EJCTS Click here to go to Edwards website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:746-747. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.12.025
Copyright © 2009, European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier. All rights reserved.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Michael Frank
Marc Laskar
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aboyans, V.
Right arrow Articles by Laskar, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aboyans, V.
Right arrow Articles by Laskar, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


Letters to the Editor

Reply to Apostolakis et al.

Victor Aboyansa,b,*, Michael Franka,c, Philippe Lacroixa,b, Marc Laskara

a Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
b EA 3174 University of Limoges, Limoges, France
c Centre d’Investigations Cliniques 9201 INSERM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France

Received 14 December 2008; accepted 18 December 2008.

* Corresponding author. Address: Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine, Dupuytren University Hospital, 2, Avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges, France. Tel.: +33 555 056 371; fax: +33 555 056 384. (Email: victor.aboyans{at}unilim.fr).

Abbreviations: BP = blood pressure • CABG = coronary artery bypass graft surgery • HR = heart rate • PP = pulse pressure

Key Words: Heart rate • Pulse pressure • Coronary artery disease • Surgery • Prognosis

We thank Dr Apostolakis et al. for their regular comments in this journal. Their comments regarding our paper [1] are focused on the highly debated usefulness of beta-blockers prior to cardiac surgery [2]. The poorer prognosis of our patients with high HR could potentially be interpreted as beneficial effects of beta-blocking therapy [1]. To date, trials on beta-blocker therapy prior to coronary surgery provide conflicting results [3].

It should be stressed that our study is descriptive [1], emphasising that rest heart rate (HR) and pulse pressure (PP) are two independent predictive markers of perioperative events, which should be considered in risk scores for coronary surgery. While we adjusted our findings to the use of preoperative HR lowering medications, primarily beta-blockers, because of their evident influence on HR and to some extent on PP values, the analysis of events according to preoperative beta-blocker therapy is beyond the scope of this observational study. Such analysis would have required a randomised controlled trial, or at least a propensity score analysis. Yet, the aim and design of our study could not support such conclusions. Of note, we did not find any significant difference regarding PP distribution according to beta-blocker administration.

We consider the issue raised about ‘mean PP’ unclear.

The conditions for HR assessment are important. We measured HR systematically the day before surgery, at patient's admittance. Pulse pressure was calculated according to systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) values averaged from a single BP measure during the anaesthetist's outpatient visit one month prior to surgery and from two consecutive BP measures upon admission. The assessment being strictly preoperative, any interference with specific premedication can reasonably be excluded. Consequently, we consider the conditions for HR and PP measurement in this study as realistic, as usually performed in clinical routine. With the aim of using these two parameters for perioperative risk stratification, we consider that they should be measured in a steady state, long before surgery.

Defining perioperative myocardial damage during heart surgery by any cut-off for troponin-I concentration remains indeed arbitrary. In a consensus statement, it has been acknowledged that ‘the situation for patients undergoing CABG is too complex to define simple cut-off values’ [4]. Hence, the troponin-I threshold used, although rather high, is consistent with findings in the literature [5], with similar rates of clinical complications. Of note, we found similar trends when we used a lower cut-off (10 µg/l), comparable to reported results with the 20 µg/l threshold.

In conclusion, we consider evidence regarding the systematic use of beta-blockers in the setting of CABG, as well as the use of biomarkers to assess perioperative myocardial damage still insufficient to be subject to consensual guidelines. Further adequate clinical trials and meta-data analyses are required to respond to these daily clinical concerns.

References

  1. Aboyans V, Frank M, Nubret K, Lacroix P, Laskar M. Heart rate and pulse pressure at rest are major prognostic markers of early postoperative complications after coronary bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:971-976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Apostolakis EE, Koniari IC, Tsigkas GG. Which are the exact guidelines for more rationale intervention concerning beta-blockers administration in coronary patients preoperatively?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009;35:746.[Free Full Text]
  3. Filion KB, Pilote L, Rahme E, Eisenberg MJ. Perioperative use of cardiac medical therapy among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review. Am Heart J 2007;154:407-414.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Apple FS, Wu AH, Jaffe AS. European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction: how to use existing assays clinically and for clinical trials. Am Heart J 2002;144(6):981-986.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Adabag AS, Rector T, Mithani S, Harmala J, Ward HB, Kelly RF, Nguyen JT, McFalls EO, Bloomfield HE. Prognostic significance of elevated cardiac troponin I after heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1744-1750.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Michael Frank
Marc Laskar
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aboyans, V.
Right arrow Articles by Laskar, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Aboyans, V.
Right arrow Articles by Laskar, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS