|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Letters to the Editor |
Division of General Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Berne, Switzerland
Received 20 October 2008; accepted 21 October 2008.
* Corresponding author. Address: Division of General Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Berne/Inselspital, 3010 Berne, Switzerland. Tel.: +41 31 632 2111. (Email: beatrix.hoksch{at}insel.ch).
Key Words: Procalcitonin Pleural empyema Decortication
We would like to thank Dr Apostolakis for his valuable comment on our recently published results on procalcitonin (PCT) in the postoperative course after decortication in case of pleural empyema [1,2].
The point of the study was the observation of the postoperative course of PCT in comparison to CrP. We registered that PCT seems to reflect the postoperative clinical course more accurately than CrP and has had a good correlation with the postoperative course in case of SIRS or sepsis [2]. On the other hand low preoperative levels of PCT, as was the case in two patients (9.1%), do not exclude a localized (without systemic signs) infection. The patient with the postoperative recurrent pleural effusions showed a preoperative level of 0.35 ng/ml. This is not a low level but rather a sign of an infection, yet not necessarily a systemic one (serum or plasma PCT concentrations of healthy persons are measured with the Kryptor-assay are below 0.06 ng/ml [3]).
If there was only the sneaking suspicion that a pleural empyema was due to tuberculosis (clinic, anamnesis) this patient was excluded from the trial from the beginning of treatment. So not one of the patients in the presented study had tuberculosis.
We are sure that in case of an earlier availability of the PCT values most of the patients with an antibiotic treatment after discharge would not have received antibiotics (up to 85.7%). So the use of PCT instead of CrP in the postoperative course after decortication could save at least 7 days of antibiotic treatment [2]. This is in accordance with other trials [4,5].
Indeed, the number of patients is small, in this prospective, but not randomized trial. And it is known that PCT levels show a wide variation but: In general dynamics of PCT levels, rather than the absolute values, may be more important for identifying patients with persistent infection or infectious complications after surgery [2].
Therefore we also think it is very important to have randomized studies with more patients, maybe in a multicenter trial. These studies should determine the value of PCT as a promising marker in thoracic surgery not only after decortication in case of pleural empyema.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Hoksch and R. A. Schmid Reply to Apostolakis et al. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 35(1): 194 - 194. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |