<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org">
<title>European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery recent issues</title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org</link>
<description>RSS on CTSNet -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery</prism:publicationName>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/759?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/767?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/769?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/774?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/777?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/781?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/786?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/790?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/794?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/799?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/805?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/812?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/819?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/824?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/829?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/837?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/844?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/849?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/856?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/862?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/872?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/878?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/881?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/885?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/890?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/899?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/906?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/914?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/924?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/925?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/926?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/927?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/928?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/931?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/934?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/937?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/939?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/942?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/944?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/945?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/945-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/946?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/947?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/948?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/949?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/949-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/950?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/951?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/951-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/523?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/529?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/531?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/537?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/542?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/548?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/554?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/560?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/566?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/573?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/583?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/596?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/600?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/607?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/613?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/619?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/626?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/633?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/639?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/645?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/651?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/653?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/660?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/666?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/673?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/679?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/685?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/691?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/695?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/700?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/703?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/707?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/712?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/717?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/723?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/728?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/735?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/736?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/737?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/738?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/739?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/740?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/742?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/745?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/748?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/751?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/754?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/754-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/755?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/756?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/757?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/758?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/323?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/334?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/341?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/355?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/364?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/370?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/377?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/402?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/409?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/418?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/424?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/430?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/435?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/440?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/444?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/451?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/457?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/461?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/466?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/473?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/480?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/485?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/487?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/497?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/502?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/507?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/508?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/510?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/513?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/516?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/518?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/521?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/3/522?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery</title>
<url>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/759?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Cardiothoracic surgery: time for reappraisal!]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/759?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hagl, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Education, History, Professional affairs]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Cardiothoracic surgery: time for reappraisal!]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>766</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>759</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/767?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Search for a better mousetrap. The quest for an ideal method of sternal closure]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/767?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robicsek, F., Fokin, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiac - other, Chest wall]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Search for a better mousetrap. The quest for an ideal method of sternal closure]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>768</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>767</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/769?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Modified closure technique for reducing sternal dehiscence; a clinical and in vitro assessment]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/769?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Although the incidence of sternal dehiscence is low its mortality can be high. An alternative technique is described (modified closure) which aims to redistribute the dehiscence force into the longer longitudinal axis rather than the shorter transverse axis, thereby maximising the closure strength. Four ethibond sutures, which interlock anteriorly, are used in addition to eight transverse sternal wires. The aim of the study was to assess the modified closure using both an in vitro and a clinical study. <b>Methods:</b> (a) In vitro study: A weight and traction pulley system applied a force of 0.1 kN to pairs of silicone rubber hemisterna approximated to each other using alternative closure techniques. The dehiscence tendency (DT) was measured as the amount of separation under tension. Using 10 pairs of hemisterna for each closure technique the measured DT for the modified closure (MC) was compare with those for each of five alternative closures (two figure-of-eight and four transverse sutures (2C), 6 (6T), 8 (8T), 10 (10T) and 12 transverse sutures (12T)). (b) Clinical study: The incidence of sternal dehiscence for the first 4 years of a consultants&rsquo; practice (using 8T) was compared with the second 4 years (using MC). <b>Results:</b> (a) Measured DT (mean &plusmn; SEM), (MC: 149 &plusmn; 14; 6T: 256 &plusmn; 13; 8T: 223 &plusmn; 9; 10T: 213 &plusmn; 13; 12T: 203 &plusmn; 8; 2C: 294 &plusmn; 15). DT was significantly smaller for MC (<I>p</I>
 &lt; 0.003). (b) The incidence of dehiscence was significantly smaller in the second 4 years (MC) than in the first (8T): 0.2% (1/529) versus 1.6% (13/788); <I>p</I>
 = 0.01 <b>Conclusions:</b> In vitro and clinical studies suggest that the modified closure technique can reduce the incidence of sternal dehiscence.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John, L. C.H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiac - other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Modified closure technique for reducing sternal dehiscence; a clinical and in vitro assessment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>773</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>769</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/774?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Lung herniation: a rare complication in minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/774?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Lung herniation, defined as a protrusion of the lung parenchyma with pleural membranes through a defect of the thoracic wall, is a rare entity. As minimally invasive cardiac procedures evolve, different complications may be evident such as lung herniation. A retrospective review of all patients submitted to minimally invasive cardiac or transplant surgery through anterior mini-thoracotomy at our department revealed 16 patients with lung herniation and this experience is analyzed. <b>Materials and methods:</b> From 1996 through 2007, 12 male (75%) and 4 female ranging in age between 23 and 77 years submitted prior either to minimally invasive cardiac or transplant surgery were admitted at our department for a lung hernia. The location was right in eight cases, left in six, and in two cases the herniation was bilateral. The majority of our patients were symptomatic. Twelve of them (75%) complained of pain. The bulge was present regardless of straining. Diagnosis was confirmed by chest X-ray and tomographic scan in all of them. The surgical procedure included identification of the hernial sac and reconstruction of the defect. A variety of materials were used for chest wall reconstruction such as Vicryl and Goretex mesh. <b>Results:</b> There was no perioperative mortality or morbidity. Patients were discharged within 5&ndash;7 days postoperatively and in a follow up of 3 months to 8 years no recurrence was observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> (1) Since the thoracic cage has inherent weakness anteriorly near the sternum, attention is needed when the anterior approach is used. (2) Hernias with persistent pain and entrapped lung usually need reconstruction with a patch in order to avoid late complications such as recurrent pulmonary infections and hemoptysis due to strangulation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Athanassiadi, K., Bagaev, E., Simon, A., Haverich, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - transplantation, Minimally invasive surgery, Chest wall]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Lung herniation: a rare complication in minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>776</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>774</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/777?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Comparison of procalcitonin and CrP in the postoperative course after lung decortication]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/777?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> The objective of this prospective study was to compare the clinical value of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CrP) plasma concentrations in their postoperative course after decortication. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-two patients requiring surgery for pleural empyema were chosen for this prospective study. Routine blood samples including CrP and PCT plasma concentrations were taken before the operation and on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 7th postoperative day. <b>Results:</b> Due to infection PCT and CrP were elevated preoperatively. In the postoperative course both PCT and CrP reached peak-levels on day 2 with values up to 43.55 ng/ml and 384.00 mg/l, respectively. In PCT the rise was followed by a clear decrease in 20 (90.9 %) patients until day 7. In contrast the CrP levels decreased slowly and only seven (54.5%) patients had values of 100 mg/l or below on day 7. PCT showed a better correlation with the clinic in case of septic course than CrP does. <b>Conclusions:</b> PCT reflects postoperative clinical course more accurately than CrP. Therefore, PCT is a more appropriate laboratory parameter to monitor patients after surgery for pleural empyema.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carboni, G. L., Fahrner, R., Gazdhar, A., Printzen, G., Schmid, R. A., Hoksch, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - other, Pleura]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Comparison of procalcitonin and CrP in the postoperative course after lung decortication]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>780</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>777</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/781?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Diagnostic value of surgical lung biopsy: comparison with clinical and radiological diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/781?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective</b>: To determine overall and disease-related accuracy of the clinical/imagiological evaluation for pulmonary infiltrates of unknown aetiology, compared with the pathological result of the surgical lung biopsy (SLB) and to evaluate the need for the latter in this setting. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective review of the experiences of SLB in 366 consecutive patients during the past 5 years. The presumptive diagnosis was based on clinical, imagiological and non-invasive or minimally invasive diagnostic procedures and compared with the gold standard of histological diagnosis by SLB. We considered five major pathological groups: diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD), primitive neoplasms, metastases, infectious disease and other lesions. Patients with previous histological diagnosis were excluded. <b>Results</b>: In 56.0% of patients (<I>n</I>
 = 205) clinical evaluation reached a correct diagnosis, in 42.6% a new diagnosis was established (<I>n</I>
 = 156) by the SLB, which was inconclusive in 1.4% (<I>n</I>
 = 5). The pre-test probability for each disease was 85% for DPLD, 75% for infectious disease, 64% for primitive neoplasms and 60% for metastases. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for the clinical/radiological diagnosis were 70%, 90%, 62% and 92%, respectively. For DPLD: 67%, 90%, 76% and 85%; primitive neoplasms: 47%, 90%, 46% and 90%; metastases: 99%, 79%, 60% and 99%; infectious disease 38%, 98%, 53% and 96%. <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite a high sensitivity and specificity of the clinical and imagiological diagnosis, the positive predictive value was low, particularly in the malignancy group. SLB should be performed in pulmonary infiltrates of unknown aetiology because the clinical/imagiological assessment missed and/or misdiagnosed an important number of patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coutinho, G. F., Pancas, R., Magalhaes, E., Bernardo, J. E., Eugenio, L., Antunes, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Diagnostic value of surgical lung biopsy: comparison with clinical and radiological diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>785</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>781</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/786?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Topographical considerations under video-scope guidance in the T3,4 levels sympathetic surgery]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/786?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Introduction:</b> Anatomical variation of the sympathetic nervous system is known to be one of the main causes of failure and dissatisfaction after sympathetic surgery. However, there are only few reports on the descriptive analysis of sympathetic nerve variants. The purpose of this study is to investigate the anatomical variations of the sympathetic trunk at the levels of T3 and T4 ganglia considered in a topographic approach for sympathetic procedures and to further improve the postoperative outcome. <b>Materials and methods:</b> From June 2003 to January 2004, 44 patients with palmar hyperhidrosis underwent bilateral T3,4 ramicotomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The anatomy of T3 and T4 sympathetic ganglia, pathway of sympathetic trunk, and rami-communicantes were recorded on video and still cut images for descriptive analysis. <b>Results:</b> The thoracic sympathetic trunks were mostly lying against the heads of the ribs, but there were variants of sympathetic trunk running along the medial side of the rib heads of 3rd, 4th and 5th ribs, respectively in 9.0%, 18.0% and 37.5% of the cases. There were also variants running along the lateral side of rib heads near the neck portion in 12.5%, 10.2% and 8.0% of the cases. The 3rd ganglion was located within the intercostal space (59.1%) or at the level of the upper border of the 4th rib (36.4%) or upon the 4th rib (4.5%). The location of the 4th ganglion was in the intercostal space (18.2%), the upper border of the 5th rib (44.3%) or upon the 5th rib (37.5%). The ascending rami were found at the level of the 3rd ganglion in 48.8% and the 4th ganglion in 45.5% of the cases. The descending rami were located at the level of 3rd and the 4th ganglion in 8.0% and 6.8%, respectively. And the middle rami were found in all cases except one. <b>Conclusions:</b> It may be difficult to localize the sympathetic trunk in some cases of severe obesity; a careful inspection has to be performed from the medial side of the rib heads to the neck portion. The obvious &lsquo;downward shift of ganglion&rsquo; in the position shown as the thoracic sympathetic trunk descends is to be deliberated in T4 sympathetic surgery. Many ascending and descending accessory pathways of sympathetic nerve were observed; therefore, a lateral extension of electrocoagulation at the level of upper and lower rib border is necessary to impose a complete blockage of sympathetic nerve stimulus.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, D. H., Hong, Y. J., Hwang, J. J., Kim, K. D., Lee, D. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mediastinum, Pleura]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Topographical considerations under video-scope guidance in the T3,4 levels sympathetic surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>789</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>786</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/790?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Lung metastasis resection of adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/790?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Background:</b> Adenoid cystic carcinoma is a rare tumour originating from the exocrine mucous glands, known for its high propensity for distant metastases. The value of lung metastasis resection from adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands origin is evaluated. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing surgery for primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands between 1982 and 2006. Patients were excluded who had primary tumour macroscopic incomplete resection or were lost at follow-up. From a database of 50 eligible patients, 27 were identified as having presented a tumour recurrence during follow-up; in 20 it was first diagnosed in the form of distant metastases, and in 7 in the form of loco-regional recurrence. Nine patients who presented isolated lung recurrence underwent complete lung metastasectomy. Demographic data, pathologic characteristics and operative and postoperative record were reviewed, as well as updated survival. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-six men and 24 women with a median age of 57 years (range 33&ndash;79) underwent radical surgery for adenoid cystic carcinoma during the study period. In 20 patients, at a median free interval time of 3 years (range 1&ndash;12), a distant metastasis relapse was observed. Nine patients with a median free interval time of 5 years (range 1&ndash;12) underwent lung metastasectomy: five had single metastasis resection, one multiple mono-pulmonary and three multiple and bilateral. In six of these patients a new disease recurrence was noted: four patients underwent further lung metastasectomy, but in all of them progression of the disease was observed. Mean survival of the population as a whole resulted as being 16 years (SE = 1.4) with an actuarial survival of 77% at 5 years, 66% at 10 years and 56% at 15 years. Mean survival of patients having presented with distant metastases resulted as being 11 years (SE = 2.2). Mean survival after appearance of distant metastases resulted as being 72 months (SE = 15.8) in the 9 patients treated by metastasectomy, and 62 months (SE = 15.1) in the 11 who did not have metastasis resection. <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma could be frequently encountered with disease recurrence confined to the lung. The impact of complete lung metastasis resection on the course of the disease, however, is yet to be determined.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobbio, A., Copelli, C., Ampollini, L., Bianchi, B., Carbognani, P., Bettati, S., Sesenna, E., Rusca, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Lung metastasis resection of adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>793</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>790</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/794?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Strategies and outcomes in pulmonary and extrapulmonary metastases from renal cell cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/794?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Resected renal carcinoma related lung metastases (LM) are associated with higher survival rates, but surgery for extrapulmonary metastases affords good results too. Patients operated on for extrapulmonary metastases before thoracotomy are at high risk of death. The purpose of our analysis was to explore the surgical impact on the outcome of patients with such association. <b>Methods:</b> We reviewed the data of 15 patients operated for LM and extrapulmonary metastases from 1984 to 2005. We studied demographic and clinical characteristics, surgical results and pathological staging of the primary tumour and LM in search of prognostic factors. <b>Results:</b> Nephrectomy and metastasectomies were synchronous in only one patient. For the others, mean time interval between nephrectomy and surgery for LM was 74.2 months (range 19&ndash;228). Metastases were resected synchronously in two patients and metachronously in 13 of them (mean time interval: 28 months). Five-year survival of this group was 32%, median value of 18 months. The prognosis was better when the resected extrapulmonary metastases were located in the perirenal (pancreas, adrenal gland) or intrathoracic structures (lymph nodes, diaphragm) than in distant visceral organs (brain, bone, thyroid gland). The lymphatic drainage for these structures connects with the thoracic duct in a similar manner as kidneys do. <b>Conclusion:</b> Surgery for lung and extrapulmonary renal cell cancer-related metastases provides favourable results and is indicated when complete resection can be achieved. The role of the lymphatic system must be explored by further investigations.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Assouad, J., Banu, E., Brian, E., Pham, D.-N.-M., Dujon, A., Foucault, C., Riquet, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Strategies and outcomes in pulmonary and extrapulmonary metastases from renal cell cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>798</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>794</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/799?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Intra-tumoral vascular or perineural invasion as prognostic factors for long-term survival in early stage non-small cell lung carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/799?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> In recent studies focusing on the prognostic significance of histologic features of NSCLC tumors, vessel invasion was correlated to survival across all surgical stages. We similarly analyzed whether intra-tumoral permeation could affect survival in subgroups of stage I and II NSCLC. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective single institution analysis of a prospectively computed database. Specimens were analyzed for intra-tumoral vascular, lymphatic and nervous permeation. Overall mortality was determined and for each stage, a Cox regression analysis of selected variables was performed. Detailed histologic information was available in all patients. Follow-up was 100% complete (median = 69 months). <b>Results</b>: From 1989 to 2004, out of 346 patients with stage I and II NSCLC, 253 patients with p stage I (75.7%) and 81 patients with p stage II (24.3%) underwent surgery with complete resection, for a completeness resection rate of 97% (334/346). We performed 70 pneumonectomies, 255 lobectomies and 9 lesser resections (respectively, 21%, 76.3% and 2.7%). In-hospital mortality was 2.1%. The incidence of intra-tumoral permeation was 14.4% (48/334). Permeation correlated both with T status (<I>p</I>
 = 0.04), grade of differentiation (<I>p</I>
 = 0.03) and stage (<I>p</I>
 = 0.02). Median survival and overall 5-year survival for patients with and without permeation were 42.3 months (95% CI [20&ndash;64.6]) and 72.1 months (95% CI [56.9&ndash;87.2]), respectively; and 44% and 54%, respectively (<I>p</I>
 = NS). However, intra-tumoral permeation was not a significant predictor for overall death (HR = 1.1 [95% CI = 0.74&ndash;1.66). <b>Conclusion</b>: In this large institutional study of early stage NSCLC, the presence of intra-tumoral permeation was correlated both to T, grade of differentiation, as well as to stage. However, in contrast to recent reports, we did not find that intra-tumoral permeation adversely affects long-term survival.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poncelet, A. J., Cornet, J., Coulon, C., Collard, P., Noirhomme, P., Weynand, B., groupe d'oncologie thoracique des Cliniques Saint-Luc]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Intra-tumoral vascular or perineural invasion as prognostic factors for long-term survival in early stage non-small cell lung carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>804</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>799</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/805?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Review] The place of excision repair cross complementation 1 (ERCC1) in surgically treated non-small cell lung cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/805?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>Platinum-based regimens are the cornerstones of therapy in adjuvant and neoadjuvant management of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the survival benefit associated with platinum-based chemotherapy is marginal and therefore adequate patient selection is essential. Excision repair cross complementation 1 (ERCC1) is a key-enzyme in the repair of platinum-DNA adducts that has been demonstrated to influence the response to platinum-based therapy. We performed a systematic review of the literature from 1996 to September 2007 on studies that assessed the role of ERCC1 in resected NSCLC. Overall, nine studies were identified. ERCC1 expression has been assessed by mRNA expression (<I>n</I>
 = 5) and/or by protein expression (immunohistochemistry) (<I>n</I>
 = 5). One study assessed ERCC1 status by both methods. In these studies, patients with early stage NSCLC treated by surgery alone survived longer if ERCC1 levels are high (favourable prognostic value of high ERCC1 level). Conversely, patients treated by surgery and who receive chemotherapy, either as adjuvant therapy or for disease relapse, have a better overall survival when ERCC1 levels are low (favourable predictive value of low ERCC1 level). ERCC1 expression might assist in selecting patients who will respond to adjuvant (neoadjuvant) platinum-based chemotherapy. However, further investigation is necessary in order to prospectively confirm these results and to ascertain the most appropriate method of assessment. Thoracic surgeons should participate in this field of research.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Breen, D., Barlesi, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer, Education, Lung - basic science]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Review] The place of excision repair cross complementation 1 (ERCC1) in surgically treated non-small cell lung cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>811</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>805</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/812?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery a feasible approach for clinical N0 and postoperatively pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer?]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/812?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> It remains controversial whether video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) major pulmonary resection (VMPR) with systematic node dissection (SND) is a feasible approach for clinical N0 and pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer (cN0-pN2 NSCLC). We compared the clinical outcome of patients who underwent VMPR with SND for cN0-pN2 NSCLC with the outcome of patients who underwent MPR with SND by thoracotomy. We conducted this study to determine the feasibility of VMPR for cN0 and pN2 NSCLC patients and intraoperative node staging by node sampling. <b>Methods:</b> Between 1997 and 2006, 770 patients underwent MPR with SND for NSCLC, wherein 450 patients had VMPR and 320 were subjected to open thoracotomy. There were 673 clinical N0 patients. Among them, we retrospectively reviewed 69 patients (10.3%) with cN0-pN2 NSCLC of which the greatest tumor dimension ranged from 20 to 50 mm. These patients were divided into two groups: 37 patients under group V, who underwent VMPR, and 32 patients under group T, who underwent MPR by thoracotomy, for cN0-pN2 NSCLC. The majority of the patients underwent postoperative chemotherapy. <b>Results:</b> There were no differences between the two groups regarding preoperative data or the number of nodes dissected. The rate of nodal metastasis (number of metastatic nodes/number of dissected nodes) was similar between the two groups (group V vs group T, 0.24 vs 0.24 in total nodes dissected, 0.24 vs 0.23 in mediastinal nodes dissected). The 3-year and 5-year recurrence-free survivals were similar (60.9% vs 49.6% and 60.9% vs 49.6%), as well. Most of the pattern of recurrence was due to remote metastasis. In like manner, the 3-year and 5-year survivals were similar (67.6% vs 57.7% and 45.4% vs 41.1%). <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrates that VMPR with SND is a feasible surgical therapy for cN0-pN2 NSCLC without loss of curability. It is unnecessary to convert the VATS approach to thoracotomy in order to do SND even if pN2 disease is revealed during VMPR.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watanabe, A., Mishina, T., Ohori, S., Koyanagi, T., Nakashima, S., Mawatari, T., Kurimoto, Y., Higami, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer, Minimally invasive surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery a feasible approach for clinical N0 and postoperatively pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>818</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>812</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/819?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Prognostic value of FDG uptake in early stage non-small cell lung cancer]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/819?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Background:</b> Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a poor prognosis even for early stages of the disease (stage I and II). We studied the prognostic value of PET FDG in patients with completely resected stage I and II NSCLC. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective study of 96 patients with NSCLC whose staging included <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET (fluoro deoxy glucose positron emission tomography). Histopathological stage was either stage I (75) or stage II (<I>n</I>
 = 21). FDG uptake was measured as maximal standardized uptake value for body weight (SUVmax). Mean follow-up was 45 &plusmn; 30 months (1&ndash;142 months). Overall and cancer-free survival rates were recorded. <b>Results:</b> SUVmax were higher for stage II than for stage I (10.5 &plusmn; 4.5 vs 8.5 &plusmn; 5, <I>p</I>
 = 0.04). Mean tumor volumes were equivalent for both stages (33 cm<sup>3</sup>, <I>p</I>
 = 0.18), excluding a partial volume effect. The median SUVmax in the whole study population was 7.8. The median survival was significantly longer in patients with a lower (SUVmax &le; 7.8) FDG uptake (127 months vs 69 months, <I>p</I>
 = 0.001). For stage I tumors (<I>n</I>
 = 75), high FDG uptake was significantly associated with reduced median survival: 127 months if SUVmax &le; 7.8 and 69 months if SUVmax &gt; 7.8 (<I>p</I>
 = 0.001). For stage II tumors (<I>n</I>
 = 21), no statistical difference was observed: 72 months vs 40 months for SUVmax &le; 7.8 and for SUVmax &gt; 7.8, respectively (<I>p</I>
 = 0.11), although there was a clear trend towards reduced survival for highly metabolic tumors. Disease-free survival was also significantly better for lower metabolic tumors: 96.1 months vs 87.7 months (<I>p</I>
 = 0.01). <b>Conclusion:</b> High FDG uptake is associated with reduced overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with completely resected stage I&ndash;II NSCLC. Whether patients with highly metabolic tumors should undergo a closer postoperative surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy has to be addressed in a properly designed prospective trial.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hanin, F.-X., Lonneux, M., Cornet, J., Noirhomme, P., Coulon, C., Distexhe, J., Poncelet, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Prognostic value of FDG uptake in early stage non-small cell lung cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>823</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>819</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/824?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Accuracy and survival of repeat mediastinoscopy after induction therapy for non-small cell lung cancer in a combined series of 104 patients]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/824?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Precise restaging of non-small cell lung cancer after induction therapy is of utmost importance. Remediastinoscopy remains a controversial procedure. In a combined, updated series of two thoracic centres, accuracy and survival of remediastinoscopy were determined. <b>Methods:</b> From November 1994 to August 2005, remediastinoscopy was performed in 104 patients (98 men, 6 women) after induction therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Mean age was 64.3 years (range 38&ndash;85). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given in 79 patients and chemoradiotherapy in 25. Follow-up data were completed in January 2007. <b>Results:</b> Remediastinoscopy was technically feasible in all patients except for one who died due to perioperative haemorrhage. Remediastinoscopy was positive in 40 patients and negative in 64; the latter group underwent thoracotomy. There were 17 false-negative remediastinoscopies. Sensitivity of remediastinoscopy was 71%, specificity 100% and accuracy 84%. Follow-up was complete for all patients. Sixty-nine died, mostly of distant metastases. Median survival time for the whole group was 18 months (95% confidence interval 11&ndash;25). Median survival time in patients with a positive remediastinoscopy was 14 months (95% confidence interval 8&ndash;20), with a negative remediastinoscopy 28 months (95% confidence interval 15&ndash;41) and with a false-negative remediastinoscopy 24 months (95% confidence interval 3&ndash;45). In univariate analysis the difference between positive and negative remediastinoscopies was highly significant (<I>p</I>
 = 0.001). In a multivariate analysis including sex, age, histology, centre, and nodal status at remediastinoscopy, only nodal status was a significant independent prognostic factor (<I>p</I>
 = 0.008). <b>Conclusions:</b> Remediastinoscopy is a valuable restaging procedure after induction therapy. Persisting mediastinal nodal involvement proven at remediastinoscopy heralds a poor prognosis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Waele, M., Serra-Mitjans, M., Hendriks, J., Lauwers, P., Belda-Sanchis, J., Van Schil, P., Rami-Porta, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Accuracy and survival of repeat mediastinoscopy after induction therapy for non-small cell lung cancer in a combined series of 104 patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>828</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>824</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/829?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Concurrent cisplatin/etoposide plus 3D-conformal radiotherapy followed by surgery for stage IIB (superior sulcus T3N0)/III non-small cell lung cancer yields a high rate of pathological complete response]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/829?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Introduction:</b> Optimal preoperative treatment of stage IIB (Pancoast)/III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains undetermined and a subject of controversy. The goal of our study is to confirm feasibility and pathological response rates after induction chemoradiation (CRT) in our community-based treatment center. <b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients were selected according to functional and resectability criteria. Induction treatment comprised 3D conformal 4500 cGy radiotherapy delivered to the primary tumor and pathologic hilar and/or mediastinal lymph nodes on CT scan with an extra-margin of 1&ndash;1.5 cm. Concurrent chemotherapy regimen was cisplatinum 20 mg/m<sup>2</sup> d1&ndash;d5 and etoposide 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup> d1&ndash;d5, d1&ndash;5 d29&ndash;33. Within 3&ndash;4 weeks after CRT completion, operability was re-assessed accordingly. Surgery was performed 4&ndash;6 weeks after CRT completion in patients (pts) deemed resectable. Inoperable pts were referred for a 20&ndash;25 Gy boost &plusmn;1 extra-cycle of cisplatinum + etoposide. <b>Results:</b> From 1996 to 2005, 107 pts were initially selected for treatment and received induction chemoradiation (stage IIB-Pancoast 18, IIIA 58 and IIIB 31, squamous cell carcinoma 48%, adenocarcinoma 44%, large-cell undifferentiated carcinoma 14%). After preoperative evaluation, 72 pts (67%) had a thoracotomy (pneumonectomy 21, lobectomy 45, bilobectomy 5) and all but one (unresectable tumor) had a macroscopic complete resection. During the 3-month postoperative time, five patients (6.9%) died, four after pneumonectomy (right 3, left 1). The analysis of tumoral samples showed a pathological complete response rate or microscopic residual foci of 39.5%. Median follow-up time was 22.3 months (survivors: 36.8 months), 2-year and 3-year overall survival rates were 55% and 40%, respectively (median = 26.7 months) for all the intention-to-treat population (<I>n</I>
 = 107), 62% and 51% (median = 36.5 months) for 71 resected pts, 41% and 16% for 36 non-resected pts (median = 19.1 months). On multivariate analysis, surgical resection and tumoral necrosis &gt;50% (or pathological complete response) were the most pertinent predictive factors of the risk of death (hazard ratio = 0.50 and 0.48, <I>p</I>
 = 0.006 and 0.038, respectively). <b>Conclusion:</b> Surgery was feasible after induction chemoradiation, particularly lobectomy in PS 0&ndash;1, stage IIB (Pancoast)/III NSCLC pts but pneumonectomy carries a high risk of postoperative death (particularly, right pneumonectomy). Pathological response to induction chemoradiation was complete in 39.5% of patients and was a significant predictive factor of overall survival.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pourel, N., Santelmo, N., Naafa, N., Serre, A., Hilgers, W., Mineur, L., Molinari, N., Reboul, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Concurrent cisplatin/etoposide plus 3D-conformal radiotherapy followed by surgery for stage IIB (superior sulcus T3N0)/III non-small cell lung cancer yields a high rate of pathological complete response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>836</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>829</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/837?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Factors affecting early and long-term outcomes after completion pneumonectomy]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/837?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> To identify factors that affect operative mortality and morbidity and long-term survival after completion pneumonectomy. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively reviewed the charts of consecutive patients who underwent completion pneumonectomy at our cardiothoracic surgery department from January 1996 to December 2005. <b>Results:</b> We identified 69 patients, who accounted for 17.8% of all pneumonectomies during the study period; 22 had benign disease and 47 malignant disease (second primary lung cancer, <I>n</I>
 = 19; local recurrence, <I>n</I>
 = 17; or metastasis, <I>n</I>
 = 11). There were 50 males and 19 females with a mean age of 60 years (range, 29&ndash;80 years). Postoperative mortality was 12% and postoperative morbidity 41%. Factors associated with postoperative mortality included obesity (<I>p</I>
 = 0.005), coronary artery disease (<I>p</I>
 = 0.03), removal of the right lung (<I>p</I>
 = 0.02), advanced age (<I>p</I>
 = 0.02), and renal failure (<I>p</I>
 &lt; 0.0001). Preoperative renal failure was the only significant risk factor for mortality by multivariate analysis (<I>p</I>
 = 0.036). Bronchopleural fistula developed in seven patients (10%), with risk factors being removal of the right lung (<I>p</I>
 = 0.04) and mechanical stump closure (<I>p</I>
 = 0.03). Overall survival was 65% after 3 years and 46% after 5 years. Long-term survival was not affected by the reason for completion pneumonectomy. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although long-term survival was acceptable, postoperative mortality and morbidity rates remained high, confirming the reputation of completion pneumonectomy as a challenging procedure. Significant comorbidities and removal of the right lung were the main risk factors for postoperative mortality. Improved patient selection and better management of preoperative renal failure may improve the postoperative outcomes of this procedure, which offers a chance for prolonged survival.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chataigner, O., Fadel, E., Yildizeli, B., Achir, A., Mussot, S., Fabre, D., Mercier, O., Dartevelle, P. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer, Lung - other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Factors affecting early and long-term outcomes after completion pneumonectomy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>843</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>837</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/844?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Post-transplant diabetes mellitus in lung transplant recipients: incidence and risk factors]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/844?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common and potentially serious complication after solid organ transplantation. There are only a few data, however, about the incidence of DM in patients undergoing lung transplantation. <b>Patients and methods:</b> The medical records of 119 consecutive patients who underwent lung transplantation from 1998 to September 2004 were reviewed. Patients were divided in three groups according to their diabetes status, including pre-transplant DM, the PTDM group and those without DM. Patient records and all laboratory data were reviewed and the clinical course of diabetes was monitored. All recipients were treated with tacrolimus based regimen. <b>Results:</b> Mean follow-up for all patients was 25 &plusmn; 10. Twenty-three patients had DM in the pre-lung transplantation (LTX) DM group. PTDM developed in 34 of the remaining 96 patients (35.4%) with an incidence of 20%, 23% after 6 months and 12 months post-transplant. No significant difference was noted between 12 and 24 months post-LTX. The patients who developed DM were older (57 &plusmn; 15 vs 53 &plusmn; 13 years, <I>p</I>
 = 0.009), had increased BMI (26 &plusmn; 5 vs 24 &plusmn; 4, <I>p</I>
 = 0.0001), shorter time from diagnosis to LTX (21 &plusmn; 13 vs 28 &plusmn; 18 months, <I>p</I>
 = 0.007) more cytomegalovirus infection and more acute rejection and hyperglycemia in the first month after LTX. Four patients died in the PTDM group compared to nine patients in the no-DM group (12% vs 14%; <I>p</I>
 = 0.72). <b>Conclusions:</b> Post-transplant diabetes is a common complication in lung transplant patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. The risk for developing PTDM is greatest among older recipients, those obese, and among recipients with more rejections episodes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ollech, J. E., Kramer, M. R., Peled, N., Ollech, A., Amital, A., Medalion, B., Saute, M., Shitrit, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer, Lung - other, Lung - basic science]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.050</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Post-transplant diabetes mellitus in lung transplant recipients: incidence and risk factors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>848</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>844</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/849?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Does perioperative use of aprotinin reduce the rejection rate in heart transplant recipients?]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/849?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Allograft rejection continues to be one of the most common causes of mortality after heart transplantation. We investigated if perioperative use of antifibrinolytics such as aprotinin and tranexamic acid can decrease the rate of rejection after heart transplant and their effect on transfusion. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data from patients who received a first heart transplant at Papworth Hospital between 2000 and 2005. Transplant registry and audit data were used for the study. Rejection biopsy results and treatment were used to designate rejection episodes as mild (grades 1A, 1B or 2 untreated) or severe (grades 2 treated, grades 3 and 4). The relationship between antifibrinolytics and rejection episodes was assessed using univariate and multiple Poisson regression. Kaplan&ndash;Meier methods and Kruskal&ndash;Wallis tests, respectively, were used to analyse survival/time to first rejection and transfusion. <b>Results:</b> There were 225 patients who underwent a first heart transplant between January 2000 and December 2005. Of these, 101 patients (44.9%) had received aprotinin, 63 (28.0%) tranexamic acid, 2 (0.9%) both (aprotinin and tranexamic acid) and 59 (26.2%) no antifibrinolytics. There was no difference in time to first rejection by antifibrinolytic treatment (<I>p</I>
 = 0.20). There was no difference in the rate of treated rejection per 100 patient-days between aprotinin and tranexamic acid groups between 0 and 3 months post-transplant, (0.6 in both), but aprotinin had a small clinical effect when compared to no treatment (0.6 vs 0.8, <I>p</I>
 = 0.54). Between 4 and 6 months, the treated and severe rejection rates were lower in the patients receiving aprotinin as compared to those receiving tranexamic acid, but these differences again did not reach statistical significance (0.1 vs 0.3, <I>p</I>
 = 0.14, 0.2 vs 0.4, <I>p</I>
 = 0.18). Aprotinin was associated with higher postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in the subgroup of patients that had a ventricular assist device, prior sternotomy or anticoagulant therapy. <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of aprotinin in heart transplant surgery may be associated with a small decrease in the incidence of treated/severe rejection within 6 months of transplantation. The perioperative use of antifibrinolytics did not influence time to first rejection or reduce blood transfusion.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shuhaiber, J. H., Goldsmith, K., Large, S. R., Tsui, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Transplantation - heart]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Does perioperative use of aprotinin reduce the rejection rate in heart transplant recipients?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>855</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>849</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/856?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Survival analysis in heart transplantation: results from an analysis of 1290 cases in a single center]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/856?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Background:</b> The clinical profiles of recipients and donors eligible for the procedure as well as the procedure itself have changed over time. We determined the impact of changes in baseline risk profiles at different transplant periods on outcome, and the time-specific distribution of causes of death. <b>Patients and methods:</b> Adult heart transplantations were performed consecutively on 1290 patients. Three transplant periods were defined: 1989&ndash;1993, 1994&ndash;1998, and 1999&ndash;2004. <b>Results:</b> Recipient age and body mass index, previous cardiac surgery, high urgency status, need of ventricular assist device, waiting time (to transplantation and on ventricular assist device), donor age and body mass index, donor&ndash;recipient body mass index mismatch, and ischemic and cardiopulmonary bypass time were significantly different over the three transplant periods. There was, however, no significant difference in mortality risk. The major causes of deaths were: acute rejection, multiorgan failure, and right heart failure (&le;30 days); infection and acute rejection (31 days to 1 year); malignancy, acute rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (&gt;1&ndash;5 years); cardiac allograft vasculopathy and malignancy (&gt;5&ndash;10 years); and malignancy and infection (&gt;10 years). The overall 1-, 5-, 10- and 15-year survival was respectively 77%, 67%, 53% and 42%. There was no difference in survival by different transplant periods (<I>p</I>
 = 0.68). <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite clearly increased baseline risk profiles over time, the outcome of adult heart transplantation remains stable and encouraging. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy, malignancy, and infection threaten the long-term survival.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tjang, Y. S., van der Heijden, G. J.M.G., Tenderich, G., Grobbee, D. E., Korfer, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Transplantation - heart]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Survival analysis in heart transplantation: results from an analysis of 1290 cases in a single center]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>861</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>856</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/862?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Review] Three good reasons for heart surgeons to understand cardiac metabolism]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/862?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>It is the principal goal of cardiac surgeons to improve or reinstate contractile function with, through or after a surgical procedure on the heart. Uninterrupted contractile function of the heart is irrevocably linked to the uninterrupted supply of energy in the form of ATP. Thus, it would appear natural that clinicians interested in myocardial contractile function are interested in the way the heart generates ATP, i.e. the processes generally referred to as energy metabolism. Yet, it may appear that the relevance of energy metabolism in cardiac surgery is limited to the area of cardioplegia, which is a declining research interest. It is the goal of this review to change this trend and to illustrate the role and the therapeutic potential of metabolism and metabolic interventions for management. We present three compelling reasons why cardiac metabolism is of direct, practical interest to the cardiac surgeon and why a better understanding of energy metabolism might indeed result in improved surgical outcomes:<l type="tab"><li><p>(1) To understand cardioplegic arrest, ischemia and reperfusion, one needs a working knowledge of metabolism;</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>(2) hyperglycemia is an underestimated and modifiable risk factor;</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>(3) acute metabolic interventions can be effective in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.</p>
</li>
</l>
</p></sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doenst, T., Bugger, H., Schwarzer, M., Faerber, G., Borger, M. A., Mohr, F. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiac - physiology, Education, Molecular biology, Myocardial protection]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Review] Three good reasons for heart surgeons to understand cardiac metabolism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>871</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>862</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/872?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] A lesional classification to standardize surgical management of aortic insufficiency towards valve repair]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/872?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Aortic valve repair is an alternative to valve replacement for treatment of chronic aortic insufficiency (AI). In order to standardize surgical management, we suggest a classification based on echocardiographic and operative analysis of valvular lesions. <b>Methods:</b> Classification was based on the retrospective analysis of chronic AI mechanisms of 781 adults operated on electively between 1997 and 2003. <b>Results:</b> AI was isolated (406 patients (52%)), associated with supra-coronary aneurysm (97 cases (12.4%)), or with aortic root aneurysm (278 patients (35.6%)). Etiologies of valvular or aortic lesions were respectively rheumatic, dystrophic and atheromatous in 17%, 73.6% and 9.4% of cases. Lesional classification is based on the analysis of chronic AI mechanisms defining type I with central jet (354 cases, 45.3%) and type II with eccentric jet (54.7%). Type Ia is defined as isolated dilation of sino-tubular junction (47 supra-coronary aneurysms), and type Ib as dilation of both sino-tubular junction and aortic annular base (233 root aneurysms, 74 isolated AI). The type II associates dilation of sino-tubular junction and annular base to a valvular lesion: IIa cusp prolapse (95 aneurysms, 200 isolated AI); IIb cusp retraction (132 rheumatic AI), IIc cusp tear (endocarditis, traumatic). <b>Conclusion:</b> A lesional classification aims to standardize the surgical management of aortic valve repair: type Ia, by supra-coronary graft; type Ib, by subvalvular aortic annuloplasty associated with the aortic root replacement with a remodelling technique (root aneurysm) or double sub- and supravalvular annuloplasty (isolated AI). For chronic AI type II, aortic annuloplasty associated a remodelling technique or double sub- and supravalvular annuloplasty is combined with the treatment of the cusp lesion (cusp resuspension, cusp reconstruction with autologous pericardium).</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lansac, E., Di Centa, I., Raoux, F., Attar, N. A., Acar, C., Joudinaud, T., Raffoul, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Great vessels, Valve disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] A lesional classification to standardize surgical management of aortic insufficiency towards valve repair]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>878</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>872</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/878?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Editorial comment]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/878?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Khoury, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Editorial comment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>880</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>878</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/881?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Pericardial patch augmentation for repair of incompetent bicuspid aortic valves at midterm]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/881?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Reoperation rates after repair of bicuspid aortic valves are higher than for mitral valve reconstruction. Satisfactory results have been reported for patch augmentation for tricuspid aortic valves. We have applied this technique for the repair of bicuspid aortic valves. <b>Methods:</b> Autologous pericardium is sutured to the free edge of the prolapsing bicuspid leaflet. A large coaptation surface is created and competence of the bicuspid valve is achieved. Forty patients underwent reconstruction of their bicuspid aortic valves by pericardial patch augmentation. Patients were followed up at regular intervals by echocardiography in yearly intervals. <b>Results:</b> There were no perioperative deaths. One year postoperatively, one patient died due to endocarditis. Seven patients (17.5%) had aortic regurgitation grade I, and the other 33 patients had non or trivial aortic regurgitation at discharge. At 4.2 &plusmn; 3.1 years postoperatively, only four patients (10%) had aortic regurgitation grade I. There were no cases of progression of regurgitation. Planimetric effective orifice areas ranged above 2 cm<sup>2</sup>. Mean aortic gradients dropped from 8.2 &plusmn; 4.8 mmHg at discharge to 3.8 &plusmn; 3 at four years and the mean height of coaptation surface from 14.7 &plusmn; 2 mm to 12.3 &plusmn; 4, respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> The pericardial patch augmentation technique increases coaptation surface, and thus provides reliable early and midterm competence of reconstructed bicuspid aortic valves.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doss, M., Sirat, S., Risteski, P., Martens, S., Moritz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Valve disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Pericardial patch augmentation for repair of incompetent bicuspid aortic valves at midterm]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>884</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>881</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/885?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Risk factors for reoperation after relief of congenital subaortic stenosis]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/885?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Background:</b> Congenital subaortic stenosis entails a lesion spectrum, ranging from an isolated obstructive membrane, to complex tunnel narrowing of the left outflow associated with other cardiac defects. We review our experience with this anomaly, and analyze risk factors leading to restenosis requiring reoperation. <b>Methods:</b> From 1994 to 2006, 58 children (median age 4.3 years, range 7 days&ndash;13.7 years) underwent primary relief of subaortic stenosis. Patients were divided into simple lesions (<I>n</I>
 = 43) or complex stenosis (<I>n</I>
 = 15) associated with other major cardiac defects. Age, pre- and postoperative gradient over the left outflow, associated aortic or mitral valve insufficiency, chromosomal anomalies, arteria lusoria, and operative technique (membrane resection (22) vs associated myectomy (34) vs Konno (2)) were analyzed as risk factors for reoperation (Kaplan&ndash;Meier, Cox regression). <b>Results:</b> There was no operative mortality. Median follow-up spanned 2.7 years (range 0.1&ndash;10), with one late death at 4 months. Reoperation was required for recurrent stenosis in 11 patients (19%) at 2.6 years (range 0.3&ndash;7.5) after initial surgery. Risk factors for reoperation included complex subaortic stenosis (<I>p</I>
 = 0.003), younger age (<I>p</I>
 = 0.012), postoperative residual gradient (<I>p</I>
 = 0.019), and the presence of an arteria lusoria (<I>p</I>
 = 0.014). For simple lesions, no variable achieved significance for stenosis recurrence. <b>Conclusions:</b> Surgical relief of congenital subaortic stenosis, even with complex defects, yields excellent results. Reoperation is not infrequent, and should be anticipated with younger age at operation, complex defects, residual postoperative gradient, and an arteria lusoria. Myectomy concomitant to membrane resection, even in simple lesions, does not provide enhanced freedom from reoperation, and should be tailored to anatomic findings.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dodge-Khatami, A., Schmid, M., Rousson, V., Fasnacht, M., Doell, C., Bauersfeld, U., Pretre, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Congenital - acyanotic]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Risk factors for reoperation after relief of congenital subaortic stenosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>889</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>885</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/890?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Jugular venous valved conduit (Contegra(R)) matches allograft performance in infant truncus arteriosus repair]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/890?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Limited availability and durability of allograft conduits require that alternatives be considered. We compared bovine jugular venous valved (JVV) and allograft conduit performance in 107 infants who survived truncus arteriosus repair. <b>Methods:</b> Children were prospectively recruited between 2003 and 2007 from 17 institutions. The median <I>z</I>-score for JVV (<I>n</I>
 = 27, all 12 mm) was +2.1 (range +1.2 to +3.2) and allograft (<I>n</I>
 = 80, 9&ndash;15 mm) was +1.7 (range &ndash;0.4 to +3.6). Propensity-adjusted comparison of conduit survival was undertaken using parametric risk-hazard analysis and competing risks techniques. All available echocardiograms (<I>n</I>
 = 745) were used to model deterioration of conduit function in regression equations adjusted for repeated measures. <b>Results:</b> Overall conduit survival was 64 &plusmn; 9% at 3 years. Conduit replacement was for conduit stenosis (<I>n</I>
 = 16) and/or pulmonary artery stenosis (<I>n</I>
 = 18) or regurgitation (<I>n</I>
 = 1). The propensity-adjusted 3-year freedom from replacement for in-conduit stenosis was 96 &plusmn; 4% for JVV and 69 &plusmn; 8% for allograft (<I>p</I>
 = 0.05). The risk of intervention or replacement for branch pulmonary artery stenosis was similar for JVV and allograft. Smaller conduit <I>z</I>-score predicted poor conduit performance (<I>p</I>
 &lt; 0.01) with best outcome between +1 and +3. Although JVV conduits were a uniform diameter, their <I>z</I>-score more consistently matched this ideal. JVV exhibited a non-significant trend towards slower progression of conduit regurgitation and peak right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) gradient. In addition, catheter intervention was more successful at slowing subsequent gradient progression in children with JVV versus those with allograft (<I>p</I>
 &lt; 0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> JVV does match allograft performance and may be advantageous. It is an appropriate first choice for repair of truncus arteriosus, and perhaps other small infants requiring RVOT reconstruction.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hickey, E. J., McCrindle, B. W., Blackstone, E. H., Yeh, T., Pigula, F., Clarke, D., Tchervenkov, C. I., Hawkins, J., the CHSS Pulmonary Conduit Working Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Congenital - acyanotic, Congenital - cyanotic, Valve disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Jugular venous valved conduit (Contegra(R)) matches allograft performance in infant truncus arteriosus repair]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>898</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>890</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/899?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Peripheral tissue metabolism during off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the microdialysis study]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/899?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> The aim of this study was to monitor and compare metabolic changes in the skeletal muscle during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) by means of interstitial microdialysis. Glucose, lactate, pyruvate and glycerol were assessed as markers of basic metabolism and tissue perfusion. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty patients undergoing surgical myocardial revascularization were enrolled in this pilot study. Ten patients were operated on without CPB (group A, off-pump) and 10 patients using normothermic CPB (group B, on-pump). Interstitial microdialysis was performed by a CMA 60 (CMA/Microdialysis AB, Sweden) probe, inserted into the patient's left deltoid muscle. Microdialysis measurements were performed at 30 min intervals. Glucose, lactate, pyruvate and glycerol were measured in samples using a CMA 600 Analyser (CMA/Microdialysis AB, Sweden). Results in both groups were statistically processed and the groups were compared. <b>Results:</b> Both groups were similar with regards to preoperative characteristics. Dynamic changes of interstitial concentrations of the measured analytes were found in off-pump (group A) and on-pump (group B) patients during the operation. There were no significant differences in dialysate concentrations of glucose and lactate between the groups. Significant differences were detected in pyruvate concentrations, lactate&ndash;pyruvate ratio and glycerol concentrations between off-pump versus on-pump patients. Pyruvate concentrations were higher in the off-pump group (<I>p</I>
 &lt; 0.05), the lactate&ndash;pyruvate ratios indicating the aerobic/anaerobic metabolism status were lower in the off-pump group (<I>p</I>
 
<I>&lt;</I>
 0.01) and the values of the concentrations of glycerol were lower in the off-pump group (<I>p</I>
 &lt; 0.01). <b>Conclusion:</b> Dynamic changes in the interstitial concentrations of the glucose, glycerol, pyruvate and lactate were found in both groups of patients (off-pump and on-pump). The presented preliminary results suggest that extracorporeal circulation during cardiac operations could compromise skeletal muscle energy metabolism.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pojar, M., Mand'ak, J., Cibicek, N., Lonsky, V., Dominik, J., Palicka, V., Kubicek, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Coronary disease, Extracorporeal circulation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Peripheral tissue metabolism during off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the microdialysis study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>905</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>899</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/906?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] The effects of therapeutic sulfide on myocardial apoptosis in response to ischemia-reperfusion injury]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/906?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Ischemia&ndash;reperfusion (I/R) injury, often encountered clinically, results in myocardial apoptosis and necrosis. Hydrogen sulfide (H<SUB>2</SUB>S) is produced endogenously in response to ischemia and thought to be cardioprotective, although its mechanism of action is not fully known. This study investigates cardioprotection provided by exogenous H<SUB>2</SUB>S, generated as sodium sulfide on apoptosis following myocardial I/R injury. <b>Methods:</b> The mid-LAD coronary artery in Yorkshire swine (<I>n</I>
 = 12) was occluded for 60 min, followed by reperfusion for 120 min. Controls (<I>n</I>
 = 6) received placebo, and treatment animals (<I>n</I>
 = 6) received sulfide 10 min prior to and throughout reperfusion. Hemodynamic, global, and regional functional measurements were obtained. Evans blue/TTC staining identified the area-at-risk (AAR) and infarction. Serum CK-MB, troponin I, and FABP were assayed. Tissue expression of bcl-2, bad, apoptosis-inducing-factor (AIF), total and cleaved caspase-3, and total and cleaved PARP were assessed. PAR and TUNEL staining were performed to assess apoptotic cell counts and poly-ADP ribosylation, respectively. <b>Results:</b> Pre-I/R hemodynamics were similar between groups. Post-I/R, mean arterial pressure (mmHg) was reduced by 30.2 &plusmn; 4.3 in controls vs 8.2 &plusmn; 6.9 in treatment animals (<I>p</I>
 = 0.01). +LV d<I>P</I>/d<I>t</I> (mmHg/s) was reduced by 1308 &plusmn; 435 in controls vs 403 &plusmn; 283 in treatment animals (<I>p</I>
 = 0.001). Infarct size (% of AAR) in controls was 47.4 &plusmn; 6.2% vs 20.1 &plusmn; 3.3% in the treated group (<I>p</I>
 = 0.003). In treated animals, CK-MB and FABP were lower by 47.0% (<I>p</I>
 = 0.10) and 45.1% (<I>p</I>
 = 0.01), respectively. AIF, caspase-3, and PARP expression was similar between groups, whereas cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP was lower in treated animals (<I>p</I>
 = 0.04). PAR staining was significantly reduced in sulfide treated groups (<I>p</I>
 = 0.04). TUNEL staining demonstrated significantly fewer apoptotic cells in sulfide treated animals (<I>p</I>
 = 0.02). <b>Conclusions:</b> Sodium sulfide is efficacious in reducing apoptosis in response to I/R injury. Along with its known effects on reducing necrosis, sulfide's effects on apoptosis may partially contribute to providing myocardial protection. Exogenous sulfide may have therapeutic utility in clinical settings in which I/R injury is encountered.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sodha, N. R., Clements, R. T., Feng, J., Liu, Y., Bianchi, C., Horvath, E. M., Szabo, C., Sellke, F. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiac - pharmacology, Myocardial infarction, Myocardial protection]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] The effects of therapeutic sulfide on myocardial apoptosis in response to ischemia-reperfusion injury]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>913</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>906</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/914?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Does radial use as a second arterial conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting improve long-term outcomes in diabetics?]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/914?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objectives:</b> The evidence supporting the survival benefit of multiple arterial grafts in the general coronary bypass surgery (CABG) population is compelling. Alternatively, results of studies comparing 2 versus 1 internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts in diabetics have reported conflicting survival data. The use of radial versus ITA as the second arterial conduit has not been studied. <b>Methods:</b> We obtained complete death follow-up in 1516 consecutive diabetic [64 &plusmn; 10 years (mean &plusmn; SD). <I>Insulin/no insulin</I>: There were 540 (36%)/976 (64%)] primary isolated CABG patients all with &ge;1 ITA grafts. The series included 626 ITA/radial (41%) and 890 ITA/vein (59%) patients. Using separate radial-use propensity models, we matched one-to-one 475 (76%) ITA/radial to 475 (53%) unique ITA/vein patients; each including 166 insulin and 309 no insulin patients. <b>Results:</b> Unadjusted survival was markedly better for (1) ITA/radial (94.3%, 86.7% and 70.4% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively) versus ITA/vein (91.8%, 74.5% and 53.8%; <I>p</I>
 
<I>&lt;</I>
 0.0001) and (2) for no insulin (94.2%, 82.8% and 65.5%) versus insulin (90.4%, 73.1% and 49.2%; <I>p</I>
 
<I>&lt;</I>
 0.0001). In matched patients, 11-year Kaplan&ndash;Meier analysis showed essentially identical ITA/radial and ITA/vein survival for all diabetics combined (<I>p</I>
 = 0.53; log rank) and for the no insulin (<I>p</I>
 = 0.76) cohort. Lastly, a trend for better ITA/radial survival in insulin dependent diabetics after the second postoperative year did not reach significance (<I>p</I>
 = 0.13). <b>Conclusions:</b> Using radial as a second arterial conduit as opposed to vein grafting did not confer a survival benefit in diabetics. This unexpected result is perhaps related to relatively diminished radial graft patency and/or the augmented radial vasoreactivity characteristic of diabetics. These findings indicate that the radial survival advantage demonstrated in the general CABG population lies primarily in non-diabetics in whom this advantage may be underestimated.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schwann, T. A., Zacharias, A., Riordan, C. J., Durham, S. J., Shah, A. S., Habib, R. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiac - other, Coronary disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Does radial use as a second arterial conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting improve long-term outcomes in diabetics?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>923</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>914</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/924?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Images in cardio-thoracic surgery] Flow-related magnetic resonance; visualization of a re-coarctation]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/924?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beran, E., Machler, H., Reiter, G., Rienmuller, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiac - other, Great vessels]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Images in cardio-thoracic surgery] Flow-related magnetic resonance; visualization of a re-coarctation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>924</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>924</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images in cardio-thoracic surgery</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/925?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Images in cardio-thoracic surgery] Calcified aneurysm of the left ventricle mimicking hydatid disease of the lung]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/925?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charokopos, N., Antonitsis, P., Rouska, E., Toumbouras, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiac - other, Congestive Heart Failure, Myocardial infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Images in cardio-thoracic surgery] Calcified aneurysm of the left ventricle mimicking hydatid disease of the lung]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>925</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>925</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images in cardio-thoracic surgery</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/926?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Images in cardio-thoracic surgery] Pannus formation on St. Jude Medical prosthetic aortic valve 23 years after initial operation]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/926?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sugiura, T., Koide, M., Kunii, Y., Umehara, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Valve disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Images in cardio-thoracic surgery] Pannus formation on St. Jude Medical prosthetic aortic valve 23 years after initial operation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>926</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>926</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images in cardio-thoracic surgery</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/927?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Images in cardio-thoracic surgery] Unusual cause for massive cardiomegaly]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/927?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ackermann, C., van Wyk, H. W. J., Katengua, M., Doubell, A. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mediastinum, Cardiac - other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Images in cardio-thoracic surgery] Unusual cause for massive cardiomegaly]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>927</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>927</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Images in cardio-thoracic surgery</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/928?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[How-to-do-it] Harvest technique for pedicled transposition of latissimus dorsi muscle: an old trade revisited]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/928?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>Transposition of extrathoracic muscle flaps has been the cornerstone of treatment of a number of complex intrathoracic pathologies such as bronchopleural fistulas and residual infected pleural spaces. We present a simple step-wise technique for preservation and harvesting of the most common muscle flap employed by thoracic surgeons, namely latissimus dorsi, just prior to performing a standard posterolateral thoracotomy. Since 2004, we have successfully utilized pedicled latissimus muscle as our preferred prophylactic flap against development of postoperative bronchopleural fistulas or recurrent empyemas. This technique should be part of every thoracic surgeon's surgical armamentarium.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abolhoda, A., Wirth, G. A., Bui, T. D., Milliken, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chest wall]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[How-to-do-it] Harvest technique for pedicled transposition of latissimus dorsi muscle: an old trade revisited]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>930</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>928</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>How-to-do-it</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/931?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[How-to-do-it] Reducing cardiac injury during minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/931?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>Minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) provides a minimal access approach to correct pectus excavatum deformities. Cardiovascular complications represent a rare but catastrophic complication of this cosmetic operation. We describe a modification to the technique following a case of cardiac puncture.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belcher, E., Arora, S., Samancilar, O., Goldstraw, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Chest wall]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[How-to-do-it] Reducing cardiac injury during minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>933</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>931</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>How-to-do-it</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/934?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[How-to-do-it] Aortic translocation, Senning procedure and right ventricular outflow tract augmentation for congenitally corrected transposition, ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/934?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>The management of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries and associated lesions is frequently challenging. Significant pulmonary stenosis is a contraindication to the conventional double-switch. Instead repair may be accomplished by the Rastelli&ndash;Senning procedure, using an extracardiac conduit to achieve continuity between the morphological left ventricle and the pulmonary arteries. This however can be accompanied by conduit and intra-ventricular baffle-related problems that can necessitate surgical re-intervention and lead to late mortality. We describe the use of aortic translocation, Senning procedure and reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract using autologous tissue and valved homograft to facilitate anatomical correction in congenitally corrected transposition. The advantages of this technique in this group of patients and the implications for conduction tissue are discussed.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davies, B., Oppido, G., Wilkinson, J. L., Brizard, C. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Congenital - cyanotic, Great vessels]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[How-to-do-it] Aortic translocation, Senning procedure and right ventricular outflow tract augmentation for congenitally corrected transposition, ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>936</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>934</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>How-to-do-it</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/937?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Case reports] Pseudotumor associated with polytetrafluoroethylene sleeves]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/937?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>We report the case of a patient who was operated on in February 2001. We performed a wedge resection of the upper right lobe. The pathologic examination demonstrated a lung adenocarcinoma (pT2N0M0, R0). We used staple line reinforcement material (ePTFE) during the operation because the patient had an important emphysema. We re-operated in January 2005 because during follow-up we observed a suspicious image that suggested a tumoral relapse. Histopathological study showed extrinsic material compatible with the one used in the original resection.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernandez, E., Castro, P. L. d., Tapia, G., Astudillo, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - cancer, Lung - other, History, Professional affairs]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Case reports] Pseudotumor associated with polytetrafluoroethylene sleeves]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>938</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>937</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/939?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Case reports] Light-guided surgery to repair coronary sinus orifice atresia with left superior vena cava]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/939?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>An 8-month-old male with coronary sinus orifice atresia, left superior vena cava, and single ventricle underwent light-guided coronary sinus unroofing concomitant with bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis to circumvent coronary sinus hypertension. During surgery, a 2.25 Fr angioscopic catheter was inserted into the coronary sinus via the left superior vena cava. The coronary sinus, lit by the illumination obtained from the catheter, was readily located from the left atrial interior, and unroofed. Light-guided coronary sinus unroofing is an easy, safe, and quick technique for the creation of unobstructed coronary sinus drainage in patients with coronary sinus orifice atresia and left superior vena cava.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaneko, Y., Kobayashi, J., Yamamoto, Y., Tsuchiya, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Congenital - cyanotic]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.048</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Case reports] Light-guided surgery to repair coronary sinus orifice atresia with left superior vena cava]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>941</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>939</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/942?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Case reports] Pleurovenous shunt for treating refractory benign pleural effusion]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/942?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>We report the case of a 63-year-old female with hepatic cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C, successfully treated for refractory nonmalignant hepatic hydrothorax by using a long-term pleurovenous shunt (PVS). After failure of conventional treatment by mechanical pleurodesis, a PVS was inserted to drain the pleural fluid into the right subclavian vein. After 8 months of follow-up, the effusion is well controlled, and the shunt remains patent.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bayram, A. S., Koprucuoglu, M., Aygun, M., Gebitekin, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pleura]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Case reports] Pleurovenous shunt for treating refractory benign pleural effusion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>943</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>942</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Case reports</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/944?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Matrix metalloproteinases do not properly work as peripheral blood biomarkers without taking into account the preanalytical impact of blood sampling]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/944?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jung, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Transplantation - heart]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Matrix metalloproteinases do not properly work as peripheral blood biomarkers without taking into account the preanalytical impact of blood sampling]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>944</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>944</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/945?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Reply to Jung]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/945?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aharinejad, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Transplantation - heart]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Reply to Jung]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>945</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>945</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/945-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: is it possible to prevent post-procedure complications?]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/945-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mastroroberto, P., di Virgilio, A., Renzulli, A., Indolfi, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Great vessels]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.036</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: is it possible to prevent post-procedure complications?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>946</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>945</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/946?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Reply to Mastroroberto et al. * Serious complications following endovascular thoracic aortic stent-graft repair for type B dissection]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/946?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neuhauser, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Great vessels]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Reply to Mastroroberto et al. * Serious complications following endovascular thoracic aortic stent-graft repair for type B dissection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>947</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>946</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/947?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Statins and perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/947?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hudorovic, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - transplantation, Cardiac - pharmacology, Cardiac - physiology, Education]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Statins and perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>948</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>947</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/948?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Reply to Hudorovic * Would a randomized controlled trial testing the effects of statins on patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery be ethical?]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/948?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paraskevas, K. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung - transplantation, Cardiac - pharmacology, Cardiac - physiology, Education]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Reply to Hudorovic * Would a randomized controlled trial testing the effects of statins on patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery be ethical?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>948</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>948</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/949?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Injury to the circumflex coronary artery following mitral valve repair: a rather opposite strategy]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/949?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gomes, W. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Valve disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.003</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Injury to the circumflex coronary artery following mitral valve repair: a rather opposite strategy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>949</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>949</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/949-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Fibrin sealant in coronary artery surgery - the devil is always in the detail!]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/949-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGoldrick, J. P., White, R. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiac - pharmacology, Cardiac - other, Coronary disease, Myocardial infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Fibrin sealant in coronary artery surgery - the devil is always in the detail!]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>950</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>949</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/950?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Reply to McGoldrick and White]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/950?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lamm, P., Juchem, G., Reichart, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiac - pharmacology, Cardiac - other, Coronary disease, Myocardial infarction]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Reply to McGoldrick and White]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>950</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>950</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/951?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Does the Nakata index predict outcome after Fontan operation?]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/951?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ovroutski, S., Alexi-Meskishvili, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Congenital - cyanotic]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Does the Nakata index predict outcome after Fontan operation?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>951</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>951</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/951-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Reply to Ovroutski and Alexi-Meskishvili]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/5/951-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adachi, I., Uemura, H., Yagihara, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-29</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Congenital - cyanotic]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Letters to the Editor] Reply to Ovroutski and Alexi-Meskishvili]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>952</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>951</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letters to the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/523?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/523?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akins, C. W., Miller, D. C., Turina, M. I., Kouchoukos, N. T., Blackstone, E. H., Grunkemeier, G. L., Takkenberg, J. J.M., David, T. E., Butchart, E. G., Adams, D. H., Shahian, D. M., Hagl, S., Mayer, J. E., Lytle, B. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.055</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>528</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>523</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/529?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/529?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aramendi, J. I., Mestres, C.-A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Valve disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.008</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Editorials] Antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>530</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>529</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/531?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: ACTION Registry survey results]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/531?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Aims:</b> A variety of antithrombotic regimens have been described for the early postoperative period after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study reviews antithrombotic practice for patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR with or without coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) amongst the centers participating in the ACTION (Anticoagulation Treatment Influence on Postoperative Patients) Registry. <b>Methods and results:</b> An antithrombotic therapy questionnaire was answered by the 49 centers participating in the ACTION Registry located in Europe, Middle East, Canada and Asia. The 43% of centers prescribe vitamin K antagonist (VKA), 20% prescribe VKA and acetyl salicylic acid (ASA), 33% prescribe only ASA and 4% do not prescribe any therapy after bioprosthetic AVR. For patients undergoing bioprosthetic AVR and CABG 39% of the centers prescribe VKA and ASA, 37% prescribe VKA and 24% prescribe ASA. After the first three postoperative months following bioprosthetic AVR, 61% of the centers prescribe only ASA, while 39% do not prescribe any therapy. Patients with bioprosthetic AVR and CABG receive ASA in 90% centers, in 2% centers VKA and ASA, and 8% centers do not prescribe any antithrombotic. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrates that, despite guidelines published by several professional societies, medical practice for the prevention of thrombotic events early after bioprosthetic AVR varies widely among cardiac surgical centers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colli, A., Verhoye, J.-P., Heijmen, R., Strauch, J. T., Hyde, J. A.J., Pagano, D., Antunes, M., Koertke, H., Ohri, S. K., Bail, D. H. L., Leprince, P., Van Straten, B. H.M., Gherli, T., on behalf of ACTION Registry Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Valve disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: ACTION Registry survey results]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>33</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>536</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>531</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/537?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations]]></title>
<link>http://ejcts.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/33/4/537?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec>
<p>
<b>Objective:</b> Minimal access cardiac valve surgery is increasingly utilized. We report our 11-year experience with minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. <b>Methods:</b> From 07/96 to 12/06, 1005 patients underwent minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. Early and late outcomes were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> Median patient age was 68 years (range: 24&ndash;95), 179 patients (18%) were 80 years or older, 130 patients (13%) had reoperative aortic valve surgery, 86 (8.4%) had aortic root replacement, 62 (6.1%) had concomitant ascending aortic replacement, and 26 (2.6%) had percutaneous coronary intervention on the day of surgery (hybrid procedure). Operative mortality was 1.9% (19/1005). The incidences of deep sternal wound infection, pneumonia and reoperation for bleeding were 0.5% (5/1005), 1.3% (13/1005) and 2.4% (25/1005), respectively. Median length of stay was 6 days and 733 patients (72%) were discharged home. Actuarial survival was 91% at 5 years and 88% at 10 years. In the subgroup of the elderly (&ge;80 years), operative mortality was 1.7% (3/179), median length of stay was 8 days and 66 patients (37%) were discharged home. Actuarial survival at 5 years was 84%. There was a significant decreasing trend in cardiopulmonary bypass time, the incidence of bleeding, and operative mortality over time. <b>Conclusions:</b> Minimal access approaches in aortic valve surgery are safe and feasible with excellent outcomes. Aortic root replacement, ascending aortic replacement, and reoperative surgery can be performed with these approaches. These procedures are particularly well-tolerated in the elderly.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tabata, M., Umakanthan, R., Cohn, L. H., Bolman, R. M., Shekar, P. S., Chen, F. Y., Couper, G. S., Aranki, S. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-07</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Minimally invasive surgery, Valve disease]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Original articles] Early and late outcome