with subsequent off-line calibration for measurement of aortic arch structures. This may have induced some error in the measurement process, however, interobserver variability showed a strong correlation between observers. Exclusion of patients without good quality imaging of the aortic arch is another potential bias. Our numbers are relatively small, reducing the power of our findings, especially when analysing results in subgroups of the coarctation group. Only a prospective study with a greater population of newborn and infants, both with and without complex associated cardiac defects, could confirm the close relation between the CSA index and coarctation.
| 5. Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abstract presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology in Warsaw, 16–19 May 2007. | References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |